Re: [gentoo-user] googleearth

2008-08-24 Thread Matthew R. Lee
On Monday 11 August 2008 19:46:22 Dale wrote: > Matthew R. Lee wrote: > > Google earth upgraded over the weekend to version 4.2.205.5730. It > > installed fine but it runs like shit. The rendering is so slow as to be > > completely unusable. The previous version worked fine so I tried to go > > bac

Re: [gentoo-user] grub.conf

2008-08-31 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Monday 01 September 2008 08:24:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Hi guys, > > I've succesfully installed gentoo on my pc, but when i wrote grub.conf, > i've made a mistake; in the second line, instead of < kernel > /boot/kernel-2.6.25- gentoo-r7 root=/dev/sda3> i wrote < kernel > /boot/linux-2.6.25-

Re: [gentoo-user] cron

2008-09-18 Thread Mick
On Monday 15 September 2008, CARON Hugo wrote: [snipped some top posting ...] > On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 12:16:02AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > > Hi > > I have added 30 16 * * * /usr/local/bin/GATEWAY/gatewaySMS.sh in roots > > crontab. It does not gets executed by cron, > > where can i look f

Re: [gentoo-user] logrotate

2008-09-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 26 September 2008 09:49:57 Kaushal Shriyan wrote: > Hi, > > I am using logrotate utility on gentoo to compress catalina.out file. [snip] > error: unable to open /var/log/tomcat5/catalina.out.1 for compression First thing to check is that the user doing this operation has write permis

Re: [gentoo-user] make.conf

2008-10-17 Thread Patric Schmitz
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:11:21 -0700 (PDT) ann kok <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > hi all Hello, > why we have to put the following flags in the make.conf > > what are the purpose? > > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" These are parameters for the gcc compile

Re: [gentoo-user] make.conf

2008-10-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 17 October 2008 20:11:21 ann kok wrote: > hi all > > why we have to put the following flags in the make.conf > > what are the purpose? > > CFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > CXXFLAGS="-O2 -pipe" > CHOST="x86_64-pc-linux-gnu" It's so that the compiler knows how to build stuff It doesn't know what

Re: [gentoo-user] Openttd

2008-10-21 Thread Arttu V.
On 10/21/08, András Csányi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Few weeks ago I reinstalled my desktop and now I want to play with > openttd but I wonder this package is masked. > I saw the version of this package int the portage is 0.5.3 but on the > openttd's website the latest stable version is 0.6.3. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Openttd

2008-10-21 Thread András Csányi
2008/10/21 Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On 10/21/08, András Csányi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Few weeks ago I reinstalled my desktop and now I want to play with >> openttd but I wonder this package is masked. >> I saw the version of this package int the portage is 0.5.3 but on the >> openttd'

Re: [gentoo-user] Openttd

2008-10-22 Thread Mickaël Bucas
2008/10/21, András Csányi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > 2008/10/21 Arttu V. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On 10/21/08, András Csányi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Few weeks ago I reinstalled my desktop and now I want to play with >>> openttd but I wonder this package is masked. >>> I saw the version of this pa

Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd

2008-10-23 Thread ert256
[ 23.10.2008 17:14 ], Jon Hardcastle : > Probably not strictly a Gentoo issue, but as i am running Gentoo I'll see if > the collective knowledge here can help me! > > I have a strange problem with my server. All the hard drives go to sleep > after ~3hrs of inactivity. BUT if they happen to still

Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd

2008-10-23 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Donnerstag 23 Oktober 2008, Jon Hardcastle wrote: > Probably not strictly a Gentoo issue, but as i am running Gentoo I'll see > if the collective knowledge here can help me! > > I have a strange problem with my server. All the hard drives go to sleep > after ~3hrs of inactivity. BUT if they happ

Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd

2008-10-24 Thread Jon Hardcastle
--- On Thu, 23/10/08, Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Volker Armin Hemmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Thursday, 23 October, 2008, 6:53 PM > On Donnerstag 23 Oktober

Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd

2008-10-24 Thread Dan Wallis
On 24/10/2008, Jon Hardcastle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I want the drives to be checked by smartd also. I just hoped there was a way > of getting smartd to wait alittle longer after waking the drive up. Could you generate some disk activity on the disk(s) just prior to the scheduled check(s)? I

Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd

2008-10-24 Thread Jon Hardcastle
--- On Fri, 24/10/08, Dan Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > From: Dan Wallis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Smartd > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Date: Friday, 24 October, 2008, 1:15 PM > On 24/10/2008, Jon Hardcastle > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [gentoo-user] xattr

2008-11-18 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag 18 November 2008 10:34:11 schrieb ext Hinko Kocevar: > include/builddefs:58: *** missing separator.  Stop. See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214655 HTH... Dirk -- Dirk Heinrichs | Tel: +49 (0)162 234 3408 Configuration Manager | Fax: +49 (0)211 47068 1

Re: [gentoo-user] xattr

2008-11-18 Thread Hinko Kocevar
Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Dienstag 18 November 2008 10:34:11 schrieb ext Hinko Kocevar: > >> include/builddefs:58: *** missing separator. Stop. > > See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=214655 > Thanks it helped! ... I was really getting frustrated by the fact I couldn't do a proper emer

Re: [gentoo-user] xattr

2008-11-18 Thread Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto
> I can live witout attr, but how can I force it *not* be built? I've set USE > to -acl and -xattr but it still wants to build attr!?!?! > Thanks, > HK > -- > Hinko Kočevar, OSS developer Issue the command emerge -pv --depclean attr to see what is depending on attr -- Software is like sex: it i

Re: [gentoo-user] xattr

2008-11-18 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Dienstag 18 November 2008 10:34:11 schrieb ext Hinko Kocevar: > I can live witout attr, but how can I force it *not* be built? I've set USE > to -acl and -xattr but it still wants to build attr!?!?! A short note to this one: USE flags are for switching on/off _optional_ functionality of packa

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-23 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 23:31:30 schrieb William Kenworthy: > What I would really like is a file system that would unify these spaces > and present them to the network as storage space - ideally with > redundant data storage so one or more machines can dissappear and the > data is still avai

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread William Kenworthy
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 07:30 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Sonntag, 23. November 2008 23:31:30 schrieb William Kenworthy: > > > What I would really like is a file system that would unify these spaces > > and present them to the network as storage space - ideally with > > redundant data storage

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 11:30:25 schrieb William Kenworthy: > By transient storage I mean that the data is duplicated across across > physical storage spaces so that if a machine goes down, the data is > still available. OK, thanks. > I thought Andrews FS did that, but didnt see when > look

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread William Kenworthy
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:07 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Montag, 24. November 2008 11:30:25 schrieb William Kenworthy: > > > By transient storage I mean that the data is duplicated across across > > physical storage spaces so that if a machine goes down, the data is > > still available. > >

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:03:13 schrieb William Kenworthy: > Discovered this: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_file_systems#Distributed_file_systems > > Thats going to keep me busy for awhile! Interesting link. However, NFS, SMB, AFP and NCP are NOT distributed filesystems. They're

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Stroller
On 24 Nov 2008, at 11:07, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: ... If you have further questions, feel free to ask. I would love a file system that transparently replicates over several systems - say 2 - 5. It doesn't need to amalgamate spare in any way (as BillK requests), let's just say I just have a

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread William Kenworthy
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 12:35 +, Stroller wrote: > On 24 Nov 2008, at 11:07, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > > ... > > If you have further questions, feel free to ask. > > I would love a file system that transparently replicates over several > systems - say 2 - 5. > > It doesn't need to amalgamate sp

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:35:25 schrieb Stroller: > I suspect I would be optimistic if I hoped for something so   > sophisticated to be readily available, as I am aware that this would   > be problematic to implement. But do you have any suggestions? Maybe Coda. Bye... Dirk

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:44:06 schrieb William Kenworthy: > I set up an openmosix cluster once using dfs I think. It replicated > data just like you want so each exported thread was seeing consistent > file space. It did work, but had a few issues ... I think it was > designed by MS being

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread William Kenworthy
On Mon, 2008-11-24 at 13:50 +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > Am Montag, 24. November 2008 13:44:06 schrieb William Kenworthy: > > > I set up an openmosix cluster once using dfs I think. It replicated > > data just like you want so each exported thread was seeing consistent > > file space. It did w

Re: [gentoo-user] filesystems

2008-11-24 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Am Montag, 24. November 2008 12:07:55 schrieb Dirk Heinrichs: > If you have further questions, feel free to ask. One smalll thing to add: If you decide to use it, there's a Howto under http://www.gentoo-wiki.info/OpenAFS. Do NOT use the one from gentoo.org, it's old, outdated and partly incorre

Re: [gentoo-user] qtiplot

2008-11-26 Thread b.n.
b.n. ha scritto: > Hi, > > I have an x86 gentoo system, and I would like to install qtiplot. > Unfortunately: > - qtiplot 0.8.x requires qwt-4. I have both qwt-4 and qwt-5 installed, > and when compilng qtiplot seems to pick invariably the qwt-5. How do I > force qtiplot to build with qwt-4 ? > >

Re: [gentoo-user] qtiplot

2008-11-27 Thread Arttu V.
On 11/26/08, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > b.n. ha scritto: >> Hi, >> >> I have an x86 gentoo system, and I would like to install qtiplot. >> Unfortunately: >> - qtiplot 0.8.x requires qwt-4. I have both qwt-4 and qwt-5 installed, >> and when compilng qtiplot seems to pick invariably the qwt-5.

Re: [gentoo-user] qtiplot

2008-11-27 Thread b.n.
Arttu V. ha scritto: > On 11/26/08, b.n. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> b.n. ha scritto: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have an x86 gentoo system, and I would like to install qtiplot. >>> Unfortunately: >>> - qtiplot 0.8.x requires qwt-4. I have both qwt-4 and qwt-5 installed, >>> and when compilng qtiplot seems

Re: [gentoo-user] Work!

2008-12-09 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 09 December 2008 10:48:40 Karl Huysmans wrote: > Hi All, > > Don't know if it's appropriate to post this on this list, sorry if it's > not. Anyway, this is serious: we are currently looking for a junior IT with > some Gentoo experience and with a special interest in media encoding and >

Re: [gentoo-user] Work!

2008-12-09 Thread Karl Huysmans
2008/12/9 Alan McKinnon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > It's not against any rules per se, so I suppose if you did post and it was > for > a genuine position and it was you who were hiring (i.e. not an agent of > some > kind), then no-one would really complain. > Genuine of course! > > We don't get such

Re: [gentoo-user] Work!

2008-12-10 Thread Rich Healey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Karl Huysmans wrote: > Hi All, > > Don't know if it's appropriate to post this on this list, sorry if it's > not. Anyway, this is serious: we are currently looking for a junior IT > with some Gentoo experience and with a special interest in media > en

Re: [gentoo-user] Work!

2008-12-14 Thread Karl Huysmans
I wouldn't mind personally :-) 2008/12/11 Rich Healey > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Karl Huysmans wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Don't know if it's appropriate to post this on this list, sorry if it's > > not. Anyway, this is serious: we are currently looking for a junior IT

Re: [gentoo-user] nwmouse

2009-01-03 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Saturday 03 January 2009 09:55:33 gmail wrote: > Hi! > > I wonder if anyone can provide a url for me to fetch *nwmouse* The issue > is already stated on bugs: > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=251379 > > But I still need a working link to get the "cursors.tar.gz". > > Thank ya! In what

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Tence T. George
errr...what's seems to be the problem? On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Dale
Daryl Styrk wrote: > Did you fall and you can't get up or what? :-p Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Daryl Styrk
Tence T. George wrote: > errr...what's seems to be the problem? > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote: > >> > Sorry I was looking for the list mailman.. I deleted the initial "Welcome to the list" containing the usual (sometimes) commands for manipulating the subscriptions.

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Qian Qiao
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 03:05, Daryl Styrk wrote: > Tence T. George wrote: >> errr...what's seems to be the problem? >> >> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 1:59 PM, Daryl Styrk wrote: >> >>> >> > > Sorry I was looking for the list mailman.. I deleted the initial > "Welcome to the list" containing the usual

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Daryl Styrk
Qian Qiao wrote: > > Such information is in the header of every message you get from the list. > Thank you for that. I normally do not view headers detailed and had overlooked it as an option.

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread damian
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Dale wrote: > Daryl Styrk wrote: >> > > Did you fall and you can't get up or what? :-p ROFL! > Dale > > :-) :-) > >

Re: [gentoo-user] help

2009-01-08 Thread Qian Qiao
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 03:15, Daryl Styrk wrote: > Qian Qiao wrote: > >> >> Such information is in the header of every message you get from the list. >> > > Thank you for that. I normally do not view headers detailed and had > overlooked it as an option. > Many list softwares add those informati

Re: [gentoo-user] ezmlm

2009-02-07 Thread Mike Kazantsev
On Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:55:26 +0100 he...@brankie.xs4all.nl wrote: > I have been using ezmlm for the past few yeears to manage some mailing > lists. Now emerge is warning me that these packages are masked for > removal. So what shoud I do next: > - stick with ezmlm as long as it keeps functioning

Re: [gentoo-user] ezmlm

2009-02-07 Thread AllenJB
he...@brankie.xs4all.nl wrote: Hello, I have been using ezmlm for the past few yeears to manage some mailing lists. Now emerge is warning me that these packages are masked for removal. So what shoud I do next: - stick with ezmlm as long as it keeps functioning - uninstall ezeml an reinstall f

Re: [gentoo-user] ezmlm

2009-02-07 Thread henkg
On Sat, Feb 07, 2009 at 01:48:33PM +, AllenJB wrote: > you can move the package to your own overlay and maintain it there under > the package manager. Why on earth would you choose to install manually when > you can use the package manager? Simply because I never looked at overlays. > > Yo

Re: [gentoo-user] DebugFS

2009-02-12 Thread Mark Somerville
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 11:29:43AM +, Mark Somerville wrote: > I see that DebugFS is getting mounted very early on in the boot > sequence. > > I want to keep it enabled in the kernel, but not automatically mounted. > What mounts it? How can I stop it? In typical style, I solved it almost imme

Re: [gentoo-user] SUID

2009-03-02 Thread Tomáš Krasničan
Hi, #! scripts can not run as suid. Regards, krasko Hinko Kocevar wrote: Hi, I'm trying to touch a file in /sbin during boot time and would like to do that with a normal user by running SUIDed shell script. I have following script: hin...@alala /tmp $ cat test.sh #!/bin/sh touch /sbin/foo.

Re: [gentoo-user] Telxon

2009-03-05 Thread Francisco Ares
try the gentoo-embedded list, better chances to get an answer there. Francisco On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:32 PM, dhk wrote: > Is it possible to put Gentoo on a Telxon gun?  If so, how would I go > about doing it? > > Thanks, > > dave > > -- "If you have an apple and I have an apple and we exch

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b

2009-03-17 Thread Dmitry S. Makovey
On March 17, 2009, Roger Cahn wrote: > Hi, > > k3b will not emerge, in spite it was emerged before: > Failed to emerge app-cdr/k3b-1.0.5-r3 > On my laptop it worked fine. > > Here are the flags: > > app-cdr/k3b-1.0.5-r3 USE="alsa dvd dvdr encode hal mp3 vorbis -arts > -css -debug -emovix -ffmpeg -

Re: [gentoo-user] k3b

2009-03-17 Thread Roger Cahn
J'ai reçu un sympathique message de Dmitry S. Makovey qui m'a aimablement écrit: > epm -qf > /usr/kde/3.5/share/apps/ksgmltools2/docbook/xml-dtd-4.1.2/ent/iso-amsn.ent > > kdelibs-3.5.9-r4 > > looks like your problem somewhere with kdelibs and not k3b. Either that or > docbook-sgml-dtd-4.1-r3 I

Re: [gentoo-user] nepomukservices

2009-04-01 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Wednesday 01 April 2009, james wrote: > Reading what I can find about it, I'm not > sure it is necessary? > no > > If so, can I renice it or only let it run once and a while, > it's a drag on system resources > > > ideas? system-settings, advanced, 'desktop search' deactivate 'enable nepo

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-22 Thread Michael Higgins
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:30:52 -0400 Simon wrote: > hi there, > i'm looking for suggestions and guidance. [] I tend to tell folks up front to never listen to me or believe anything I say, so here's my... $.02. > I've looked into several ideas, but the last one that remains a good > 'deal'

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-22 Thread Stroller
On 22 Apr 2009, at 17:30, Simon wrote: ... I'm thinking on setting up asterisk, but having read about it in the past, i know as soon as i set it up it will take more of my time than my girlfriend ever dreamed of! It seems extremely difficult to setup, specially for a newbie. In addition to Si

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread Simon
Hey thanks John, I found some pages of it online (specially the TOC) and it does seem like a very thorough answer to clear the fog in my situation! I'll try to find a place to read the whole content, or a book like this i might actually buy it. Thanks! On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 4:11 PM, John cov

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread Simon
Well i've had several projects ideas in the past that would have used asterisk in different ways. So, the reason to get it installed for my personal 1-line use is really a first step in understanding asterisk's basics and since I will probably work and tweak it every day for a certain period of ti

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread Simon
Hey Stroller, nice to see a friend in a similar situation as mine! I'm sure that having the hardware already, you probably made a lot of tests in the past... can you share some of your experience? and also, i wonder, why did you let the project down? was it because of lack of motivation (ie ot

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread kyle . bader
It is a great book, I used it to help me setup my first voip box. Here's that link: http://www.asteriskdocs.org/ Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: John covici Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 16:11:18 To: Subject: [gentoo-user] telephony Take a look at a book called

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread Simon
oh! wow, i was on that page, but i followed some of the links and got to a place where you had to register to view the whole content on the website... didnt know it was avail for download!! thanks! On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:04 PM, wrote: > It is a great book, I used it to help me setup my firs

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread kyle . bader
might be woth a look. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Simon Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:05:02 To: Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] telephony oh! wow, i was on that page, but i followed some of the links and got to a place where you had to register to view the whole co

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-23 Thread Stroller
On 23 Apr 2009, at 16:57, Simon wrote: On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 2:22 AM, Stroller ... I've actually got a really expensive (or it was when I bought it!) Cisco phone and an X100 POTS card sitting here, as I've been meaning to get round to implementing Asterisk for about 4 years now! Perhaps t

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-24 Thread Michael Higgins
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:08:48 +0100 Stroller wrote: [...] > If you want Asterisk to answer your conventional POTS phone line > then you can use an X100P card which you can buy for c £17. AIUI this > is basically a modem based on a certain chipset that Digium have > written drivers for. They have

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-24 Thread Stroller
On 24 Apr 2009, at 19:38, Michael Higgins wrote: On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:08:48 +0100 Stroller wrote: [...] If you want Asterisk to answer your conventional POTS phone line then you can use an X100P card which you can buy for c £17. AIUI this is basically a modem based on a certain chipset tha

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-24 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stroller wrote: > > On 24 Apr 2009, at 19:38, Michael Higgins wrote: > >> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 19:08:48 +0100 >> Stroller wrote: >> >> [...] >>> If you want Asterisk to answer your conventional POTS phone line >>> then you can use an X100P card which

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-25 Thread Simon
> You seem to want to know the difference, FXO vs FXS.  If I got this wrong, > just > delete it.  FXS is meant to interface to a telephone set, so it gives talk > battery and (as needed) ringing current.  FXO is meant to interface to a line > from a telco switch, so it accepts battery (if the circ

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-25 Thread Chuck Robey
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Simon wrote: >> You seem to want to know the difference, FXO vs FXS. If I got this wrong, >> just >> delete it. FXS is meant to interface to a telephone set, so it gives talk >> battery and (as needed) ringing current. FXO is meant to interface to

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-25 Thread kyle . bader
of fxo/fxs, they are simple removable modules. Don't waste your time with a x100p card, they suck and will be more of a waste of time then they are worth. Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile -Original Message- From: Simon Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 14:14:56 To: Subject: Re: [gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] telephony

2009-04-27 Thread Yahya Mohammad
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:30:52PM -0400, Simon wrote: > hi there, > i'm looking for suggestions and guidance. I have a vps host with > gentoo on it, i dont think the vps is stable enough to ensure a good > quality of service, but it could just need an upgrade, no big deal. I > need a phone and

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread KH
zhen schrieb: > Hi. > > It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now > it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like > an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it? > > Best regards, > Evgeniy B. > I called his company and they promissed to

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread AllenJB
The list admins have been notified - you can track the issue at https://bugs.gentoo.org/267740 AllenJB zhen wrote: Hi. It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like an endless mail loop. Is there

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:46:46 +0400, zhen wrote: > It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now > it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like > an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it? A bug report has already been filed, we'll just have

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Daniel de Oliveira
Yes, moderating him. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:46, zhen wrote: > Hi. > > It seems that somebody has started autoresponder for his email. And now > it is replying to it's own replies to lists once an hour. It seems like > an endless mail loop. Is there way to stop it? > > Best regards, > Evgeniy

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Daniel de Oliveira
Where is the moderation? Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to every mail sended to him. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 09:06, Daniel de Oliveira wrote: > Yes, moderating him. > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 06:46, zhen wrote: >>

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:10:45 -0300, Daniel de Oliveira wrote: > Where is the moderation? This list is not moderated. > Man, its so stupid using Vacancy-auto-respond > on a mail that you read a lot of mailing lists. We'll receive that to > every mail sended to him. It's more a case of a broken a

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Jarry
Daniel de Oliveira wrote: Yes, moderating him. He deserves much more than that. Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate... Jarry -- ___ This mailbox accepts e-mails only from selected mailing-lists! Everything else is cons

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote: > Daniel de Oliveira wrote: > > Yes, moderating him. > > He deserves much more than that. > Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate... > > Jarry you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time. Did you?

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Xavier Parizet
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote: > Daniel de Oliveira wrote: >> Yes, moderating him. As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick... Now i

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Daniel de Oliveira
When I say to moderate him its just for a little time, not life-time. On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:29, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote: >> Daniel de Oliveira wrote: >> > Yes, moderating him. >> >> He deserves much more than that. >> Life-time ban for that stupid

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote: > > Yes, moderating him. > > He deserves much more than that. > Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate... That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder is so hideously broken. -- Neil Bothwick Nostalgia

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Jarry
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote: Daniel de Oliveira wrote: Yes, moderating him. He deserves much more than that. Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate... you are a flawless person. you never made a little mistake in your life time. Did you?

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Jarry
Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 17:24:31 +0200, Jarry wrote: Yes, moderating him. He deserves much more than that. Life-time ban for that stupidity would be adequate... That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's auto-responder is so hideously broken. IMHO, setting

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Saphirus Sage
Toppost due to iPhone. I just made a measure through gmail to block the source of the epic-spammed autoreplies. On Apr 28, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Volker Armin Hemmann > wrote: On Dienstag 28 April 2009, Jarry wrote: Daniel de Oliveira wrote: Yes, moderating him. He deserves much more than th

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote: > > That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's > > auto-responder is so hideously broken. > > IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake. Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail t

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-28 Thread felix
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote: > As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i > sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to > gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick... > Now i think he is spammed with "you'

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread KH
fe...@crowfix.com schrieb: > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote: > >> As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i >> sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to >> gentoo-user+unsubscr...@lists.gentoo.org and it did the trick... >> N

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread KH
Neil Bothwick schrieb: > On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:12:02 +0200, Jarry wrote: > >>> That's a little harsh. He may not even know his company's >>> auto-responder is so hideously broken. >> IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake. > > Any kind? Even a well functioning one that

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wednesday 29 April 2009 11:25:41 KH wrote: > fe...@crowfix.com schrieb: > > On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 05:31:06PM +0200, Xavier Parizet wrote: > >> As his autoresponder respond to all mail received to his mail address, i > >> sent at 12h15 a mail "faking" hist email address to > >> gentoo-user+unsu

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:34:11 +0200, KH wrote: > >> IMHO, setting up any kind of auto-responder is a *huge* mistake. > > > > Any kind? Even a well functioning one that send no more than one mail > > to any address in a day? I use a procmail rule to take care of this, > > it appears after list filt

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 11:42:59 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > Unsubscribing the user will have reduced the traffic he is causing by a > significant margin. And give the list admins breathing space in which to add a rule to silently drop messages from that address. I suppose what we really need is

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread KH
> >> To answer you question: It depends. > > I was responding to a statement that any kind of auto-responder is wrong, > so "it depends" is not allowed :) so the correct answer is: NO. :-) > > > Another use it to let people know that their mail has been received. I > company I do work for has

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Markus Schönhaber
Neil Bothwick: > I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by > auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such > mails. In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps. Whoever is "able" to configure an auto-responder in such a completely br

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 13:15:30 +0200, Markus Schönhaber wrote: > > I suppose what we really need is a standard header to be inserted by > > auto-responders. Then mailing list software can simply ignore any such > > mails. > > In theory a good solution. In practice I doubt it helps. > Whoever is "

Re: [gentoo-user] autorespond

2009-04-29 Thread Eray Aslan
On 29.04.2009 14:30, Neil Bothwick wrote: >> In fact, all that's needed is already there (just the other way round, >> though): every list I'm subscribed to adds a "Precedence" header field >> (with values of "bulk" or "list") to the messages. A sane auto-responder >> will not send replies to messa

Re: [gentoo-user] resolv.conf

2009-05-06 Thread Dirk Heinrichs
Hi, would you please be so kind not to hijack other threads. Thanks... Dirk signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] security

2009-05-23 Thread Saphirus Sage
Daniel Iliev wrote: > Hi, > > Since I'm not familiar with Gentoo's practice in dealing with > security problems I got curious about the following case. > Yesterday a Secunia advisory [1] about pidgin was brought to my > attention. The solution offered by the up-streams is upgrading to >

Re: [gentoo-user] security

2009-05-23 Thread Justin
Daniel Iliev wrote: > > Hi, > > Since I'm not familiar with Gentoo's practice in dealing with > security problems I got curious about the following case. > Yesterday a Secunia advisory [1] about pidgin was brought to my > attention. The solution offered by the up-streams is upgrading t

Re: [gentoo-user] security

2009-05-23 Thread Justin
Daniel Iliev wrote: > > Hi, > > Since I'm not familiar with Gentoo's practice in dealing with > security problems I got curious about the following case. > Yesterday a Secunia advisory [1] about pidgin was brought to my > attention. The solution offered by the up-streams is upgrading t

Re: [gentoo-user] security

2009-05-23 Thread Daniel Iliev
On Sat, 23 May 2009 09:23:27 -0400 Saphirus Sage wrote: > Daniel Iliev wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since I'm not familiar with Gentoo's practice in dealing with > > security problems I got curious about the following case. > > Yesterday a Secunia advisory [1] about pidgin was brought to my >

Re: [gentoo-user] security

2009-05-23 Thread Saphirus Sage
Daniel Iliev wrote: > On Sat, 23 May 2009 09:23:27 -0400 > Saphirus Sage wrote: > > >> Daniel Iliev wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> Since I'm not familiar with Gentoo's practice in dealing with >>> security problems I got curious about the following case. >>> Yesterday a Secunia adviso

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >