Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: The GeoTools module gt-app-schema has now been included in GeoServer releases since October 2009. I propose to promote it (and the proposed gt-app-schema-resolver) to extension. The old unsupported/app-schema will remain to house gt-webservice and other

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new module: gt-app-schema-resolver

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: I propose to split off the application schema resolution code from gt-app-schema into a new module gt-app-schema-resolver: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3085 Any objections? The new module has no dependencies on gt-app-schema. If

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: OK to put some non-GeoTools dependencies (application schema bundles) in our osgeo maven repo?

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: On 18/05/10 09:22, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: So, if I announced that I had a third-party whizbang-1.3.2.jar that I wanted to use in app-schema testing, would I be allowed to upload it to the osgeo maven repo? I think the process has been fairly informal so far.

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: OK to put some non-GeoTools dependencies (application schema bundles) in our osgeo maven repo?

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Andrea Aime ha scritto: Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: On 18/05/10 09:22, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: So, if I announced that I had a third-party whizbang-1.3.2.jar that I wanted to use in app-schema testing, would I be allowed to upload it to the osgeo maven repo? I think the process has been

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote: How is the test coverage? OK. All encoding test are in GeoServer. Is it a single module or multimodule? Multiple. gt-app-schema, gt-app-schema-resolver (coming soon), gt-sample-data-access (for testing). You are the maintainer for all of them? Yes.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote: How is the test coverage? OK. All encoding test are in GeoServer. Is it a single module or multimodule? Multiple. gt-app-schema, gt-app-schema-resolver (coming soon), gt-sample-data-access (for testing). You are

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new module: gt-app-schema-resolver

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 18/05/10 14:39, Andrea Aime wrote: Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: The new module has no dependencies on gt-app-schema. If gt-app-schema-resolver works well enough, it might be useful elsewhere. It will be used initially by gt-app-schema only. Sounds good to me. I'm just wondering about

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposed new module: gt-app-schema-resolver

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: On 18/05/10 14:39, Andrea Aime wrote: Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: The new module has no dependencies on gt-app-schema. If gt-app-schema-resolver works well enough, it might be useful elsewhere. It will be used initially by gt-app-schema only. Sounds good to

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 18/05/10 16:11, Andrea Aime wrote: Ok, this goes against the graduation rules, you don't have the necessary testing coverage. So, I thought, why am I waving my hands when I should be measuring the coverage? Turns out it is much better than I thought (gt-app-schema on trunk, before

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: OK to put some non-GeoTools dependencies (application schema bundles) in our osgeo maven repo?

2010-05-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 18/05/10 14:49, Andrea Aime wrote: I don't think you really need permission, especially for a non core module. If it was main, renderer or something a lot of people depend onto I would expect some discussion before adding a dependency, but otherwise I don't think you really need to ask

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Jody Garnett
I view this as one of the stars we use to evaluate things (ie things we care about as a community) rather then a complete down check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out quickly right? We do not demand

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Andrea Aime
Jody Garnett ha scritto: I view this as one of the stars we use to evaluate things (ie things we care about as a community) rather then a complete down check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2010-05-18 Thread Jody Garnett
On 18/05/2010, at 10:44 PM, Andrea Aime wrote: Jody Garnett ha scritto: check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out quickly right? Coverage being checked nightly? This is news to me. I though he

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3087) CoverageCrop: cropping by shape

2010-05-18 Thread Emanuele Tajariol (JIRA)
CoverageCrop: cropping by shape --- Key: GEOT-3087 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3087 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: core coverage Reporter: Emanuele

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3088) make RenderingExecutor more flexible

2010-05-18 Thread Michael Bedward (JIRA)
make RenderingExecutor more flexible Key: GEOT-3088 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3088 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: ext mappane Reporter:

[Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3089) add 'dirty rectangles' logic to JMapPane

2010-05-18 Thread Michael Bedward (JIRA)
add 'dirty rectangles' logic to JMapPane Key: GEOT-3089 URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3089 Project: GeoTools Issue Type: Improvement Components: ext mappane