On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
+1.
Some things are hard to test (GUI, network [e.g. JDBC]), so rather than
an absolute rule for for all modules, those falling below 40% for
offline tests may have to refer to online tests or special
On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 10:56 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies
ben.caradoc-dav...@csiro.au wrote:
Aha: I found my canonical source for the 40% threshold: Andrea. :-)
On 18/05/10 16:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
All the docs and much of the test coverage is in GeoServer.
Ah, much of the test coverage
Aha: I found my canonical source for the 40% threshold: Andrea. :-)
On 18/05/10 16:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
All the docs and much of the test coverage is in GeoServer.
Ah, much of the test coverage where it cannot be measured... ugh...
does it go beyond 40% with the tests in Geotools?
--
Given that Andrea is the source of all truth (or was it the Pope? someone in
italy).
Could we make a motion to update the developers guide with a consistent target
of 40%?
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 9 May 2011 at 6:56 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
Aha: I found my canonical source for the
On 9 May 2011 20:18, Jody Garnett jody.garn...@gmail.com wrote:
Could we make a motion to update the developers guide with a consistent
target of 40%?
It should be 42
Michael
--
WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network
Okay I will say +1 to that :-)
Seriously we are supposed to follow the change procedure to make modifications
to the developers guide; in this case where it is inconsistent I would like to
just do a patch.
--
Jody Garnett
On Monday, 9 May 2011 at 9:03 PM, Michael Bedward wrote:
On 9 May
+1.
Some things are hard to test (GUI, network [e.g. JDBC]), so rather than
an absolute rule for for all modules, those falling below 40% for
offline tests may have to refer to online tests or special pleading.
Some modules have low coverage in their own tests but are massively
covered by
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
The GeoTools module gt-app-schema has now been included in GeoServer
releases since October 2009. I propose to promote it (and the proposed
gt-app-schema-resolver) to extension. The old unsupported/app-schema
will remain to house gt-webservice and other
On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote:
How is the test coverage?
OK. All encoding test are in GeoServer.
Is it a single module or multimodule?
Multiple. gt-app-schema, gt-app-schema-resolver (coming soon),
gt-sample-data-access (for testing).
You are the maintainer for all of them?
Yes.
Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto:
On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote:
How is the test coverage?
OK. All encoding test are in GeoServer.
Is it a single module or multimodule?
Multiple. gt-app-schema, gt-app-schema-resolver (coming soon),
gt-sample-data-access (for testing).
You are
On 18/05/10 16:11, Andrea Aime wrote:
Ok, this goes against the graduation rules, you don't have the necessary
testing coverage.
So, I thought, why am I waving my hands when I should be measuring the
coverage? Turns out it is much better than I thought (gt-app-schema on
trunk, before
I view this as one of the stars we use to evaluate things (ie things we care
about as a community) rather then a complete down check.
The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly build somewhere
means that any incidental breakage will be found out quickly right?
We do not demand
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
I view this as one of the stars we use to evaluate things (ie
things we care about as a community) rather then a complete down
check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly
build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out
On 18/05/2010, at 10:44 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
check. The fact that the coverage is being checked with a nightly
build somewhere means that any incidental breakage will be found out
quickly right?
Coverage being checked nightly? This is news to me.
I though he
The GeoTools module gt-app-schema has now been included in GeoServer
releases since October 2009. I propose to promote it (and the proposed
gt-app-schema-resolver) to extension. The old unsupported/app-schema
will remain to house gt-webservice and other unreleased code.
gt-app-schema is
Exciting Ben,
We do ask that one page be available in the geotools user guide; even if it
just links off to docs you have written in geoserver.
Any of my other questions can be answered as you fill in the pages you already
found:
- code coverage
- review.apt
- documentation
- etc...
Should we
On 18 May 2010 11:46, Jody Garnett wrote:
indeed there may be some overlap with recent work Micheal was doing.
Me ?
Michael
--
___
Geotools-devel mailing list
You.
Reni had worked on some of the symbology encoding functions earlier; and they
were used as a base for some of the mapping functions.
One I did with her involved reading in a property for (or csv file?) and the
function would look up a value in the file ...
The same approach could be used
On 18 May 2010 12:47, Jody Garnett wrote:
You.
Reni had worked on some of the symbology encoding functions earlier; and they
were
used as a base for some of the mapping functions.
One I did with her involved reading in a property for (or csv file?) and the
function would
look up a value
19 matches
Mail list logo
