Things are working fine on windows for both the imagepyramid and the imagemosaic
Let's see what you find out on other platforms.
Simone.
---
Ing. Simone Giannecchini
GeoSolutions S.A.S.
Founder - Software Engineer
Via Carignoni 51
55041 Camaior
On 02/07/2010, at 7:04 PM, Daniele Romagnoli wrote:
> Hi Jody,
> a quick question:
> Is it the imagemosaic still failing the extensive tests for you?
I will let you know this weekend; given the discussion it seems I will make a
milestone this Monday and let you know. Do you ever run extensive t
Hi again,
let me also provide some further details on what me and Simone are doing on
gt-trunk.
I'm working on an imageio-ext 1.1.x version using GDAL 1.7.2 and I will
update the gt-imageio-ext-gdal to use it.
Moreover, as you have noticed from the last JIRAs, I did some updates on the
coverage/me
Hi Jody,
a quick question:
Is it the imagemosaic still failing the extensive tests for you?
I have just tried on my windows machine with the -Pextensive.tests and it
worked fine.
Please let me know so I can take a look on it in case it is still failing
(in that case, please let me know info about y
On 02/07/10 14:43, Jody Garnett wrote:
> The only impact is on of appearance; students may feel they are being short
> changed if they are paying for a course that is making use of a milestone
> release.
Milestones are quite respectable. FOSS4G attendees will mostly be
early-adopters and likely
On 02/07/2010, at 4:32 PM, Andrea Aime wrote:
>> Currently as it stands imagemosic is not releasable; and has not been
>> for the last last two milestones. Other then that things are
>> proceeding fairly smoothly. It is *very* handy having cite tests
>> being run by hudson as that is our usual slo
On 02/07/2010, at 4:24 PM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> Jody, could you please sketch your path-to-FOSS4G milestones? (Are these GT
> workshop or uDig?)
GeoTools workshop; similar content to last year; this time the documentation is
done in Sphinx (CSS skills permitting). Thus far transferring t
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I am not sure what the correct venue is to start a discussion? The
> admin email list?
The correct venue is either this ml or the admin mailing list
A proposal would be even better.
Rationale: we make proposals for everything that affects developers
and users at large.
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> I am not sure what the correct venue is to start a discussion? The
> admin email list? We don't have IRC breakouts at the moment; it is
> more that I am doing this with my GeoTools hat on; rather then in
> conjunction with a release of geoserver or uDig ... so there is no
Jody, could you please sketch your path-to-FOSS4G milestones? (Are these
GT workshop or uDig?)
What are the impacts on you if we do not have an RC? Are these manageable?
--
Ben Caradoc-Davies
Software Engineering Team Leader
CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering
Australian Resources Res
I am not sure what the correct venue is to start a discussion? The admin email
list? We don't have IRC breakouts at the moment; it is more that I am doing
this with my GeoTools hat on; rather then in conjunction with a release of
geoserver or uDig ... so there is not much warning or pull for a r
Jody Garnett ha scritto:
> Okay; apparently the RC Notice has come as a surprise.
>
> This was not my intension; indeed I am a bit annoyed that some
> plugins are still not passing intensive tests and are not ready for a
> release candidate. I have been up front with my intension to make a
> relea
Okay; apparently the RC Notice has come as a surprise.
This was not my intension; indeed I am a bit annoyed that some plugins are
still not passing intensive tests and are not ready for a release candidate. I
have been up front with my intension to make a release candidate; but may be
able to g
13 matches
Mail list logo
