Re: [Geotools-devel] git local repo: per-branch or per-svn-repo?

2010-08-31 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 31/08/10 21:48, Jody Garnett wrote: > I also found on on mac that "git-svn" is actually "git svn" Same under Linux. Looks like it changed some time in the 1.5 series. Now git-svn is used only as a name and for the man-page. Reminds me of "openssl x509". :-)

Re: [Geotools-devel] git local repo: per-branch or per-svn-repo?

2010-08-31 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
AM, Andrea Aime wrote: > >> Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >>> Andrea and Justin, >>> do you use a single "git svn init" command for the whole geotools repo or >>> do you use "git svn init" once for each branch? What pattern do you find >>

Re: [Geotools-devel] JTS version update request

2010-09-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
___ > User-friendly Desktop Internet GIS (uDig) > http://udig.refractions.net > http://lists.refractions.net/mailman/listinfo/udig-devel > > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies

Re: [Geotools-devel] JTS version update request

2010-09-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
010, at 5:30 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > >> Trunk switched to JTS 1.11 in r35079 on 21 March: >> http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-2994 >> >> uDig users may already be version-managed to 1.11. Try mvn dependency:tree >> in a uDig module. >> >> Ki

[Geotools-devel] Remove .gitignore from GeoTools trunk and 2.6.x?

2010-09-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
thout Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev ___ Geoserver-devel mailing list geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:geoserver-de...@lists.sourceforge.net> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoserver-devel -- Ben Caradoc-D

[Geotools-devel] Build failure under Java 5 (now fixed); Java 6 API not allowed (yet)

2010-09-13 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Java 5 to check the API. (2) OpenGeo Hudson uses Java 6 to build GeoTools and so has no coverage of Java 5 build failures. I found this build failure only because we (CSIRO) use Java 5 on our buildbot. Any chance of reverting OpenGeo Hudson to Java 5? Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies

Re: [Geotools-devel] Remove .gitignore from GeoTools trunk and 2.6.x?

2010-09-13 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Done. I have removed .gitignore on trunk/2.6.x in r36193/r36194. Kind regards, Ben. On 09/09/10 17:27, Jesse Eichar wrote: > Go crazy. I didn't commit it intentionally and I agree with your arguments > > On Thu, Sep 9, 2010 at 5:26 AM, Ben > Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Jes

Re: [Geotools-devel] Remove .gitignore from GeoTools trunk and 2.6.x?

2010-09-14 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
tt wrote: > >> So can some kind git master tell me how git ignore works? I went from being >> able to use git status to having a mess in one day :-) >> >> Jody >> >> On 14/09/2010, at 5:42 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> >>> Done. >>&g

Re: [Geotools-devel] Remove .gitignore from GeoTools trunk and 2.6.x?

2010-09-14 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ore file and it's in my home (so, outside > of the version control). > You can follow these instructions: > http://www.gitready.com/beginner/2009/01/19/ignoring-files.html -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian R

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failure under Java 5 (now fixed); Java 6 API not allowed (yet)

2010-09-14 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
well received on this list. :-) A more significant problem is that we only build trunk/trunk. At the moment, nobody is covering stable with Java 5 (AFAIK). This could potentially leave us shipping a stable product that does not work on Java 5. I'll see what we can do. -- Ben Caradoc-D

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failure under Java 5 (now fixed); Java 6 API not allowed (yet)

2010-09-14 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
is.linux4all.at/hudson64/ Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Start uncovering the many advant

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3268) Intermittent build failure in gt-feature-pregeneralized ShapeFilePreGeneralizedFeatureSourceTest

2010-09-20 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
was: "Oh no, I've forgotten how to do this !". Then > I re-ran the build and it succeeded. Since then I've done another > couple of builds without striking the error. > > Michael > > > On 16 September 2010 16:54, Ben Caradoc-Davies (JIRA) > wro

Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC meeting on attribute evaluation

2010-09-21 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+61 8 6436 8914 > > Australian Resources Research Centre > 26 Dick Perry Avenue, Kensington WA 6151 > > > > -- > Niels Charlier > > Software Engineer > CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering > Phone: +61 8 6436 8914 > > Australian Resources Research

Re: [Geotools-devel] coding conventions and eclipse warnings?

2010-09-23 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
o many occurrences. > What, if any, are the geotools conventions about this? > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre --

Re: [Geotools-devel] IRC meeting on attribute evaluation

2010-09-23 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Skype (often seems to be > when chatting with CSIRO :-) ). > > Jody > > On 22/09/2010, at 2:09 AM, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I can stick around later for a meeting so around 9am perth time should be > fine but i can't do it today. How about we do

[Geotools-devel] shapefile .fix generated on stable only?

2010-09-30 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
d not on trunk? Automatic index generation turned on by default? It is going in my .gitignore, but it might indicate a problem. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research C

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build Failure: AppSchemaFileDataTest gives errors

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ke(NativeMethodAccessorImpl.java:39) > at > sun.reflect.DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.invoke(DelegatingMethodAccessorImpl.java:25) > at java.lang.reflect.Method.invoke(Method.java:592) > at > org.apache.maven.surefire.booter.Sure

Re: [Geotools-devel] Binding DirectPosition with app-schema

2010-10-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Aime > Senior Software Engineer > > GeoSolutions S.A.S. > Via Poggio alle Viti 1187 > 55054 Massarosa (LU) > Italy > > phone: +39 0584962313 > fax: +39 0584962313 > > http://www.geo-solutions.it > http://geo-solutions.blogspot.com/ > http://www.linkedin.com/in/andr

Re: [Geotools-devel] Binding DirectPosition with app-schema

2010-10-05 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
: > Mumble... so there is no other way out? > I guess my only way out is to use some XSLT post processing on the GML > generation chain to switch from gml:Point to gml:DirectPosition > then... -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineerin

Re: [Geotools-devel] Binding DirectPosition with app-schema

2010-10-05 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
any DataAccess or non-simple features. We have not even investigated how to use xpaths for complex properties in an SLD. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] Binding DirectPosition with app-schema

2010-10-05 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 05/10/10 15:57, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 9:51 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > wrote: >> Note that WMS does not yet support any DataAccess or non-simple features. We >> have not even investigated how to use xpaths for complex properties in an >> SLD. >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Mapping an optional element whose attributes are not optional

2010-10-05 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
> Beautiful is writing same markup. Internet Explorer 9 supports > standards for HTML5, CSS3, SVG 1.1, ECMAScript5, and DOM L2& L3. > Spend less time writing and rewriting code and more time creating great > experiences on the web. Be a part

Re: [Geotools-devel] AppSchema store builds chained features, xml encoder does not emit them...

2010-10-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
the above ring any bell? >>> >>> Cheers >>> Andrea >>> >>> - >>> Ing. Andrea Aime >>> Senior Software Engineer >>> >>> GeoSolutions S.A.S. >>> Via Poggio alle Vit

Re: [Geotools-devel] AppSchema store builds chained features, xml encoder does not emit them...

2010-10-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ng specification conformance, and as a consequence, their schemas were not conformant, principally in not observing the striping rule. Do you have any ability to change the schema? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineeri

Re: [Geotools-devel] AppSchema store builds chained features, xml encoder does not emit them...

2010-10-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
o not know if there is any open source equivalent or schema conformance testing tool. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Build Failure: AppSchemaFileDataTest gives errors

2010-10-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
problem is not evident (the file is only removed when it has no links and nothing has it open). On 04/10/10 13:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > That is really weird. It looks like the sort of failures you get on > Windows when something else has the file open. Can you please manually > delete

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Build Failure: AppSchemaFileDataTest gives errors

2010-10-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
I have fixed a bunch of resource leaks (see GEOT-3273, not committed but in progress); I think the underlying problem was an unclosed FeatureIterator in MappingFeatureIterator.getCount ... a workaround used *only* for property files. On 12/10/10 09:56, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Florence

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Build Failure: AppSchemaFileDataTest gives errors

2010-10-12 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
I found the cause and created a Jira issue: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3290 On 12/10/10 12:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > I have fixed a bunch of resource leaks (see GEOT-3273, not committed but > in progress); I think the underlying problem was an unclosed > FeatureIt

[Geotools-devel] Adjusting logging in unit tests?

2010-10-12 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
often tried but seem to be defeated by the gap between commons-logging and java.utils.logging, which seems to be designed to defeat all logging outside a fully configured environment. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adjusting logging in unit tests?

2010-10-12 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
be configurable from outside the code, by setting a property (or even many). Justin's solution seems a bit cleaner; I ended up hacking the root logger to log everything. Logging is not very test-friendly, and I end up scattering System.err breadcrumbs in code, which is a logging antipatte

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Nominate Niels Charlier for commit access

2010-10-12 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
-schema improvements, and > been active with the mailing list discusssions. > He contributed a patch that has been approved, but not yet committed: > http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3066 > You will hear more from Niels as more of his patches are in progress. > > Thank y

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Nominate Niels Charlier for commit access

2010-10-13 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
If your username does not work for svn, try entering it as lowercase. Rini had a problem with mixed case. (Or is it the GeoServer repo that does this?) On 14/10/10 11:27, Niels wrote: > My osgeo username is NielsCharlier, so is my codehause username. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Softw

[Geotools-devel] WFS 2.0 specification released

2010-11-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
The WFS 2.0 specification has been released: http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wfs -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS module back to supported

2010-11-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
for both shapefiles and spatial databases ;-) Try app-schema and you'll appreciate plain WFS. ;-) -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre --

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Module maintainer for sample-data

2010-11-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
SIRO I would still like to inform the module maintainer -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Centralized Desktop Delive

Re: [Geotools-devel] Skipping postgis tests, resources not available:

2010-11-14 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
esktop deployment and management using > Dell EqualLogic storage and VMware View: A highly scalable, end-to-end > client virtualization framework. Read more! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/dell-eql-dev2dev > _______ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists

[Geotools-devel] GeoTools trunk build fails with Maven 2.0.10: upgrade to Maven 2.2.1

2010-11-16 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
annot override read-only parameter: resources in goal: resources:resources -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Beaut

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools trunk build fails with Maven 2.0.10: upgrade to Maven 2.2.1

2010-11-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
+1 for updating the dev guide. Although it is a bit naughty forcing tool upgrades on stable, we have to be pragmatic. On 17/11/10 22:38, Justin Deoliveira wrote: > So what do people prefer? Shall I just updated the developer guide? Or roll > back the change? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies So

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMS GetFeatureInfo GML output

2010-11-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
rmat based on backend > data source could work... albeit a bit tricky. And I think it is nicer to be > explicit. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering A

Re: [Geotools-devel] WMS GetFeatureInfo GML output

2010-11-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ures and common needs can still > work. +1 for per-layer/featuretype configuration. Complex features will need different GML versions if a WFS provides types from different application schemas. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engi

Re: [Geotools-devel] GeoTools trunk build fails with Maven 2.0.10: upgrade to Maven 2.2.1

2010-11-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ting great > experiences on the web. Be a part of the beta today > http://p.sf.net/sfu/msIE9-sfdev2dev > ___ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geotools-devel >

Re: [Geotools-devel] ... namespaces

2010-11-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 26/11/10 15:21, Jody Garnett wrote: > So you should be able to create a filter that supports namespace right now. I think Niels agrees, but is examining the implications of merging the one from app-schema (or similar) into core so it is used by WMS. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Softw

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: ... namespaces

2010-11-25 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 26/11/10 15:30, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > On 26/11/10 15:21, Jody Garnett wrote: >> So you should be able to create a filter that supports namespace right now. > I think Niels agrees, but is examining the implications of merging the > one from app-schema (or similar) into cor

Re: [Geotools-devel] JTS upgrade (from 1.10 to 1.11) on geotools 2.6.x branch?

2010-11-29 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
work http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GEOT-3306 that has > new labeling features. It has been backported to 2.6.x but requires JTS 1.11 > because it uses MBR-calculations that was introduced in that version. > > Would it be possible to upgrade JTS to 1.11 on the 2.6.x branch? > &g

Re: [Geotools-devel] WFS 2.0 specification released

2010-11-29 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
The WFS/FES 2.0 schemas have now been published: http://schemas.opengis.net/wfs/2.0/wfs.xsd http://schemas.opengis.net/filter/2.0/filterAll.xsd On 05/11/10 09:04, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > The WFS 2.0 specification has been released: > http://www.opengeospatial.org/standards/wfs >

[Geotools-devel] ArcSDE 10?

2011-02-07 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Gabriel, do we support or plan to support ArcSDE 10 as a datastore backend? Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex features without application schemas: would it work?

2011-02-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
es? > And would the gml encoding for features work without having a published schema > to target? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre ---

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex features without application schemas: would it work?

2011-02-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
elf would be in the _Feature subs group. What else is _needed_? > > Cheers, > Gabriel -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] Complex features without application schemas: would it work?

2011-02-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
[Back on the list] Unit test. It is the only way to be sure. Kind regards, Ben. On 09/02/11 15:42, Andrea Aime wrote: > On Wed, Feb 9, 2011 at 4:14 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies > wrote: >> I was thinking about non-feature polymorphic complex properties. For >> example, CGI_Value

Re: [Geotools-devel] Performance patch bug

2011-02-16 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ed elsewhere to signal "unknown size", so I'd recommend > that instead, as Integer.MAX_VALUE is potentially a valid size? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Aus

Re: [Geotools-devel] app-schema log file use during testing

2011-03-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
as: {urn:cgi:xmlns:CGI:Utilities:1.0}LocalizableGenericNameType > Tests run: 3, Failures: 0, Errors: 0, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.064 sec > > When testing the app schema resolver; do you think you can arrange to turn > down the logging here? Or has something gone wrong with the test -

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: app-schema log file use during testing

2011-03-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
should vanish in from your build. Please let us know if you encounter any further app-schema log flooding; we have plenty of sandbags. Kind regards, Ben. On 09/03/11 09:15, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Sorry about that. We will get this fixed today. > > On 09/03/11 08:50, Jody Garn

[Geotools-devel] EMF upgrade

2011-03-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
2.2.1 org.eclipse.emf ecore 2.2.2 Just thinking aloud, so please interrupt me if I am going off track. :-) Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research C

Re: [Geotools-devel] EMF upgrade

2011-03-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
if you don't have an account on > opengeo repo. > > +1 on pushing the dependency declaration up into the root pom as well. > > -Justin > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 8:00 PM, Ben > Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Justin, > > I am quite keen to upgrade EMF

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: EMF upgrade

2011-03-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
I take that back: I now have consistent compile errors between Eclipse and maven. (The generics problems Justin knows about. I'm working on it.) On 11/03/11 14:28, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Still working on GeoServer (builds in Eclipse, not javac, probably > because ecj follows the

[Geotools-devel] download.osgeo.org is down

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/download.osgeo.org This breaks the build as I just upgraded to EMF 2.6.1, which is in a maven repo on this server. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] download.osgeo.org is down

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
is down for router maintanence just got the confirm will be about an hour On 16/03/11 10:33, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/download.osgeo.org > > This breaks the build as I just upgraded to EMF 2.6.1, which is in a > maven repo on this server. >

Re: [Geotools-devel] Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk-docs #570

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
th/to/file -Durl=[url] > -DrepositoryId=[id] > >Path to dependency: > 1) org.geotools:docs:jar:2.8-SNAPSHOT > 2) org.geotools:gt-wfs:jar:2.8-SNAPSHOT > 3) org.geotools.ogc:net.opengis.wfs:jar:2.8-SNAPSHOT > 4) org.eclipse.emf:ecore:jar:2.6.1 &g

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Build failed in Hudson: geotools-trunk-docs #570

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Jody informs me that blacklisting is only per-run. On 16/03/11 11:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Ok, good. The osgeo repo has been blacklisted. The build will be broken > until it recovers. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engin

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] download.osgeo.org is down

2011-03-15 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
download.osgeo.org is back and Jody has kicked the GT build. On 16/03/11 10:55, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >From #osgeo: > > download.osgeo.org is down: > http://www.downforeveryoneorjustme.com/download.osgeo.org > Title: http://download.osgeo.org Is Down -&

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] download.osgeo.org is down

2011-03-16 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
e you the exact same artifacts on opengeo, and should give us the same redundancy we have with the old EMF. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Aus

Re: [Geotools-devel] Some progress on image comparison

2011-03-28 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
f we find a significant > platform/jdk/font > variation we can just raise the threshold without giving up the test > altogheter. > > The only major thing we'd need is to have perceptualdiff installed on Hudson > and on machines of anyone that is interested in rendering testi

Re: [Geotools-devel] New unsupported module request

2011-03-29 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Any questions? > > Jesse -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management T

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-05 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
EOTOOLS/Skip+GeoTools+3 > > Feedback welcome :-) > > -- > Jody Garnett > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre --

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Dropping the "2." off svn branches sounds good to me. On 07/04/11 05:36, Jody Garnett wrote: > We will just smoothly go over to 2.6.x, 2.7.x, 8.x, 9.x etc... from this > standpoint we are simply dropping the "2". -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Lead

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: Skip GeoTools 3

2011-04-06 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
It doesn't change. On 07/04/11 10:10, Michael Bedward wrote: > What have you get against the number 2 ? > > On 7 April 2011 11:54, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Dropping the "2." off svn branches sounds good to me. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Created: (GEOT-3511) Build failure in coverage if no local host name

2011-04-13 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
look up the host name so I > guess the thing to do is to add a boolean flag to be check by the > offending tests so that they skip when a host name isn't available. > > I can do this unless Simone, Daniele or Andrea have a better suggestion. > > Michael > > > On 13 A

Re: [Geotools-devel] app-schema docs are up?

2011-04-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
still missing the minimum; a code example for a GeoTools developer. > > -- > Jody Garnett -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre --

Re: [Geotools-devel] app-schema docs are up?

2011-04-17 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On Monday, 18 April 2011 at 11:19 AM, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > > This is scheduled for completion in May, as a prerequisite for getting > app-schema into extension. > > Kind regards, > Ben. > > On 16/04/11 22:12, Jody Garnett wrote: > Hi Ben: > > App sch

Re: [Geotools-devel] docs typos and sphinx error

2011-04-18 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
d > Consolidation -- Increasing the use of server virtualization is a top > priority.Virtualization can reduce costs, simplify management, and improve > application availability and disaster protection. Learn more about bo

Re: [Geotools-devel] Shouldn't svn.geotools.org be closed by now?

2011-04-27 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
and then send a mail > to Jason and James to shut down the svn.geotools.org dns? > > Cheers > Andrea > -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding support for a new EPSG code: EPSG:0

2011-04-28 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
nfo/geotools-devel >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Ian Turton >> >> -- >> WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Software >> The most intuitive, comprehensive, and co

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding support for a new EPSG code: EPSG:0

2011-05-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
PSG:0 Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 12:48:15 +0800 From: Ben Caradoc-Davies To: Andrea Aime CC: Geotools-Devel list -1 from me, because EPSG:0 is already reserved by the EPSG OGP Geodesy Subcommittee. Would you consider another integer >32767? Think of other extensions, like 900913. What is l33t

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding support for a new EPSG code: EPSG:0

2011-05-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
yone voting -1 has to provide an alternative, just > saying > "no" is not allowed: > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/procedures/proposal.html#voting -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rebooting the EPSG:0 thread

2011-05-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
are fine hairs to split, but we are about to establish a de-facto standard. Kind regards, Ben. On 30/04/11 05:37, Alessio Fabiani wrote: > Oracle Spatial assigns 99 srid code to unknown CRS as far as I know; it's > ugly but already used by someone as a convention. -- Ben Cara

Re: [Geotools-devel] Adding type and return info to FunctionName

2011-05-01 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ter > makes more sense: > > interface FunctionParameter { >... >boolean isVariable(); > } > > > Anyways thoughts? > > -Justin > > > -- > Justin Deoliveira > OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org > Enter

Re: [Geotools-devel] Versioning rules

2011-05-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
initial > acquisition cost and overall TCO of any competing solution. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/whatsupgold-sd > ___ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/geoto

Re: [Geotools-devel] Versioning rules

2011-05-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ditions to the current API. So that > will mean it couldn't be in 8.x - yes ? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -

Re: [Geotools-devel] Versioning rules

2011-05-04 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
your confusion? Trunk is still open for backwards-incompatible changes. On 05/05/11 11:24, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > Change that breaks compatibility is what trunk is for. :-) > > On 05/05/11 11:19, Michael Bedward wrote: >> My item #3 (bringing swing branch code over) will most

Re: [Geotools-devel] NumberRange huh?

2011-05-08 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
peration.ZonalStasTest) > Time elapsed: 0.004 sec<<< ERROR! > java.io.FileNotFoundException: Can not locate test-data for "testpolygon.shp" > at org.geotools.test.TestData.url(TestData.java:30

[Geotools-devel] Developer guide link on docs.geotools.org?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Should we have a developer guide link here? http://docs.geotools.org/ I think I found it, but only going via the wiki ... -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

[Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Did the rules for module promotion make it from the wiki to the developer guide? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre

Re: [Geotools-devel] Developer guide link on docs.geotools.org?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ols.org either. -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- WhatsUp Gold - Download Free Network Management Sof

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 09/05/11 16:07, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 9 May 2011 17:49, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> Did the rules for module promotion make it from the wiki to the >> developer guide? > Is this what you're looking for ? > http://docs.geotools.org/latest/developer/guide/proced

Re: [Geotools-devel] [ExternalEmail] Re: Developer guide link on docs.geotools.org?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
On 09/05/11 16:09, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: > On 09/05/11 16:05, Michael Bedward wrote: >> Hello Ben >>> Should we have a developer guide link here? >>> http://docs.geotools.org/ >> Possibly. There is a link to it from here: >> http://geotools.org/getinvolv

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
great* reason to have policies in a VCS. :-) On 09/05/11 16:20, Michael Bedward wrote: > On that page, about 2/3 of the way down, there is a statement that > test coverage should be>= 30%. However, it refers to GeoTools 2.4 :) -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Lead

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
27;d be welcome to contribute a docs patch Ben ;-) > > Michael > > On 9 May 2011 18:41, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >> This page looks very out of date. I don't recall any star rating since the >> inception of app-schema, and even on the wiki the links to it are missing.

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
guide/roles/maintain.html > > If I was going to do this right; I would make a table comparing > supported/unsupported on the above page for module maintainers). It is where > we are listing responsibilities after all. > -- > Jody Garnett > > > On Monday, 9 May 2011 at 6:

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Aha: I found my canonical source for the 40% threshold: Andrea. :-) On 18/05/10 16:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote: >>> All the docs and much of the test coverage is in GeoServer. >> Ah, much of the test coverage where it cannot be measured... ugh... >> does it go beyond

[Geotools-devel] Proposal: promote app-schema modules to extension

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
did I miss anything? Do I need anything else? Any objections? This is a big clean up, and long overdue. Kind regards, -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Austra

Re: [Geotools-devel] Removing old/unused/aborted

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
Looks like support for coverages from Matlab 5 data files. On 09/05/11 20:38, Jody Garnett wrote: > What is "matfile5"? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Re

Re: [Geotools-devel] Rules for module promotion in developer guide?

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
should be. :-) On 18/05/10 16:11, Andrea Aime wrote: > Ben Caradoc-Davies ha scritto: >> On 18/05/10 14:38, Andrea Aime wrote: >>>> All the docs and much of the test coverage is in GeoServer. >>> Ah, much of the test coverage where it cannot be measured... u

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: move app-schema from unsupported to extension

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
the source of all truth (or was it the Pope? someone in > italy). > Could we make a motion to update the developers guide with a consistent > target of 40%? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Res

Re: [Geotools-devel] committer request

2011-05-09 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
the reach of its next-generation tools > to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > ___ > Geotools-devel mailing list > Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net<mailto:Geotools-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > https://lists.sourcef

Re: [Geotools-devel] Filter Support for Comparing with Multi-valued Properties

2011-05-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
or for feature > members; need some feature builders created etc...) and I am worried that > they are not getting addressed and are going to be left for a rainy day / > code sprint. > I am not asking you to address all of these today; just the one you are > exposing the code bas

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: promote app-schema modules to extension

2011-05-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
IP review? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australian Resources Research Centre -- Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability What every

Re: [Geotools-devel] Proposal: promote app-schema modules to extension

2011-05-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
That's grassraster? Agreed. On 11/05/11 10:26, Jody Garnett wrote: > I will make you a deal; want to review the headers for moovida and I will > review for app-schema? -- Ben Caradoc-Davies Software Engineering Team Leader CSIRO Earth Science and Resource Engineering Australia

Re: [Geotools-devel] CSV module [was: committer request]

2011-05-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
-- > Achieve unprecedented app performance and reliability > What every C/C++ and Fortran developer should know. > Learn how Intel has extended the reach of its next-generation tools > to help boost performance applications - inlcuding clusters. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmay > _

Re: [Geotools-devel] CSV module [was: committer request]

2011-05-10 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
ll not be returned as part of the feature type. Default >> value will recognise common names: lat, latitude, y >> - srs: String (optional); srsName to use; default value is >> DefaultGeographic.WGS84 >> - geometry: String; name of geometry attribute (using x& y above); if >

Re: [Geotools-devel] [jira] Issue Comment Edited: (GEOT-3577) Add line generation to vector grid module

2011-05-11 Thread Ben Caradoc-Davies
What is the replacement for GridElement.getCenter()? (I'd guess some sort of spatial average, but is there a canonical form?) On 11/05/11 16:14, Michael Bedward wrote: > On 11 May 2011 18:08, Ben Caradoc-Davies (JIRA) wrote: >> >> The r37164 change just broke the GeoServer

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >