zhuqi-lucas opened a new pull request, #16862:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16862
## Which issue does this PR close?
Follow-up https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16826
1. I found some cache will affect this benchmark, so i added more groups in
this PR.
theirix commented on PR #16861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16861#issuecomment-3105891200
Thank you! I'll check my cases.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the sp
berkaysynnada commented on PR #16745:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16745#issuecomment-3105944943
Hi again @liamzwbao. We’ve discussed this with @ozankabak, and the actual
fix should be on the `PartialOrd` implementation of ScalarValue of floats. The
comparison currently us
2010YOUY01 commented on code in PR #16860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16860#discussion_r2224349405
##
datafusion/sqllogictest/test_files/joins.slt:
##
@@ -4164,23 +4164,40 @@ AS VALUES
(3, 3, true),
(3, 3, false);
-query B
-SELECT * FROM t0 FULL JOIN
yoavcloud opened a new pull request, #1966:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1966
Add support for a numeric prefix for a stage name
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
dharanad commented on PR #1997:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1997#issuecomment-3105504827
> @dharanad any plans on this one? I can take this if you busy
@comphead Been occupied at work. Please feel free to pick this one up
--
This is an automated message fro
dharanad commented on PR #1997:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1997#issuecomment-3105504858
> @dharanad any plans on this one? I can take this if you busy
@comphead Been occupied at work. Please feel free to pick this one up
--
This is an automated message fro
adriangb commented on PR #16861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16861#issuecomment-3105503133
@theirix could you take a look? Are there any other expressions we should
dissallow?
@alamb are there any existing APIs to get "volatility" from a
`PhysicalExpr`? If not shou
adriangb opened a new pull request, #16861:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16861
Closes #16545
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscrib
2010YOUY01 opened a new pull request, #16860:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16860
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
When I was working on a j
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15847: Deprecate `ExprSchema`
functions
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15847
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific co
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #15946:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15946#issuecomment-3105395460
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15876: fix: Allow ORDER BY aggregates
not present in SELECT list
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15876
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15963: Fix `datafusion-cli` memory
leak by using `snmalloc`
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15963
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15977: Demonstrate wrong statistics
reported from parquet
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15977
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go t
github-actions[bot] closed pull request #15981: Optimize hash partitioning for
cache friendliness
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/15981
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to
github-actions[bot] commented on PR #16060:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16060#issuecomment-3105395323
Thank you for your contribution. Unfortunately, this pull request is stale
because it has been open 60 days with no activity. Please remove the stale
label or comment or
comphead commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3105350373
Testing on Comet, seeing some test failures
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL abo
shehabgamin commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3105316541
Tested on Sail. Everything looks good!
https://github.com/lakehq/sail/pull/653
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message
waynexia opened a new pull request, #16859:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16859
## Which issue does this PR close?
- follow-up of #14593
## Rationale for this change
Follows the comment
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14593#disc
adriangb commented on issue #16545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16545#issuecomment-3104993647
It seems reasonable to me to blacklist some filters. But given that users
can create arbitrary trait implementations for PhysicalExpr we obviously can't
black list everything.
comphead commented on PR #1997:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1997#issuecomment-3104955716
@dharanad any plans on this one? I can take this if you busy
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub an
theirix commented on issue #16545:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16545#issuecomment-3104952628
> > I expect the physical plan optimiser doesn't perform pushdown of
volatile predicates.
>
> I am not sure -- does this result in wrong results?
We don't observe i
altmannmarcelo opened a new pull request, #1965:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1965
Add support for RENAME AS in ALTER TABLE. This is a MySQL extension.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
vbarua commented on code in PR #16857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16857#discussion_r2223862112
##
datafusion/substrait/tests/testdata/test_plans/select_count_from_select_1_virtual_table_expressions.substrait.json:
##
@@ -0,0 +1,94 @@
+{
Review Comment:
mi
NGA-TRAN commented on code in PR #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16858#discussion_r2223808490
##
datafusion/core/src/physical_planner.rs:
##
@@ -1358,6 +1358,9 @@ impl DefaultPhysicalPlanner {
physical_name(expr),
))?]
NGA-TRAN commented on code in PR #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16858#discussion_r2223805868
##
datafusion/proto/proto/datafusion.proto:
##
@@ -859,6 +859,7 @@ message PhysicalScalarUdfNode {
optional bytes fun_definition = 3;
datafusion_common.Arro
NGA-TRAN opened a new pull request, #16858:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16858
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16772
## Rationale for this change
Serialization and deserialization of physical plans are currently
incomplete
Col-Waltz commented on PR #16066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16066#issuecomment-3104751477
Thanks again for your comment, I tried to compact the code but it leads to
additional trait implementations in another parts of the project, so I assumed
that it will be better to
Col-Waltz commented on code in PR #16066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16066#discussion_r2223769176
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/common_subexpr_eliminate.rs:
##
@@ -316,6 +316,19 @@ impl CommonSubexprEliminate {
} => {
Col-Waltz commented on code in PR #16066:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16066#discussion_r2223769176
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/common_subexpr_eliminate.rs:
##
@@ -316,6 +316,19 @@ impl CommonSubexprEliminate {
} => {
Iskander14yo commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3104690263
@parthchandra `query.py` in the original PR contains the whole SparkSession
configuration. Here you can see following:
```python
df = spark.read.parquet("hits.par
parthchandra commented on issue #2035:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/2035#issuecomment-3104670999
Thanks @Iskander14yo. I'll try that. Do you know how the values for
EventDate are meant to be interpreted? I tried days in unix epoch but that
also filtered out all t
NGA-TRAN commented on issue #16772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16772#issuecomment-3104669997
There are total 3 bugs during serialization and deserialization. I have
narrowed down all repros and fixes for them. The PR will be out soon
--
This is an automated message f
theirix commented on code in PR #16831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16831#discussion_r2223673060
##
datafusion/optimizer/src/simplify_expressions/utils.rs:
##
@@ -168,10 +133,17 @@ pub fn is_one(s: &Expr) -> bool {
Expr::Literal(ScalarValue::Float64(S
findepi commented on code in PR #16831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16831#discussion_r2223630607
##
datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1790,6 +1808,27 @@ impl ScalarValue {
(Self::Float64(Some(l)), Self::Float64(Some(r))) => {
theirix commented on code in PR #16831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16831#discussion_r2223625696
##
datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1790,6 +1808,27 @@ impl ScalarValue {
(Self::Float64(Some(l)), Self::Float64(Some(r))) => {
theirix commented on code in PR #16831:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16831#discussion_r2223620746
##
datafusion/common/src/scalar/mod.rs:
##
@@ -1382,6 +1382,12 @@ impl ScalarValue {
DataType::Float16 =>
ScalarValue::Float16(Some(f16::from_f32(1.0
lorenarosati opened a new pull request, #16857:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16857
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #16363.
## Rationale for this change
Virtual tables in Substrait can have either literal values or expressions,
an
waynexia opened a new pull request, #16856:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16856
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
I wonder if `chr()` works for larger or negative input, as I read from
[`encode_ut
waynexia commented on PR #14700:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/14700#issuecomment-3104237037
> how long does it take to compile the benches library on running `cargo
bench`
for me it takes ~1min to compile `cargo bench --bench chr`
--
This is an automated message f
gabotechs commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2223443238
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty()
comphead commented on PR #1978:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1978#issuecomment-3104162980
Depends on
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/1997
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to Gi
comphead commented on code in PR #2039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2039#discussion_r2223413371
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/arrays.scala:
##
@@ -378,3 +378,38 @@ object CometCreateArray extends CometExpressionSerde {
}
}
}
+
+
comphead commented on code in PR #2039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2039#discussion_r2223409537
##
docs/spark_expressions_support.md:
##
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
- [x] arrays_overlap
- [ ] arrays_zip
- [x] element_at
- - [ ] flatten
+ - [x] flatten
Revie
comphead commented on code in PR #2030:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2030#discussion_r2223402109
##
spark/src/main/scala/org/apache/comet/serde/arrays.scala:
##
@@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ object CometArrayAppend extends CometExpressionSerde with
IncompatExpr {
findepi commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2223260832
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty() {
findepi commented on code in PR #16846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16846#discussion_r2223254701
##
datafusion-examples/examples/async_udf.rs:
##
@@ -15,104 +15,104 @@
// specific language governing permissions and limitations
// under the License.
-use ar
findepi commented on code in PR #16846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16846#discussion_r2223250443
##
docs/source/library-user-guide/functions/adding-udfs.md:
##
@@ -419,6 +432,7 @@ impl ScalarUDFImpl for AsyncUpper {
Ok(DataType::Utf8)
}
+//
huaxingao commented on PR #2032:
URL:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2032#issuecomment-3103829451
@parthchandra I have put back the methods and marked them deprecated. Could
you please take one more look?
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To re
kazantsev-maksim opened a new pull request, #2039:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/pull/2039
## Which issue does this PR close?
Related to Epic: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-comet/issues/1042
array_except: flatten(array(array(1, 2), array(3, 4))) => [1,2,3,4]
NGA-TRAN commented on issue #16772:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16772#issuecomment-3103487562
I am investigating this and hopefully will have a fix
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use
comphead commented on PR #16847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16847#issuecomment-3103215052
Thanks @xudong963 for the review
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the
alamb commented on PR #16853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16853#issuecomment-3103194835
I'll plan to merge this PR once the DataFusion 49 release is complete
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub a
alamb merged PR #16827:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16827
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
findepi merged PR #16815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16815
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafu
yoavcloud opened a new pull request, #1964:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/pull/1964
This PR addresses two issues:
1. Added missing `CREATE SCHEMA` privilege
2. Added missing `ON ALL FUNCTIONS IN SCHEMA' target object for grant
--
This is an automated message
alamb commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3102465161
I made a few documentation PRs as well:
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16855
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16853
- https://github.com/apache/data
alamb opened a new pull request, #16855:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16855
## Which issue does this PR close?
- part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235
## Rationale for this change
Let's bring the changes from the 49 branch to main so
alamb merged PR #16852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16852
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
xudong963 opened a new pull request, #16854:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16854
## Which issue does this PR close?
- Closes #.
## Rationale for this change
## What changes are included in this PR?
## Are these changes teste
alamb opened a new pull request, #16853:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16853
## Which issue does this PR close?
- part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235
- part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16799
## Rationale for this chang
notfilippo commented on issue #16841:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16841#issuecomment-3102449595
According to the docs in
[`MemoryPool`](https://docs.rs/datafusion/latest/datafusion/execution/memory_pool/trait.MemoryPool.html#memory-management-design):
> DataFusion
alamb opened a new pull request, #16852:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16852
## Which issue does this PR close?
- part of https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235
- related to https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16847
## Rationale for this
xudong963 commented on issue #16838:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16838#issuecomment-3102442296
Thanks @zhuqi-lucas .Our scenario is `list(struct{})`, and the inner fields
of struct are like:
```rust
let schema = Arc::new(Schema::new(vec I will be done testing by tomorrow EOD.
If that blocks the RC, I can always test the RC.
+1, I'll test mv lib with RC1
--
This is
xudong963 commented on issue #16235:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16235#issuecomment-3102346353
FYI, I'm doing the voting process
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go
alamb commented on code in PR #16846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16846#discussion_r178654
##
docs/source/library-user-guide/functions/adding-udfs.md:
##
@@ -434,13 +448,17 @@ impl AsyncScalarUDFImpl for AsyncUpper {
Some(10)
}
+/// Thi
alamb commented on code in PR #16846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16846#discussion_r172192
##
docs/source/library-user-guide/functions/adding-udfs.md:
##
@@ -345,12 +354,17 @@ async fn main() {
}
```
-## Adding a Scalar Async UDF
+## Adding a Async Sca
alamb commented on PR #16847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16847#issuecomment-3102220306
Thanks @comphead and @xudong963
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spe
alamb merged PR #16847:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16847
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb merged PR #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/92
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusio
alamb commented on PR #92:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-site/pull/92#issuecomment-3102153976
> Sorry I’m not available all week. I’ll try to catch up on things next
Monday.
No worries -- I'll merge this one and we can always adjust in the future if
we need to.
Tha
alamb merged PR #16845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16845
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
To unsubscribe, e-mail: github-unsubscr...@datafusi
alamb commented on PR #16845:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16845#issuecomment-3102149601
https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/cffd0caf-03d4-4a38-90ee-10fa83d6a22b";
/>
Thank you @findepi
🤦
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
dependabot[bot] opened a new pull request, #16850:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16850
Bumps [sysinfo](https://github.com/GuillaumeGomez/sysinfo) from 0.35.2 to
0.36.1.
Changelog
Sourced from https://github.com/GuillaumeGomez/sysinfo/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md";>sysi
dependabot[bot] closed pull request #16747: chore(deps): bump sysinfo from
0.35.2 to 0.36.0
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16747
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the s
dependabot[bot] commented on PR #16747:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16747#issuecomment-3101819137
Superseded by #16850.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the spec
jcsherin opened a new issue, #1963:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion-sqlparser-rs/issues/1963
While reviewing
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16839#issuecomment-3097357784 found
these broken links in the doc comments.
1. The ClickHouse `attach-partitionpart` link m
jcsherin commented on issue #16840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16840#issuecomment-3101422403
@Adez017 Thank you. These are the command I used.
To generate rust docs (same as `ci/scripts/rust_docs.sh`):
```text
$ RUSTDOCFLAGS="-D warnings" cargo doc --documen
gabotechs commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2221469424
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty()
gabotechs commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2221469424
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty()
gabotechs commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2221469424
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty()
Adez017 commented on issue #16840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16840#issuecomment-3101400436
> > hi [@2010YOUY01](https://github.com/2010YOUY01) i would try to validate
the concerned issue and find out a way
>
> Thank you.
>
> You can try `lychee` mentioned
findepi commented on PR #16849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16849#issuecomment-3101398359
cc @parkma99, @alamb
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific com
2010YOUY01 commented on issue #16840:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/issues/16840#issuecomment-3101392719
> hi [@2010YOUY01](https://github.com/2010YOUY01) i would try to validate
the concerned issue and find out a way
Thank you.
You can try `lychee` mentioned by
ht
findepi commented on PR #16815:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16815#issuecomment-3101386952
This failed due to a flaky test 🙁
- https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16849
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, pleas
findepi opened a new pull request, #16849:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16849
The query lacks total ordering, so `rowsort` is appropriate.
--
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL a
findepi commented on code in PR #16816:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16816#discussion_r2221442844
##
datafusion/functions-aggregate/src/array_agg.rs:
##
@@ -315,11 +313,7 @@ impl Accumulator for ArrayAggAccumulator {
};
if !val.is_empty() {
findepi commented on code in PR #16846:
URL: https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/16846#discussion_r2221418135
##
datafusion-examples/examples/async_udf.rs:
##
@@ -127,118 +123,45 @@ fn animal() -> Result {
Ok(RecordBatch::try_new(schema, vec![id_array, name_array])?)
97 matches
Mail list logo
