On Thu, 18 May 2000, jim t.p. ryan wrote:
> Any suggestions as how one could back this machine up? I don't want to
> leave any of the client machines up at night. All the shares will be on
> the same physical device. I could put a tape drive in the Linux box. So
> the backup would have to be e
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Kevin D. Clark wrote:
> I haven't read the other book mentioned in this thread, but I'd say
> that you can't go wrong with reading AEleen's.
I've read (at least good sized chunks of) both; both are good, but I
thought Nemeth was better. It doesn't go into as much detail as
On Fri, 19 May 2000, Paul Lussier wrote:
>
> In a message dated: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:47:09 EDT
> Benjamin Scott said:
>
> > It is a good book, although it is a bit dated, and pretty much
> completely >ignores the free Unixes. :( Sure, it kind of pre-dates
> Linux, the BSDs have >been around a
In a message dated: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:36:48 EDT
"Kevin D. Clark" said:
>
>Paul Lussier writes:
>
>> AEleen's book spends entirely too much time in Sun/Linux land, and not
>> enough time covering the general basics.
>
>I must politely disagree.
Okay :) I also must admit, I've only read the fi
Paul Lussier writes:
> AEleen's book spends entirely too much time in Sun/Linux land, and not enough
> time covering the general basics.
I must politely disagree.
AEleen's books (I've owned both editions) have helped get me through
sysadmin problems on AIX, HPUX, IRIX and a tiny few problems
In a message dated: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:47:09 EDT
Benjamin Scott said:
> It is a good book, although it is a bit dated, and pretty much completely
>ignores the free Unixes. :( Sure, it kind of pre-dates Linux, the BSDs have
>been around a lot longer. For commercial Unix systems, though, you'
Hi,
>Any suggestions as how one could back this machine up?
Following up on this question...I read about the Logical Volume Manager project
some time ago. Actually, I read the Howto of it. My question is if anybody has
tried it, and how suitable it is for production. I mean I wouldn't love to us
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
On 5/18/00, 4:29:48 PM, "jim t.p. ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
regarding Re: Windows front end to a backu
On Thu, 18 May 2000, "jim t.p. ryan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyway, so I don't reinvent the wheel, does anybody know of a web based
> interface to a backup program?
Here's one:
Backup linuxbox
Seriously, you may find something like that (amanda?) but it is
somewhat dicey becaus
u, 18 May 2000 16:27:59 -0400 (EDT)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows front end to a backup utility?
jim t.p. ryan writes:
[please wrap your lines at around 75 columns]
> But here is the problem that I have. This application is one that I
> want
jim t.p. ryan writes:
[please wrap your lines at around 75 columns]
> But here is the problem that I have. This application is one that I
> want to put on a machine that, in all other respects, has a very
> intuitive web interface. One adds users, shares, printers etc via
> this. It would be
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Windows front end to a backup utility?
On Thu, 18 May 2000, jim t.p. ryan wrote:
> Picture a small office. All client machines are winsdows based (NTWK or Win9x).
>One Linux based file/print server. People will use this as a common share as well as
>pers
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Derek Martin wrote:
> There is a good section on data archiving in Evi Nemeth's (et. al.)
> _Unix_System_Administration_Handbook_. I suggest you give it a good
> once-over.
>
> Note to all GNHLUGers: Based on the number of times Paul and I have
> mentioned this book, in or
On Thu, 18 May 2000, jim t.p. ryan wrote:
> Picture a small office. All client machines are winsdows based (NTWK or Win9x).
>One Linux based file/print server. People will use this as a common share as well as
>personal shares. No monitor keyboard or mouse on the box. Configured and manage
In a message dated: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:23:49 PDT
"jim t.p. ryan" said:
>True, and I'll have to read about rsync, but I was hoping for something a litt
>le more "traditional" in terms of rotation and off-site storage.
Well, can you log into the linux box via telnet, rlogin, ssh, etc?
If you ca
> Picture a small office. All client machines are winsdows based (NTWK or Win9x).
>One Linux based file/print server. People will use this as a common share as well as
>personal shares. No monitor keyboard or mouse on the box. Configured and managed
>from a browser.
Sounds like a customer
Picture a small office. All client machines are winsdows based (NTWK or Win9x). One
Linux based file/print server. People will use this as a common share as well as
personal shares. No monitor keyboard or mouse on the box. Configured and managed
from a browser.
Any suggestions as how one
17 matches
Mail list logo
