Re: [google-appengine] MASSIVE ApiProxy$CancelledException Exceptions since Friday Night.

that have run into this issue. -- Chris Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Scott Murphy wrote: > I have been experiencing MASSIVE ApiProxy$CancelledException exceptions > since Friday night. > My instances start up times are also

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Dashboard error when trying to add custom domain

Hi fayerm@, Just tested this myself, and was able to add a domain to one of my apps. Is this still an issue for you? Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, App Engine On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:05 AM, tempy wrote: > Sorry for the *bump* post, I don't usually do this on these forums, >

Re: [google-appengine] Feature Request I Think....

Hey Brandon, A timely post indeed. Amongst the team, we've been discussing this exact problem. Splitting your app out into smaller apps has a handful of benefits, one of which is the ability to fine tune the performance settings for each app. I'd love to hear more about your design. For example:

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Feature Request I Think....

Great feedback. Here's the model that I've been envisioning: - I have foo.com and foo.com/api - foo.com serves up my UI and needs to be super-fast - foo.com/api serves up non-realtime API requests - both route to a separate App Engine app - foo.com has max pending latency of 200ms, and several idl

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Feature Request I Think....

On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 7:27 PM, James X Nelson wrote: > I definitely, absolutely love the idea of having appengine internally > route foo.com/api to api.foo.appspot.com. An under-the-covers targeting > of different apps/versions is the only way I can think of to get ssl for > the whole app witho

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Feature Request I Think....

e /api app. Example, if I get a huge burst of traffic, for > certain types of recs I would much rather build a queue backlog rather > than spin up new 10s latency instances. TQFTW. stevep. > > On Nov 29, 11:36 am, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > > Great feedback. Here's the mod

Re: [google-appengine] Google Cloud Storage API

Hey Jeff, What errors are you seeing? Do you know that you have a valid readChannel? -- Chris On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Jeff Morgan wrote: > Is it possible to read a binary file from GCS using the GAE API? The > example provided in the GAE documentation works great but a text file but >

Re: [google-appengine] State of Python 2.7

Hey Andrin, Python 2.7 is very close to being announced as GA. We're monitoring the apps that have already moved over to 2.7 and are making some final performance tweaks -- things are looking good. Trust me, we want to get this door as bad as any one else. -- Chris Product Manager, Google App En

Re: [google-appengine] Google, time for a little housekeeping

Thanks for the heads up. We have changes for both that will be rolled out shortly. Not quite "spring cleaning", but close enough. -- Chris On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:17 AM, Kenneth wrote: > The roadmap page needs > updating, I think there have

Re: [google-appengine] Google, time for a little housekeeping

ish than annoucing Java as a "new > feature" to AppEngine... I reported in a few blog posts, but they are not > updated yet. > > Docs are outdated too. > > Em terça-feira, 21 de fevereiro de 2012 18h31min23s UTC-2, Chris Ramsdale > escreveu: >> >> Thanks f

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Huge number of datastore reads?

Dave, Sorry that you had issues with Checkout. We continue to work with them on improvements that they should make to the service (and I've forward this thread on to them). Setting your budget higher is probably not a bad idea, but totally up to you. I think the pros and cons have been outlined (

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Appengine 1.6.3 Python 2.7 - Error 404

Split versions do share MemCache. -- Chris On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 7:59 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > Does traffic split versions share MemCache? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Google App Engine" group. > To post to this group, send email to

Re: [google-appengine] My expirencie with python 2.7 and others

Hey Felippe, Have you considered bumping your instance class and enabling threadsafe? We have seen a handful of customers that have had success doing just this. Also, did you hear back from the premier account folks? If not, send me your app IDs (offline if you'd like) and I'll get the ball rolli

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Outages?

make the move over to HRD. It's the quickest and most long-term fix that you can make. -- Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 2:33 PM, Amit Sangani wrote: > Hi Ikan, > > We wouldn't mind moving to HRD from M/S, but isn't it 3X more exp

[google-appengine] Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

*Hey App Engine Users,* * Almost 4 years after launch, we’ve seen fantastic growth both in Google App Engine and the apps that run on it. And although the Master/Slave Datastore was a big part of our early success, it's tim

Re: [google-appengine] Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

se > master-slave. I have not spoken to anyone who regretted the move to > high-replication. > > > Robert > > > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 15:42, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > > Hey App Engine Users, > > > > Almost 4 years after launch, we’ve seen fantastic g

Re: [google-appengine] Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

Andrew, Regarding the migration of all data from all namespaces (as well as other updates to the migration tools), we're actively working on these changes. The initial HRD migration tools was the first iteration and Blobstore migration was the next. And now that we've announced the deprecation of

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

ler wrote: > We've already lasted 4 years, which makes us an outlier in your list :-). > > > On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Andrei wrote: > >> will gae last 3 years? >> google wave, google buzz, ... gae? >> >> On Apr 4, 11:20 pm, Andrei wrote: >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

4:16 PM, Andrei wrote: > > > will gae last 3 years? > > > google wave, google buzz, ... gae? > > > > > On Apr 4, 11:20 pm, Andrei wrote: > > > > 3 years from now? > > > > > > On Apr 4, 4:42 pm, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > > > > &

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Master/Slave Datastore, thanks for all your hard work

more exceptions than most shared MySQL hosting >>> > outside. I know I know, its about scalability. But how many apps are >>> > having hundreds or thousands of DB access every second that can >>> benefit >>> > from its scalability which can compensate the cons

Re: [google-appengine] Migration to HRD - 4 days - Not done

Hey Aswath, I've asked some folks to take a look back here. I'll let you know what we find out. -- Chris On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 6:55 PM, Aswath Satrasala wrote: > I have started of a migration to HRD about 4 days ago. > > It is still in the copy phase of the process. I even tried 'Pause' and

Re: [google-appengine] Google checkout must die

Hey Jeff, Thanks for venting, this is a vicious cycle that needs to be fixed. We've addressed several issues that land people in the 'Free' => 'Activating...' => 'Free' bucket. These fixes will be rolled out with 1.6.5. Next? Look into speeding up Checkout all together. -- Chris On Fri, Apr

Re: [google-appengine] EMERGENCY: Entity serialization broke yesterday

Hey Jeff, We're looking into this and will follow-up as soon as we have more info. -- Chris On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > A lot of Objectify users are reporting an NPE with a stack trace that > looks like this: > > java.lang.NullPointerException >at > com.goo

Re: [google-appengine] EMERGENCY: Entity serialization broke yesterday

ay 16, 2012 at 10:15 AM, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > Hey Jeff, > > We're looking into this and will follow-up as soon as we have more info. > > -- Chris > > > On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 9:57 AM, Jeff Schnitzer wrote: > >> A lot of Objectify users are reporting an NPE

Re: [google-appengine] Get this off my screen: Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with App Engine?

This is a user satisfaction survey that we introduced in 1.6.6. If you click on one of the options, we'll anonymously capture your response and the survey will not be displayed until sometime in the distant future. You can chose to rate your experience low, but we hope that you'll provide honest

Re: [google-appengine] Get this off my screen: Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with App Engine?

It seems that I was a bit hasty in my response. We're rolling this back and apologize for the inconvenience. I'll follow-up here once the rollback is complete. -- Chris On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 6:02 AM, Mat Jaggard wrote: > Also, it was stated that this was an "Optional Survey" - clearly it is

Re: [google-appengine] Get this off my screen: Overall, how satisfied or dissatisfied are you with App Engine?

This change has been rolled back. If you're still seeing the satisfaction survey, please email me directly at cramsd...@google.com. -- Chris On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:55 PM, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > It seems that I was a bit hasty in my response. We're rolling this back > a

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Datastore Statistics Not Updating

Datastore statistics and billing data are generated by separate map reduce jobs. Currently there is an issue with the job that updates the datastore stats on a daily basis, and we're investigating potential fixes. I'll send out an update as soon as we have more information. -- Chris On Mon, Jun

Re: [google-appengine] Google to add new runtime at I/O

Completely fair point. That said: - do folks find this page, and its content, useful? - does it change whether or not you would use the platform or a particular feature? - is there a more desirable channel for communicating this information? -- Chris Product Manager, Google App Engine On F

Re: [google-appengine] Google to add new runtime at I/O

thanks for all of the solid feedback. while we do rely on our blog as the push channel for new releases it sounds like a) folks find the consolidated list beneficial, but b) the frequency of updates needs to be higher. makes sense. let us get the I/O release out the door (announcement coming nex

[google-appengine] Upcoming Change to Datastore Auto IDs

Hello App Engine folks, In the upcoming 1.8.1 release, the Datastore default auto ID policy in production will switch to scattered IDs to improve performance. This change will take effect for all versions of your app uploaded with the 1.8.1 SDK. You can preview the new behavior in the dev server,

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.8.1 Pre-release SDKs Available.

to move to General Availability (GA). We encourage developers to start moving over to the new Cloud Storage Client Library as soon as possible. Information on getting started can be found at the open source project linked below. https://code.google.com/p/appengine-gcs-client/ Cheers, -- Chr

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Deploy issues

hey Renzo / Tony-- there don't appear to be any systemic issues, but we're double checking just in case. i'll post an follow-ups here. -- Chris Product Manager, Google App Engine On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 12:56 PM, Tony França wrote: > Having the same issue as Renzo with our Python app. > > Ac

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.8.1 Pre-release SDKs Available.

hey Chris, et al.-- a bunch of great feedback that we'll continue to address. in regards to timeline, we have no plans of decommissioning this API before end of year. that said, assuming the following: - App Engine <=> Google Cloud Storage performance is equivalent to (if not better than)

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.8.1 Pre-release SDKs Available.

Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox> for iPad > > > On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 8:05 AM, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > >> hey Chris, et al.-- >> >> a bunch of great feedback that we'll continue to address. in regards to >> timeline, we have

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Upcoming Change to Datastore Auto IDs

AM UTC+8, Vinny P wrote: >> >> >> On Friday, May 24, 2013 7:04:08 PM UTC-5, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >>> >>> In the upcoming 1.8.1 release, the Datastore default auto ID policy in >>> production will switch to scattered IDs to improve performance. >>>

Re: [google-appengine] Deploy issues

Just to follow-up, if you run into further deployment-related issues, please submit an issue with app ID and exact times. if there is no response, you can reach out to me directly and i'll get the right internal teams looking at it. thanks... -- Chris On Friday, June 7, 2013, Chris Ram

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

re: multi-core, you can os.fork() in Python and ForkJoinPoolsin Java. re: Google Groups, we can only do so much :) -- Chris On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:58 PM, pdknsk wrote: > How does this work on multi-core VMs I

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

some comments inline below. -- Chris On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 7:59 AM, Nicolas Fonrose (Teevity) < nicolas.fonr...@teevity.com> wrote: > That really is a great news ! > > And it is something that makes AppEngine so much simpler to use in > situation where we have to mix between PaaS and IaaS! >

Re: [google-appengine] Search API questions for app engine team

We're looking into per-index limits with a more relaxed aggregate index limit. This is still in the research phase and I expect the total 250 GB limit to persist through GA. Feel free to reach out directly if this limit is blocking your use of the Search API. -- Chris On Jun 25, 2013 9:46 AM, "Mah

Re: [google-appengine] Re: HR Migration - SSL VIP question

hey John, i'm checking with our internal teams on this. would you mind following up with an off-list email (to cramsd...@google.com) with the app IDs in question and we'll have a closer look. thanks. -- Chris On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 12:47 AM, johnP wrote: > bump... > > I'm assuming this is a

Re: [google-appengine] Downtime Notifications US / EU & EU Status Page

great feedback. we're working on a revamp of the status site and will definitely have views into all regions. look for posts to downtime notify to start including region along with other impact quantification. thanks, -- Chris On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Marcel Manz wrote: > We would b

Re: [google-appengine] Moving application to European datacenter?

Peter, we're still building out our footprint in the EU clusters and are controlling the flow of new users to ensure a high quality of service. we're looking to removing the manual whitelisting soon. in the meantime, i can enable this support for you. simply send a direct email to cramsd...@goo

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Sunsetting double wildcard SSL certificate support for applications serving from appspot.com

Tobias, Our apologies that this impacted your application and customers. The initial communication was sent our several months ago with suggested changes that developers should make to transition off of double wildcard certs. I realize that this may have missed your inbox. Moving forward, these

Re: [google-appengine] Widespread transaction failures under 1.8.2

Jason, we haven't updated any Datastore backends at this point, so this seems a bit strange. is this still an issue for you? -- Chris On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Jason Collins wrote: > We are seeing a significant uptick in datastore transaction failures under > 1.8.2. > > Is anyone else

Re: [google-appengine] Running App Engine Instance 1.8.2

hey folks, in regard to the issues related to App Engine Modules (previously "Servers") and 1.8.2, you were seeing the side effects of a name change ("Servers" => "Modules") that took place with the 1.8.2 rollout. i had sent out a communication to all Modules users a few weeks back that we were m

Re: [google-appengine] Running App Engine Instance 1.8.2

y regarding pre-released/trusted > testers features? > > > Thanks up front for clarifying. > > > PK > http://www.gae123.com > > On July 16, 2013 at 9:28:31 AM, Chris Ramsdale (cramsd...@google.com) > wrote: > > hey folks, > > in regard to the issues related to A

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Modules vs Backends

good feedback. perhaps the documentation could have been a bit clearer, "we suggest that you start looking into Modules". the feature is scheduled to go to GA in the next 3 releases. they will in fact subsume Backends, with the following being the preferred architecture for larger GAE apps: app

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Modules vs Backends

rmup > requests for front end instances in the docs on modules. Do/Will they > still exist for auto scaled frontends? > > T > > On Friday, July 26, 2013 5:44:09 AM UTC+8, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> good feedback. perhaps the documentation could have been a bit clearer

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Blobstore file-like API deprecation timeline (py 2.7 runtime) [XPOST from StackOverflow]

while there's currently no defined date for decommissioning this API, we are committed to supporting it throughout the remainder of the year (2013). please don't hesitate to reach out to me directly (cramsd...@google.com), if you have further questions (this thread is fine as well). -- Chris Pro

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.8.3 Pre-Release SDKs are now available.

i replied on the original thread. let's move the conversation there. On Tue, Jul 30, 2013 at 6:33 AM, rdodev wrote: > Hey Richmond, > > I still have not gotten an answer (not even a ballpark one) about the > timeline for final removal of the blobstore file-like API for python 2.7 > runtime. If

Re: [google-appengine] GAE Blobstore file-like API deprecation timeline (py 2.7 runtime) [XPOST from StackOverflow]

> I will copy-pasta your reply to the thread in StackOverflow, there were a > few people interested in the response as well. > > Best, > Ruben > > On Tuesday, July 30, 2013 8:17:21 PM UTC-4, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> while there's currently no defined date for de

Re: [google-appengine] Re: 1.8.3 Pre-Release SDKs are now available.

Thanks! On Jul 31, 2013 4:07 PM, "rdodev" wrote: > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-appengine/b0bElNbdVDU > > On Wednesday, July 31, 2013 6:43:58 PM UTC-4, jon wrote: >> >> Chris may I ask where the original thread is? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed t

Re: [google-appengine] Re: App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

Manual scaling for a V1 launch, but we're looking into auto-scaling. -- Chris On Thu, Aug 8, 2013 at 1:47 AM, Andrew First wrote: > This is great! Any plans to support autoscaling as well? > > Andrew > > > On Thursday, June 20, 2013 12:21:06 PM UTC-7, Takashi Matsuo (Google) > wrote: > >> >> F

Re: [google-appengine] Re: MapReduce Roadmap

PK, We're definitely planning on moving mapreduce to GA. Plan is to get the API finalized and then move it through the std Preview => GA channel. Questions for you: - how would prefer to access the library itself? - is there something about having it outside of the SDK that causes substantial f

Re: [google-appengine] Re: MapReduce Roadmap

;can=5&colspec=ID%20Type%20Status%20Priority%20Component%20Owner%20Summary> > or Issue > 203<https://code.google.com/p/appengine-mapreduce/issues/detail?id=203> > map reduce is broken since r534) > > Thanks, > PK > > On December 5, 2013 at 8:27:33 PM,

[google-appengine] An ode to Sharkon

tform family, while still paying homage to Sharkon. For more information, including a great writeup on the history of the original logo, be sure to checkout our latest blog post: http://googlecloudplatform.blogspot.com/2013/12/an-ode-to-sharkon.html Cheers! -- Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Googl

Re: [google-appengine] APP DOWN due to some sort of undocumented Google security system

Jeff, et al.-- We have verified that a configuration change on our side led to certain requests being denied / redirected. The rollback of this change started earlier this morning and should be completed shortly. We are actively looking into measures that we can take to ensure that issues like t

Re: [google-appengine] APP DOWN due to some sort of undocumented Google security system

have told you > was going to break it. > > sorry, but we're bailing on appengine as soon as we can. > > > > On Thursday, August 2, 2012 1:46:14 PM UTC-4, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> Jeff, et al.-- >> >> We have verified that a configuration ch

Re: [google-appengine] APP DOWN due to some sort of undocumented Google security system

something which we could have told you > was going to break it. > > sorry, but we're bailing on appengine as soon as we can. > > > > On Thursday, August 2, 2012 1:46:14 PM UTC-4, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> Jeff, et al.-- >> >> We have verified that a

Re: [google-appengine] APP DOWN due to some sort of undocumented Google security system

billing for my appid > fixed. If you can't figure it out, feel free to contact me privately. > > jon > > > On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Chris Ramsdale > wrote: > > Rick, > > > > We publish upcoming features and functionality within the "App Engi

[google-appengine] Datastore Storage - Usage Stats for Aug 10th

quest.py?contact_type=cloud_platform_billing> . Regards, Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google App Engine" group. To post to this group, send email to google-appengine@googlegroups.com. To unsubs

Re: [google-appengine] HardDeadlineExceededError - Production Issue

Nick, We're looking into this and will update you if there are any system-wide issues. If you are looking for support options with a higher SLA, you may want to consider upgrading to a Premier Account . -- Chris Product Manager, Google App

Re: [google-appengine] delete Master/Slave application after migration without deleting data

Glad you made the move. Mind pinging me off thread with the app ID so that we can dig in further? -- Chris Product Manager, Google App Engine On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 4:20 PM, c h wrote: > So i finally finished my migration to HIgh Replication, and i want to > delete my old app so that i don'

[google-appengine] Re: European hosted apps - when will $500 fee be lifted?

Thanks for the feedback. It's not a charge to run within the EU datacenters, rather it's that we're only offering this ability to premier customers as we expand out our capacity within these datacenters. We'll be expanding out the offering to all billing enabled apps very soon. -- Chris Prod

Re: [google-appengine] Re: European hosted apps - when will $500 fee be lifted?

rs that are interested. http://goo.gl/ZgOjX -- Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine On Mon, Oct 8, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Matthew Pease wrote: > Is there a bug out there that we can +1? > > I'm also starting a service focused on Europe. Latency is a big issue. > Just ask an

Re: [google-appengine] Fwd: [Action Required] Update your domain's CNAME record

Deepak, things should continue to work correctly. the PageSpeed-related message you received is in regard to non-App Engine domains that are PageSpeed enabled. -- Chris On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Deepak Singh wrote: > Hi, > > Through App engine, we enable / disable page-speed-service. On

[google-appengine] App Engine Servers - Trusted Tester Sign-up

Based on input we'll select a small group of trusted testers. App Engine Servers - Trusted Tester Sign-up<https://docs.google.com/a/google.com/forms/d/1qjuLxnAHQeq2YQMCMAITbC6St_NrfzHDxrbkuTqvmfY/viewform> Cheers! Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine -- You received this mes

[google-appengine] Java 7 Runtime - Trusted Tester Sign-up

Fellow App Engine Users, In the 1.7.3 blogpostwe mentioned that in an upcoming release we will be upgrading our Java runtime to Java 7. Before doing so though, we'd like to get as many developers as possible test driving t

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine Servers - Trusted Tester Sign-up

Hey Brandon, Added you to the TT group and sent you an invite. Let me know if you don't get an email. -- Chris On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Brandon Wirtz wrote: > We applied. This is our exact use case. > > ** ** > > This would solve many of the limitations we run in to, and save us a

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

We are currently experiencing an issue with Google App Engine and some applications are experiencing elevated latency levels and error rates. For everyone who is affected, we apologize - we know you count on Google to work for you and we're working hard to restore normal operation. We will provide

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > We are currently experiencing an issue with Google App Engine and some > applications are experiencing elevated latency levels and error rates. For > everyone who is affected, we apologize - we know you count on Google to > work for you and we're working hard

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

We continue to work at a resolution in regard to current App Engine issue. Error rates should continue to decline for affected applications and we will provide another status update by 12:00 PM PST. -- Chris Product Manager, Google App Engine On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Chris Ramsdale

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

better. We will provide a more detailed analysis of this incident once we have completed our internal investigation. Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > We continue to work at a resolution in regard to current App Eng

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Console issues?

App Engine Status > page to reflect real life. For me, for the past few weeks App Engine has > been unstable. > > > On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 11:37:05 AM UTC-8, Chris Ramsdale wrote: > >> We continue to work at a resolution in regard to current App Engine >> issue. Er

Re: [google-appengine] Appengine outage for our app

Hey Richard, There were no system-wide issues around this time. If you'll send me your app ID(s) offline, I'll have someone take a look on our side. Thanks... -- Chris Product Manager, Google App Engine On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 8:01 PM, Richard Druce wrote: > We had an outage of about 40 min

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Problems with deploying

We are investigating deployment issues related to a single data center and will send an update once we have more information. Chris Ramsdale Product Manager, Google App Engine On Feb 2, 2013 9:45 AM, "Saurabh Gupta" wrote: > Google has not acknowledged this as an issue. In fac

Re: [google-appengine] Anyone using EU-datacenter option outside Premier Accounts?

Hey Juha, Email me offline (include the username that you would like the service provisioned for) and we'll get this taken care of. -- Chris On Fri, Feb 1, 2013 at 11:57 PM, Juha Koskela wrote: > Hi, > > I signed up for the "Google App Engine is extending its European offering > to non-premie

[google-appengine] Re: App Engine blocked in certain regions?

Hello Sandro, Google restricts access to some of its business services in certain countries or regions, such as Crimea, Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Sudan, and Syria. If you try to access services from these countries or regions, the error you cited (or similar ones) will appear. let me know if yo

Re: [google-appengine] App Engine VM-based Backends - Trusted Tester Sign-up

yes, you can use JDO, JPA, Objectify, etc. when running on a Managed VM (previously referred to as "VM Backend"). let me know if you need more clarification. -- Chris On Wednesday, April 9, 2014, Rafael wrote: > Also in my case. The only reason why we stick with appengine and are not > on GCE

Re: [google-appengine] Future of App Engine Classic runtimes

hey David, the existing runtimes, and overall runtime environment, will not be frozen and we will continue to provide updates and new functionality. in terms of new runtimes, an upgrade to Java 8 is on the near-term roadmap. -- Chris On Tue, Oct 20, 2015 at 4:36 PM, David Cohen wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Massive GAE latency since 10:00 GMT

If you can email me application IDs, we can take a look. -- Chris On Feb 1, 2016 4:24 PM, "Nick (Cloud Platform Support)" wrote: > Thanks for moving this to the issue tracker, since it's the best forum to > get such support. I wish you luck in having the issue triaged quickly. > > On Monday, Feb

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Security Issues in App Engine

For completeness here... Google is aware of the post from Security Explorations on the Full Disclosure mailing list. We definitely take reports of vulnerabilities in our products very seriously and we are investigating the findings in this post. We are working with the researcher who has reporte

Re: [google-appengine] Re: "One senses GAE is just not a major priority for Google"

re: Python 3, we're actively building a new hosting environment that is based on containerized virtual machines, today called Managed VMs. with this new architecture we'll be able to update existing (and build new) application runtimes at a much faster pace. in fact, a Google-provided Python 3 ru

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Google Cloud Platform wants to hear from you

Hey Folks, Chris Ramsdale, Lead Product Manager for App Engine here. This is definitely some great feedback. I’ve taken a stab at responding to some of the key points below [in bold]. Don’t hesitate to follow-up on this thread or reach out to me privately. Thanks

Re: [google-appengine] Google Cloud Platform wants to hear from you

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:22 PM, Vinny P wrote: > Hi Katie, > > I think Karl's post hit a home run and I'm happy to see the positive > response to his post. Let me just tack on a few items: > > > *Managed VMs:* The development toolchain for Managed VMs can be a bit > finicky. To be quite honest

Re: [google-appengine] Google Cloud Platform wants to hear from you

tly. if anything, we're going to make those same APIs available from other compute environments (e.g. Compute Engine and Container Engine). > > On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 8:31:47 AM UTC+2, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:22 PM, V

Re: [google-appengine] Google Cloud Platform wants to hear from you

able to deploy Managed VMs to our default modules, > perform traffic splitting, access the logging api's and realtime api's, > etc? These are the things that have been traditionally missing from managed > vms. > > On Wednesday, April 22, 2015 at 10:33:46 AM UTC-7, Chris

Re: [google-appengine] Google Cloud Platform wants to hear from you

ont end traffic over it. > > For background processing the value is so high that we've moved all of our > backend modules to managed vms (unless they need any of the above API's). > > On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 2:24:59 PM UTC-7, Chris Ramsdale wrote: >> >> yes, the g

Re: [google-appengine] The future of prospective search

hey Frederik, the prospective search API has been in Alpha way too long, i agree. we're currently working through options on what to do with that particular API moving forward. the functionality is very useful (IMO), but the underlying integration between the backend service (internal to Google)

Re: [google-appengine] Re: Deleted default Google Cloud Storage bucket, unable to recreate

well, this isn't cool. let me look into what's going on here and see if we can add a fix. at minimum, we shouldn't allow you to delete the default bucket (we use if for other services) and get yourself into a horked state. -- Chris On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Sean Lynch wrote: > While GCS

Re: [google-appengine] Re: URGENT: 1.9.25 causes many errors in my python app

PK, this is not the way that this should roll out. reach out to me personally and i'll credit you for the support costs. in the parallel i've reached out to the Python team to see what the root cause was here. -- Chris Product Manager, Google Cloud Platform On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 8:31 PM, Di