Re: Digest for google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com - 6 updates in 1 topic

@Craig Mitchell. What version of Java SDK do you use with the eclipse 2021 06. I would like to use the eclipse plugin as well. It has been a long time since I worked with GWT. On Fri, Oct 8, 2021 at 6:02 AM wrote: > google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com >

Re: Unknown argument: -superDevMode

-superDevMode -remoteUI "${gwt_remote_ui_server_port}:${unique_id}" >> -startupUrl ChordEarTrainer.html -logLevel INFO -codeServerPort 9997 -port >> -war >> C:\Users\James-PC\workspace\FINALWORKINGSPACE1\ChordEarTrainer\war >> com.sinewavemultimedia.chordeartrainer.

Client to client communication

to me what control over port numbers and Sockets I have in GWT. Does any one have any information on this? James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "GWT Users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an

Re: Problem compiling GWT code with Java9

If you aren't using java 9 modules, the latest release will work. It does this by reading the classpath from System.getProperty("java.class.path"), so if you are using standard tools for creating classpath, everything should work fine. If you are doing anything non-standard for assigning clas

ER tool

I like to use GWT or Vaadin to draw ER diagram. I came cross JointJs as well as https://www.lienzo-core.com/lienzo-ks/. There is no GWT wrapper for JointJS. Lienzon seems promising to me. How do you think? Thanks, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Custom Events and Elements with Elemental 2

Anyway, once again: I would strongly recommend avoiding all use of shadow root unless you really enjoy debugging bleeding edge bugs. :D On Tuesday, October 17, 2017 at 7:48:25 PM UTC-7, James Nelson wrote: > > It is possible to create web components with "fake" ES2015 classes built

Re: Custom Events and Elements with Elemental 2

It is possible to create web components with "fake" ES2015 classes built out of raw javascript. https://github.com/WeTheInternet/xapi/blob/master/gwt/components/src/main/java/xapi/components/impl/WebComponentBuilder.java#L108 Note that the library above depends on a custom fork of Gwt that is no

Re: Problem compiling GWT code with Java9

Hi. I am currently very busy this week, but can try to schedule a push to maven central this weekend (I have other people waiting on it to use various other tools I dabble in as well). Please remind me if I don't post links back here by next Monday. Worst case scenario, I can just upload jars

Re: Problem compiling GWT code with Java9

Also, the reason gwt.xml files aren't loading sanely has to do with how resources are handled in java 9. You are going to have to either declare your source modules (with the gwt.xml) as `open` (no documentation for this, I found it trolling JCP forums), or you can open your module to your gwt

Re: Problem compiling GWT code with Java9

Hi. Per this thread: https://plus.google.com/+JamesNelsonX/posts/gBfpBDnwV9V I have actually dove into Java 9 support, and cleared all the roadblocks once (before the JCP pushback force the module system to get more last minute changes). The main issue was not language support (easy upgrade fr

GWT Logging

an issue with a new version of iOS on the device either. Have any of you seen this error happen in your own apps and was there an issue that you found that might be of some help to me trying to diagnose my own issue? I'd appreciate any help or answers that can be offered. Thanks, James --

Re: Emulating CompletableFuture with Promise

This is brilliant. I would *love *to see this in GWT proper. Maybe even a separate library temporarily since it won't make the 2.8.0 release train? On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 2:41 PM Andrei Korzhevskii wrote: > In this case I wanted 'new Promise', not 'Promise.resolve'. Thanks for > spotting that ou

Re: Problem with 2.8.0 rc1 SDM

Updating gson to 2.6.x fixed it for me On Thursday, August 11, 2016 at 10:04:44 PM UTC+1, Alberto Mancini wrote: > > Hello, > in the attempt of porting an internal project from beta1 to rc1 we faced > an issue i do not understand how to debug. > > The project uses errai but my feeling is that th

Re: Problem with 2.8.0 rc1 SDM

Ah, just realized this was discussed in more detail at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/google-web-toolkit/-c4RR6oLr2o I'll check my gson dep and report back On Thursday, August 25, 2016 at 11:28:58 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote: > > Meant to say that I'm seeing the

Re: Problem with 2.8.0 rc1 SDM

Meant to say that I'm seeing the same error after switching from beta-2 to rc2 On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 11:15 PM James Horsley wrote: > Doesn't the CodeServer need the gwt-dev.jar though? > > > On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 3:45:03 PM UTC+1, viviana zimbone wrote: >

Re: Problem with 2.8.0 rc1 SDM

Doesn't the CodeServer need the gwt-dev.jar though? On Tuesday, August 23, 2016 at 3:45:03 PM UTC+1, viviana zimbone wrote: > > If you have a maven dependency for gwt-dev, removing it shoudl fix the > issue :) > > Il giorno martedì 16 agosto 2016 11:03:03 UTC+2, Alberto Mancini ha > scritto: >>

Re: GWT 2.8.0 RC2 is here!

I saw there were some commits to master after RC2 was cut. Are there plans to cut an RC3 or just roll those commits into the GA? On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 5:31 PM Alexander Polunochev wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > Link to download SDK on the official page still points to RC1. > http://www.gwtproject.org

Re: Ui Binder Alternatives

Something like Elemento + Elemental 2 seems like a great lightweight choice in the future. FWIW I agree with Paul that UiBinder plus some top layer of the widget API (UIObject, Widget, etc.) will get ported over to work with GWT 3.0 by the community. There's no reason it can't work with Java APT +

Re: GWT React

Great work Paul. Thanks for sharing. On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:57 PM Paul Stockley wrote: > I plan on doing this. I have a couple of things I need to prove out then I > will start working on setting up the Github projects. I will post a preview > to my google drive in a couple of weeks so you ca

Re: Is anybody of you guys using GWT with Lombok?

I haven't used Lombok due to similar reasons as Jens described but have had really great success with annotation processing libraries like Immutables ( http://immutables.github.io/), AutoValue, etc. I've even started writing my own annotation processors to help reduce boilerplate. On Wed, Mar 16,

Re: What is j2cl?

Ok. So, I have Map, how do I map that to goog.structs.Map? The closure objects do not behave 100% the same as the java objects, and if you expect your code to do the same thing on every platform (very common, reasonable expectation), then you can't pick an emulation library that is functional

Re: What is j2cl?

Marko, even is the closure libs were extended to look like java Map/Set, that does not replace the need to emulate Map/Set. Gwt already has its own versions of HashMap and ilk, and even if they could compile them directly to closure types, we would STILL need to use the java.util.* apis, because

Re: GWT release prioritization

Any chance someone from the steering committee could comment on this? On 3 August 2015 at 09:37, maticpetek wrote: > 1+ > > > On Friday, July 31, 2015 at 11:39:00 AM UTC+2, James Horsley wrote: >> >> Firstly, I am very much looking forward to the next generation j2cl

GWT release prioritization

al. I, and I'm sure the rest of the GWT community, would greatly appreciate a clearer view on current release expectations and prioritization; is there anything you guys can share on that front? Again, really appreciate the recent work and love the plans for GWT 3.0. Cheers, James -- You r

Re: Research on Elemental

Is it recommended to use the current elemental API even though it's not based on JsInterop yet? For example, if I use the current elemental API, can I expect that Elemental 2.0 should be a fairly easy transition? On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 5:14 PM Lukas Glowania wrote: > Great resource! Thanks a lo

Re: Important videos from GWT Meet-up 2015

On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 11:18 AM Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Sunday, June 21, 2015 at 11:17:50 AM UTC+2, James Horsley wrote: >> >> Also worth noting that, outside of GWT-RPC, I think that many of the >> current major GWT features (widgets, uibinder, etc.) could be port

Re: Important videos from GWT Meet-up 2015

Also worth noting that, outside of GWT-RPC, I think that many of the current major GWT features (widgets, uibinder, etc.) could be ported by the community such that only minor code changes are necessary. I would even hazard a guess that companies like Vaadin might be interested in supporting or at

Re: Important videos from GWT Meet-up 2015

Someone in the video commented that there needs to be a very clear messaging around how to best protect/"future proof" yourself. The Modernizing GWT video was obviously a step in that direction but I'd love to see something more concrete e.g. if UiBinder won't be supported, what should we be using?

Default/Defender Method Support in JsInterop

2.8 or not. Cheers, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group,

Re: SuperDevMode Running With GWT 2.6.1 (ant/Command Line)

t the time. So with SuperDevMode it took me a LONG time to try just running my server and pointing my web browser at it without any funky parameters like you do with DevMode. James On Sunday, April 19, 2015 at 3:31:53 AM UTC-5, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > Did you stumble on https://stackove

SuperDevMode Running With GWT 2.6.1 (ant/Command Line)

k your "Dev Mode On" bookmark to recompile and reload. It's a little clunky having to click the button to recompile, but it's a whole lot better than running an old version of a browser. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups &q

Re: Issues with sourceLevel in latest 2.8.0-snapshot

o dist-dev. If I go back to isolate the change that's making it work I'll report back to this thread. Thanks for your help. Cheers, James On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:51 PM Jens wrote: > > Thanks. I'm using ant with some custom build targets and passing in >> sourceLevel usin

Re: Issues with sourceLevel in latest 2.8.0-snapshot

l do some additional verification and report back. Cheers, James On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:01 PM Jens wrote: > I have a custom build from 3rd April which only adds some Java 8 API > emulation patches and it works without issues when using -sourceLevel 1.8 . > > Maybe you are not passing

Issues with sourceLevel in latest 2.8.0-snapshot

I was using an older version of the 2.8.0-snapshot jars just fine, but after pulling in the latest versions from sonatype I've started getting the error "Lambda expressions are allowed only at source level 1.8 or above". Adding "-sourceLevel 1.8" doesn't appear to fix this. I'm having the same issu

Re: GWT 2.70 and emulated compiler stack mode

Whoops, to be clear, it was working up to and including GWT 2.6.1, but has stopped working in GWT 2.7.0. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from i

GWT 2.70 and emulated compiler stack mode

my gwt.xml I had the following: TIA, James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.co

GWT 2.7 Window Close Handle Bug?

n I'm going to have to downgrade to GWT 2.6. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.

Re: GWT 2.7 manifest support

Curious: What are the cache headers set on the .nocache.js file? Expires, Cache-Control, etc? You are expected to tell your web server to set non-caching headers for that file, so if your browser is caching it at all, I would say you need to modify your webserver cache policy. -- You receive

Re: GWT 2.7 manifest support

Oh, wait, sorry, I see you're dealing w/ offline support. I will politely bow out and wish you luck in diagnosing the problem. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from

Re: GWT 2.7.0 is here

eload when there are changes) is awesome. I really appreciate the work the GWT team has done. Thanks, -James On Thursday, November 20, 2014 4:59:06 AM UTC-6, Daniel Kurka wrote: > > Today we are excited to announce the GWT 2.7.0 release. Thanks to > everyone who contributed to this relea

Re: master/3.0.0 js interop ready to play with?

I'm also interested in Cristian's second question about using callback functions. Is this supposed to "just work" with the current master or is Cristian's EventListenerFactory workaround the best bet for now? Cheers, James On Monday, August 11, 2014 7:17:32 PM UTC+

Re: Can't Set App Engine SDK - Eclipse Plugin

ZOMG... 4 years later, and this is still the right fix!! > > then remember make sure that all maven jars are at bottom in "order > and export" tab. > This was BEYOND frustrating (just lost over a day on this), and all it took was putting maven on the bottom. Sigh, thank you so much. -- Yo

Re: GWT 2.7.0 Release Date

Is there any word as to whether Java 8 language/syntax support will be included in 2.7? On 28 May 2014 18:51, confile wrote: > Great thank you! > > > Am Mittwoch, 28. Mai 2014 19:17:22 UTC+2 schrieb Jens: > >> Build GWT from source if you want to play around with it. You need to: >> >> 1.) mkdi

Re: March 12 minutes

(Replied to google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com) Thanks Colin. Out of interest, would it be likely for java 8 syntax to be supported in a 2.7 release with the Google I/O target date? FWIW I'd personally be delighted to have a 2.7 release for June with incremental compilation as the big ticket item

Re: Chrome Canary 36 not showing sourcemaps

FWIW I have the same problem with Firefox hanging while using 100% CPU with SDM On 16 April 2014 05:41, Stefano Ciccarelli wrote: > Chrome 35 too. I ha dato switch back to chrome 34. > On Firefox suorce maps are showing, but our project is so big that Firefox > became unusable. > > > Il mercole

Re: Development Mode will not be supported in Firefox 27+

My company got screwed by using GXT2 with gxt-uibinder library that broke with GWT 2.5 due to compiler changes. We've been stuck on GWT 2.4 for that reason as we had 100+ .ui.xml files to convert to pure java. We finally did the work, but it was definitely a painful lesson. -- You received th

Re: Compile time with a large project

It's a VM with 4 CPU cores (X5690 CPU, Xeon's are from Q1 2011), and 10GB of ram. It looks like the 40 minute quote was doing with localWorkers=1. On another build with localWorkers=3, the build time was 12 minutes 30 seconds. It looks like on the GWT compile we set: -XX:MaxPermSize=128M -Xmx

Re: Compile time with a large project

To add. the "permutation-0.js" generated by the compileReport is 640MB. And using cloc , we are at 200k lines of code for java+xml (for uiBinder). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubsc

Re: Compile time with a large project

On our build machine (which isn't the fastest thing in the world), it takes 40 minutes to run javac + build 18 permutations. Running the compileReport on it, tie "Full code size" is just under 5MB. And yes, multiple apps, each having their own html host pages. I was thinking that splitting th

Compile time with a large project

We have a fairly large single GWT project that we feel has out-grown itself at this point. It's setup in a way where we could split it out into a collection of smaller projects (though this is not a simple task). What I'm looking to find out: does compile time of large GWT projects scale line

Re: canvas toDataUrl() works in mouse event but not in touch event

OK, I rolled the code out to production and borrowed a newer android phone and it works like a champ. Go team. I still don't understand why, but oh well. James On Saturday, November 16, 2013 10:45:58 AM UTC-6, James Bearden wrote: > > Thank you for the reply, but I don't quite

Re: canvas toDataUrl() works in mouse event but not in touch event

2013 12:58:41 PM UTC-6, Jim Douglas wrote: > > https://code.google.com/p/android/issues/detail?id=7901 > > On Friday, November 15, 2013 9:36:21 AM UTC-8, James Bearden wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I have implemented a signature widget using the GWT 2.5 Canvas. It wor

canvas toDataUrl() works in mouse event but not in touch event

Hello, I have implemented a signature widget using the GWT 2.5 Canvas. It works great on the desktop (mouse event), but not on a tablet (touch event). Unfortunately the only table I have available for testing is an Android 2.3.4 tablet. So here is my code snippet: _canvas.setTabIndex(tab

Re: Using Object in classes passed via GWT RPC

Cargo cult programming, born of desperation. I have another class that is working correctly with a field of type Object, so I was analyzing it and trying to eliminate each difference as a possible cause. The other class happens to pitch to the zero-argument Object constructor, so I added it to

Using Object in classes passed via GWT RPC

I am trying to return the result of a calculation from an RPC call, and having trouble with the GWT compiler. Specifically, the class I am returning has a field of type Object in it. This field can contain: String, Integer, Double, Long, Boolean or Date. If I change the Object field to type S

Re: Thoughts on GWT 3.0 re: Java 8 and IE 8/9

Ray, sounds fantastic and can happily say that something along those lines would tackle many of the issues with GWT I noted in the current GWT survey. Will be eagerly awaiting the design docs and proposals. On 26 October 2013 00:06, Ed wrote: > We're thinking about introducing a way of developi

Re: GWT 2.6 Release Note

GWT 2.6 Release Plan: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ZdMwcTjc4rkWg6nntCY1BDB1xI2PHPwaCnTYw-9uAKE/edit# On 21 October 2013 10:31, Davide Cerbo wrote: > Hi all, > > somebody have news about GWT 2.6 release date, or information about new > feature? > > Now we are in QA 2013 and the release d

Re: Developer plugin for Firefox 23 doesn't work

I just upgraded to FF 23.0.1 and devmode seems to be loading just fine for me. No issues that I've seen yet. OSX 10.8.4 FF 23.0.1 GWT plugin 1.23 Eclipse Kepler GWT 2.4.0 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe fr

Re: Announce: Cowj 0.2

Hi David, the library and demo sound great but the links appear to be broken. Is there any chance that you could make the files available again? Congratulations on the good work! James On Sunday, 2 October 2011 12:52:49 UTC+1, David Given wrote: > > I did some more work on my GWT emu

Re: RequestFactory module - queue, retry and non atomic batching..

I'm also quite interested but haven't had time to look. On 18 July 2013 10:00, salk31 wrote: > Ho k... I'll be very interested to hear your thoughts... If you think it > is fixable maybe GAE demo with some UI may be next step for me? > > > On Thursday, July 18, 2013 9:49:47 AM UTC+1, Thomas Bro

Re: GWT plugin support for Eclipse Kepler (4.3)

Thanks. I have gone and created a bug on the GPE issue tracker. https://code.google.com/p/google-plugin-for-eclipse/issues/detail?id=221 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving e

GWT plugin support for Eclipse Kepler (4.3)

hanks, -James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to goo

Re: Code splittingmysteries

FYI I updated http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7874 with some of my findings. I haven't found a workaround other than reverting to GWT 2.5.0 and am not sure I can dedicate any more time to this right now so will just revert I guess :( On 12 June 2013 19:34, Ed wrote:

Re: Code splittingmysteries

Ed, out of interest, are you using Gin? On 12 June 2013 16:29, James Horsley wrote: > Yeah. the SOYC report in this case hasn't helped me much either because > I'm not reading it right or it's just not surfacing the right info. The > only 404 I get is regarding the

Re: Code splittingmysteries

he SOYC report is buggy, as some pages result in a 404 >> :(.. (I experienced that several times the last years with a correctly >> created soyc, it's also in some issue if I remember correctly). >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 4:45 PM, James Horsley &

Re: Code splittingmysteries

Quite frustrating as I don't feel like I'm making much progress and am just going to have to go back to 2.5.0 but don't really want to lose out on the bugfixes from 2.5.1 :( On 12 June 2013 15:45, James Horsley wrote: > Yeah. I've tried reproducing the issue with a

Re: Code splittingmysteries

Yeah. I've tried reproducing the issue with a sample app but thus far haven't been able to; not sure that the sample webapp captures enough of the complexity of the actual webapp we're having the problem with. As I mentioned before can confirm that changing none of the webapp code but switching bet

Re: Code splittingmysteries

Ed, did you ever get this sorted? As I commented on the linked issue I'm running into what seems to be a similar problem. On Wednesday, April 10, 2013 8:13:07 AM UTC+1, Ed wrote: > > I just downgraded to GWT 2.4 and my left over fragment disappeared :(... > (initial load was almost the same) > S

Re: Adsense Subscription for GWT Based Website

Same issue here, did ye guys find any solution? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to google-web-toolkit+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post t

ClientAbortException Issue Since 2.5.1

Hey Guys, The company I work for uses apache + gwt + tomcat7 for our site. I've been trying to update from gwt 2.5.0 -> 2.5.1. GwtSerlvet.jar used to contain the org.apache.catalina.connector.ClientAbortException class. What is upgrade path from 2.5.0 to 2.5.1 for users who are depended on ca

Re: I/O 2013 - GWT Sessions?

oblem! See the show! Here's some more free stuff!". > > It's a shame. I don't even think all of the GWT session videos made it up > on youtube. They had some great pointers... > > > > On Wednesday, March 6, 2013 5:56:52 PM UTC-5, James wrote: >> >&

I/O 2013 - GWT Sessions?

I know it's earlybut is anyone familiar with the planned Google Web Toolkit sessions for Google I/O 2013? It was a bit disappointing last year when there was only one real GWT session...after there had been many in all the previous years. GWT Team...any comments? -- You received this mes

remove final from public final void RemoteServiceServlet.processPost

servlet. In this case, same business logic spreads two classes. If RemoteServiceServlet.processPost is allowed to override, I can implement it to allow processPost to return either string or stream through response. Does GWT committee have a plan to relieve this restriction? James -- You

Re: RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

setter = getBeanMethod( BeanMethod.SET_BUILDER, domainType, property, propertyType ); } return setter; } On 28 February 2013 13:44, James Horsley wrote: > Makes sense. Thanks! > > > On 28 February 2013 13:27, Thomas Broyer wrote: > >> >>

Re: RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

Makes sense. Thanks! On 28 February 2013 13:27, Thomas Broyer wrote: > > > On Thursday, February 28, 2013 1:50:03 PM UTC+1, James Horsley wrote: >> >> I'll take a stab at writing a ServiceLayerDecorator as that should get me >> unblocked without writing DT

Re: RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

I'll take a stab at writing a ServiceLayerDecorator as that should get me unblocked without writing DTO's and if the correct setter is called the NPE's won't be an issue. Thanks to you both for the suggestions! Thomas, is this issue likely to end up as PatchesWelcome or WontFix? If the former then

Re: RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

Issue filed https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=8039 On 27 February 2013 17:04, James Horsley wrote: > Thanks for the quick and detailed reply. > > Given a big win using RequestFactory is having it work well with existing > server side data models it

Re: RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

hat I should get a patch out for it so will try to do that. The geTop().getGetter(domainClass, property) suggestion you made sounds like a quick and mildly dirty way through; although I may look at the first fallback based solution you mentioned. Cheers, James On 27 February 2013 16:05, Thom

RequestFactory issue with overloaded setters in domain type

I'm running into an issue where RequestFactory isn't calling the correct setter on the domain object in DevMode and I've not tried it compiled yet. Looking at the code it appears that ReflectiveServiceLayer.getBeanMethod is just picking the first setter it finds based on SET/SET_BUILDER, are only v

Re: GWT 2.5 dev mode unable to refresh

Have you guys considered trying out the new super-dev-mode? I only save the sluggish dev mode for when I absolutely have to have a java debugger to find out what's going on. Super-dev-mode will cost you a few seconds per page refresh (though, OOM popping your JVM is much, much slower), but it a

Re: GWT still viable for new projects?

app that builds web apps, it's a pretty sweet tool (collide alone, not just my fork)! If you'd like to try it out when it's ready, just add me on g+ / click my name and get my email. :) On Tuesday, February 26, 2013 10:13:06 AM UTC-7, emurmur wrote: > > I agree with wha

Re: GWT still viable for new projects?

GWT is still alive and well. 2.5.1 is getting released soon, and work is happening on 2.6 already. The main reason why there is less attention being paid to GWT is that it is a mature library; there's still lots of work and maintenance to do, but as for the core features, it's all there already

Re: [POLL RESULTS] Maven project layout, what to "standardize"?

Personally, I store all super source and .gwt.xml in src/main/resources, and never have a problem. (Eclipse 4.2; not too painful if you don't use GTK window manager) No filtering, especially on src/main/java; the contract of maven is source goes into src/main/java, and it will go into the jar a

DataGrid doesn't show data in TabLayoutPanel

distracting during debug. Is there some way to get rid of this problem? I appreciate your help. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msg/g

Firefox 18 GWT plugin

It looks like the Google dev team has already started working on the GWT plugin for Firefox 18 (which was released today). GWT Bug: https://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/detail?id=7877 Firefox release notes: http://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/18.0/releasenotes/ -- You received

JMockit compatible with GWTTestCase?

Hello all- I'm trying to use JMockit in a GWTTestCase (JUnit 3, for what it's worth) and I'm not having any luck. I have jmockit.jar on my classpath for the test, but when I run it, I get this error message: [ERROR] Line 50: No source code is available for type mockit.NonStrictExpectations; di

Re: GWT Whiteboard (freehand drawing)

I am feeling this library can provide good chart potential abilities. I can wait for a couple of months for my project. Do you have a road map for chart features? James On Tuesday, December 18, 2012 12:17:12 PM UTC-5, Dean S. Jones wrote: > > GWT Visualization is just for charting, an

Problem getting my GWT RPC to work when I deploy to app engine

I have been following the StockWatcher tutorial and have an RPC service on my local server which is successfully invoked when I open my HTML page and add a new stock. Now, I deployed my app to the GAE but when I go to the same page on the GAE hosted app it no longer calls the RPC service. What

Re: GWT Whiteboard (freehand drawing)

Is it promising to use this library for reporting to replace other third party chart libraries such as GWT Visualization? On Monday, December 17, 2012 5:34:17 PM UTC-5, Alfredo Quiroga-Villamil wrote: > > Forgot to mention ... You can also add a touch end handler and apply the > same concept. T

Re: Debug GWT in JBOSS

al/hosted.html?approval"; is invoked with 404 error code This is a legacy J2EE application (Strut1 and Strut2 + Spring). There are a lot of filters. I implemented one servlet - GwtServlet to bypass filter to load a GWT page. I appreciate your help. James -- You received this messag

google-web-toolkit@googlegroups.com

ation (Strut1 and Strut2 + Spring). There are a lot of filters. I implemented one servlet - GwtServlet to bypass filter to load a GWT page. I appreciate your help. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view

Re: The Future of GWT Report 2012 Published

I am evaluating a chart library for my incoming project. I can not find any information about chart library for GWT. Is it included in the next report? I am trying to find the most popular chart library for GWT. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google

Re: Debug GWT in JBOSS

309&gwt.codesvr=127.0.0.1:9997";, I could not get a right page display and got log output under jboss like ## 03 Dec 2012 12:31:46,004 ERROR (http-127.0.0.1-80-4) RequestProcessor - Invalid path /approval/hosted was requested. Your help is greatly appreciated. James On Friday, November

Debug GWT in JBOSS

What are options to debug GWT in JBOSS? Should I use Jboss tool plugin for Eclipse? I just added a GWT module into Strut application running in Jboss. Should I run a separate a GWT code server or run a GWT code server inside Jboss process? James -- You received this message because you are

Remediating older GWT code with GWT 2.3 XsrfProtectedService - any experiences?

Hi all- We're looking at remediating an existing GWT application with the CSRF/XSRF protection features introduced with GWT 2.3. Has anybody else done this, and do you have any experiences/advice to share? I'm looking particularly for testing advice. How did you validate that the XSRF protectio

Re: GWT Dev Plugin for Google Chrome

Everything was working a week ago and suddenly today I gettting same problem -- Chrome now displays the "Download the GWT developer plugin for chrome" dialog as if the plugin was never installed/ If I go to settings I can clearly see the GWT developer plugin is installed in Chrome as an extensi

Re: CellTable - hide/show individual columns?

I can use removeColumnStyleName to hide one column and addColumnStyleName to restore that column. I run into one issue. Once one column is hiding, each row of the result table has a large height (almost double). James On Wednesday, October 17, 2012 11:32:07 AM UTC-4, Thomas Broyer wrote

Firefox 16 GWT Plugin

With Firefox 16 now out, the GWT plugin is incompatible again. But it looks like Google is already working on it: http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1851804/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this discussion on the

Re: compiled file ending with *.htm instead of *.html

te: > > I assume it should be possible by extending IFrameLinker, and overriding > getCompilationExtension(...) to return ".cache.htm". Then define and add > your linker as in /com/google/gwt/core/Core.gwt.xml > > I haven't tried it though, so you may encounter some difficulties (?

ClickHandler for ImageResource in tablebuilder (GWT 2.5)

need using tablebuilder with a problem how to handle click event from a image in CellTable. Do you have some suggestions or I need to change my implementation. James -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Google Web Toolkit" group. To view this

  1   2   3   >