Good catch Thomas, didn't see the "a".. but yeah, it isn't very clear.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Jan 14, 2011 at 3:42 AM, Thomas Broyer wrote:
> I guess that's why it says "*a* BasicPlace" rather than just "BasicPlace".
> Yes, it's up
e any state to the URL, so they
could just extend a BasicPlace which declares a PlaceTokenizer that
returns a null token."
But BasicPlace doesn't seem to exist. Is this a typo? I guess we can
just declare our own BasicPlace?
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--
http://groups.google.com/g
I'm wondering if the TestNG stuff
(http://gwt-code-reviews.appspot.com/1085801/patch/60001/61019) is
just for this validation piece or if this is the beginning of an
update to support TestNG for client side GWTTestCases?
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 4:54 PM,
Is this coming with GWT 2.1? I'm guessing this is a Chrome Extension
for Mac OS X
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> LGTM2
>
> On 2010/10/20 18:54:20, jat wrote:
>>
>> Ok.
>
>> Be sure and check in the compiled libraries in
l the
info!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Unnur Gretarsdottir wrote:
> Hi Arthur -
> Yes - we probably could build it, but then you wouldn't be able to
> customize any of the aspects of that HTML page. Most people want
> something else on that page other than
Great, thanks. Would a patch be helpful or will you be using some
other Maven repository?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:22 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
> I created an issue so we can fix this for the final GWT 2.1 release:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/issues/
/repository/com/google/gwt folder to force Maven to
redownload 2.1-SNAPSHOT).
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 5:12 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I'm trying to build the expense report app, and it looks like the
> source has been refactored to remo
epositories/google-snapshots) seems
to contain the correct SNAPSHOT. I'll try to use that. Thank you.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
t a simple HTML
page that includes its contents.
Then again, if this server side selection is coming soon (gwt 2.2?),
building this linker won't make much sense. Thanks again for all the
info!
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Oct 11, 2010 at 1:03 PM, Unnur Gretarsdottir wrote:
That's a great idea Unnur. Is there an existing linker for this or
would I have to build it (it seems like something the linker would do,
if I understood them correctly)?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Oct 8, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Unnur Gretarsdottir wrote:
> Hi Arthur -
> This is, and wi
Wow, this is great! I'm guessing this means we can cut the startup
round trips to one? Is this going into GWT 2.1?
Exciting stuff.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:09 PM, wrote:
> Reviewers: jgw,
>
> Description:
> Add Support for server side script se
n the client side is safe enough, when it's clearly not.
I guess some documentation to that effect would be enough.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Christoph Kern wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 01:44, wrote:
>>
>> On 2010/08/17 23:23:39, xtof
But this is looking to be a really great release for enterprise app
building! I can just imagine how many days and weeks of work this
release would have saved me :D
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:12 PM, Arthur Kalmenson wrote:
> Ah, sorry about that.
>
> --
> Arth
Ah, sorry about that.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> This patch is focused on the validation plumbing. The UI is throw away.
>
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Arthur Kalmenson
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm really excited for t
I'm really excited for this validation component, you guys/gals are
doing a great job! But it looks like Validation is using
VerticalPanel, but from my understand we're trying to discourage the
use of table based widgets where possible. Could this be done with
UiBinder and divs instead?
e
what gets instantiated. If you inject one of these Ginjectors lower in
the hierarchy, would the instances still be the same?
And sorry for my inaccurate info, my GWT is getting rusty :(.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Peter Schmitt wrote:
> Hi all,
> this topic comes up
g multiple Ginjectors, instances of classes don't stay the
same. For example, a Singleton EventBus in two Ginjectors are
different instance types.
Also, I'm pretty sure you can't put an @Inject on an interface method,
but I haven't tried.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Aug 9, 201
s for different parts of a system.
I understand the idea of making your own HandlerManager, but from a
design perspective, doesn't it make sense to just have a singleton
HandlerManager? Are there performance implications of having
everything go through one HandlerManager?
All the best,
--
Arthur
Great job! Some nice bug squishing.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
2010/2/2 Miguel Méndez :
> The GWT 2.0.1 point release is now available for download. It contains fixes
> for bugs found in the 2.0.0 release.
>
> Potentially breaking changes and fixes
>
> Fixed a bug in how code
Seems like we need a bot to publish Waves as Google Code wikis :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> Well, not nothing — it'd be pretty easy for a bot to be written to publish
> static views of waves. But without that…
>
> On Tue, Feb 2
Well, AFAIK, the response is in fact JSON, it's compact JSON but still
JSON. GWT-RPC requests are of type "text/x-gwt-rpc", but the response
is "application/json".
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sat, Jan 30, 2010 at 2:12 PM, jarrod wrote:
> Is there anything in GWT's
Hmm, a nightly build sounds like a cool idea, I wouldn't mind seeing that as
well.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:28 AM, David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It would be nice that the GWT team would release some development
> builds once in a while. That would be very use
> Graphics
> The graphics library provides a single, platform independent API that works
> on top of Canvas and VML. The library is not ready for GWT trunk, but this
> project is worth pursuing.
Will you be building on what was done in Speed Tracer for Canvas integration?
Thanks again for
o that
size yet
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Brad Leupen wrote:
> Arthur,
>
> No, we are not closing DevMode. Our client app is not small.
> Refreshing DevMode in 2.0 takes 20-30 seconds on a decent multi-core
> workstation. Often,
u definitely
shouldn't deploy JavaScript compiled that way, but it can be a time
saver during non-production continuous builds."
-draftCompile in addition to restrictions to the user agent you
compile to (if you can afford to do that during development), should
make your compiles a lot
de.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit/wiki/CssResource#Image_Sprites
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 7:03 AM, nicolas.deloof
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm migrating some nice HTML-fragment to GWT. Thanks to UiBinder this
> is really easy and I get a nice result in
2.0.0 tag in the repo, because
http://google-web-toolkit.googlecode.com/svn/tags/2.0.0-rc1/distro-source/core/src/gwt-module.dtd
works.
All the best,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
thanks for all the great work!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Working on a draft one.
> What do folks here think is important?
>
> On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 7:42 AM, tfreitas wrote:
>>
>> What about roadmap?
>>
>
Sorry to jump in here, but that looks almost like data bindings Ray. I
missed that feature of uibinder too. I tried it out and you're able to
bind from a POJO during initialization, I wonder if that could be used
as a starting point to do data bindings on set and get. Thanks!
--
Arthur Kalm
clipse. This would be something like the
Spring IDE plugin that one you configure Spring XML files with all the
above features.
Thanks again for the UiBinder, we'll definitely have to spend more time with it.
Best regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~--
ressive, Arthur! This is the sort of conscientiousness
> (i.e. for optimizing user experience) I hope all GWT developers would strive
> for. Nice work.
> And yes, we'd like to help you get that down to 1, too.
Thanks Bruce! But it's really all thanks to Bob's ClientBundle
I'd love to see this in the trunk too. We have only 2 round trips on
start up now, thanks to ClientBundle. Getting it down to one will be
very slick!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 8:41 AM, Cameron Braid wrote:
> I'd be keen to see this land in trunk !
>
> Ca
Eric, are you using Maven? It might be the GWT Maven Plugin doing
that, not GWT itself.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sat, Aug 1, 2009 at 9:06 PM, Eric B. Ridge wrote:
>
> I'm a random lurker who recently started using GWT 1.6. Since 1.7 was
> released (to which I have not yet upgrad
Today sounds like it'll be the day we switch to trunk ;)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:42 AM, Ray Ryan wrote:
>
> How does today strike you? It's headed into gwt trunk, and will be
> part of the 2.0 release.
>
> On Tuesday, August 4, 2009, brett.wooldri
This sounds very promising! Will there be (is there already?) a wiki
page explaining how this works?
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 3:04 PM, wrote:
>
> Reviewers: robertvawter_google.com, scottb,
>
> Description:
> This patch removes the previous specia
Finger slipped? :P
On Jul 28, 8:15 pm, Scott Blum wrote:
> Nothing to see here... move along please.
>
>
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 8:14 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> > Anyone else just get bombarded by about 20+ old commit messages? I got
> > messages from stuff committed days ago.
>
> > -Ray
-
er to convince a company to
install Gears then installing and using a completely new browser, so
at least for enterprise settings some common API would be very useful.
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 10:24 AM, dflorey wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've been wondering how G
Sweet, can't wait :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 12:25 PM, Ray Ryan wrote:
> It's coming RSN. We're trying to get UiBinder into GWT 2.0. It will
> certainly be in SVN this month or early next.
> I know I've been saying that for a while, but now we
Good question, I'd be interested in a nightly build of GWT trunk as well.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 4:14 AM, nicolas de
loof wrote:
> Hi
> is there a pulic CI server for GWT 2.0 where I could get the latest 2.0
> artifacts ?
> I'd like to improve the gw
the compiler just
assume the name of the runAsync call is the name of the class it lives
in? If you allow providing a class name, would you check it's the name
of the class the call is in? I like the automagic naming using the
class name.
Best regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
P.S. Naming to allow
Would it be better to post this to the GWT Discussion Group? You'll
get a lot more feedback there. You can find the group here:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:10 PM, Elad and Osnat wrote:
>
> Here is a link to the p
is an interesting question. However, wouldn't the AOP be
happening before you send the object over the wire? You wouldn't
really care about any interception at that point
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:28 AM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 7:
ities,
Bruce. I'll try to do it some time this week.
Best regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 2:58 PM, Ray Cromwell wrote:
>
> Interesting question. Gin auto-creates RPC interfaces as well, for
> example, if you have:
>
> public interface MyFoo exte
it's dropped in the incubator, you could avoid
duplicate work.
Best regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 3:03 AM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
>
> What I'm looking for is both some AOP capability and a way to port javaFx
> "bind" keyword to Java /
Is the Google Eclipse Plugin not a Google Code OSS project?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:18 PM, Alex Rudnick wrote:
>
> Gary,
>
> Here is fine (alternatively, on the Google-Web-Toolkit group). What
> issues and questions have you got?
>
> On Thu, Ap
I haven't tried GAE/J just yet, but I'm guessing the problem with JPA
is the same one you would have with any database. If your domain
objects aren't very large, you can use Dozer to map the object onto
itself which removes all the enhancements and makes them regular
objects.
--
A
*jaw drops*
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:44 AM, stuckagain wrote:
>
> Great news,
>
> Any chance for getting an offline installation for the eclipse
> plugin ? Company policy makes it impossible to connect my development
> machine to the internet.
>
>
It depends on how you are building your authorization. If you use
something like Spring Security, this is done automatically with every
RPC you make.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 11:43 PM, John Tamplin wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 10:22 PM, Vitali Lovich wrote:
>>
by a current project. I'll write something up soon.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Bruce Johnson wrote:
> Mind? Heck no! That would be great!
> On Wed, Feb 18, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Arthur Kalmenson
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello everyone,
>>
>> I h
to select multiple dates at once
on the date picker.
Another solution could be to catch clicks on dates and make the first
one the lower range and the next click the higher range, but this
would pose usability problems IMHO.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 11:20 PM, tfreitas wrote
reminding me that I forgot to attach the
> patch.
Handy, ain't it? :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Isaac Truett wrote:
> I basically agree with John and Ray. In general, I agree that using
> the most remote parent type possible (without introducing cas
TestNG to test that
particular class because of the single line of code.
P.S. Does anyone mind if I write a little guide in the GWT Group about
using GWTMockUtilities with EasyMock?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
m/p/google-gin/wiki/GuiceCompatibility.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sun, Feb 8, 2009 at 1:27 PM, jarrod wrote:
>
> I'm a huge fan of GWT, but I'm also a big fan of development
> methodologies, like Inversion of Control and Aspect-Oriented
> Programming.
>
> IoC and AOP a
will it be just the final release?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 10:57 AM, nicolas de loof
wrote:
> AFAIK, mvnrepository "latest" is based on textual version comparison, so
> 1.5-RC* > 1.5.3
>
> On Fri, Feb 6, 2009 at 4:54 PM, nicolas de loof
> wrote:
Hello everyone,
I'm not sure who rsyncs GWT releases to Maven central, but if you look
at: http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/com.google.gwt/gwt-user you can
see that the default GWT version is 1.5-RC1 and not 1.5.3.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
Congratulations! I'll try to give this a swing this week or next week,
I hope it doesn't break the gwt-maven plugin too badly. Does anyone
know when this milestone will hit the central Maven repo?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 7:34 PM, Scott Blum wrote:
>
Thanks John, that works :)
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:05 PM, John LaBanca wrote:
> You can use the CSS from the gen2 demo:
> http://code.google.com/p/google-web-toolkit-incubator/source/browse/trunk/src/com/google/gwt/demos/scrolltable/public/ScrollTableDemo.css
&
ks (not as nice as the demo). Is
there any CSS available that works with the gen2 ScrollTable? Thank
you.
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
Hi Yann,
You found the wrong forum (Google Group). The GWT Contributors Google
Group is specifically to discuss development in GWT, not for support
questions. You'll have better luck on the regular GWT Group:
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue
Hello Olivier,
Does this run GWTTestCases or is it possible to have it run
GWTTestSuites? Running each GWTTestCase individually is very slow.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sun, Jan 11, 2009 at 10:03 AM, Olivier Modica wrote:
>
> Ray et al.,
>
> You may be interested to know that at Lom
I look forward to it!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Isaac Truett wrote:
>
> Thank you for the reminder, Emily! I'll get you a patch as soon as I
> have a few minutes to spare.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Emily Crutcher wrote:
>
Ravindra, you'll have better luck asking in the GWT Group
(http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit). This group is
specifically for discussion regarding the development of GWT, not for
general questions.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 8:03 AM, kundlaravin...@gmai
Sounds good to me.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:25 AM, Emily Crutcher wrote:
> For gwt-incubator users who are using svn tip from gwt-1.6 or gwt-trunk, we
> currently are in a confusing situation of having two different, almost
> identical event systems: o
most of the Widgets implement HasValue would
really help us clean up the code.
Perhaps CheckBox should implement HasValue using some "complex"
object that combines the Boolean and String value that the CheckBox
contains for its type?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 6:
That would be awesome. We've been meaning to implement it ourselves
for some time but haven't had the chance. I'll be very interested in
using it. Thanks!
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Dec 4, 2008 at 10:31 AM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I wrote a Mont
Hi John,
Thank you for the reply. Are there any plans in the future to include
various variations of the date picker for developers to choose from
(which would be inline with the requests for a "richer" widget set)?
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 11:37 AM, John LaBan
rs and not general questions.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Tue, Nov 25, 2008 at 8:43 AM, Bhupen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> [ERROR] Uncaught exception escaped
> java.lang.AssertionError: A widget in the detach list was found not
> attached to the document. The is likely caused by wrappi
We check the .project file in for all of our projects, this makes
picking it up from the repo really easy.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 11:31 AM, Lex Spoon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 4:28 PM, BobV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
Well it looks like the two plugins are merging, I'm very happy to hear
that! I look forward to the merging of the features of both of these
plugins.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 4:00 AM, nicolas.deloof
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I have lots of respect for
.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 3:20 AM, nicolas.deloof
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I understand your point of view,
>
> I just want to notice Mojo project has been created to avoid such case
> of multiple plugins for same use-cases / technology.
>
> Anyone
I'm going to second that request. We use Hudson and we get no
reporting on GWTTestCases that are being run by Maven. Would be nice
to get those reports.
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Nov 20, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Ray Cromwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> BTW, while we're di
This would make jumping into the incubator much easier.
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Emily Crutcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Several months ago we had the discussion of whether it was worth polluting
> the root directory of gwt-incubator
atus of the GWT teams solution is.
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Thu, Nov 13, 2008 at 8:41 PM, rahul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hello Emily,
>
>>
>> *Metadata Systems, comprising Models and Controllers*
>> xforms, Ian's databinding system, Arthur
How do I import an existing
Subversion repository?" section here:
http://code.google.com/p/support/wiki/FAQ. It does track all svn
activity from that sub directory.
You might have to ask to have your svn repo reset to 0 so you can sync
it. Check out the Group here:
http://groups.google.com/gro
lly, I prefer Maven
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 9:48 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I don't expect to require HasData, I just expect to have some kind of
>> generic implementation for both Editor and Viewer that wrap a HasData
>> instance s
some things to
change.
> Indeed, but I'll be a Seattlite in three weeks for a new job. Given
> that, the next three weeks are going to be _very_ busy for me so I'm
> not sure how much progress I'll be able to make in any given
> direction.
Oh, working for the enemy :P? We
going to create a new Google Code project? It'd be easier
to track issues and contribute code. Thanks!
P.P.S. Nice to have a fellow Torontonian here :)
Regards,
--
Arthur Kalmenson
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 5:16 PM, Ian Petersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Ray,
>
> On Wed
if people could nominate widgets they would like to see leave
>incubator, that would be very helpful as well!
This should be very easy to do with a Google Docs Form. Do you want me
to create one?
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 10, 6:02 pm, "Emily Crutcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
nizations that use GWT. I know that the GWT team said GWT was
meant to be pretty low level and they wanted the community to build on
top of that, but it seems that the community is not delivering. I know
Bruce mentioned that better widgets are on the agenda, so I don't
know....
Regards,
Arthur
ed so more people contribute and give feedback.
What do you think?
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
les
should work. I'm not really sure about creating a new widget
hierarchy, though. My initial goal was to allow developers to use any
widget they like and not use some new widget hierarchy. Getting data
out of the widgets can either be handled through the HasValue
interface or using DataMan
Sounds good to me, a solution that fits seamlessly with GWT would be
very nice.
Will you be posting a design document about it? Will this all tie into
some form component for GWT? Will you include other useful features
like visibility logic?
Best regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 8, 10:15 am
I'll try to post some
code and more concrete examples in the next few days. I'm just
wondering if the approach makes sense to people. Thank you.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
I'm sorry to hear that. I hope you have a safe journey.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 8, 12:14 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Arthur Kalmenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Will you start a new Googl
kit-Contributors/browse_thread/thread/8c611ab8bb076ead) but I'm
sure what you and Chris have done will help the GWT team out a lot.
Will you start a new Google Code project for this data binding
framework?
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 7, 3:47 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PRO
e field to it's
previous value, which prevented validation from running its course.
I'll just create my own editor and leave the field the way it was.
Ian, I think this data binding framework is really excellent. It's
really well thought out and I think it'll be a major contribu
t started on some of our projects, but this data binding framework
would be very helpful since we build/will build a lot of form based
applications. Thanks for sharing your code!
On Oct 7, 10:20 am, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 9:28 AM, Art
hope that this makes it
into the incubator soon.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 3, 11:09 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Here's a sample project. The .tgz includes an updated
> data_binding.jar because I found a few bugs while working on the
> exampl
Hey Emily,
Is there a use case when a ValidatorController will hold different
types of Subjects and Validators or can I assume that
ValidatorController is generic and the generic type will be the same
in Validators and Subjects?
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 6, 12:20 pm, "Emily Cru
jection,
perhaps a good way to wire these classes together would be to use
Google GIN (http://code.google.com/p/google-gin/). It's fairly new,
but it looks very promising.
I'll add an issue about the update to Java 1.5 and I'll start
implementing that portion.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
alidation
What do you think about annotation based validation? It could look
something like this:
@NotEmptyValidator
TextBox firstName = new TextBox();
@NumberRangeValidator(low = 18, high = 100)
TextBox age = new TextBox();
Let me know what you think. Thank y
Does this mean that all the GWT core widgets will implement the
HasValue interface?
On Oct 4, 10:33 am, "Emily Crutcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> LGTM
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 9:16 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Oops. My *other* datepicker, right.
> > Here's the new pat
re and should probably be included in
incubator if not in gwt. I was talking to papick in #gwt who created a
simple data binding library using generators. I'll try to see if he
can release his code, so we could potentially work from it.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 3, 1:25 pm, "Emily C
r use case where we have large forms with dozens of
questions. Being able to automatically map them to beans that I can
send to the server side and store would be a huge plus.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-W
rrent
RadioButton implementation is pretty low level and is rather close to
the way it's done in Javascript.
Regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 3, 2:33 pm, "Ian Petersen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 3, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Isaac Truett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
get, it would
implement the HasData interface? It seems that S would end up being
the same as T in the generic implementation. I'll try to implement
this to get an idea what you mean.
Best regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
On Oct 3, 11:25 am, "Emily Crutcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
ng on creating wrappers for all the core GWT
widgets and the incubator ones. Feedback would be much appreciated.
Thank you for your time.
Best regards,
Arthur Kalmenson
--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
http://groups.google.com/group/Google-Web-Toolkit-Contributors
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---
97 matches
Mail list logo
