Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting

You can download the three files from the top of this page. Let me know if you need help. http://openforum.worldvista.org/~forum/index.php?title=Debugging_with_GT.M Kevin --- Usha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I would like to have it. > Thanks > Usha > - Original Message - > From: "Ke

[Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message I went to the hardhats page and downloaded Fileman to my PC but I am trapped inside Fileman!  How can I get to a MUMPS prompt?   Thanks,   Ric

[Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

What does the SERVICE/SECTION field specify for a NEW PERSON? And how to specify the specialty of a provider?   What does TREATING SPECIALTY file contain? Which one of them (or a third one) holds the specialty of a clinic or ward? If TREATING SECIALITY is the one, then TREATING SPECIALTY SET

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I think just keep hitting enter, and it will drop you back to a mumps prompt. How did you launch fileman? Kevin --- "Carroll, Richard (EDS)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I went to the hardhats page and downloaded Fileman > to my PC but I am > trapped inside Fileman! How can I get to a MUMPS >

[Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

As I get ready to make the next round of OpenVistA SemiVivA FOIA Gold (and maybe VivA too - please let me know if you want a VivA live CD), it occurs to me that I could easily organize the global variables into multiple database files where it makes sense for them to be separate. For example,

Re: [Hardhats-members] How to "save" a nake reference?

Excellent. I think this will do it. MyFunct new NakeRef set NakedRef=$$LGR^%ZOSV ... new discard set discard=$get(@NakedRef) quit Thanks Kevin --- Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I believe there's an entry point in %ZOSV to call > the platform > dependent method of

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Are you using Cache or GT.M?   Jim Gray - Original Message - From: Carroll, Richard (EDS) To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:09 PM Subject: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt I went to the hardhats pag

Re: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

Within the VA what most of the rest of the English speaking world would call a department, the VA calls a Service.  Sub-departments are called Sections.  So Sections are subsets of the services.   Jim Gray - Original Message - From: Usha To: hardhats-members@lists.sourcefo

Re: [Hardhats-members] How to "save" a nake reference?

$$LGR^%ZOSV - Original Message - From: "Gregory Woodhouse" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, June 20, 2005 10:02 PM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] How to "save" a nake reference? > I believe there's an entry point in %ZOSV to call the platform > dependent method of getting the l

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Does shift-6 help?   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of James Gray Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 11:21 AM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt   Are you using Cach

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Usually the ^ symbol backs you out of Vista functions.   Thanks, Marc Aylesworth   C3I Associates AFRL/IFSE Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team   525 Brooks Rd Rome, NY 13441-4505   Tel:315.330.2422 Fax:315.330.7009 Email:Marc[EMAIL PROTECTED]   From:

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting

I do not know how you would do this in GT.M. But in Cache, when I am in a terminal window at the programmer's prompt I would do the following: VAH>S PATH="your path" S PATH=$$DEFDIR^%ZISH(PATH) W !!,PATH VAH>S FILE="your filename" VAH>S %IO=PATH_FILE VAH>S %IS="%IO:(newversion):3" VAH>O @%I2

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

If you have the proper keys to make you a programmer(XUPROG and XUPROGMODE), then you only need type ^PG. I am assuming that you signed in through ^ZU. If you started at the MUMPS prompt and then used ^XUP to get to DIUSER (you said Fileman, didn't you?), then you can just back out. But if you sig

Re: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

In my site, I used SERVICE/SECTION to enter the names such as FAMILY PRACTICE, GASTROENTEROLOGY. Kevin --- Usha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What does the SERVICE/SECTION field specify for a > NEW PERSON? And how to specify the specialty of a > provider? > > What does TREATING SPECIALTY file c

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message I'm not sure, the hardhats web site said:Learn M and FM v21 for freeDownload this free version of M that has been pre-configured to run File Manager v21. Dave Whitten, a fellow Hardhat, created it with MSM Workstation, so it is limited to a single user. Check out the readme.txt fo

RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Just curious, what, if any, advantages are there to doing that? I like having just one file to deal with. Steven B. Tomlinson [EMAIL PROTECTED] Pacific Telehealth and Technology Hui www.PacificHui.org > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf

RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

I'm just a lowly programmer (not a sysadmin), but the first two things that come to mind are 1. improved parallelism 2. keeping your bus good and busy (Okay, okay, so maybe the 2nd item is really an advantage.) --- "Tomlinson, Steven B" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Just curious, what, if any, a

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Then it is neither Cache or GT.M.  It is MSM.  Hopefully you can use one of the techniques mentioned in one of the other messages. Jim Gray - Original Message - From: Carroll, Richard (EDS) To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting

I followed this thread to the end and thought I would jump in at this point. It seems to me that we are dealing with an environment issue. What does vista's .bash_profile say for gtm_vista and vista_home variables? It may not allow you to create files outside of vista_home if vista_home = /hom

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Richard, If you're running MSM Workstation, that means Windows. If you're sticking with Windows, then I suggest you go to the InterSystems web site and download their free, single-user version of Cache (MUMPS) for Windows. http://www.intersystems.com/cache/downloads/index.html If you ever think

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Thanks for clearing that up.  I am on windows.  I have an old box I've been thinking about loading with Linux though, this sounds like a good excuse to dig in.   Ric  -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of chuck5566Sent: Tue

[Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Bhaskar, I think this a good idea. If one uses journaling and backups it would make the administration of backup and recovery easier by separating the critical mass from the mundane wouldn't it? Also, the multiple databases would sort of be self documenting, i.e. what global var's go to what app

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

“but this group is mainly about a completely open-source stack of VistA/MUMPS/Linux, and in that respect, at least, this group can be immeasurably helpful.”   It is starting to look like that. Don’t think it was that when I subscribed. Thought Hardhats was about VistA, regardless of the

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Actually, this is an anything you want to run VistA group as this is the Hardhats mailing list. It happens to have a big, noisy contingency of WorldVistA/GT.M users, but M is M whether or not Intersytems mentions it on their web page and you can practice M in Cache just fine. On Tuesday 21 June

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Steve -- The only reason to segregate globals is for operational reasons such as those I outlined, e.g., a throw-away-on-system-crash database file for scratch globals, a read-only database file for globals that are not modified in normal operation, such as globals that define the data dictio

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

The gurus need to weigh in on this, but from what I understand, partitioning the globals might be something that would not be desireable, at least not until/unless VistA is reengineered to facilitate that sort of management. On Tuesday 21 June 2005 06:00 pm, gmartinson wrote: > Bhaskar, > > I

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Title: Message Hold the CTRL key down and type “C”.   -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carroll, Richard (EDS) Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 12:05 PM To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMP

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

If that doesn't work, try Ctrl-Q (just in case you inadvertently hit ^S). Cameron Schlehuber wrote: Hold the CTRL key down and type “C”. --- SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies from IBM. Find simple to foll

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Guess what guys and gals, be prepared because when VistA-Office comes out, we will be discovered anew, and we will be seeing newbies like never before. Most of them will be running on Cache and Windows. So, Thurman, you are going to be an important resource because there are a bunch on this

Re: [Hardhats-members] Mainly Open/The MUMPS Prompt

I too hope this group stays open and not just open-source.  It should be open to discussion of any flavor of Mumps and any OS they will run on. Jim Gray - Original Message - From: Thurman Pedigo To: hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 200

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting

Good grief...it didn't even occur to me that absolute pathnames would be "munged" like this depending on your environment variables. I don't know why not. --- Mark Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I followed this thread to the end and thought I would jump in at this > point. > > It seems to

Re: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

Trivia here, but I think that the VAs are often associated with Medical schools, and the Medical Schools have the Departments, such as Deparment of Medicine, and the hospitals have the Services, which are usually the patients, wards, etc., assigned to the Medicine folks (and that the Surgeons w

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Is it really going to be 'that good'? I am cleaning up some programming projects and setting aside some brainspace right now so when it comes out I have some room in the cortex. On Tuesday 21 June 2005 13:51, Nancy Anthracite wrote: > Guess what guys and gals, be prepared because when VistA-Offi

[Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

I am trying to populate the NEW PERSON file by reading a text file I received from an existing application.  I have written a routine that will read the file and create the FDA array.  However when it gets to the UPDATE^DIE call, I get the following message:   . S DIEFNIEN[EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I must say I have had a lot of help here. Perhaps I should change to Linux while all this focus is hot. I'm just ready for it yet. .../t > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Anthracite > Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 2:52

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

On Tuesday 07 June 2005 06:44, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > >>4. Network services can now be written in GT.M and deployed under > >>inetd/xinetd. > > [KSB] This will allow the new "direct connect" CPRS GUI to be used more > easily. Effectively, it means that VistA can be packaged & deployed > like other

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I guess we'll find out. Believe me...I empathize. I am swimming (drowing?) in projects. --- Mark Street <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Is it really going to be 'that good'? > > I am cleaning up some programming projects and setting aside some > brainspace > right now so when it comes out I have

RE: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

Anyone ever wonder what VistA (AND EHR) could have been if all the Medical Schools had gotten behind it instead of playing KING OF THE HILL? thurman > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nancy Anthracite > Sent: Tuesday, June 21,

Re: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

There are a few files like 2 and 200 that have so much logic built into the DD (try looking at a standard listing) that doing bulk updates like this is all but a lost cause. You can try tracking it down, but most likely you'll have to build your entries incrementally, following the logic in the Reg

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

The partitioning of the globals is or is not needed. For a single doctor's office with 2-5 users, it probably does not make sense. For a serious implementation at a sizeable medical center (or an outpatient clinic with many providers) it makes absolutely perfect sense. If you look at the larger

RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

Title: RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE I am very new at this so I'm not sure what you mean by building the entries incrementally.  Do you mean inserting the data straight into the globals?  I was hoping to use UPDATE^DIE since it does all of the indexing...(at least that's what the documenta

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I'll be ready when GT.M runs on OS X. (Yes, and I know Apple has announce a move to Intel.) This may sound like a crazy idea, but wouldn't we benefit from having people proficient in Cache, in GT.M, in Linux, in OS X, FreeBSD, Windows, and perhaps other platforms? Making applications available on

RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

Presume you went through PATIENT FILE and deleted all the “Required Field” iterations? Another option is to “stuff” the fields using “///” or “” -force. Would first add a complete record (YOU WILL HAVE A LOT OF EMPTY FIELDS) before trying “stuff” or UPDATE^DIE.   thurman  

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

OS X is a BSD variant and GTM should run in Linux compatible mode. Thanks Marc Aylesworth C3I Associates AFRL/IFSE Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team 525 Brooks Rd Rome, NY 13441-4505 Tel:315.330.2422 Fax:315.330.7009 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTE

RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

I'd start by looking at the option XUSERNEW and thinking about how to make it non-interactive. Trying to add a whole record in one fell swoop might be possible for file 200. File 2, well, I think trying to add everything in one UPDATE^DIE call would be a disaster. --- "Theriot, Derek" <[EMAIL PROT

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Yes...I know that. Of course, it still runs on the PowerPC. I don't know if there's a publicly available Darwin port for Intel (yet). --- Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OS X is a BSD variant and GTM should run in Linux compatible mode. > > Thanks > > Marc Ayleswort

Re: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

I did bulk enrollment and was able to get it working. I also had to bump around in the dark a bit to figure out how to do it. Here is what VPE says are the required fields: Required Fields.. FLD NUMDD FIELD NAME -- -- .01200

RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

In file 200 I file some address information, etc. Here's the snip of the code: S DIC="^VA(200,",DIC(0)="F" D DO^DIC1 S X=$P(L1,U) L +^VA(200,"AA") S DA=$O(^VA(200,"AA"),-1) D FILE^DICN L -^VA(200,"AA") I +Y<0 W !,"Error" G ACTIVATE S IEN=+Y_"," K FDA,^TMP("

Re: [Hardhats-members] Mainly Open/The MUMPS Prompt

Gosh, we're too small a group for infighting. If we subdivide M supporters the resulting groups will be a bit on the small side. So all flavors welcome.. Kevin --- James Gray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I too hope this group stays open and not just > open-source. It should be open to discuss

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

"I'm just ready for it yet. .../t" Freudian slip? :-) Kevin Get an older computer and run one of the newer Linux distros. Its not as painful as one might think. I was intimitated initially by Linux too. But its not so bad. Kevin --- Thurman Pedigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I mus

RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

My first preparation for this was to delete "Required" from something over 20 (I think) fields. I am working on printing something over 20,000 patient records to ASCII for upload. The work is synchronizing the VistA fields with my old FileMan fields. I will have to add several fields. My hold-up fo

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

> >> "but this group is mainly about a completely open-source stack of >> VistA/MUMPS/Linux, and in that respect, at least, this group can be >> immeasurably helpful." > > It is starting to look like that. Don't think it was that when I subscribed. > Thought Hardhats was about VistA, regardless

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

I think you have hit the nail on the head with your last sentence. The old RPC broker pretty much required that the server and clients be on the same network to provide secuity for the system because of the way the callback was made to the server. The new broker fixed that but did not work wel

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I'm not intimidated by Linux at all. Through all of undergraduate and graduate school I used Unix (from V7 to BSD 4.3) every day, for everything from programming to writing term papers. I was a pretty decent C programmer long before I had even touched a system running DOS or Windows. I once even ha

Re: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

> I'd start by looking at the option XUSERNEW and thinking about how to > make it non-interactive. Trying to add a whole record in one fell swoop > might be possible for file 200. File 2, well, I think trying to add > everything in one UPDATE^DIE call would be a disaster. >From having tried to do

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

Mark -- Comments below. -- Bhaskar Mark Street wrote: On Tuesday 07 June 2005 06:44, K.S. Bhaskar wrote: > >>4. Network services can now be written in GT.M and deployed under > >>inetd/xinetd. > > [KSB] This will allow the new "direct connect" CPRS GUI to be used more > easily. Effective

RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

That all sounds good, my concern, just for the sake of discussion, is that the routines and business logic may be so tightly integrated across packages/namespaces that the advantages of physically partitioning the data may not be realized sufficiently to justify the added system administration over

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Fair enough, Steve. I thought that with the use of namespaces, VistA was well partitioned, but I probably don't understand its interwoven intricacies. I know GT.M, but not VistA. -- Bhaskar Tomlinson, Steven B wrote: That all sounds good, my concern, just for the sake of discussion, is that

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

I think you are right Yellow dog and Darwin only live on PowerPc. The closest you could probably get in a intel flavor would be FreeBSD or OpenBSD. Thanks Marc Aylesworth C3I Associates AFRL/IFSE Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team 525 Brooks Rd Rome, NY 13441-4505 Tel:315.330.2422 Fax:315.

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

I understand. Can you explain some details/mechanism on the new 'direct connect' CPRS GUI. Am I assuming that the 'new way' is to make a direct connection to GT.M/VistA using a superserver connection instead of having RPCBroker listener. Did this grow out of limitations of RPCBroker? On Tues

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

Unfortunately, I don't know the details on how to connect to the new CPRS GUI, but I know that it works with a GT.M server deployed under inetd/xinetd, but hopefully someone on this list will be able to tell you how. I also don't know why the protocol was changed/enhanced. -- Bhaskar Mark St

RE: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Actually, I did install Linux on a couple of computers and GT.M trial on one. It subsequently crashed and I just didn't have the time work a parallel approach. Maybe I'm not ready .../t > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardhats- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevi

RE: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

Under the old CPRS the client connected to the server and then the server opened a connection back to the client this is an older style of making connections between server and client for two way communications. The new CPRS makes one connection from the client and uses this to communicate both way

Re: [Hardhats-members] HUI OPENVISTA VERSION 3.0 RELEASED TO WORLDVISTA

Well, you made the news --- "Zukaitis, Karl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE > June 20, 2005 > > > Hui OPENVISTA VERSION 3.0 RELEASED TO WORLDVISTA > > The Pacific Telehealth & Technology Hui ("Hui") announced the

Re: [Hardhats-members] HUI OPENVISTA VERSION 3.0 RELEASED TO WORLDVISTA

Well, I looked on the worldvista site at Sourceforge for this release. Is it available yet? What will it be named when it does surface? On Tuesday 21 June 2005 15:42, Greg Woodhouse wrote: > Well, you made the news > > --- "Zukaitis, Karl" <[E

Re: [Hardhats-members] The MUMPS Prompt

Geez, just try and complement some people. . . On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:27 PM, Nancy Anthracite wrote: Actually, this is an anything you want to run VistA group as this is the Hardhats mailing list. It happens to have a big, noisy contingency of WorldVistA/GT.M users, but M is M whether or not I

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

The old way involved having a listener running on a known port, which would job off a new MUMPS process for each CPRS client. Since the new MUMPS process created a new TCP/IP outgoing socket from the server, the listener only had a minimal load per CPRS client, and thus didn't have to hand off the

Re: [Hardhats-members] GT.M V5.0-000 available

Beautiful Dave, thanks for the clarification. I can remember running into that problem some months back. Socket's are good. Am I correct in assuming that one would have two choices here since there is no daemon process to run. 1. Run/spawn a gtm/mumps process through xinetd/inetd (Is this wh

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Having things spread across multiple partitions (or namespaces or volume sets or whatever) does increase the management complexity of the system. However routines and business logic will see a VistA database set as one virtual database. Thus the tight integration is not an issue. Now if you are t

RE: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Likewise, there are a number of packages that had wise developers who separated relatively static globals from relatively dynamic globals. We really didn't get into that habit until the mid 80's. The two globals that grow the fastest and largest are the Orders and the Notes. -Original Messag

Re: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE

Title: RE: [Hardhats-members] UPDATE^DIE Evidently mine is a minority opinion, but I think it is OK, even commendable, to use UPDATE^DIE to pre-load File 200.  In fact, ^XUSERBLK "Grant Access by Profile" constructs an FDA and calls UPDATE^DIE, so what can be wrong with that?   I know of a bu

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

smcphelan wrote: > ... If you look at the > larger VA sites they will have the globals partitioned over 15 - 30 virtual > volume sets spreading the IO out over multiple spindles and disk > controllers. I would be very interested in a concrete description of how this is worked out at an actu

Re: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

Thurman Pedigo wrote: > Anyone ever wonder what VistA (AND EHR) could have been if all the Medical > Schools had gotten behind it instead of playing KING OF THE HILL? > Oh, Thurman, you old trouble-maker. How about this one: Has anyone noticed the coolness, even prejudice toward VistA within the

Re: [Hardhats-members] Wireless in the enterprise?

FWIW: My GP has been using a wireless PDA for over a year now. He uses it to order my meds/refills and Lord knows what else. He's very happy using it. His office still uses paper records - he tells me they're going electronic soon. On Jun 20, 2005, at 10:53 AM, Greg Woodhouse wrote: Th

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

Then is taking backup of a particular module's globals also possible? If so, how? Regards Usha - Original Message - From: "K.S. Bhaskar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 1:48 AM Subject: Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning > Steve -- > > The o

RE: [Hardhats-members] Wireless in the enterprise?

Wireless PDA's have some benefit in a (small) private practice, though the wireless part leaves some question. Most who use it in the context of medication ordering of refills get some perks, to get the drug ordering business, along with free use of the PDA. PDA medical records have serious limitat

RE: [Hardhats-members] What is SERVICE/SECTION and TREATING SPECIALTY

JohnLeo Zimmer wrote: "Has anyone noticed the coolness, even prejudice toward VistA within the family practice community?" Anyone who has invested $50k in a system will not be quick to idolize a freebie. Next generation - maybe. .../t > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailt

Re: [Hardhats-members] VistA global variable partitioning

There's always KIDS. === Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] "The whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking." -- Albert Einstein On Jun 21, 2005, at 8:49 PM, Usha wrote: Then is taking backup of a particular module's globals also possible? If so, how? Regar

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exporting

Kevin, Thanks for the debugger. It's really nice. I got to know where the problem is. This is my %ZISH routine's OPEN portion. Here I had included the command "S X2="/home/vista/OpenVistA"" to restrain the system from creating an HFS file in the "/" directory by default. As soon as I rmoved this

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exportingMy

Does the Device file HFS do that? NUMBER: 39 NAME: GTM-UNIX-HFS $I: /tmp/hfs.dat ASK DEVICE: YES ASK PARAMETERS: YES LOCATION OF TERMINAL: Host File Server (GT.M) ASK HOST FILE: YESASK HFS I/O OPERATION: YES OPEN PARA

Re: [Hardhats-members] Does not ask DEVICE while exportingMy

This is the DEVICE file's captioned output for HFS. NUMBER: 39 NAME: GTM-UNIX-HFS $I: /home/vista/tmp/hfs.dat ASK DEVICE: NO ASK PARAMETERS: NOVOLUME SET(CPU): ROU LOCATION OF TERMINAL: Host File Server (GT.M) ASK HOST FILE: YES