At 12:55 AM 1/8/2006, AMDSpeed typed:
Correct. I don't need film quality material. Likely going to input video
using a firewire link from a MiniDV videocam. I guess I'll lean toward the
P4 solution. I think I can pick up a P4 chip on ebay for around $100. I can
actually use the Celeron in another
dware List
Subject: RE: [H] Recommendation on computer build
The bottom line is that he is just trying to make a simple instructional
video, not a high def movie. Even VCD quality would be Ok for that purpose.
ctor, the Award Winning Anti-Spam Filter
http://mail.giantcompany.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Sevart
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:41 PM
> To: The Hardware List
> Subject: Re: [H] Recomme
I guess you haven't looked at high end cards lately as my high def capture
card [MyHD MDP-120] requires very little cpu usage since it does all the
processing but it captures in streaming mpeg so one has to convert it to
mpeg2 with a freeware app hdtvtompeg2.exe and the null packets should be
At 10:30 PM 1/7/2006, Winterlight typed:
But in my mind there is still a long way to go with these cards and
high end video capture products in general.
I guess you haven't looked at high end cards lately as my high def
capture card [MyHD MDP-120] requires very little cpu usage since it
does
At 07:00 PM 1/7/2006, you wrote:
OK, but were you recording in .VCR (what it considers it's highest format)
or DVD-Compliant MPG2?
I was recording MPEG-2
Video 720X480 NTSC(525)
61.76 MB/Minute
Audio 48,000KHZ 16 Bit, Stereo
This works fine for me. I think you are making too big of a deal abou
http://mail.giantcompany.com
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:hardware-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Winterlight
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 7:30 PM
> To: The Hardware List
> Subject: RE: [H] Recommendation on computer build
>
>
> >
> >
CTED] On Behalf Of Chris Reeves
> Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 7:06 PM
> To: 'The Hardware List'
> Subject: RE: [H] Recommendation on computer build
>
> Yeah, this won't work out so well. P4 solution will be better then the
> Athlon XP solution, though
Here's another solution (and think about this) The ATI AIW is still a
software-encoding system. So, it takes high CPU.
I had this card on my dual 3.06 Xeon for a year, and it only pulled 12
percent CPU when recording at it's highest level. I eventually moved thtat
9600 AIW over to a P4
The IS7-V (Intel 848P chipset) would, IMO, be a better choice than the A7N8X
(NF2). There would, of course, be the extra expense of buying a new chip...
- Original Message -
From: "AMDSpeed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'The Hardware List'"
Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 5:40 PM
Subjec
Yeah, this won't work out so well. P4 solution will be better then the
Athlon XP solution, though it would cost you more (since the other route you
have the board + processor).
Here's another solution (and think about this) The ATI AIW is still a
software-encoding system. So, it takes high CPU.
I think you will find that the P4 3 with HT will work best for this job as
long as that board is stable. I have had this setup with a Intel board and
it worked great for video editing. The 9600 AIW will do on the fly DVD but
I don't think you need that kind of video quality so you may want to re
At 06:40 PM 1/7/2006, AMDSpeed typed:
I'm in the process of building my girlfriend a computer on a budget. She
plans on recording interviews with patients using a miniDV camcorder and
using the footage to make instructional DVDs and powerpoint presentations.
Video processing & doing it on a bud
13 matches
Mail list logo
