Oliver Deakin wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 9 May 2006 at 10:32, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
As the Harmony Classlib grows, I think that being able to work on a
single module (or some subset of the modules) will become the
typical
To whom it may concern. I was getting similar errors recently. It seems the
HTTPS SVN site/port is down or blocked. Anyway, I fixed my stuff by changing
to the http://svn.apache.org/ URL.
-Original Message-
From: Apache Harmony Build [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 11,
2006/5/12, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Note, the RI is NOT throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions, it is just
letting them happen via invalid array look ups, but in these cases, the
specification is marked with an IndexOutOfBoundsException.
For most methods in StringBuilder and
2006/5/12, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
I agree that the easiest way for us is to throw RI or subclass.
+1.
Is it 'bad' practice to fix this bug (replace subclass with RI) on
user
request and do not think about this problem today?
In this
That's great. Thanks Nathan. :-)
Shall we also change our build system to access Harmony SVN repository
through http instead of https?
Nathan Beyer wrote:
To whom it may concern. I was getting similar errors recently. It seems the
HTTPS SVN site/port is down or blocked. Anyway, I fixed my
Stepan Mishura wrote:
On 5/12/06, Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
I agree that the easiest way for us is to throw RI or subclass.
+1.
Is it 'bad' practice to fix this bug (replace subclass with RI) on
user
request and do not think about this problem today?
In this case,
Note that this is not only beautiful but also performance oriented way -
do not create extra rethrows if it's possible
On 5/12/06, Semukhina, Elena V [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To have a beautiful fix, why don't you just write
System.arraycopy(data, start, value, 0, count);
without trying
On 12 May 2006 at 13:59, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
To do this there are at least three steps needed, as far as I can see:
1) Refactor the native code into the modular structure we currently
have for Java code and tests. This has been spoken about
On 12 May 2006 at 1:01, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To whom it may concern. I was getting similar errors recently. It seems the
HTTPS SVN site/port is down or blocked. Anyway, I fixed my stuff by changing
to the http://svn.apache.org/ URL.
I've been getting these consistently since
On 12 May 2006 at 14:19, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. Thanks Nathan. :-)
Shall we also change our build system to access Harmony SVN repository
through http instead of https?
Unless committers are also able to use http instead of https then I'd
rather know about
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
However according to
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/compat.html
it has already draw a conclusion that:
1) throw according to spec
2) when we discover RI throw difference exception which
Nathan Beyer wrote:
snip
What is the value in changing the 1 method that throws
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException to ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException? According
to the compatibility guidelines, first and foremost we follow the
specification. The documented exception (no pun intended) to this rule
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Perhaps this is a bit of an aside, but one of the biggest difficulties I
have when trying to develop against a single module is the
availability of
the test support classes. Currently, I run the ant build and run the
'compile-support' to build the
Hey, I'm using it as a time server (with a really long root delayg).
Regards,
Tim
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 12 May 2006 at 14:19, Richard Liang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's great. Thanks Nathan. :-)
Shall we also change our build system to access Harmony SVN repository
through http instead
More generally, from a performance point of view it is best not to write
if (index 0 || index = array.length || etc. etc.) {
throw new FooIndexOutOfBoundsException();
}
if there is a method call or an array access which will throw the exception
anyway. (Many null parameter checks can be
(sorry for the late response)
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
For both items we had discussions that did not complete to decisions:
About exception messages Geir was going to contact Sun.
I believe the issue was not whether we can copy Sun's exception messages
but the problem of a test case asserting
2006/5/12, Nathan Beyer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
What is the value in changing the 1 method that throws
StringIndexOutOfBoundsException to ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException?
The value is that possible user application depending on RI's
behaviour will work with ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException but will
I have different opinion there.
This exception is quite rare in this function, isn't it? If so, we can
optimize common pass by removing explicit checks. It could be
performance beneficial.
There other point here, internal exception can be lazy exception or
even be optimized out. On DRLVM IMHO if
Chris Gray wrote:
More generally, from a performance point of view it is best not to write
if (index 0 || index = array.length || etc. etc.) {
throw new FooIndexOutOfBoundsException();
}
if there is a method call or an array access which will throw the exception
anyway. (Many null
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Note, the RI is NOT throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions, it is just
letting them happen via invalid array look ups, but in these cases, the
specification is marked with an IndexOutOfBoundsException.
Hi Nathan,
If we consider the RI as a black box whose internals
I'd like to create a new snapshot of the classlib code this weekend and
upload it to our dist directory[1] (in time for JavaOne).
Please shout if you have any objection.
Regards,
Tim
[1] http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/harmony/snapshots/
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java
The SVN machine (minotaur.apache.org aka people.apache.org) has suffered
some severe crashes 'n stuff. Committers have been notified (through the
committers@ mailing list) and will be notified again when write access is
back up.
On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 08:45:52AM +0100, Mark Hindess wrote:
On
On Friday 12 May 2006 11:37, George Harley wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Note, the RI is NOT throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions, it is just
letting them happen via invalid array look ups, but in these cases, the
specification is marked with an IndexOutOfBoundsException.
Hi Nathan,
If
2006/5/12, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, Jimmy, Jing Lv [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
snip
However according to
http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/subcomponents/classlibrary/compat.html
it has already draw a conclusion that:
1) throw according to spec
2) when we
2006/5/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like there are as many interpretations of the guidelines as
their are correspondents on this topic :-)
My suggested change would be that we state that Harmony class library
code should throw exceptions of the same runtime class as the RI.
Chris Gray wrote:
On Friday 12 May 2006 11:37, George Harley wrote:
Nathan Beyer wrote:
Note, the RI is NOT throwing ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsExceptions, it is just
letting them happen via invalid array look ups, but in these cases, the
specification is marked with an
BTW I propose to add a String: reason why into every exception thrown:
E.g.
replace:
throw new IOException();
with
throw new IOException(Stream does not support reset operation..);
?
On 5/12/06, Paulex Yang (JIRA) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like there are as many interpretations of the guidelines as
their are correspondents on this topic :-)
My suggested change would be that we state that Harmony class library
code should throw exceptions of the same
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 9 May 2006 at 10:32, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
As the Harmony Classlib grows, I think that being able to work on a
single module (or some subset of the
Hi George,
2006/5/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, George Harley [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds like there are as many interpretations of the guidelines as
their are correspondents on this topic :-)
My suggested change would be that we state that Harmony
Leo,
We partitioned Harmony contributors a long time ago (based on prior
access as declared in the ACQ), so while you state it as:
* there are people who want to only ever work on a small part of
the codebase
in fact there are people who only *can* contribute to a part of the
Harmony
please ignore
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can you get the src snap there as well?
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
SSG/MPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 203 665 6437
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 5:39 AM
To: harmony-dev
Subject: [classlib] Plan to create a new snapshot
I'd like
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tests shouldn't assert the actual message String in an exception.
I disagree. We need some technique to test exception messages.
As I wrote in the thread should strings in exceptions match the
reference implementation?
sure
Magnusson, Geir wrote:
Can you get the src snap there as well?
--
Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe,
Hi All,
I'd like to mention one more issue concerned with the broken https
access: the building script supplied with the DRLVM is currently
checking out sources for class libraries from
https://svn.apache.org/... . Though it can be easily changed in a
build property file, this still may create
Either way. We expect to be fixed soon - it's not avail because infra
wants to review the SVN repo to ensure that there was no damage due to
the crash. That should be happening today.
gier
Andrey Chernyshev wrote:
Hi All,
I'd like to mention one more issue concerned with the broken https
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006 10:50 PM
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: [classlib] exception messages
Mikhail Loenko wrote:
2006/5/12, Tim Ellison [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Tests shouldn't assert the actual message String in an exception.
I
I agree (modulo externalizing the message string).
Regards,
Tim
Mikhail Fursov wrote:
BTW I propose to add a String: reason why into every exception thrown:
E.g.
replace:
throw new IOException();
with
throw new IOException(Stream does not support reset operation..);
?
On 5/12/06,
On 5/12/06, Oliver Deakin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Oliver Deakin wrote:
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
On 9 May 2006 at 10:32, Geir Magnusson Jr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mark Hindess wrote:
As the Harmony Classlib grows, I think that being able to
Hello,
We had a discussion about stress tests design. I'd like to present you simple
model which allows construction of stress tests from junit tests. Using simple
configuration strings we get various stress scenarios.
Please, find it here:
Hi,
Alongside the DRLVM codebase, here is a contribution from Intel of an OPEN
( Open Pluggable Extensible Interface ) specification for JVM and
Classlibrary-VM Interface development.
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-459
We hope that this spec will promote modular component
On 12 May 2006 at 21:18, Shipilov, Alexander D
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
We had a discussion about stress tests design. I'd like to present you
simple model which allows construction of stress tests from junit
tests. Using simple configuration strings we get various stress
unsuscribe
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/12/06, hugo F. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
unsuscribe
-
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail:
I already tryed: it doesn't work
Have I to write a message?
From: Mike Ringrose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: unsuscribe
Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 13:39:43 -0400
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 5/12/06, hugo F. [EMAIL
I did it manually... you should only get one copy of this due to the CC
hugo F. wrote:
I already tryed: it doesn't work
Have I to write a message?
From: Mike Ringrose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
To: harmony-dev@incubator.apache.org
Subject: Re: unsuscribe
Hi all,
I was working with the version of DRLVM that I compiled off of
JIRA-438. I tried it with a JVMTI agent using -agentlib:... It looks
like this version gives Class Load events. According to JVMTI, loading
eclipse loads 4,189 classes.
I'm not seeing any Method Load Events though.
Mark,
Please, find it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/
Shouldn't this go in a JIRA rather than on the wiki?
If I understand Alexander correctly, currently this is not yet a
contribution, but a prototype. Alexander has presented a concept sketch
and awaits a design review from the community.
My
On Friday 12 May 2006 22:18 Elford, Chris L wrote:
Hi all,
I was working with the version of DRLVM that I compiled off of
JIRA-438. I tried it with a JVMTI agent using -agentlib:... It looks
like this version gives Class Load events. According to JVMTI, loading
eclipse loads 4,189
New class library snapshot builds are available on the Harmony downloads
page:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/harmony/snapshots/
These represent the state of the classlib code at repository revision
r405803.
There are both binary and source versions available as a convenience for
Fedotov, Alexei A wrote:
Mark,
Please, find it here:
http://wiki.apache.org/
Shouldn't this go in a JIRA rather than on the wiki?
If I understand Alexander correctly, currently this is not yet a
contribution, but a prototype. Alexander has presented a concept sketch
and awaits a design
Thanks Gregory,
I did mean CompiledMethodLoad. Thanks for the explanation about the
state of JVMTI support in DRLVM and the caveat about -agentlib
defaulting to interpreted mode for some simple JVMTI support.
Adding -Dvm.use_interpreter=false did enabled the JIT for me [and the
Is any license included? If not, just add that
I'll put pointers on the wiki that our mail list contribution policy
applies...
--
Geir Magnusson Jr
SSG/MPD
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1 203 665 6437
-Original Message-
From: Tim Ellison [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 12, 2006
Hello, Rana
I took a quick view on the document, and I have some questions on Chapter 6.
Let's take 6.9.1 A.NM ACCESS TO NATIVE MEMORY as example:
citeThe MemoryAccessor interface includes the following function groups:
1.Memory allocation and de-allocation: malloc, realloc, free
2.Operations
55 matches
Mail list logo
