RE: [hlds_linux] gaming cluster.

> So would openmosix be able to spread an hlds process over > multiple cpus in > one computer? Didn't I already answer this question? The answer is NO. NO. NO. Mosix can distribute multiple HLDS processes to different CPUs, depending on the load each HLDS process is generating. Mosix works

RE: [hlds_linux] gaming cluster.

I'd like to know how Ryan came up with 50 milliseconds of latency for GiGE. As m0gely points out, GiGE has a latency measured in *micro* seconds (millionths of a second) in a switched LAN environment. Hell, 100BaseTX and 10BaseT have latency in the lower microsecond range (which is obviously sub

RE: [hlds_linux] RE: P3 vs P4 vs Athlon was: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU Usage?

> You'll need (stan?) about 3x the airflow to keep this monster > at a decent temperature. I won't even guess at a ratio. I just wouldn't run peltiers in a server at all, especially a 1U or 2U. > Most Peltier using overclockers tend to couple them with > water cooling as its > heat carrying cap

Re: [hlds_linux] mp_tkpunish

Rob Sanders wrote: I've used damp for quite some time. If you cant figure out how to config it, then you shouldn't be running a server, much less linux. Oh man come on. Thanks alot. I get the drive to go learn something and get this crap. Your as bad as wraith, and I don't run linux. And I

[hlds_linux] RE: laggy server

Ok, in response to the questions, no, there are no other mods, just hlds, cstrike and adminmod, no hlguard on any of the servers on the machine. The network doesn't seem to be a problem as we have other machines and servers that work fine; it's just this single server on this one machine. The other

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] CS server needed

A guy who needs some CS servers apparently. > > Ok, I'll bite, who's Andy Hodges? > > -- > - m0gely > http://quake2.telestream.com/ > Q2 | Q3A | Counter-strike > > ___ > To unsubscribe, edit your list preferences, or view the list archives, please visit:

Re: [hlds_linux] cause of choke

I still haven't fixed this problem. Ironicly, the people who complain about the choke are the ones that are using LAN Settings on internet (e.g. cl_cmdrate 101; cl_updaterate 101; rate 2;). I've even tried setting sv_maxrate to 0 to see if it would help, and it doens't seem to do much. Actual

Re: [hlds_linux] cause of choke

I don't know if you ever solved this problem but this might be worth a shot. We had some small problems with choke a long time ago. The solution to get rid of the choke (for us at least) was to increase the sv_maxrate on the server and the rate on the client. We also noticed that an decreased valu

RE: [hlds_linux] Why did this happen? Please help

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 11:08:59 -0500, Sullivan, Rick wrote: > This exact failure happened on my server alsoI ended up un-loading > all the statsme; adminmod; adminmod plugins; metamod; chickenmod etc. > appendages, and then it ran just fine. I then started adding them back > one at a time and f

Re: [hlds_linux] Laggy Server

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 09:42:06 -0500, Phillip Meents wrote: > Ok, im running 2 16 person CS servers, and 1 20 person CS server on a p4 > 1.7GHZ machine. The 2 16 person servers are empty 90% of the time. The > people on the 20 person server experience lag spikes every couple of > minutes. We have wa

RE: P3 vs P4 vs Athlon was: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU Usage?

There are lot of 1U servers that run dual AMD's. Can't understand why some of you don't think it's any good. Sure there is some cost to develop the 1U chassis and the one who has to pay is the customer. But if you need the space to other things, well then there's really not much to do than to pay..

Re: [hlds_linux] sv_maxrate -- does it actually do anything?

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 04:00:04 -0500, zeek wrote: > > I've been doing some experimentation with 'sv_maxrate' (on the server) > and 'rate' settings and I've come to the conclusion that they do not > limit the data rate (as they are documented to do). > > I've set sv_maxrate 1000 and sv_maxupdaterate 1

Re: [hlds_linux] statsme

On Tue, 12 Nov 2002 08:47:39 -0500, Stefan Huszics wrote: > > I've solved that in another way. Losing team gets an auto teamslay. That > makes CT ALWAYS at least TRY to get to the bomb ASAP and defuse it. > > Works wonders also to avoid having people camping in a corner the last > 45 seconds after

RE: [hlds_linux] Why did this happen? Please help

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. -- [ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ] This exact failure happened on my server alsoI ended up un-loading all the statsme; adminmod; adminmod plug

RE: [hlds_linux] Laggy Server

Internet server, or LAN server? If internet server, what is the size of the internet pipe? StanTheMan TheHardwareFreak http://www.hardwarefreak.com rcon admin at: Beer for Breakfast servers 209.41.98.2:27016 (CS multi-map) 209.41.98.2:27015 (DoD) 209.41.98

RE: [hlds_linux] RE: P3 vs P4 vs Athlon was: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU Usage?

> Anyone out there using TEC modules (Thermo-electric cooling > AKA Peltier > device) ? I am really looking into it for a dual P3 system. About the only people using peltiers are serious overclockers. If you put them inside a server (especially a small one like 1U or 2U), they'll have to be powe

Re: [hlds_linux] [OT] CS server needed

Delirium Tremens wrote: No thanks... I see Andy Hodges is a part of it :/ Use your head before you post.. don't you think that most of the people that read this list -ALREADY- run and operate their own server(s) and do not really need the Andy Hodges spam? Ok, I'll bite, who's Andy Hodges?

Re: [hlds_linux] Laggy Server

Are you running HLGuard? If so, turn off the WH block, that did it for me. I'm running 2 servers on my 1.2 Ghz AMD machine and have had no problem at all before last month when I upgraded HLGuard to the latest one. Before that I had 3 servers on it, but I did as you, tested lots of things. Anyway,

[hlds_linux] Laggy Server

Ok, im running 2 16 person CS servers, and 1 20 person CS server on a p4 1.7GHZ machine. The 2 16 person servers are empty 90% of the time. The people on the 20 person server experience lag spikes every couple of minutes. We have watched the "top" for the machine and there is no processor overloadi

RE: P3 vs P4 vs Athlon was: Re: [hlds_linux] CPU Usage?

> > I would never have considered running AMDs in a 1u rack > mount regardless. > > but if you did, I could see that heat could become a small problem, > > especially if you cramming a few high speed HDDs into that > small space as > > well. Satndard mini tower with front and back fans seems > to

RE: [hlds_linux] statsme

> > Any suggestions/comments regarding the installation and > > configuration of statsme ? > > OOHH Dear GOD, you must disable the annoying bomb counter ;) Nah, I like the bomb counter :) -- Eric (the Deacon remix) ___ To unsubscribe, edit your lis

RE: [hlds_linux] gaming cluster.

> Yeah, thats wrong. I read the FAQ before I started but I'm still not > sure how networking works. I guess any process I start even if its > migrated to another system keeps the IP of its parent node? So, data > would come into the parent node then be forwarded to wherever the > process is?

Re: [hlds_linux] statsme

Kevin J. Anderson wrote: hmmm, I personally like the bomb counter. Lets people know whether they have a chance to go for the defuse or not. I've solved that in another way. Losing team gets an auto teamslay. That makes CT ALWAYS at least TRY to get to the bomb ASAP and defuse it. Works wonde

Re: [hlds_linux] Issues with firewalls

i had a similar problem. try editing the /etc/hosts file and add the line near the top. XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX HOSTNAME where XXX... is the ip address of you box and hostname is the actual name of the box From: Shaun Reynolds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] CC: [E

Re: [hlds_linux] RE: P3 vs P4 vs Athlon was: Re: [hlds_linux] CPUUsage?

Capriotti wrote: Anyone out there using TEC modules (Thermo-electric cooling AKA Peltier device) ? I am really looking into it for a dual P3 system. Why? Do you have any idea what the power requirements for those things are? For a dual system you would need at least a (good) 400wt p/s. besid

RE: [hlds_linux] gaming cluster.

> I'm reading all these interesting methods for gaming clusters > and such, > but after all the information coming in, it still seems like a single, > multi-CPU machine would be better for these types of tasks. > Is this not > the case? I would tend to agree. > It seems like it'd be cheaper, too