kfj wrote:
On 3 Mrz., 17:19, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
here is a sort of handy trick, to make nicer looking photos, which maybe
could be incorporated into this grey picker somehow?
when i'm developing raw files, i use the grey picker equivalent, but then
i dial up the WB just
Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
Hi Kay,
Am 03.03.2011 18:34, schrieb kfj:
Hmmm... I'm very much in two minds about features like this. I feel
that image processing functionality should be kept out of hugin. Of
course we need to align the images photometrically, but manually
finetuning the white balance
Gnome Nomad schrieb am 04.03.11 08:55:
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
On this note,
If I made a real attempt to redesign some elements of hugin, UI-wise i
mean, would anyone be interested in trying to implement it? (If anyone
agreed with the suggestions of course)
I think everyone can admit that Hugin
On 3 Mrz., 19:26, Pablo d'Angelo pablo.dang...@web.de wrote:
Am 03.03.2011 18:34, schrieb kfj:
Hmmm... I'm very much in two minds about features like this. I feel
that image processing functionality should be kept out of hugin. Of
course we need to align the images photometrically, but
On 4 Mrz., 09:57, Carl von Einem c...@einem.net wrote:
As an example why do important UI elements vanish if I switch the main
window into fullscreen mode?
...
or, to add another thing that has always bugged me, sort columns when
the column header is clicked on - in every columnar display
i guess you're an engineer then ;-)))
Clean UI != eye candy
designed by engineers != clean UI
clean UI != designed by engineers (usually)
On Friday, March 4, 2011 8:55:46 AM UTC+1, GnomeNomad wrote:
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
On this note,
If I made a real attempt to redesign some
I agree with you Kay.
It's a matter of what you mean by everything. Hopefully it is almost
nothing ;-)
Anyway, this is a bit of a silly conversation, I'll just try to make
something.
On Thursday, March 3, 2011 6:20:35 PM UTC+1, kfj wrote:
On 28 Feb., 13:56, Yuval Levy goo...@levy.ch
Thanks Jeffery. I have read many reviews and also checked images. Samyang is
a better lens indeed :))
On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
no contest, samyang is vastly superior in terms of flare.
at any rate, you MUST keep your fisheye lens very very
Hi Kay,
I don't think this is a borderline case at all. for anyone who's not
experienced shooting panos, this is *completely* a mainstream case - cameras
are on auto white balance. you can't and shouldn't expect a normal person to
know how to set white balance, or that they should have to
forgive me for not reading all of your words. I have seen (and commented on)
your post in the ptgui forum.
honestly, i guess ptgui will have no problem stitching that many images.
i've certainly thrown more files at it (an order of magnitude more)
it sounds like your problem is that the images
what do you mean? i don't understand.
On Thursday, March 3, 2011 10:47:04 PM UTC+1, David Haberthür wrote:
- Can or should we vouch for another, smaller project? Any ideas or
suggestions?
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free
On 4 Mrz., 04:55, tcorbet terry.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
08. If it will help clarify what I can only poorly explain with
words, I will try to upload screenshots of previews before and after
being forced to press the Step 2 Align button so you can see what I am
talking about. Otherwise, if
On 4 Mrz., 10:35, Jeffrey Martin 360cit...@gmail.com wrote:
I agree with you Kay.
It's a matter of what you mean by everything. Hopefully it is almost
nothing ;-)
By everything I meant the bottom of the stitcher tab with the
processing options for nona end en.
And, as far as the
On 3 Mrz., 22:47, David Haberthür david.haberth...@gmail.com wrote:
The deadline for the submission to Google is in about a week. I'd be happy if
you (yes you, reading this mail) could give some feedback and edit the page,
so I can fill in the application next Tuesday or Wednesday.
David,
Kornel Benko wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. März 2011 schrieb Pit Suetterlin:
Lajos Höss wrote:
Now another problem, when i use help-about, hugin crash.
Same here (with the 2011.0.0 beta2 tarball)
Pit
Hmm, cannot reproduce. Hugin from today trunk.
Confirmed, that one(*) also doesn't
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 3:04:53 PM UTC+1, Yuv wrote:
1. Decide a minimum screen size at which the application is functional.
Regarding this point, the website analytics could be useful - if only to
have a generic measure.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the
Pablo d'Angelo wrote:
Hi Kay,
Am 03.03.2011 18:34, schrieb kfj:
Hmmm... I'm very much in two minds about features like this. I feel
that image processing functionality should be kept out of hugin. Of
course we need to align the images photometrically, but manually
finetuning the white balance
Hey Jeffrey
On Thursday, March 3, 2011 10:47:04 PM UTC+1, David Haberthür wrote:
- Can or should we vouch for another, smaller project? Any ideas or
suggestions?
what do you mean? i don't understand.
Do you know any other project that is applying for GSOC that could use
some support from
Hey Kay
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 11:27, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
On 3 Mrz., 22:47, David Haberthür david.haberth...@gmail.com wrote:
The deadline for the submission to Google is in about a week. I'd be happy
if you (yes you, reading this mail) could give some feedback and edit the
page, so
Ok, fair points. But you know what I mean, I think. There are a lot of
things antithetical between the mind of a designer, and a (software)
engineer. Anyway, I will shut up and try to do something.
On Friday, March 4, 2011 11:04:50 AM UTC+1, kfj wrote:
On 4 Mrz., 10:35, Jeffrey Martin
I definitely agree with Kay - save them as 1/2 or 1/4 size jpegs and upload
them. We will help :)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
Hugin and other free panoramic software group.
A list of frequently asked questions is available at:
I absolutely believe that you can solve what I have not been able to,
and I gladly accept your offer to 'give it a try'. As to your idea
that I may have a misconception about what the modern camera
equivalent of the source files is, I am glad to think outside any box
I have put myself in. You
On 4 Mrz., 17:06, tcorbet terry.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
You can view the sources, in a manner of speaking at this URL:
http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/addItemLink.pl?tourl=/gmd/gmd416m/g4164...
I think that'll do just fine. JPEG2000 is a bit of an exotic format,
but I managed to download some
Fellow Alien, I am also quite new to planet Hugin and I completely
sympathise with your confusion.
The most important thing to do is Don't ever hit the Align button on
the Assistant Tab - EVER!
In particular, while I thought I had it turned off, running another align/
optimize cycle causes the
Meanwhile, I have compressed the files, and ziped them up with
the .pto file after re-setting the 28 Control Points, but my
membership in this group exposes no Files button. How can I send you
about 15MBs? Or, since you have downloaded the jp2 files, you can
generate the tiffs which is even
At the risk of being accursed of only liking your response because it
is almost as verbose as my postings, I do have to say thank you very
much, JohnG. I apologize for my over-long posting, but given the non-
standard nature of this content, plus the complexity of the software
interface to any
On 4 Mrz., 17:06, tcorbet terry.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
Other than that, since a manual set of Control Points is the only way
to get a 'first approximation' of the correct result, I would send you
the 28 coordinate pairs that work to save you that pain, but again, if
you want jpegs, I will
Just for the record. I hate to say it, but the Files option for this
Group does correctly appear if I go back to Internet Explorer from old
tried and true Firefox. So, if you do want me to upload something, I
guess I can pull it off with the other browser.
As to the error log message, I have
Hi kfj,
Am 04.03.2011 10:23, schrieb kfj:
On 3 Mrz., 19:26, Pablo d'Angelopablo.dang...@web.de wrote:
But just throwing in a new free lunch feature without
documentation for everyone to figure out how it works by trial and
error isn't what I consider good style. For example, it took me quite
On 4 Mrz., 13:58, David Haberthür david.haberth...@gmail.com wrote:
I think that with a rephrasing of that sentence we can make sure that
we don't drive away an UI-geek. Additionally there should also be a
blueprint at launchpad where we state a bit more than coherent,
efficient and pretty
On 4 Mrz., 19:13, tcorbet terry.cor...@gmail.com wrote:
Just for the record. I hate to say it, but the Files option for this
Group does correctly appear if I go back to Internet Explorer from old
tried and true Firefox. So, if you do want me to upload something, I
guess I can pull it off
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 2:27 AM, kfj _...@yahoo.com wrote:
I have a feeling that there is too strong a focus on new features. I
feel this is wrong. Looking at what a large amount of traffic on hugin-
ptx is about, I feel that what is currently most needed is a good hard
look at the user
Hugin 2010.4.0 is the version that I am using. When I do an operation
(e.g. Assistant/Align, or Images/CreateControlPoints), A log screen
opens up. I have an 8 Cpu system so the work really flies past this
window. Then the script finishes and the window closes. Blipits
gone. It went by
On 4 Mrz., 20:36, xraycrystallographer
xraycrystallograp...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that I remain “fuzzy” on is the optimization process using
the control points. From my playing around it appears that an
increase in the number of control points results in a better fit of
the images
On Friday, March 4, 2011 6:27:13 PM UTC-5, kfj wrote:
On 4 Mrz., 20:36, xraycrystallographer
xraycrysta...@gmail.com wrote:
One thing that I remain “fuzzy” on is the optimization process using
the control points. From my playing around it appears that an
increase in the number
On March 2, 2011 12:34:35 pm harry van der Wolf wrote:
I would like to raise the question if we as OS community
would like to dedicate Hugin
The decision has obviously fallen and future releases of Hugin will not be
dedicated.
What I find questionable is the timing of this objection. The
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 10:34 AM, Bruno Postle br...@postle.net wrote:
The whole 'About window' is unnecessary and I have no use for it, but it is
still very important that contributors are publically acknowledged,'
I agree, this is very important to keep.
and
having an opportunity for users
On March 1, 2011 08:54:43 am Seb Perez-D wrote:
as Kornel says, it's easier to de-install
easier than `sudo make uninstall` ?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Hoi Habi,
On March 3, 2011 04:47:04 pm David Haberthür wrote:
- The ratio of students passing to students allocated from the last years
IIRC:
4/5 in 2007,2008,2009
4/4 in 2010
Can or should we vouch for another,
smaller project? Any ideas or suggestions?
We did so in 2008. One of the
On March 4, 2011 07:58:50 am David Haberthür wrote:
GSOC should not *only* be about new features. Nonetheless I personally
would go as far as saying a GUI-overhaul could be considered a new
feature as well.
GSoC is first and foremost about students and about code. Google requires
that code
Nope. Creative writing, art, web design, and long ago some UI design.
Jeffrey Martin wrote:
i guess you're an engineer then ;-)))
Clean UI != eye candy
designed by engineers != clean UI
clean UI != designed by engineers (usually)
On Friday, March 4, 2011 8:55:46 AM UTC+1, GnomeNomad wrote:
01. I am restarting, hopefully for the benefit of all concerned. The
first thread has lots of problems, most of which are attributable to
my poor understanding of the basic terminology, methodologies and
fundamental algorithms that are both at the heart of PTGui [and its
sister products] and
Hi all,
just read this article:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/11/03/05/012204/35000-Linux-Benchmarks-In-a-Week
I wonder if someone is interested in creating a stitching benchmark?
With and without Graphics card?
Jan
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
43 matches
Mail list logo
