Hi,
Thanks all.
Now it seems that I have two way to setup the Printway.One is using
Direct socket connection,we must know if hte printer support the function
and the port number.Another is using LPR function,we must know the queue
name of the printer.
I will try these way.Thanks alot.
Yan
-- snip --
But I was under the impression a multi-site GDPS/PPRC environment is
suppose
to offer continous availability, how does it do it if both CF are at one
site and the site destroyed. If you're using dedicated standalone CF (not
ICF), why whould it matter if the CF were local or physically
PAV will give you up to eight SSCHs/RSCHs at a time per page data set.
Wrong. ASM will start at most 2 I/Os to a page data set when WLM managed
PAVs are in use. Otherwise it is a single I/O even if the device has 15
alias's assigned.
Greg
-- snip --
GDPS is evolving.
It hasn't reached that ideal state you are looking for.
So far, if I recall correctly, only the SYSPLEX timers and the DASD are
truly in synch.
And, DASD is not bi-directional (yet) for the same volume.
-- snip --
Ted, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by not
Hi Scott
Thank you for explaining. So, I'll let the reasoncode aside. Below is the
code to be added to the previously posted version of QJOBRC. This will show
the abends occurred so far. Sample Output:
Schtepp 001 Stepname: E900A1Pgmname: NOPCONTI Rc(dec): 32 Rc(hex):
0020
Schtepp
...
Ted, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by not bi-directional.
...
It means I can only update at one site and back up to another.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
Shane Ginnane wrote:
Everyone else has had their say, why not me ...
I size the PLPA to not spill. Yes I oversize it, but as Ron is fond of
pointing, what's the cost of a few extra cylinders ???.
I pamper ASM - page-only volumes, good pathing, separate ranks. You name
it, ASM gets it.
But as
Pierre
Below is an extract from our current IOCDS with 2 OSA-ICC, 2 Cus and 2x16
devices (200-20F, 210-21F respectively).
CHPID PATH=(CSS(0),AD),SHARED,*
PARTITION=((SYK,SYT,SY1,SY2,VM2,VM3),(=)),PCHID=331,*
TYPE=OSC
On Mon, 25 Jul 2005 23:53:30 -0700, Greg Dyck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
PAV will give you up to eight SSCHs/RSCHs at a time per page data set.
Wrong. ASM will start at most 2 I/Os to a page data set when WLM managed
PAVs are in use. Otherwise it is a single I/O even if the device has 15
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 09:01:31 +0200, John Ticic [EMAIL PROTECTED]
INFORMATIK.DE wrote:
A prerequisite is that the PPRC feature is available on both subsystems.
Discalaimer : My basis is IBM ESS. Ron - you could give us the HDS view.
John.
John,
The HDS Point of view is the same as IBM's.
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 00:00:00 GMT, Ted MacNEIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
Ted, I'm not sure exactly what you mean by not bi-directional.
...
It means I can only update at one site and back up to another.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
Ted,
If I
ooo ...
if IBM had that motto, the MVS wouldn't have progressed to z/OS.
i believe if a change provide benefits that far outweighs the risks,
i'd go for it.
i've done DDCONS(NO) and used SMS to assign default dataclass
to DSORG=PS so that DFHSM can migrate them later - else i end up
with
In a message dated 7/26/2005 1:53:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
ASM will start at most 2 I/Os to a page data set when WLM managed
PAVs are in use. Otherwise it is a single I/O even if the device has 15
alias's assigned.
Didn't know that. Live and learn. But
From: R.S.
Yes, paging rate. My rate is 0 whenever I look at the data. It seems I
have more memory than I need (or just *enough*).
Do I have to pamper ASM ?
Or rather just allocate PLPA, COMMON and several LOCALs ?
Everybody decides this for themselves.
Due to bad experience, I tend to be a
...
If I understand your response correctly, you mean that I can't have two
boxes connected doing Remote Copy in both directions at the same time?
...
No, I meant at the volume level.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
Ed Finnel wrote:
Think file182 PDS85 does what you need. Once you get it cooking and have
toured the PROSE members. The command is:
=== rep * str1 str2 write
The * should be changed to a : which specifies all members. I would run
with the default of NOWRITE to see what would get changed before
Ted,
And it works twice as fast with one volume each for Common and PLPA - or PAV
and PLPA and Common on one volume, but without the overflow.
In case you didn't read the posts from Shane and myself, PLPA/Common paging
is extremely disruptive, and doing away with an archaic practice in order to
I received a zSeries Red alert today but have not been able to locate the
alert document at https://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/redAlerts
The alert is for HFS
Red Alerts (2005.07.26)
On Tuesday 26 July 2005 08:21 am, John Ticic wrote:
I received a zSeries Red alert today but have not been able to locate the
alert document at https://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/redAlerts
The alert is for HFS
Red Alerts (2005.07.26)
Users of Hierarchical File System
...
If this is what you mean, then I can't see any sense in doing it. Could you
clarify with an example?
...
One direction:
One site has IMS sharing with another site.
A transaction comes into site 1, and is shipped to site 2 (primary DASD),
I/O is done at site 2, backed up at site one
...
Two dedicated volumes for PLPA and Common is how it was designed to work. An
overflowed PLPA is additional work (albeit small), and forcing overflow of
PLPA when you have a dedicated volume is just plain silly.
...
When I have PLPA (or CSA) paging, I'll consider it.
(PS: try attacking the
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/26/2005
at 10:00 AM, Ron and Jenny Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Then that would be just plain pigheaded
PKB.
you are restricting the number of paging paths, not increasing.
He's doing neither. The limit is still 2 exposures per paging data
set. If you're
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on
07/26/2005
at 01:27 AM, mary george [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
In my system we are experiencing a S0A8 abend but the
system does not seem to crash.
Therofore I suspect that some recovery routine is been written to
recover from this error.
Now I want to know which routine
The alert that shows up is for GRS STAR, not HFS, and it's dated in
February.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the
Ted,
Thinking this through, the return lap is not necessary.
With current synchronous mirroring a failure in site 1 will cause a recovery
in site 2.
A failure in site 2 would see production continue to run in site 1. A
return lap mirror would be redundant.
With GDPS, any IMS processing
Shmuel,
If all of PLPA page-in occurs from the one cylinder PLPA dataset then I
totally agree with you.
However, with PLPA overflowing into Common the majority of PLPA page-ins
will come from the Common Page Dataset, not PLPA. You will have contention
for the two exposures when concurrent
On 25-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger) wrote:
I guess I don't understand what you're trying to do. For the records you
showed,
you were treating records with 'N' in 22 as duplicates even though they had
different
characters in 21 ('*' and 'L'). If you are looking at 21-22, then
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
[...]
So tell me, if I am building a new system and allocating new PLPA, Common,
and Locals, why wouldn't I simply allocate a larger PLPA without overflow
this time around (with PAV). That would be two JCL changes: one to deduct
CYLS from the Common and two; add them
Why not just change the sort statement from SORT
FIELDS=(1,10,CH,A,21,2,CH,A)
to SORT FIELDS=(1,10,CH,A,20,3,CH,A)
Bill Coatney
ANPAC - Information Services
(417)-887-4990 ext. 2610
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
...
I used to allocate a one clinde PLPA and let COMMON have the rest of
the volume; I believe that to still be a sound option.
...
At least one person agrees with me.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
The quickest wayI know of is to split the file into 2 files one
contain the 'L' and another that don't.
sort both removing duplicates ( are there multiple ''L' records?)
then merge the files removing duplicates and put the 'L' records first.
MIke
Hi all,
Looking for advice on preventing unauthorized writes to specific JES2
output classes anyone have any nifty suggestions or are you using JES2
exits and job standards? We do have RACF but that doesn't appear to have
anything for outclasses yet.
On 26-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Coatney, Bill) wrote:
Why not just change the sort statement from SORT
FIELDS=(1,10,CH,A,21,2,CH,A)
I need to eliminate duplicates - with column 21 not being part of the duplicate
check, but with column 21 sorted anyway - so that the last duplicate is
Ron and Jenny Hawkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Shmuel,
If all of PLPA page-in occurs from the one cylinder PLPA dataset then I
totally agree with you.
However, with PLPA overflowing into Common the majority of PLPA page-ins
will come from the Common
Bob H wrote:
Hi all,
Looking for advice on preventing unauthorized writes to specific JES2
output classes anyone have any nifty suggestions or are you using JES2
exits and job standards? We do have RACF but that doesn't appear to have
anything for outclasses yet.
RACF doesn't protect
Hello list,
With the recent discussion (regarding easy questions) in mind,
hopefully this type of question will be forgiven.
I would like to know your experience/opinions on how to set up an
environment for backing up your DASD storage (i.e. syncing data
between two seperate DASD arrays) over
1. Sticking It Out on MVS
Customers continue to run mission-critical applications and
systems on older MVS mainframes. In spite of IBM's best
efforts, many (if not most) of these customers are staying
put. The good news is that there's no shortage of vendors
willing to help them do so.
**Read
Ted
He used past tense: used to. So he doesn't do it any more (G, D R), but
he thinks it is a sound option - as do I. I just do not think it is the best
option for optimum paging throughput. I like to buy my insurance before the
fire happens.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM
Ted,
I agree that this is a perfectly sound option in a system that has little to
no paging. However, the point that Ron is making (and I agree with) is that
for those systems that are memory constrained, and, as such incur paging,
that having a PLPA page-in blocked by common paging operations,
...
I just do not think it is the best
option for optimum paging
...
When we have sub-0.01 pages per second define 'optimum'.
It must be nice to have a shop that is running so clean that this is something
you 'need to address'.
(8-{]}
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W.
dumb way without using merge
1. sort using your control cards but add INCLUDE to get just the 'L'
2, second sort using same control cards with include anything not 'L'
3. concat 'L' data first other second
sort with your control cards and specify OPTIONS EQUALS which will
keep the 'L' s first
However, with PLPA overflowing into Common the majority of PLPA page-ins
will come from the Common Page Dataset, not PLPA. You will have
contention
for the two exposures when concurrent page-in requests for PLPA happen
at
the same time as Common Page-in/out activity using the same two
Howard Brazee wrote:
Am I being more clear now?
I'm not sure. It would have helped if you'd answered the question I asked:
Are you looking for L specifically, or L because it collates after '*'
or what?
If you want the 'L' because it collates after the '*', then this
DFSORT/ICETOOL job
would
Maciej K. wrote:
Hello list,
With the recent discussion (regarding easy questions) in mind,
hopefully this type of question will be forgiven.
I would like to know your experience/opinions on how to set up an
environment for backing up your DASD storage (i.e. syncing data
between two
Radoslaw,
No.
Ron
BTW: Is ther any disadvantage from having (slightly) overallocated PLPA
dataset ? Of course except waste of few cylinders.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
Ed Gould wrote:
1. Sticking It Out on MVS
I must be missing something. Why do you consider it good news that an
installation runs obsolete mainframe hardware and software? Wouldn't it
be better if they upgraded to z/OS??
--
Gentlemen,
Since the answer to question below is NO, I really don't understand why
to insist on 1 Cyl PLPA.
Of course I understand when one doesn't want to change existing
configuration.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
Ron and Jenny Hawkins wrote:
Radoslaw,
No.
Ron
BTW: Is ther
I have found the following (watch the wrap):
http://search390.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid10_gci1110717,00.html?track=NL-170
but where's the IBM announcement letter?
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
I just got a resend
-
Red Alerts
(2005.07.26)
RESEND - Users of Hierarchical File System (HFS) on z/OS 1.4 through 1.7
This REDALERT is now available for your viewing.
We apologize for any confusion this problem may have caused.
More
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 02:02:54 EDT, Ed Finnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adieu...
_http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7652606/_ (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/7652606/)
Ed,
While it's very big of you to post evidence that proves my point - we both
stated we would drop this thread. If you still desire to
Because they're management, it was brought to their attention, and it is an
error, i.e. message id ends in E.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Sunday, July 24, 2005 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re:
Can you do PPRC or XRC over IP ? I don't think so. Or am I just ignorant ?
Marian
On 7/26/05, R.S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Maciej K. wrote:
Hello list,
With the recent discussion (regarding easy questions) in mind,
hopefully this type of question will be forgiven.
I would like to
so do they have to be allocated next to one another ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 11:54 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ILR005E PLPA PAGE DATA SET FULL
Gentlemen,
Since the answer
On 26-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger) wrote:
Are you looking for L specifically, or L because it collates after '*'
or what?
I suspect the latter.
At any rate, I'll try your multi-pass solution. I was thinking that would be
what was needed, but was hoping not. (I'll have to
Ted MacNEIL wrote:
I have found the following (watch the wrap):
http://search390.techtarget.com/originalContent/0,289142,sid10_gci1110717,00.html?track=NL-170
but where's the IBM announcement letter?
Have patience. Search390.com jumped the gun!
--
In a message dated 7/26/2005 9:50:51 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I would greatly appreciate if you shared your experience or at the
very least directed me to the right solution.
_www.cnt.com_ (http://www.cnt.com) is the clear leader at this. Priced
...
so do they have to be allocated next to one another ?
...
Ideally, yes.
-teD
In God we Trust!
All others bring data!
-- W. Edwards Deming
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
thank you
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, July 25, 2005 8:00 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ILR005E PLPA PAGE DATA SET FULL
...
so do they have to be allocated next to one another ?
...
Any rumors on the z8 for us little folks? :)
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bob Shannon
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 9:53 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: z9 Announcement
Have patience. Search390.com
Short answer: doable, but not easy.
Slightly longer answer: there is simply too much data, the bandwidth too small,
and the windows too small to not have some sort of detailed plan.
One example plan: the last step in the batch process is to simply FTP the
updated files to the remote site.
Bruce boda wrote:
WHAT IS THE BIG ANNOUNCEMENT ?
IBM System z9. The successor to zSeries.
--
-
| Edward E. Jaffe||
| Mgr, Research Development| [EMAIL
All should have received an update with the correction. The HFS issue is
now on the page.
https://techsupport.services.ibm.com/server/redAlerts
Hal.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Justice
Sent: Tuesday, July 26,
In a message dated 7/26/2005 12:11:48 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The information is supposed to appear on IBM.COM at any time. Loading
started at 1230 ET.
Made it, thanks a bunch.
_http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/systems/systemz9/feature072605/?ca=systemsmet=
Dean,
If one follows the IBM recommendations then you are configuring PLPA and
Common for a non-cached, non-RAID 4200 RPM SLED, and in that case they
should go together with PLPA in front. Of course that device hasn't been
built or shipped for 10% of a century.
In actual fact 2/3 of one Virtual
Ed,
That would be www.mcdata.com. CNT have ceased to be. Also, if you are going
to do IP extension over metro distances than the Eclipse SAN Routers are
probably a better, cheaper choice than the Big Mama USDX boxes or the Edge
Routers.
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Thanks Ron.These datasets are on a DMX-1000, RAID-1.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Ron and Jenny Hawkins
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:22 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ILR005E PLPA PAGE DATA SET FULL
Dean,
If
In a message dated 7/26/2005 12:22:37 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There is alternatively far more and far less seeking going on then you can
ever tell by looking at things from the Host.
Reducing seeking was not the only driver for their recommendation to place
Bob Shannon wrote:
It was revealed to the press at 10:00 AM eastern. The major news
services all have the story. The last group to hear about it will be the
customers. I don't get it.
Must have been a last minute delay/rework of some kind. In spite of the
partial web site update Ted
I opened an IBMLINK Feedback. first answer was to call ATT support
line, option 4. Option 4 is for dialup problems and the poor fellow had
no idea what I was talking about. He made an effort to lookup info but
eventually referred me back to IBM. IBM now tells me that ATT does
have an open
Hi,
With regards to CF, if the failure where not a DASD failure but rather a
CF failure. Given CF are at each site, and we're recommended not to
duplex. How or under what conditions are we suppose to do CF duplexing ?
Looks like high availability parallel sysplex CF duplexing is broken
when we go
Howard Brazee wrote:
Now I have to persuade people that it's time to allow some ICETOOL instead
of
DFSORT in. In the past I've been told everybody knows DFSORT and we
don't want
to train people in ICETOOL.It's a hard sell. The LASTDUP might do
it - or
it might not.
I suspect that
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:31:40 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Bob Shannon wrote:
It was revealed to the press at 10:00 AM eastern. The major news
services all have the story. The last group to hear about it will be the
customers. I don't get it.
Must have been a last minute delay/rework of some
Dean,
If you read up on the way EMC run their cache algorithms, they choose an M1
or an M2 for a logical volume's disk access based on the activity of other
M1/M2 on the same physical disk, all with the intent of minimising
inter-volume seek distance - a dynamic short stroking of sorts.
Unless
Found this link on the subject:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/systems/systemz9/z9109/
-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET
So the big question remains, when is IBM going to END OF LIFE
z800-z890-z900-z990 and force us onto Z9 ?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Staller, Allan
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 1:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
The System z9 news is now on http://www.ibm.com (front page). Reuters,
AP, Wall Street Journal, Computerworld, Search390, Infoworld, scores of
newspapers, CNN, etc. are all reporting.
I'll give you all the very short technical version: this one's a big deal
because it's 2X in pretty much
Thanks Ron,
Yes I am fimilar with the M1/M2 access. So I won't bother then..
Dean
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
Do I smell the foul stench of an incomplete migration to a PC platform??
To upgrade would require a public admission of the incomplete migration,
and that the migration will not be complete anytime soon. And that would
lead to questions why that is so. Politically unacceptable, methinks.
But
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:31:56 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be missing something. Why do you consider it good news that an
installation runs obsolete mainframe hardware and software? Wouldn't it
be better if they upgraded to z/OS??
I struggled with this a little also,
Bill Seubert wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:31:56 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must be missing something. Why do you consider it good news that an
installation runs obsolete mainframe hardware and software? Wouldn't it
be better if they upgraded to z/OS??
I
In a message dated 7/26/2005 1:54:21 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've seen that too, *far* too many times. When a customer stops
upgrading, it's usually the kiss of death for their mainframe. I've
seen many IT organizations with stabilized mainframes comparing
On 26-Jul-2005, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Yaeger) wrote:
In that case, the following DFSORT/ICETOOL job would do
what you want:
//S2EXEC PGM=ICETOOL
//TOOLMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//DFSMSG DD SYSOUT=*
//IN DD DSN=... input file
//T1 DD DSN=T1,UNIT=SYSDA,SPACE=(CYL,(5,5)),DISP=(,PASS)
//OUT
Howard Brazee wrote:
No USING CTL1 in this sort.
Oops. Yes, it should have the USING(CTL1). Just a fingercheck.
Frank Yaeger - DFSORT Team (IBM)
Specialties: ICETOOL, IFTHEN, OVERLAY, Symbols, Migration
= DFSORT/MVS is on the Web at http://www.ibm.com/storage/dfsort/
Need a little RMM help - after a CDS corruption I forward recovered and
restarted RMM. I received a message that the recovery may have errors, so I ran
EDGUTIL. It seems that a tape was assigned to two different bins. I can move
the tape to a new location, but there are still two bins. I can't
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:59:03 -0500, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 10:31:40 -0700, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Must have been a last minute delay/rework of some kind. In spite of the
partial web site update Ted found, there is still no official
announcement. I can't remember past announcements
On 26 Jul 2005 12:17:35 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Isn't it more of an infrastructure issue? Don't throw more
money at it if it's working becomes the working mantra. Then
committees spring up to justify their existence and terms like
'modern appliances','legacy business fundamentals', and
Timothy Sipples wrote:
[...]
- Direct frame upgrade paths from z900 and z990.
Just curious: What does it mean exactly ?
Is it marketing or technical option/possibility ?
Explanation of terms above
- marketing upgrade: you sign contract for 'upgrade' and IBM takes your
old RVA and delivers
I am constantly suprised that upgrade was/is an option - we had it happen
(z/900 - z/990).
Same serial number, but about the only common components were a couple of
cards.
Used to be a *serious* point of contention when sales were in the offing,
and there were multiple suppliers.
I can remember
- Original Message -
From: Frank Habura [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, July 26, 2005 4:21 PM
Subject: RMM Bins
Need a little RMM help - after a CDS corruption I forward recovered and
restarted RMM. I received a message that the recovery may have
Macro GTRACE support SYSSTATE AMODE64=YES for some requests but
still fails for a QUERY in a SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2 without a base register.
AC 58F0 001000010 2008+ L 15,16(0,0)
B0 BFF7 F0ED000ED 2009+ ICM 15,7,X'ED'(15)
B4 58F0
Schiradin,Roland HG-Dir itb-db/dc wrote:
Macro GTRACE support SYSSTATE AMODE64=YES for some requests but
still fails for a QUERY in a SYSSTATE ARCHLVL=2 without a base register.
[snip]
Well a simple
CLM 15,B'',=XL4'0010'
would help
I believe these system macros
this has been an IBM recommendation for over 20 years.
I dunno. I never liked the recommendation. If you run out of space in the
Common Page DS you will crash with a wait state. It seems to me that with
a PLPA page DS that is a bit bigger than your PLPA and a Common Page DS
that is a
Bill,
This is brand new information, but I am not sure that it is correct. You
state that simply butting PLPA and Common up against one another will cause
ASM to treat them as one single dataset. I really don't think this is
correct.
AFAIK the Seldom Ending Channel Program running to the Common
On Jul 26, 2005, at 10:31 AM, Edward E. Jaffe wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
1. Sticking It Out on MVS
I must be missing something. Why do you consider it good news that an
installation runs obsolete mainframe hardware and software? Wouldn't
it be better if they upgraded to z/OS??
Of
On Jul 26, 2005, at 12:59 PM, Staller, Allan wrote:
Found this link on the subject:
http://www-03.ibm.com/servers/systems/systemz9/z9109/
Allan,
Chuckle... did you see the threat to M/f is a linux logo?... talk about
strange bedfellows.
EEd
Jim,
Thanks for that - so it is more like a bus than a train :-)
Is there any frequency or time associated with the period between PCIs?
Ron
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jim Mulder
Sent: Wednesday, 27 July 2005 9:10
Now I know I am out of date on this but somewhere in the mists of time,
I could swear that IBM came out saying that anthing above 18(??? this
is a number I am not sure of) was not good, in fact it was bad as the
interprocessor costswas more overhead than they were worth. They
sited some
All,
I am actaually a newbie to dump reading.
We have a s0a8 abend but our system runs
fine without any crash.
After a basic investigation
into the software edit report in LOGREC, I found
that a recovery routine(FRR) in is action at the time of
abend.I suspect this to be the cause of no
98 matches
Mail list logo
