Hi,
I've looked through the DF/dss manuals and I can't figure out how to do a
backup of the dataset allocations only. With FDR, you can backup a volume
with a parm of
SELECT ALLDSN,DATA=NONE
which will allow you to create a backup which contains only the necessary
information to restore the d
to: comp.lang.cobol and IBM-MAIN
For those of you who may have missed it in IBM's z/OS 1.9 "preview" at
(long
URL)
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=
an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS207-018
There is a paragraph that says,
"A pair of new call
Besides program directories and installation stuff, have you looked at both
the COBOL and the LE "Migration Guides"/
In general,
I would recommend upgrading the operating system (with LE) first and get
it "stable" in all environments (LPARs, whatever). After that is stable
(and all your old COB
Hello Steve,
We protect the OMEGAMON commands via the security exit in the Omegamon
Classic products...we use the same exit code for MVS, CICS and DB2.
We call the module KOMRACFX
We heavily modified the sample so that is uses General Resource profiles in
the existing FACILITY classdue to
Skip wrote on 07/02/2007 11:24:32 AM:
> Various components of z/OS or ISV products may implicitly use SID unless
> some value is explicitly coded.
Our SAP R3 people won't allow us to use a different SID on our D/R tests,
so there may be impacts there if you use the product.
As Skip says, there a
I am migrating Ent COBOL for Z/OS & OS/390 3.4 and z/OS 1.7 in one of our
parallel sysplex system replacing IBM COBOL for OS/390 & VM 2.2.0 and z/OS
1.4. My concern is about the run time environment and upward compatibility
of COBOL /LE especially for CICS – DB2 – COBOL programs compiled in z/OS
On Feb 6, 2007, at 7:08 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
SNIP
- Obtain a fixtest for the PE APAR. Safer by far than BYPASS, but
you're
still taking a chance that the early fix code is not solid. A step
not to
be taken lightly, but it's not ill
Barry Merrill discussed the reporting aspects, but SMF SID can most
definitely affect a running system if--as has been common practice for
decades--SID is used implicitly for other non-SMF functions. Various
components of z/OS or ISV products may implicitly use SID unless some
value is explicit
Barry,
Actually, for the SCRT report, the reports need all Lpars for each CPU. The
prod and the test lpar both run on the same machine, and the SCRT report had
some flaky messages and wouldn't give the proper results. I'm not doing the
SCRT stuff, so I never really saw what the error message
I'm curious as to which PTF. It's been a long time since I've seen more
than three or maybe four APARs bundled into a single fix for a core
operating system component. One APAR per PTF is 'standard', two not
infrequent. But 13? Really?
What I suspect is that a chain of PTFs was blocked by a PE
While IBM added the "SYSTEM NAME FROM IEASYSXX" SMF70SNM field
back in 1994, it was only last year that I observed in data
that if you have the same SYSTEM name in two LPARs in a SYSPLEX,
that SMF70SNM must be added to the "BY" variables to segregate
RMF data, and thus last year, all of the MXG RMF
>Was this from IBM, with the "service provider" an intermediary, or was it
>service on an ISV's product?
My original post mentioned that it was a cross-memory PTF.
So, this is definitely an IBM PTF/APAR.
We're outsourced, so the outsourcer is the 'service provider'.
My company has asked me not
In a recent note, Ted MacNEIL said:
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 22:28:51 +
>
> >Have the APAR handy? We could take a look.
>
> I have been trying to get two things:
> 1. The meaning of 'bundled'.
> 2. The APAR/PTF #'s.
>
> So far, all our service provider has given me is a soft-shoe an
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>
> >Individual PTFs, APARs, USERMODs, etc. can be selectively applied.
>
> That's what I thought.
> But, they claim it's a lot of work to sift through the APAR
> and pick out the non-PE'd (and their asso
We just made an interesting discovery. Our SMF SID parameter is the same
for our production Lpar and the corrosponding Test Lpar for one of our
boxes. I changed the SID for the Test MVS machine, as that would not
affect the production system. We run two sysplexes, which do not talk to
each o
>Individual PTFs, APARs, USERMODs, etc. can be selectively applied.
That's what I thought.
But, they claim it's a lot of work to sift through the APAR and pick out the
non-PE'd (and their associated apply chains).
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
---
>Have the APAR handy? We could take a look.
I have been trying to get two things:
1. The meaning of 'bundled'.
2. The APAR/PTF #'s.
So far, all our service provider has given me is a soft-shoe and a side-step.
I'm not on a witch-hunt; I just want to ensure it doesn't happen again.
But, they nev
On 6 Feb 2007 12:34:08 -0800, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:27:10 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Hi, All,
>>
>>Having a problem getting into the SHARE Requirements area with MS IE7
>>and Firefox from home (DSL connection). Whenever I click on the "E
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Skip Robinson
>
> No answers, but I forwarded John's note to SHARE HQ. Their IT
> person will look into it.
Thanks. Likely I'll need to configure something in the CA eTrust
Internet Security package, since both bro
No answers, but I forwarded John's note to SHARE HQ. Their IT person will
look into it.
"Chase, John" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/06/2007 07:27 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
SHARE Requirements acc
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
>
> Our service provider missed on a critcal PTF (cross memory
> services), because it was bundled, in an APAR, with 13
> others, of which some were PE'd.
> That is their explanation.
> Since (and I admit
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 21:11:13 +, Ted MacNEIL <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>1. Is it all or nothing?
>2. Or, can they apply them (easily) individually?
The answer to both can be yes. It depends on what you mean by "bundled".
If it was PRE/CO REQ'd with the PE'd ones, then, yes, it is all or
not
- Original Message -
From: ""Ted MacNEIL"" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 4:06 PM
Subject: Basic SMP/E question
Our service provider missed on a critcal PTF (cross memory services),
because it was bundled, in an APAR, with 13 othe
>Space information for non-VSAM is not in the catalog. I think File-AID will
>give you what you want, but I don't know how.
ISPF 3.4/3.2 gives it to you.
Maybe you could write a REXX that calls the same functions, or traps the
output, or...
I don't recall if LISTDSI() under REXX does it or no
Our service provider missed on a critcal PTF (cross memory services), because
it was bundled, in an APAR, with 13 others, of which some were PE'd.
That is their explanation.
Since (and I admit it) I have not had the pleasure of working with SMP/E, I do
not know:
1. Is their explanation valid? Is
I just got in and voted with Firefox.
Bob
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
I have only IE6 at work, but I'll check Firefox when I get home.
I know the Reqs pages were working with Firefox as recently as Sunday.
--
For IBM-MAIN subs
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:39:29 -0600, Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>...
>APAR OA14164 "does not cause" the problem - they will mark it PE ...
>...
Well, they are right, you know, if they want to quibble over symantics.
An APAR is a report of a problem.
Now, if they had said "the fix f
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 09:27:10 -0600, Chase, John <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Hi, All,
>
>Having a problem getting into the SHARE Requirements area with MS IE7
>and Firefox from home (DSL connection). Whenever I click on the "Enter
>New Requirements 4.1" button I get an immediate (instantaneous) "se
--
Thank you Birger for the link to the new z/OS Hot Topics newsletter.
I have a question concerning the byte range lock manager article.
After reading about the various evolutions of the BRLM (single
environment, shared, recovery considerations withi
-
As long as I can remember REWIND is done disconnected from the channel,
but the 3480 is the first drive I looked at for performance.
---
IIRC, on the 2400/2800 drives and the 3420 drives, REW didn't tie up the
In a recent note, Ed Finnell said:
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:52:02 EST
>
> Don't forget this is just the tip of the iceberg. CEEUOPT for LE and JRE for
> JAVA, plus TZ in USS environment and all the in between servers. Why does it
> matter? Well first and foremost if TIME offset between
The Copy request jobs from this product generates many output statements,
separately. Does anyone know how to combine these output statements?
TIA
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email t
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:08:55 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
Hallo to all,
I need to put some drives offline on 4 lpars (they share the dasds).
I am using the following command :
*V A0F1,OFFLINE,ALL
But it doesn't go offline. When I query the drive it shows the
status
In a message dated 2/6/2007 12:26:31 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you all -
>>
Don't forget this is just the tip of the iceberg. CEEUOPT for LE and JRE for
JAVA, plus TZ in USS environment and all the in between servers. Why does it
matter? Well first an
In a message dated 2/6/2007 12:38:28 P.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is anyone allocated to the devices?
RO *ALL,D U,ALLOC,,A0F1,1
>>
Or is it even spinning?
-->RO *ALL,DS QD,A0F1,1,VALIDATE
--
F
Thank you all -
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Baron
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:48 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: T CLOCK command for DST
>
>
> Hi all -
>
> Once again we have the DST to attend, only this ye
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:48:22 -0600, Mark Baron wrote:
>
>Anyone want to settle an argument. One colleague insists that we reset the
>clock thus:
> t clock=hh.mm.ss reset
>
>RESET indicates that the clock will be offset from GMT according to the
>TIMEZONE parameter in CLOCKxx. He further argue
Thank you, bah.
Actually there is an impractical way to influence the number, pick a
judicious time to roll DFHSM, right after recycle is complete. :(
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Jack Kelly
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2
Looks like it is time for you to review the SET command in the MVS
reference manual. The CLOCKxx parmlib member is only read at IPL
time. The system won't reread the member after the fact - so
changing it won't come into effect until you IPL again.
Futhernore 't clock=hh.mm.ss reset' is NOT a
Hi all -
Once again we have the DST to attend, only this year it falls 3 weeks
earlier than in the past.
Anyone want to settle an argument. One colleague insists that we reset the
clock thus:
t clock=hh.mm.ss reset
RESET indicates that the clock will be offset from GMT according to the
T
I checked that there is nothing allocating the device. I will try your
suggestion to vary them offline in MVS. Thanks
Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:08:55 -0800,
willie bunter wrote:
>Hallo to all,
>
> I need to put some drives offline on 4 lpars (they share th
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Susan Rice
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 11:09 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Omegamon - How to
Steve,
You can set up profiles in RACF. Look in the manual for Initial 1
intial 2
int
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 11:17:19 -0600, Tom Marchant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>Is anyone allocated to the devices?
>
>RO *ALL,D U,ALLOC,,A0F1,1
Sorry, that should be
RO *ALL,D U,,ALLOC,A0F1,1
--
Tom Marchant
--
For IBM-MAIN sub
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:08:55 -0800, willie bunter wrote:
>Hallo to all,
>
> I need to put some drives offline on 4 lpars (they share the dasds).
> I am using the following command :
>
> *V A0F1,OFFLINE,ALL
>
> But it doesn't go offline. When I query the drive it shows the
> status a O.
It's
Steve,
You can set up profiles in RACF. Look in the manual for Initial 1 intial 2
intitial 3. There are many ways to set up security but that is the basics.
The one step that is sometimes forgotten is that when you get to the
security module in ICAT you need to specify external=yes.The othe
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 11:57 -0500, Richard Tsujimoto wrote:
> Einstein regarded quantum (physics) as "spooky action at a distance".
He was referring to entanglement. See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
--
David Andrews
A. Duda and Sons, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Einstein regarded quantum (physics) as "spooky action at a distance".
"Jeffrey D. Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/06/2007 11:54 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: The quantum computer comes of age
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 9:23 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: The quantum computer comes of age
>
> This is the sort of hype to potential investors and
In a message dated 2/6/2007 9:45:17 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems it'll bring some fun for those of us processing SMF records
>>
Doncha just feel they plopped it out there so they could use it as a buzz
booster at SHARE?
--
In a recent note, Dave Jones said:
> Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 08:17:35 -0600
>
> http://www.dwavesys.com/
> and here:
> http://www.flickr.com/photos/jurvetson/376098497/
>
> Why do I suddenly get the sinking feeling that all current encryption
> algorithms are now obsolete? ;-)
>
This is t
Steve Flynn wrote:
On 06/02/07, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
(I guess this is to Shane?) I'd try swapping out the memory, and/or
swapping the memory sticks in the machine and see if it gets past that
point. Usually, if memtest86 shops for some reason, there is a memory
problem; p
Hallo to all,
I need to put some drives offline on 4 lpars (they share the dasds). I am
using the following command :
*V A0F1,OFFLINE,ALL
But it doesn't go offline. When I query the drive it shows the status a O.
Am I missing something else?
---
Is there a way to define in RACF and have Omegamon recognize, that a
user is authorized for the special features?
The idea is to avoid having each authorized user from having to enter
the special password. And we'd like to do it w/o having to put an exit
in Omegamon.
And I've looked at the
On 06/02/07, Kim Goldenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
(I guess this is to Shane?) I'd try swapping out the memory, and/or
swapping the memory sticks in the machine and see if it gets past that
point. Usually, if memtest86 shops for some reason, there is a memory
problem; probably it's in the
Binyamin Dissen wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:07:29 +1000 Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 14:48 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
:>> I like http://www.memtest86.com/ FREE, GPL, bootable ISO you can
:>> download.
:>Ditto - and is an option on every boot menu on every one
Seems it'll bring some fun for those of us processing SMF records
...
Robert
> -Ursprungliche Nachricht-
> Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Auftrag von McKown, John
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 6. Februar 2007 16:37
> An: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
> Betreff: z/OS 1.9
On Tue, 23 Jan 2007 06:07:29 +1000 Shane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:>On Mon, 2007-01-22 at 14:48 -0500, Knutson, Sam wrote:
:>> I like http://www.memtest86.com/ FREE, GPL, bootable ISO you can
:>> download.
:>Ditto - and is an option on every boot menu on every one of my systems.
:>And it's
Nope. That is the Pre-announcement
"z/OS 1.9 is planned to offer"
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of McKown, John
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2007 9:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: z/OS 1.9 announced
http://www-306.i
(cross posted to IBM-MAIN and ISPF-L)
On Tue, 30 Jan 2007 Mark Zelden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Anyway... we ran into the problem described by APAR OA16455. The
>fix is on RSU0609, but right in the APAR text it says the problem was
>caused by OA14164.
I opened a PMR with ISPF support on this
http://www-306.ibm.com/common/ssi/fcgi-bin/ssialias?subtype=ca&infotype=
an&appname=iSource&supplier=897&letternum=ENUS207-018
sorry if that wraps.
--
John McKown
Senior Systems Programmer
HealthMarkets
Keeping the Promise of Affordable Coverage
Administrative Services Group
Information Technolog
Wasn't Dortmunder the guy who presented Clara the Nutcracker in the ballet
of the same name?
Oh. No, that was Herr Drosselmeyer.
Howard Brazee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
02/06/2007 10:05 AM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
To
IBM-MAIN@BAM
Since there does not appear to be a mad rush to commend on this item, I'll
add what I know.
I was having problems with HSM tape usage. During the pmr process that I
had, l asked a similar question and Lev2 said that there was no way to
influence this number. I was at 1.4 at the time.
Jack Kell
Hi, All,
Having a problem getting into the SHARE Requirements area with MS IE7
and Firefox from home (DSL connection). Whenever I click on the "Enter
New Requirements 4.1" button I get an immediate (instantaneous) "session
timeout" along with a page instructing me to "log in to SHARE
requirements
On 6 Feb 2007 05:59:50 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Shmuel Metz ,
Seymour J.) wrote:
>>Subject: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files
>
>Check with Dortmunder ;-)
Can we trust him?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Program LISTICAT on the CBT tape, file 527 will report on the allocations
for each file in the catalog for each volume it resides on.
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 07:47:04 -0600, John P Kalinich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Paul Ip of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote
>on 02/06/2007 05:29:51 AM:
>
>>
Hello all,
Has anyone found an easy way to incrementally backup HFS/ZFS files on a
ZOS platform. At the moment I am using the service routines BPX1GMN and
BPX1OPD to get a list of the mounted file systems, their ZOS dataset name
and modified date then using this as source to incrementally backu
This has nothing to do directly with VM, but I though some folks might find
it interestingD-Wave Systems Inc.will be unveiling a quantum computer on
Feb. 13. They note "This quantum computer employs the resources of 65,536
parallel universes to compute answers in a fundamentally new way." More
We recently replaced our 3590-B1A tape drives 3590-H1A units in our 3494
tape library. Now when ever I insert a private tape into the library I have
to go to RMM and set the Attribute to RDCOMPAT. I would like avoid this and
tried to find a way to do that via CBRUXENT exit.
I found a sample in
Thanks, Roy. The Migration Guide cuts to the heart of it even better than
the HCD User's Guide. Great reference.
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems & Services Division
Computer & Network Operations
Phone: (703) 450-3156
Fax:(703) 450-3197
Steven,
You can, you need to apply some toleration maintainence. You can IPL and
activate from a V5 iodf, but you can't use HCD to update it.
From the z/OS 1.7 Migration guide GA22-7499-08
Other system (coexistence or fallback) requirements:
To read from, IPL with, and dynamically activate a
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on
01/31/2007
at 07:45 PM, Víctor de la Fuente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I am a newbie on Server Pac, and I read a lot of documentation
>related to Server Pac; I was trying to get a good approach. One of
>the things I read (I think it was on Planning for Installation bo
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, on 01/31/2007
at 08:16 AM, Carl Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>Subject: Dorting multiple VSAM and PS files
Check with Dortmunder ;-)
>The VSE Sort program was able to sort a variety of
>files, mixed SAM and VSAM in one pass. This is not
>supported in Z/OS (DFSORT).
Of course, I found what I was looking for right after I posted.
In the HCD User's Guide,
http://publibz.boulder.ibm.com/epubs/pdf/cbdzug40.pdf?bcsi_scan_CD2948435F56D921=0&bcsi_scan_filename=cbdzug40.pdf,
Pg 68, IODF Release Level Compatibility. z/OS 1.4 requires compatibility
PTF from APAR O
Have a 1.4 system that is a totally separate/isolated environment that
doesn't share any dasd with the 1.7 systems I have on the same CEC. All
HCD work is done on the 1.7 system and a copy of the IODF is shipped
across to the 1.4 system. For some unknown reason, when the IODF V5 was
unloaded ont
I don't believe you can use a V5 IODF (created on the z/OS 1.7 system) on
a z/OS 1.4 system.
Perhaps one if the hardware gurus on the list can help out with a
reference?
Cheers,,,Steve
Steve Conway
Lead Systems Programmer
Information Systems & Services Division
Computer & Network Operations
Paul Ip of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote
on 02/06/2007 05:29:51 AM:
> suppose I have a QSAM file (across 6 vols) like this:
> ISRUAIES Data Set Information
> Command ===>
>
> Data Set Name . . . . : TEST.TEST01
>
> General Data Current Alloc
Roger,
Rather that rename the IODF, just copy the 1.7 (v5) IODF with a new
suffix, then do an soft activate. This should then resync the
tokens...(name of the IODF doesn't need to match for the tokens to be in
sync). Then if they go back in sync, rename the old iodf, copy this IODF
back to th
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 05:29:51 -0600, Paul Ip wrote:
>hi all,
>
>suppose I have a QSAM file (across 6 vols)
>
>How can I display the value of "Allocated cylinders" (that is "19076") in
>batch? I'm wondering if this information is obtained in CATALOG rather
>than VTOC (if access via VTOC, have to
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 06:41:19 -0600, Roger Lowe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:30:43 +, Roy Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>wrote:
>
>>
>>May I ask why you need to rename?
>>
>Roy,
> Have a 1.4 system that is a totally separate/isolated environment that
>doesn't share any dasd
On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 12:30:43 +, Roy Hewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>May I ask why you need to rename?
>
Roy,
Have a 1.4 system that is a totally separate/isolated environment that
doesn't share any dasd with the 1.7 systems I have on the same CEC. All
HCD work is done on the 1.7 syst
Roger,
Sure, even deleted a few in my time!.. Apart from IPL it isn't used, or
even allocated by the system until you come to do an activate...so if
you do rename it you might have some difficulty Activating...
May I ask why you need to rename?
Roy
Roger Lowe wrote:
Hi Listers,
H
Roger Lowe wrote:
Hi Listers,
Has anyone renamed an active IODF whilst the system is up?
It is possible, but you won't be able to do dynamic changes. Why don't you
*copy* IODF instead of rename ? What do you need to do ?
If you want to change HLQ, then you have to re-IPL.
--
Radosla
Hi Listers,
Has anyone renamed an active IODF whilst the system is up?
Roger
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
hi all,
suppose I have a QSAM file (across 6 vols) like this:
ISRUAIES Data Set Information
Command ===>
Data Set Name . .
On Tue, 2007-02-06 at 03:32 -0600, Christian Blesa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> it's not easy that all stars are aligned and five wolfs crying at the same
> time but all it's possible... About local fix... it's too...
Anything is possible.
At which point it becomes probable.
I had a customer ring me midni
Hi,
it's not easy that all stars are aligned and five wolfs crying at the same
time but all it's possible... About local fix... it's too...
OA17708: UNABLE TO IPL SYSTEMS BACK INTO A SYSPLEX, MSGIXC455D AT IPL TIME
APAR status
Closed as program error.
KNOWN IMPACT:
System(s) cannot rejoin a s
Hi,
I am running z/os v1.6 on a z9 ec.
I've got OSA ICC setup and working. But i noticed that i am limited to 15
sessions. I don't have the scroll bar on the right side.
I've checked our IODF from HCD. I can see all the 32 device addresses
defined for OSA-ICC. I also did a D IOS,CONFIG to ensur
88 matches
Mail list logo
