Hi all
can anyone send me a sample of the USER2 SMF exit.
I need to filter SMF records when running IFASMFDP based on specific
record fields.
Thanks
Fabio
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
Hi,
Is there anyone have experience on setting the WLM GOAL on DB2, CICS MQ.
In our shop...All DB2, CICS and MQ are in same importance
anyone try to set DB2 higher than CICS MQ...
thanks for share
Tommy
--
For IBM-MAIN
It's funny, I was just trying myself to understand this, along with WLM in
general. What a massive topic! I feel like one of those Thai monkeys on his
first day at coconut picking school.
FYI, there's a nice Redbook on WLM if you've not already found it:
At one of the Share presentations I seem to remember that the IRLM address
space should be placed higher in WLM than the DB2 address spacess. If I
recall correctly, it is so you do not wait on lock processing.
Lizette
Is there anyone have experience on setting the WLM GOAL on DB2, CICS MQ.
-- snip --
As Sam has already pointed out, there is nothing available in native SMS
other than the ACS test option.
Oh ye of little faith! Since z/OS 1.7, there is a console command
SETSMS VOLSELMSG which will provide summary or detailed info about the
SMS allocation process. It can be
-- Forwarded message --
From: Jorge Arueira Campos [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Jun 7, 2007 7:18 PM
Subject: LISTCAT RBA UPDATE
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Hi All
In Z/os 1.7 in command LISTCAT after REPRO to load a some records in VSAM
DATASET the information in catalog about allocate
Anyone else having IBMLINK problems today? Or maybe I should say, is
anyone NOT having problems???
Jon L. Veilleux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(860) 636-2683
This e-mail may contain confidential or privileged information. If
you think you have received this e-mail in error, please advise the
sender by
SEV1 ticket # 32141089
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at http://bama.ua.edu/archives/ibm-main.html
YES IT IS DOWN AGAIN, SHOCK AND SURPRISE
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Oops. I'll add some content this time
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 9:20 PM
Hi,
IBMLink is down completely again. I contacted the IBMLink
help desk at
800-543-3912 as I am trying to update a
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Veilleux, Jon L
Anyone else having IBMLINK problems today? Or maybe I should
say, is anyone NOT having problems???
I had zero problems with it -- until I tried to sign in
-jc-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
YES IT IS DOWN AGAIN, SHOCK AND SURPRISE
Again? or Still?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access
Perhaps the time has come for some large IBM customers to offer to
withhold payment for this service until such time as the service
becomes reliably available, if ever.
EXACTLY, companies need to quit paying for that garbage until IBM fixes it, by
either putting the 3270 interface back up or
It maybe down, but they are very apologetic about it.
Thanks,
Fletch
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
Hi Bruce,
Thanks for the info, I'll give it a try!
Bob Lester
Technical Services
OppenheimerFunds
Centennial, CO
USA
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Bruce Black
Sent: Friday, June 08, 2007 11:10 AM
To:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
It maybe down, but they are very apologetic about it.
But apologies don't bring home the bacon.
The call-bot says to try it again at/after 09:15 EST
-jc-
Chase, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Fletcher, Kevin
It maybe down, but they are very apologetic about it.
But apologies don't bring home the bacon.
The call-bot says to try it again at/after 09:15 EST
-jc-
Well
Maybe IBMLINK should be renamed The Missing Link?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert Justice
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:49 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: GEE, web IBMLINK is down again, shock and surprise
SEV1
I've asked CA for clarification and since the response was less than
satisfactory, I'll ask the group.
Has anyone installed CA-1 r11.5 recently?
I'm not familiar with using Iebupdte and because it is an IBM utility CA won't
give an example.
My first question is why use iebupdte at all? Why
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 07:41:28 -0400, Lizette Koehler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At one of the Share presentations I seem to remember that the IRLM address
space should be placed higher in WLM than the DB2 address spacess. If I
recall correctly, it is so you do not wait on lock processing.
All
the latest claim is that it will be fixed by 10:15
I hope customers rip IBM apart at Share and at the z/OS expo for this web
IBMLINK nonsense.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:15:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Missing Link?
Or 'No LINK at all'. Seems like the cognoscenti would at least give the
customers an option 'til they can make the one option dependable.
Down all weekend as near as I can tell. Unacceptable since we (and most
other shops) do weekend upgrades. Luckily I didn't run into any issues
with a 1.8 roll out to a production LPAR this weekend and didn't need to
use IBMLINK. I did try to logon serveral times Saturday evening and
Sunday to
I agree -jc-...i forgot to set the sarcasm flag to on.
Thanks,
Fletch
It maybe down, but they are very apologetic about it.
But apologies don't bring home the bacon.
The call-bot says to try it again at/after 09:15 EST
-jc-
-
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Timothy Sipples
Sent: Sunday, June 10, 2007 7:50 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: mainframe = superserver
SNIP
... Microsoft Exchange servers are not supported on z/OS nor am I aware
of
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:25:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rip IBM apart at Share and at the z/OS expo for this web
IBMLINK nonsense.
I don't see what SHARE/Expo has to do with it. This is bread and butter
'bidness'. Services offered, services not
Tommy,
In your post and the three replies to date I saw no mention of response
time goals. I strongly suggest you do as Mark Zelden recommends for the
server address spaces, but also set percentile response time goals for
the CICS and DDR transactions.
There are plenty of presentations and
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Mark Zelden
Down all weekend as near as I can tell. Unacceptable since
we (and most
other shops) do weekend upgrades. Luckily I didn't run into
any issues
with a 1.8 roll out to a production LPAR this weekend
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of O'Brien, David W.
(NIH/CIT) [C]
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 8:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: CA-1 install - user exits?
I've asked CA for clarification and since the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
I don't see what SHARE/Expo has to do with it. This is bread
and butter
'bidness'. Services offered, services not
rendered...unfortunately it's tied
in to the support contract. So non-payment could
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:47:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In this case, it's not exclusively a CA-1 question, this applies to a
lot of properly organized SMP/E configurations. If this is your first
dive into this, be glad it's CA-1, there are much worse
Merging John's and my replies, his replacement method would have SMP/E
MCS as
++SRCUPD (TMSUX2C )
./REPLACE
...source here...
Mine would be
++SRC (TMSUX2C)
..source here...
Again, from memory. There's always more than 1 way to do the same thing.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
something has to be done, because this is absurd.
I think it passed absurd last week.
Perhaps someone envisions this possible future scenario:
Support: We've had zero problem reports for the last
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:54:06 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems that once upon a time access to IBMLINK was an extra-cost option
called SoftwareXcel Extended. Is that no longer true?
Yeah, but with long term service contracts it all gets lumped
Yes, I did RTFM.
You obviously have a higher opinion of CA than I do.
Tim, John, Len, Thank you for your responses. They were most helpful, unlike
the one I'm responding to.
From: Ed Finnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon 6/11/2007 9:56 AM
To:
Lindy,
Thank you for the Redbook reference. I actually had a copy of this.
However, this one updated with a date of February 2007. If anyone else
has downloaded this in the past they may want to download a new copy.
Tom Kelman
Commerce Bank of Kansas City
(816) 760-7632
-Original
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Ed Finnell
Seems that once upon a time access to IBMLINK was an
extra-cost option called SoftwareXcel Extended. Is that no
longer true?
Yeah, but with long term service contracts it all gets lumped
The CA-1 team including Russell Witt who participates here is generally
very good. CA like many large software companies feels to users more
like many small companies with some variations in culture and quality of
services.
We have no complaints about CA-1 (TMS) software reliability and the
Robert Justice wrote:
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
Is it time to hold a contest to pick the time and date that IBMLINK is
back? :-)
--
Mark Jacobs
Technical Services
Time Customer Service - Tampa, FL
--
Victory in defeat, there is none higher. She
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
Second Tuesday of next week?
-jc-
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Did they specify what day?
Thanks,
Fletch
snip
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
/snip)
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Knutson, Sam
The CA-1 team including Russell Witt who participates here is
generally
very good. CA like many large software companies feels to users more
like many small companies with some variations in culture
Did they specify what day?.
lol, good point.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search the archives at
The company is call Bynari.
http://www.bynari.net/
/Tom Kern
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 09:33:59 -0400, Thompson, Steve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to remember who it is, it may be Sine Nominae (Latin for no
name?) has a product called Binarii (?). At an IBM school I went to, it
was said to
On 11 Jun 2007 06:40:54 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:25:48 A.M. Central Daylight
Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rip IBM apart at Share and at the z/OS expo for this web
IBMLINK nonsense.
I don't
Hi Sam,
Generally speaking I agree that CA-1 runs as designed and Russell is helpful to
users of this list. However since upgrading to Zos 1.7 we have been
experiencing intermittant 0c4 errors which FDR support attributed to CA-1.
Having a question about iebupdte and having CA support refuse
Robert Justice wrote:
hmm, 9:15, then 10:15, now 11:15
anyone seeing a trend here?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN INFO
Search
In a message dated 6/11/2007 9:02:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Management: Nobody has tried to use the service for the last quarter.
Support: And your point is..?
What was the old film where the inmates are freed and are charged with
running the
In a message dated 6/11/2007 9:20:00 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In that case, non-availability of part of the contracted service would
constitute breach of contract, wouldn't it?
Yeah, but it varies from state to state. CE's still come when called, parts
It looks like its back up.
next question is for how long. We'll see what the response to my feedback
record is this time. .
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, 11 Jun 07 11:27:48 GMT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is getting really interesting. I'm beginning to understand
why history has to repeat itself. People can't tolerate that
the new thing isn't new. For some reason, they must think
it will take away from their glory of doing it first.
All good ideas come from a single individual, and by constantly putting
roadblocks in their paths, progress stops. Patents and copyrights mean
that people cannot stand on the shoulders of those who went in front
of them When you make a judgment (that stifling the competition, for
example) is
Clem Clarke wrote:
All good ideas come from a single individual, and by constantly
putting roadblocks in their paths, progress stops. Patents and
copyrights mean that people cannot stand on the shoulders of those
who went in front of them When you make a judgment (that stifling the
On Jun 11, 2007, at 8:40 AM, Ed Finnell wrote:
In a message dated 6/11/2007 8:25:48 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
rip IBM apart at Share and at the z/OS expo for this web
IBMLINK nonsense.
I don't see what SHARE/Expo has to do with it. This is bread and
I must somewhat disagree with you. I am against software patents. The
reason is that they stop others from implementing work alike products.
Imagine if the first person who wrote a job scheduler had patented it.
No other job schedulers could have been written as they most likely
would have
In a message dated 6/11/2007 10:28:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Have you (and other asked for a duty manager? This just rises
visibility usually doesn't fix the issue. Once in a while he (or she)
can step in and slap some knuckles. But in cases (probably )
-snip---
something has to be done, because this is absurd.
I think it passed absurd last week.
Perhaps someone envisions this possible future scenario:
Support: We've had zero problem reports for the last quarter.
Management: Nobody has tried
oh yes, as I do with all ibmlink outages, I have sent this latest issue on to
our
IBM rep in-house here, and last time IBMLINK suffered outage problems I
received an email reply from the SoftwareExcel Manager
--
For IBM-MAIN
On 11 Jun 2007 08:16:46 -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clem Clarke)
wrote:
All good ideas come from a single individual,
What's his name?
and by constantly putting roadblocks in their paths, progress stops.
Lots of good ideas have been created by teams. And lots of patents
and copy rites are
On 11 Jun 2007 08:27:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I happen to agree with everything you said, but sadly common sense
usually isn't common anymore.
You're implying it was once common.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/08/2007
at 11:31 AM, Paul Gilmartin [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
But LMTR now runs IEBCOPY, which is the fly in
the ointment: IEBCOPY requires AC=1, which in turn requires that the
caller run AC=1. I assume IEBCOPY does all the RACHECKs to ensure
security. But does
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 06/06/2007
at 12:39 PM, Mark Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Common Name: Master Trace Table Mapping Macro
Has nothing to do with the system trace table. Master trace is a view
of the console data stream.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Howard Brazee
On 11 Jun 2007 08:27:26 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
I happen to agree with everything you said, but sadly common sense
usually isn't common anymore.
You're implying it was once
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 11:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Patents, Copyrights, Profits, Flex and Hercules
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
what does IBM really have to lose?
I agree that licenses of some sort need to be accessible to the small
developers; however if a hobbyist license is granted, how do they keep
it from being abused by unscrupulous companies who then run their business
on the hobbyist machine rather than the
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tim Hare
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 12:49 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Patents, Copyrights, Profits, Flex and Hercules
snip
What if they were allowed to sell us a single
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Clem Clarke) writes:
It's a shame, but unless IBM does do a big rethink on this, and allows
small developers some sort of inexpensive or free
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Robert Justice
It looks like its back up.
FSVO up. I signed on, checked my AST apar and saw that it had closed
and a PTF was available, ordered the PTF for Internet delivery,
navigated to SRD and saw the order
Fabio,
Its probably easier to do with DFSORT than with any exit. There are
probably some exceptions.
Ed
On Jun 11, 2007, at 4:56 AM, fabio ottaviani wrote:
Hi all
can anyone send me a sample of the USER2 SMF exit.
I need to filter SMF records when running IFASMFDP based on
specific
FSVO up. I signed on, checked my AST apar and saw that it had closed
and a PTF was available, ordered the PTF for Internet delivery,
navigated to SRD and saw the order status as submitted, went to a
couple of meetings, went to lunch, came back from lunch, and now, four
hours later, my PTF order
For your last question (from r11.0 but I'd be surprised if anything
changed):
++USERMOD(CL05205) REWORK(...).
++VER(Z038) FMID(CL052B0)
REQ(AWMAC01) /* my usermod */.
++JCLIN.
//CL05205 JOB
//LKED EXEC PGM=IEWL,PARM='RENT,REUS,...'
Many times the order status does not change right away but the order is
still available. Do not wait for the status to change before going to
the ftp site to download it if you know the current password and url.
If you are not sure of the url, start with
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Barkow, Eileen
Many times the order status does not change right away but
the order is still available. Do not wait for the status to
change before going to the ftp site to download it if you
know the current
Many times the order status does not change right away but the order is still
available.
That is NOT how the product(s) should work!
You should not have to memorise URLs, nor should you have to keep refreshing.
If we accept that, there is NO way IBM will fix things!
-
Too busy driving to stop
McKown, John wrote:
And what about people who develop alternative software? If SDSF is free,
then what happens to EJES? If DB2 is free, then what happens to Oracle
and other RDMSes that run on z/OS? If RMM were free, then what about
CA-1? And so on down the line.
For IBM this issue was settled
You bring up an excellent point. I was thinking about this a bit when this
thread first started.
Would you agree, though, that mainframe users tend much more to be legal than
personal users? IBM can audit any of their mainframe machines at any time.
And the large businesses that use
Nothing in this field ever works 100%, least of all IBMLINK, so it is
better and faster to try to work around it than wait forever for a
status msg to change.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Ted MacNEIL
Sent: Monday, June 11,
Would you agree, though, that mainframe users tend much more to be legal than
personal users?
No, I would disagree.
Regardless of the platform, I believe that the larger (and medium-2-large)
companies (also known as customers) are totally honest!
But, there are many independent vendors who do
Nothing in this field ever works 100%, least of all IBMLINK, so it is better
and faster to try to work around it than wait forever for a status msg to
change.
Considering the kind of money we pay for it, the other things we have to do,
and the fact that the 3270-based one works, and this
Just to remember BS3000 (a german OS from Siemens) died because it violates
IBM patents and/or copyrights. Long time ago but no complains or even a note.
So FLEX and other emulator or simulator isn't the first or maybe the last.
Roland
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 23:16:16 +0800, Clem Clarke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
It's a shame, but unless IBM does do a big rethink on this, and allows
small developers some sort of inexpensive or free access to the
mainframes, they will die. ...
Ah. A new slogon for IBM comes to mind. ReTHINK.
ReTHINK.
Or, ReTHWIM.
I think, as a 50-year-old mainfraimer, sinking is going to be the main stream!
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL
FWIW, The TN3270 IBMLink interfaces to ETR, SIS, etc. are working for me
right now!
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite 800
Los Angeles, CA 90045
310-338-0400 x318
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.phoenixsoftware.com/
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:02:06 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, The TN3270 IBMLink interfaces to ETR, SIS, etc. are working for me
right now!
Haven't used that in a long time. What is the address? The session I
had set up tries to go to ibmlink.advantis.com and can't get
Mark Zelden wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:02:06 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FWIW, The TN3270 IBMLink interfaces to ETR, SIS, etc. are working for me
right now!
Haven't used that in a long time. What is the address? The session I
had set up tries to go to
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:49:07 -0400, Tim Hare wrote:
What if they were allowed to sell us a single OS license that included
everything we needed to run our apps, including CICS, WebSphere, and DB2,
and they priced it for what z/OS goes for now? Would our bean counters be
happy?
Your bean
Dave Kopischke wrote:
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:49:07 -0400, Tim Hare wrote:
What if they were allowed to sell us a single OS license that included
everything we needed to run our apps, including CICS, WebSphere, and DB2,
and they priced it for what z/OS goes for now? Would our bean counters be
In a message dated 6/11/2007 2:24:06 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Finally got the auto-notification at 1:13 PM (CDT), and downloaded it.
After a 60 hr outage there's probably a queue the size of political egos.
** See
Lindy Mayfield asks
Would you agree, though, that mainframe users tend much more to be
legal
than personal users?
I would say that practically all large customers are about as legal as
they can possibly be and that there are strong external factors that
drive them to behave that way. SOX here
I think that I know the answer to this, but I'll ask here. Suppose that
I have an input file with variable length records. I use OPTION VLSHRT.
I then have a couple of OUTFIL statements, similar to:
SORT FIELDS=COPY
OPTION VLSHRT
OUTFIL
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 13:17:46 -0700, Edward Jaffe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
In PCOM, I specify the primary address as ibmlink.advantis.com and
the
backup1 address as 204.146.168.209.
...
It's also available via connection through ATT Global Network Services
(aka Advantis, aka IBMIN) for
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 16:45:13 -0400, Craddock, Chris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lindy Mayfield asks
I would say that practically all large customers are about as legal as
they can possibly be and that there are strong external factors that
drive them to behave that way. SOX here and corporate
On Mon, 11 Jun 2007 14:32:11 -0600, Steve Comstock wrote:
I'm with you. Except for the cheap part, of course.g
Maybe a more precise word to use would be affordable ??? ;) But what I
think is affordable is probably not what others think is affordable.
If it were up to me, I'd do more to keep
John McKown wrote on 06/11/2007 01:46:55 PM:
I think that I know the answer to this, but I'll ask here. Suppose that
I have an input file with variable length records. I use OPTION VLSHRT.
I then have a couple of OUTFIL statements, similar to:
SORT FIELDS=COPY
OPTION VLSHRT
OUTFIL
Alan,
According to the Redbook: FICON Implementation Guide, SG24-6497, dated:
January 2006, Section 1.4.1 FICON support for cascaded Directors (Page
11), there is the following note:
Keep in mind that once a 2-byte link address is defined to a channel path, all
link addresses defined to be
Hello all,
I am starting to forget more than I ever knew. I thought it was a SETSYS
sometime.
In the ARCCMD HSM member there was a way to restrict User and Supervisor
Mode without RACF in ISMF. (it
I will accept even a hint...say the URL to the right DFSMS manual.
Also, the 'sunset' warning messages are not being displayed anymore when
you enter each function. I tried to access these functions on Sunday morning
about 02:00 Central Time and they were unavailable(down). The 'sunset'
messages were there indicated the functions were unavailable.
Glenn
YEA !
the green screen is BACK !
THANK GOODNESS !
I will have to thank our IBM REP tomorrow !
- Original Message -
From: Glenn Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2007 5:57 PM
Subject: Re: 3270 IBMLink is UP!!!
AUTH userid DATABASEAUTHORITY(CONTROL)
AUTH userid DATABASEAUTHORITY(USER)
Is this what you want?
---
This e-mail is sent by Suncorp-Metway Limited ABN 66 010 831 722 or one of its
related entities Suncorp.
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
