We do not have any problems but we specify which servers can access a
directory in the EXPORTS file. So we don't use SAF security.
___
Jim Petersen
MVS - Lead Systems Engineer
Home Depot Technology Center
1300 Park Center Drive, Austin, TX 78753
www.ho
Timothy,
Do you really think your blog has more readers than IBM-Main? There are
usually over 5,000 readers subscribed to IBM-Main. Somehow I think more
people would see IBM-Main than your blog. How many readers to you get on
your blog?
Eric
Eric Bielefeld
Sr. Systems Programmer
Milwauke
Linux guys figured a security setting they had put on that disabled them
getting to me...thanks all for your help..
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be
I only did posted to tell the person that started this string that there
is this a way that a file and/or data can be lost while the file is
open. I agree. What is being done for these files at our location is not
a good idea w/o MIM-DASD to protect across sysplexes.
Regards
Otto Schumacher
Tech
Eric Bielefeld wrote:
Do you really think your blog has more readers than IBM-Main? There
are usually over 5,000 readers subscribed to IBM-Main. Somehow I
think more people would see IBM-Main than your blog. How many readers
to you get on your blog?
What's a blog? :-D
--
Edward E Jaffe
Ph
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:44 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: METAL C: CodeGen defeciency?
> Interesting that they didn't use XC, isn't it? If you spen
In , on
04/04/2009
at 03:49 AM, "Scott T. Harder" said:
>You are "the man", and I mean that sincerely (your questions and comments
>at the TDM's are legendary as far as I'm concerned), but isn't the
>parsing in REXX better than Clist?
No, just different.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, S
At the current time GRS does not support Enq propagation across
SYSPLEXES. However MIM/DASD does.
Regards
Otto Schumacher
Technical Support, CICS
EDS, an HP Company
Ahold Account
2000 Wade Hampton Blvd.
LC1-302
Greenville, South Carolina, 29615
Tel: 864 987-1417
Fax: 864 987-4500
E-mail: ot
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:27:26 +0200, Barbara Nitz
wrote:
>Apparently after the last change to Servicelink IBM decided to employ
ActiveX controls when showing me my open ETRs. And these are ActiveX
controls that are unsafe, according to the security options. I am NOT free in
my choice of browse
Like you we have created a small Sysrexx that shuts down our system.
To circunvent this time limit issue, we have instructed the operators to
Start a proc named SHUTDOWN that follows :
//SHUTDOWN PROC
//STEP1EXEC PGM=COMMAND
/
Have a look at the (very rough) draft article at
http://www.longpelaexpertise.com.au/ezine/HLASMfromJava
This shows how to call an HLASM module from Java, with code examples.
However this uses C for the JNI code.
Martin Packer wrote:
Could someone point me to a good simple sample of a HLASM JN
I am curious what methods are used to sync an IBM tape library (3494 or 3584,
non-VTS) during DR exercises. I have never done a DR with an IBM library, and
am trying to determine the best way to do this fror our up-coming test.
TIA
CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmiss
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:58:18 -0400 "Farley, Peter x23353"
wrote:
:>> -Original Message-
:>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
:>> Behalf Of Kirk Wolf
:>> Sent: Wednesday, April 22, 2009 8:44 PM
:>> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
:>> Subject: Re: METAL C: CodeG
On 22 Apr 2009 11:29:57 -0700, joa...@swbell.net (John McKown) wrote:
>This is the case where "n" smaller servers are "better" than the mainframe.
>Most, if not all, z shops upgrade their processors due to the increase in
>their application workload. That is, they are running the same software, bu
On 22 Apr 2009 22:39:18 -0700, timothy.sipp...@us.ibm.com (Timothy
Sipples) wrote:
>I appreciate the responses, but please (also) post them to the comment
>thread at The Mainframe Blog:
>
>http://mainframe.typepad.com/blog/2009/04/what-more-open-source-software-do-you-want-for-zos.html
If you lik
>At the current time GRS does not support Enq propagation across SYSPLEXES.
>However MIM/DASD does.
Doesn't GRS-Ring?
I know GRS* does not; I thought Ring did, though.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
For IBM-MAIN subscrib
Let suppose IBM make processors with predicatble instruction speed, no
heuristics etc , as it had been.
We are back (with assembler) again ?
Interesting that they didn't use XC, isn't it? If you spend any time
looking at XLC generated code you will see lots of interesting stuff.
Of particular
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:45 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Effective pipeline programming [was:RE: METAL C: CodeGen
> defeciency?]
>
> On Thu, 23
Where does the default sysout class get set in JES2 if a job is submitted with
no msgclass on it?
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAI
In the TSU/STC/JOBCLASS definitions in JES2PARMs?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Melissa Perry
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 10:07
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Jes2 default sysout
Where does the default sysout class
Yes, it does, but the performance can be horrendous.
>>> Ted MacNEIL 4/23/2009 10:52 AM >>>
>At the current time GRS does not support Enq propagation across SYSPLEXES.
>However MIM/DASD does.
Doesn't GRS-Ring?
I know GRS* does not; I thought Ring did, though.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
JCL reference manual, JOB:MSGCLASS says that the default is based on the
source of the job. If the job is being submitted by a TSO user, the
MSGCLASS defaults to that of the TSO userid.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
Unfortunately (at least as of z/OS 1.7), JOBCLASS doesn't allow MSGLEVEL
to be defined, only STC and TSU. At least that's what the INIT
reference manual says...
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Field, Alan C.
Sent: Thur
Paul Gilmartin wrote:
On Wed, 22 Apr 2009 13:36:13 -0400, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
* setting 14 bytes to 0x00
XC102(14,13),102(13)
You're only trying to help the programmer, but perhaps thereby
thwarting the intent of a deliberate Dirty GETMAIN.
This setting-of-zero is re
-
It appears that some kind of monitor of 3rd party software usage could
be used to create competitive upgrades to their license fees.
If you'll kindly replace
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 10:44 -0400, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
> As there is no reason to code a BCR 15,0
Is that really true? We don't have the M91/195 (and their "imprecise
interrupts") to kick around anymore, but is there any other legitimate
use for serializing the pipeline? Why would IBM carry t
And as vain and self centered as I am, I'm not so much to use facebook
or twitter.
---
HURRAY! Good sense prevails. :-)
--
Rick
--
Remember that if y
-
Doesn't GRS-Ring?
I know GRS* does not; I thought Ring did, though.
Not sure but IIRC, GRS Ring requires at least a Basic Sysplex
--
Rick
--
Remember
No, it quite definitely does not.
>>> Rick Fochtman 4/23/2009 11:51 AM >>>
Not sure but IIRC, GRS Ring requires at least a Basic Sysplex
--
Rick
--
Remember that if you’re not the lead dog, the view never changes.
CONFIDENTIALITY/EMAIL NOTICE: The material in this transmission contains
confi
I'm not really an assembler programmer, but I've known this one since
my earliest days. I'm sure it was in the 370 Pop I used in my one and
only assembler programming class in 1979. Good class, I have a job today
because I took that class, did an internship the next semester and here
I am today :
What do you mean 'sync'?
The DR ATL would have whatever tapes you put in for the test. The BAU (business
as usual) ATL would have its normal population of tapes minus those sent to DR.
The source ATL and the tapes therein would be presumed to be destroyed.
I suppose you'd want to populate the
Gibney, Dave wrote:
I'm not really an assembler programmer, but I've known this one since
my earliest days. I'm sure it was in the 370 Pop I used in my one and
only assembler programming class in 1979. Good class, I have a job today
because I took that class, did an internship the next semester
Anyone running a program called EDVPARM? A consultant is trying to convince
us to install this program to an authorized library with AC(1). Looking at
the source concerns me. It appears that you can pass it a program name and
parameter list and the program will ATTACHX it. This seems like a big
is he from nexio company ??
see it is a extention to some ca endevor stuff...
and purpose ??
--
Email Disclaimer
This E-mail contains confidential information belonging to the sender,
which may be legally privileged infor
I used this in another shop in a similar situation.
The "software product", brought in by the applications group, was not
fully developed but needed to be authorized.
Our Management denied it.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behal
We delete all the TCDB's including the VGENERAL & re-define the VGENERAL
& a TCDB for the range of native tapes we've brought to DR. This means
the VGENERAL & TCDB for the native tapes are empty. We define the
library environment at DR which is usually a VTS and an MTL for the native
tapes.
It looks as if Kelly posted this directly to the "newsgroup" and didn't send
it to the list.
See "IBM response" below.
"Kelly Arrey" wrote in message
news:<179d3e62-69d2-482c-99f1-0b74a830f...@g19g2000vbi.googlegroups.com>...
Hi Johnny,
We're investigating - it looks like a compiler bug. And y
And don't forget to put the CDS's on a volume by themselves, so your
reserve doesn't lock up some other application. (for instance the tms audit
file :-) .
no pithy saying.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive acce
---
Anyone running a program called EDVPARM? A consultant is trying to
convince us to install this program to an authorized library with AC(1).
Looking at the source concerns me. It appears that you can pass it a
progra
I will be out of the office starting 23/04/2009 and will not return until
04/05/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.u
Hi Phil,
It is an Endevor utility that prevents everyone from selecting their own
options. This keeps the control under the Endevor Admins. And out of the
applications programmer/consultant.
If you feel that this is too greater risk for the benefit gained then ask
them to put in a check for the
>Not sure but IIRC, GRS Ring requires at least a Basic Sysplex
That's not a problem for the OP.
He was asking how to propagate ENQs across multiple SYSPLEXes, so he meets that
requirement.
-
Too busy driving to stop for gas!
--
>Yes, it does, but the performance can be horrendous.
I'm aware of that.
If you can keep it below 4 systems, you may survive -- especially with today's
faster FICON.
I am not recommending the use of GRS-Ring, rather I was merely disputing the
comment that "only MIM-DASD can do it".
BTW, there
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 12:55 -0400, Bill Klein wrote:
> See "IBM response"
"IBM response" in quotes, I know. Whatever influential IBMers are out
there, know that at least one customer *really* appreciates this kind of
give-and-take.
ibm-main is not an official support forum, requirements should b
Wrong! As I wrote, GRS ring supports it. How do you think people shared
DASD prior to MVS/ESA 4.2? Performance may be poor compared to
MII (especially once you get past 2 or 3 systems), but it works.
Mark
--
Mark Zelden
Sr. Software and Systems Architect - z/OS Team Lead
Zurich North America /
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:14:38 -0300, ITURIEL DO NASCIMENTO NETO
<4254.itur...@bradesco.com.br> wrote:
>
>Another cool thing that can be done with Sysrexx is to invoke MXI :
>
>/* REXX */
>Parse ARG mxicmd
>"STEPLIB ADD DA('SYS2.MXI43.LOAD') NOMSG"
>Rcode = MXIREXX('line.',mxicmd)
>If Rcode = 0 Th
Hi,
Where can I find more info on
IBM Systems Director Active Energy Manager (AEM) Version 4.1
than is indicated on
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/management/director/plugins/actengmgr/
… Active Energy Manager is an IBM Systems Director extension that supports the
following endpoints: IBM BladeCe
David Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 10:44 -0400, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
As there is no reason to code a BCR 15,0
Is that really true? We don't have the M91/195 (and their "imprecise
interrupts") to kick around anymore, but is there any other legitimate
use for serializing the pipeline?
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:55:18 -0500, Bill Klein wrote:
>It looks as if Kelly posted this directly to the "newsgroup" and didn't send
>it to the list.
My apologies. Thanks Bill.
Kel
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive
I have snipped all the content from this IBM-MAIN thread *and* have sent
this note to both IBM-MAIN and the Assembler list.
The question has been asked as to whether there is "consolidated"
information anywhere on IBM "performance advice" related to HLASM coding for
best pipeline performance.
T
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
>
> Gibney, Dave wrote:
> > I'm not really an assembler programmer, but I've known this one
since
> > my earliest days. I'm sure it was in the 370 Pop I used in my one
and
> > only assembler programmin
Check the SHARE proceedings for presentations by David Bond titled
"Coding Assembler for Performance". Excellent advice therein.
John Ehrman
(-- Referenced Note Follows )
From: "Bill Klein"
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:28:36 -0500
<...>
The question has been a
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:34:22 -0500, Chase, John wrote:
>
>To this day I have the impression that many "COBOL shops" actually
>*fear* Assembler and/or anybody who professes even the slightest
>proficiency with it.
>
>-jc-
IMO, most shops today fear any and all programmers who could be conside
All:
Message ADR935W provides an error code that doesn't seem to be documented, does
anyone out there have an explanation for this particular code?
ADR935W (001)-T0MI (01) A FAILURE OCCURRED WHILE ATTEMPTING TO PERFORM FAST
REPLICATION FOR VOLUME SH2029.
DIAGNOSTIC INFORMATION: 1E19-08040
Some IBMers have written about AEM 4.1 in IBM Systems Magazine, Mainframe
edition.
www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe
http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe/januaryfebruary09/webexclusive/23657p
1.aspx?ht=aem%204%201%20aem%204%201%20aem%204%201
http://www.ibmsystemsmag.com/mainframe/enewsletterexcl
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:57 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
> It's not "[nonzero],0", it's "15,0".
Hey, you're absolutely RIGHT. (I wonder if it's always been like this?
Am I mis-remembering stuff from 35 years ago? Anyone got a *really* old
PrincOps?)
> SRCHFOR 'BCR 15,0' in SYS1.SHASSRC for some
>IMO, most shops today fear any and all programmers who could be considered
"above average", regardless of the language that they use. Why? Because their
code will be harder to understand than the simple code written by less talented.
I TOTALLY disagree with that statement!
I've found that the mo
On 23 Apr 2009 12:37:25 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Steve Comstock
>>
>> Gibney, Dave wrote:
>> > I'm not really an assembler programmer, but I've known this one
>since
>> > my earliest days. I'm su
On 23 Apr 2009 13:35:12 -0700, eamacn...@yahoo.ca (Ted MacNEIL) wrote:
>I find the weak programmers are the ones to use strange (and often
>misunderstood) tricks, or as we used to call it 'spaghetti code'.
>
>Writing hard to maintain code is produced by poor programmers, not strong ones.
I once
2009/4/23 David Andrews :
> On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:57 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
>> It's not "[nonzero],0", it's "15,0".
>
> Hey, you're absolutely RIGHT. (I wonder if it's always been like this?
> Am I mis-remembering stuff from 35 years ago?
Yup - it's always been like this. I think of it as
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:32:30 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>>IMO, most shops today fear any and all programmers who could be considered
>"above average", regardless of the language that they use. Why? Because
their code will be harder to understand than the simple code written by less
talented.
>
>I
>In order to do some necessary things, some smart programmers wrote some
>hard-to-maintain code using tricks.
Would a weak programmer even know how to do it?
>Once they got a CoBOL compiler, that wasn't needed anymore.
>With that exception, I strongly agree with you that the best programmers
>
So far so good. Now what do I use for defined capacity for LPARs B, C, and D. I
don't care if they use all of what A does not need.
Set them all to 100? That is, set the group to 100, B to 10, and all others to
100?
-Original Message-
From: Al Sherkow [mailto:a...@sherkow.com]
Sent: T
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:35:17 -0700, John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543
T/543-) wrote:
Cross-posted to the Assembler Listserver.
>Check the SHARE proceedings for presentations by David Bond titled
>"Coding Assembler for Performance". Excellent advice therein.
>John Ehrman
I found it as "Session 8192
This looks official:
http://www-01.ibm.com/support/docview.wss?uid=isg3T1011588
I found that by going to http://www.ibm.com and searching for "
207.25.253.31"
--Roger
IBM Mainframe Discussion List wrote on 04/16/2009
07:58:07 AM:
> Did anyone find an official notification? This is all well and
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 16:38 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
> 2009/4/23 David Andrews :
> > On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:57 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
> >> It's not "[nonzero],0", it's "15,0".
> >
> > Hey, you're absolutely RIGHT. (I wonder if it's always been like this?
> > Am I mis-remembering stuff from
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:35:17 -0700, John R. Ehrman (408-463-3543
T/543-) wrote:
Cross-posted to the Assembler Listserver.
Check the SHARE proceedings for presentations by David Bond titled
"Coding Assembler for Performance". Excellent advice therein.
John Ehrman
I f
David Andrews wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-23 at 14:57 -0400, Bob Rutledge wrote:
It's not "[nonzero],0", it's "15,0".
Hey, you're absolutely RIGHT. (I wonder if it's always been like this?
Am I mis-remembering stuff from 35 years ago? Anyone got a *really* old
PrincOps?)
I seem to recall BCR 1,
At z/OS 1.9 only one multisystem sysplex can exist in any GRS ring complex.
I think when people discuss serialization between sysplexes they
usually mean multisystem sysplexes.
The answer to Victor's original question is "it depends." If you want
to serialize resources between multisystem sysple
Rick Fochtman wrote:
I would have a VERY SERIOUS PROBLEM (Capitalized, quotated, underlined,
in italics, in the middle of a blank page!) with installing a program of
that nature. If your consultant requires the use of an authorized
program, other than what the system provides, he/she needs to j
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 12:34 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Effective pipeline programming [was:RE: METAL C: CodeGen
> defeciency?]
>
> > -Origina
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:17 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Effective pipeline programming
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:35:17 -0700, John R. Ehrman (
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Richard Peurifoy
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 5:33 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Effective pipeline programming
> There is "Session 8193 August 2008" which include z1
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:22:31 -0400, Stocker, Herman
wrote:
>It is an Endevor utility that prevents everyone from selecting their own
>options. This keeps the control under the Endevor Admins. And out of the
>applications programmer/consultant.
Yes, unfortunately there is nothing I can see to pr
I guess you need to ask CA the why and wherefore and safeguards. We
use Endevor, but I'm not aware of seeing the source for any modules. I
know that Endevor does some manner of ID switching to allow programmers
to use Endevor to do changes while not allowing them direct access to
the repository
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:32:30 +, Ted MacNEIL wrote:
>
>I find the weak programmers are the ones to use strange (and often
>misunderstood) tricks, or as we used to call it 'spaghetti code'.
>
What's a "trick"? What's an "idiom"? In a recent discussion in
TSO-REXX, Phil Smith, among others, urg
Mike,
All I found of interest was this:
If you receive a fnrs code other than what is displayed in the following list,
contact the IBM ESS Hardware Support structure for further assistance.
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List on behalf of Mike Myers
Sent:
You don't need to set Defined Capacities for the other LPARs (though you
may). If you want to limit the 4HRA of an LPAR to limit what that particular
LPAR can contribute the 4HRA of it's products you can. If you don't card
about the individual LPARs don't set a defined capacity. The Group Capacity
Hello All,
I need to find IBM Messages and Codes on the Web to find what this S413-08
is all about.
See messages below. It seams like when the second volser is needed we get
s413-08. I do not know what these EDG4038 messages is all about.
46.48 JOB16789 IEC501A M
0C1B,V06198,SL,,TERU328B,DSN
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/lookat/
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ed. Benoit
Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 20:11
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Need to find IBM Message and Codes for S413-08 See mes
I was agreeing with you, Ted. I just wanted to point out the performance
issue. Since he is talking about using it to connect 2 Parallel Sysplexes, my
assumption was that it would be AT LEAST 4 systems (you could have a single
system Parallel Sysplex, but why?). Also, I'm not sure you could u
Hi,
Recently a problem was experienced a Channel Extended Peer To Peer VTS
complex, where selective resets inside the VTC stopped all tape requests
either completing or continue to process.
All VTC's in production are in the main site and there is no channel extended
VTC's in this complex act
On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:59:39 -0700, Gibney, Dave wrote
> I guess you need to ask CA the why and wherefore and safeguards. We
>use Endevor, but I'm not aware of seeing the source for any modules. I
Oh, don't point to CA. This isn't actually part of Endevor.
googled & found: http://www.nexio.co
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
> Behalf Of Phil Sidler
> Sent: Thursday, April 23, 2009 9:51 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: APF question
>
> On Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:59:39 -0700, Gibney, Dave
wrote
>
> > I guess y
IBM-MAIN is fine -- wonderful, even -- but for the *specific* audience I
have in mind there should be more dissemination. If you'd like to double
post (IBM-MAIN and the Blog), wonderful. If you'd only like to reply on
IBM-MAIN, your choice, but please don't complain later if a particular open
sourc
Art,
>I, too, have no choice - most company apps require ActiveX to work. After
>years of unsuccessful protests, I finally gave up on home access and
>acquired a company laptop. Let them deal with it.
>So much for the Statement of Integrity ... I would have expected better ...
You're right, w
>Also, I'm not sure you could use FICON CTCs, since GRS Ring requires BCTCs
>(IIRC).
I know it used ESCON CTC's because that's how we set it up on an environment
long ago.
If it's still supported by IBM, and it is, and we have processors without
parallel channels, it has to use more than BCTC's
87 matches
Mail list logo
