Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote in message
news:listserv%201004140039341764.0...@bama.ua.edu...
Answering all of last nights post in one:
Big snip ...
That 'foreign' subplex will be decommisioned soon. At this time we are
again
prone to paying more money if we keep TEST separate from
Are you sure you *have* to pay more if you don't merge Test and Prod?
Having repeatedly asked my managers about just that (and my feelings about
this idea are certainly known here - I have made enemies in the past because
of it), I have to *believe* what they tell me. I am not privy to the
Peter, There is no rmm command to immediately return a tape to scratch.
All return to scratch must be preceded by either the expiration (via
'housekeeping') or by releasing the volumes - either way the volume is now
pending release and cannot be used. To be returned to scratch the volume
must have
So, is that a next line of System z mainframe we're looking at in the
background ?
Marc Wambeke
Mainframe Watch Belgium
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:56:10 EDT, Ed Finnell efinnel...@aol.com wrote:
In a message dated 4/13/2010 12:44:02 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
ken.porow...@cit.com writes:
IBM's
Barbara,
Having performed IBM Software Asset Management in a past life, something
doesn't quite add up here. But without the details, it is impossible to
challenge your management's assertions.
I would suggest that you take a different approach. Contact Al Sherkow
(a...@sherkow.com) about
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 11:30:45 -0700, Kurt Eastwood kurtms...@yahoo.com wrote:
I hope those of your who have experience with Linux on the mainframe would
be wiling to share your expertise.
My boss has asked me to find out anything I can about running Linux on the
mainframe.
Is anyone running
All,
could anyone tell me correct settings for a SSH connection to a z/OS
Box? I use PuTTY and encounter some funny things, for i. e. I can't
enter the number 2 Maybe just $TERM is wrong (I use vt100).
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Michael
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:42:56 -0500, McKown, John
john.mck...@healthmarkets.com wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Kurt Eastwood
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: LINUX on the
To get a flavour of the installation process without carving out an LPAR or
installing z/VM you could always use Hercules. z/Linux is one of the few
legitimate modern OS that may be run on Hercules.
Then of course why would you run z/Linux under Hercules on Intel when you
could just run Linux?
An equivalent for z/VM TPCPIP
DEVICE d...@0620 OSD 0620 NONROUTER
LINK OSA1 QDIOETHERNET d...@0620 MTU 1500 ETHERNET For a Layer 2
transport
or
LINK OSA1 QDIOETHERNET d...@0620 MTU 1500 IP For a Layer 3
transport
On VM we do not have VTAM involvement so there is no TRLE.
Hello
Is the a unility where it is possible to do something like this:
PRINT MEMBER=XYZ,DD=ABC
And the JCL
//ABC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=X.B
// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=X.A
Output
MEMBER XYZ found in DSN X.A
member
We have a auditor on site and he is looking into our parmlibs.
Venlig hilsen
I think a good many of us went down similar paths, starting out in
operations, moving into applications programming, and eventually getting
into systems programming.
Bill Janulin
Mgr Tech Support Product Dev.
ASPG, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Remember, a scheduling environment consists of one or more flags and
their required state.
Based on your description below, you seem to be close. However, there
does seem to be some overkill here. I think the SCHENV for each CICS
region, DB2 region,... is overkill.
May I suggest that one SCHENV
Mark
So the MTU size can not be greater than 1500 ??
even when running OSA-Gig ??
From:
Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
04/14/2010 07:03 AM
Subject:
Re: Fw: LINUX on the MAINFRAME
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
An equivalent for z/VM
or anyone else that wants to jump in on this..
find it strange the osa gig speed not supported? can not find anything
as yet that says I can increase past 1500?
- Forwarded by Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin on 04/14/2010 08:22 AM -
From:
Ron Wells/AGFS/AGFin
To:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 14:09:05 +0200 Frank Allan Rasmussen
frank.allan.rasmus...@regionsyddanmark.dk wrote:
:Is the a unility where it is possible to do something like this:
:PRINT MEMBER=XYZ,DD=ABC
:And the JCL
://ABC DD DISP=SHR,DSN=X.B
:// DD DISP=SHR,DSN=X.A
:Output
:MEMBER XYZ
Yes - you can change the MTU size, make the 1500 what ever size you need.
From the z/VM TCPIP configuration.
MTU *mtusize* Specifies the maximum transmission unit (MTU) size in bytes to
be used on the interface. To determine the recommended MTU size, refer to
the hardware documentation
so on the LINK statement--VM/TCPIP config... I can change the MTU to
8992 or does it need to be 9000 ?
seeing only the reference of 8992 but want to be sure
From:
Mark Pace mpac...@gmail.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
04/14/2010 08:27 AM
Subject:
Re: Fw: LINUX on the MAINFRAME
Sent by:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 00:39:34 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Answering all of last nights post in one:
Mark,
Anyway, I am commenting on it because the reason I had to use group name
was due to 2 different DB2 subsystems on different systems in the same
sysplex that had the same name.
Many of us skipped the applications sidetrack and just went straight from Ops
to Sysprog.
William Janulin william.janu...@aspg.com 4/14/2010 8:43 AM
I think a good many of us went down similar paths, starting out in
operations, moving into applications programming, and eventually getting
into
Ron
I'll try to get back to you on this - and whatever else you that may be
concerning you - when I have a chance.
Meantime, in order to discover what MTU size applies to what type of
interface, you should use the famous Figure 1, Summary of DEVICE and LINK
statements in the z/OS
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:00:07 -0500, Mark Steely mark.ste...@wnco.com wrote:
I have look in the archives - still can't find the answer. I am trying to
update a few parms in the OPERLOG definition. This is dasd only structure
and we are z/os V1R11. When I try to update the parms I receive
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:24:21 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net wrote:
Are you sure you *have* to pay more if you don't merge Test and Prod?
Having repeatedly asked my managers about just that (and my feelings about
this idea are certainly known here - I have made enemies in the past because
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:35:25 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
After some discussion here in the office, we are wondering why SMP/E
would be allowed to subvert the protections on data sets
I'm not so sure that it does.
Consider this: It does not require update authority to SYS1.LINKLIB to
RECEIVE
Mark Zelden mzel...@flash.net wrote in message
news:listserv%201004140856187730.0...@bama.ua.edu...
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 02:24:21 -0500, Barbara Nitz nitz-...@gmx.net
wrote:
Are you sure you *have* to pay more if you don't merge Test and
Prod?
Having repeatedly asked my managers about just
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:58:55 -0500 Tom Marchant m42tom-ibmm...@yahoo.com
wrote:
:On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:35:25 -0400, Thompson, Steve wrote:
:After some discussion here in the office, we are wondering why SMP/E
:would be allowed to subvert the protections on data sets
:I'm not so sure that it
Has IBM gotten around to providing a MACRO with EQUates and DSECTs for the PLO
instruction?
--
Binyamin Dissen bdis...@dissensoftware.com
http://www.dissensoftware.com
Director, Dissen Software, Bar Grill - Israel
Should you use the mailblocks package and expect a response from me,
you should
The following message is a courtesy copy of an article
that has been posted to bit.listserv.ibm-main,alt.folklore.computers as well.
scott.r...@joann.com (Scott Rowe) writes:
Many of us skipped the applications sidetrack and just went straight
from Ops to Sysprog.
I took a intro to fortran
I'm just curious as to why IBM chose to create the VRRN type of VSAM file. I
understand a normal RRN (NUMBERED). In both cases, the record is addessed by
relative record number. But I don't really see the need for a VRRN. Why not
just have a KSDS with a 4 byte key at offset 0? Is it to remove
Mr Sinram,
Thanks for your feed back. Specifying EXTENDED_DATA=YES did the trick.
Actually, i'm trying to find out the most idle system to direct work to.
To do it i'm not just only evalueting Unused Service Units, which
sometimes
presents value 0 even when the system is not full.
I'm
Chris..
IPAQENET that is what I have in z/os tcpip for the osa device
but in my ROUTE statements example
ROUTE 10.239.53.0/24 =LINKF800 MTU 1500
was told the 8992 could not be used because JUMBO packets not support on
network.??
so I guess that is a factor..??
Ron
As I said, I'll try to get back to you. Meantime you can read up on Path MTU
Discovery and how that could resolve the apparent differences.
Incidentally, I dimly discerned other considerations in your earlier posts so
perhaps you can state clearly and distinctly what *all* your concerns
Be careful changing the MTU size. Most routers can handle the 1500, but
larger MTUs may be fragmented into small chunks. I believe there was a
discussion on this list about MTU size and if I remember correctly
someone said(it may have been Chris Mason) that if the router isn't
configured correctly
Hello,
If I use IEAVPSE to pause a TCB and a time interval set using STIMERM
expires, will the exit specified to be driven under another RB as it
does with wait?
If I schedule a synchronous SRB from a TCB and a time interval set using
STIMERM expires, will the specified exit be driven prior
Unfortunately not - you have to roll yer own.
Rob Scott
Developer
Rocket Software
275 Grove Street * Newton, MA 02466-2272 * USA
Tel: +1.617.614.2305
Email: rsc...@rs.com
Web: www.rocketsoftware.com
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu]
Thanks to all who replied - the answer was I had to upgrade the LOGR to the new
release level and then the updates work as expected. To update the LOGR
definitions I had to add ITEM NAME(SMDUPLEX) NUMBER(1) to the LOGR definitions.
Thank You
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
It sounds like you are trying to identify the location of members in your
PARMLIB concatenation. ISPF's DDLIST command can help. Enter DDLIST on any
ISPF panel, then enter sub-command PARMLIB, then sub-command M XYZ PARMLIB
will locate all members named XYZ in the PARMLIB concatenation.
- Don
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:25:12 +0300, Binyamin Dissen
bdis...@dissensoftware.com wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:12:19 -0400 Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote:
:Sorry, SMP does not bypass security. The user has to be smart and know what
:to do, but no security is bypassed or violated.
If the
That is a true statement.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ward, Mike S
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 10:32 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Fw: LINUX on the MAINFRAME
Be careful changing the MTU size. Most
Hi again,
I think i've found out the problem.
When WLM presents The sum of all SU in the last 60 seconds, it includes
unused SU too.
So the right formula should be :
Busy% = (Sum of all SU - unused SU) / (Num of processors * CPU Speed *
60)
Thanks anyway.
Atenciosamente / Regards / Saludos
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:31:15 +0100 Steve Austin steve.aus...@macro4.com
wrote:
:If I use IEAVPSE to pause a TCB and a time interval set using STIMERM
:expires, will the exit specified to be driven under another RB as it
:does with wait?
I would expect so.
:If I schedule a synchronous SRB from a
I went through all this in a previous employer. Due to acquisitions, we merged
4 plexes into one site, into one shamplex. Only one small system was able to
be combined with another, wound up with 3 MAS'es, 3 RACFDB's, 3
SMSplexes, etc. Chose to send LOGREC data to LOGR for the contractual
Thanks everyone...gather from Router group I can not use the JUMBO size..
Network not setup to handle this ++ $$$
From:
Shumate, Scott scshum...@bbandt.com
To:
IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Date:
04/14/2010 09:53 AM
Subject:
Re: Fw: LINUX on the MAINFRAME
Sent by:
IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On 4/14/2010 at 09:23 AM, Ron Wells rwe...@agfinance.com wrote:
or anyone else that wants to jump in on this..
find it strange the osa gig speed not supported? can not find anything
as yet that says I can increase past 1500?
MTU size has nothing to do with the speed of the network
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 14:02:08 -0500, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 21:36:16 +0300, Binyamin Dissen wrote:
Now that IS scary. It seems to imply that SMP bypasses data set security.
No, it does not imply that. You may, of course, infer that, but you'd be
wrong :)
Hmmm. At a casual
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 09:43:15 -0500, Mark Steely mark.ste...@wnco.com wrote:
Thanks to all who replied - the answer was I had to upgrade the LOGR to the
new release level and then the updates work as expected. To update the LOGR
definitions I had to add ITEM NAME(SMDUPLEX) NUMBER(1) to the LOGR
W dniu 2010-04-14 15:59, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM pisze:
[...]
PSLC is pretty simple. Your qualifying sysplex (biggest one) has to
be 50%
or more of the used capacity on each box.
80% is the value I heard.
HEARD? Is it documented anyhwhere? I have SEEN IBM documents describing
Terms and
W dniu 2010-04-14 16:18, McKown, John pisze:
I'm just curious as to why IBM chose to create the VRRN type of VSAM file. I understand a
normal RRN (NUMBERED). In both cases, the record is addessed by relative record number.
But I don't really see the need for a VRRN. Why not just have a KSDS
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 19:06:07 +0200, R.S. r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl wrote:
W dniu 2010-04-14 15:59, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM pisze:
[...]
PSLC is pretty simple. Your qualifying sysplex (biggest one) has to
be 50%
or more of the used capacity on each box.
80% is the value I heard.
HEARD? Is
Does anyone have a good link to this manual? Everyone I try seems to be dead.
I'm specifically looking for the standard for sending data to a LU type 3
(simulated) device (simulated with Netspool).
We are migrating to z/OS from VSE and the behavior we have for CICS printing on
VSE seems to be
W dniu 2010-04-14 16:46, Walt Farrell pisze:
[...]
In the original discussion, it was speculated that IBM obviously did not
understand that one should protect the data sets rather than trying to
protect the program or functions. And that therefore anyone who did have
proper data set protections
PSLC is pretty simple. Your qualifying sysplex (biggest one) has to
be 50%
or more of the used capacity on each box.
80% is the value I heard.
HEARD? Is it documented anyhwhere?
It was in 1998.
We got PSLC by running SYSLOGR and Batch on the CEC.
I don't know if it's more complex now.
The
Busy% = (Sum all Service units in the last 60 seconds) / (Num of
Processors * Cpu Speed per second * 60)
SU's are a software measurement.
And, as such, the amount accumulated per workload is different depending on
many things, such as dispatching priority, workload activity, swapability,
On 13/04/2010 19:30, Kurt Eastwood wrote:
I hope those of your who have experience with linux on the mainframe would be
wiling to share your expertise.
My boss has asked me to find out anything I can about running linux on the
mainframe.
Is anyone running linux on their mainframe?
If so,
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why a VSAM VRRN vs. KSDS with 4 byte key?
W dniu 2010-04-14 16:18, McKown, John pisze:
I'm just
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Frank Swarbrick
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:18 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: 3270 Data Stream Device Guide
Does anyone have a good link to this manual? Everyone I try
Hi Frank,
From what you wrote, I believe that you are looking for the 3270 data stream
(i.e. the contents of the RU) rather than the SNA encapsulation and protocol.
If so, the data stream is described at
Frank
The IBM page which supposedly gives you access to GA23-0059-07 is a
Norwegian blue pining for the fiords.
I was thinking of a punishment suitable for whomever in IBM is responsible for
this but I'd better not say it in a family list.
Meantime we can thank someone on the hercules390 list
W dniu 2010-04-14 19:48, McKown, John pisze:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of R.S.
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 12:13 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why a VSAM VRRN vs. KSDS with 4 byte key?
W dniu 2010-04-14
If the PARMLIB is the only case, you might try using the parmlib
service. I don't know if this will give you the DSN or not, but it will
fetch the parmlib member that's currently active within the system, with
a very few possible exceptions.
Rick
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/04/14/1548238/Is-OS2-Coming-Back?art_pos=3art_pos=3
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1508584,00.html
quote
A systems integrator close to the computing giant swears there's a move afoot
inside IBM to reintroduce the
Michael
If the partner node supports SNA, typically 802.2 LAN although SDLC is
possible, then a DLSw router at either end of the communication path is all
you need. You don't need any more advice here - unless it's about the basics
of defining a logical 3172 to VTAM - and possibly the SNA
Can anyone tell me where I can find doc for the QUIKCELL mechanism?
It seems tailor-made for a problem I have to deal with while avoiding
1000's of calls to STORAGE services. I vaguely remember touching on it
in a class many moons ago.
Rick
Service replaced a 3590 tape drive but we cannot vary the drive online.
In the past the only way we could get the drive back online was to
re-cycle the control unit.
Has anyone figure out how to bring the drive online without a re-cycle
of the control unit?
The other drives on the controller are
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:37:10 -0500 Rick Fochtman rfocht...@ync.net wrote:
:Can anyone tell me where I can find doc for the QUIKCELL mechanism?
:It seems tailor-made for a problem I have to deal with while avoiding
:1000's of calls to STORAGE services. I vaguely remember touching on it
:in a
I remembered Google, and did in fact find the Reference, but some CICS
documentation refers to a Guide, and this is what I am not able to find.
But probably I can live with just the Reference.
Thanks!
--
Frank Swarbrick
Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development
FirstBank Data
Hi Frank,
If you want to print the contents of a complete PDS or specific members of a
PDS, you could use IEB PTPCH -
This version prints each member of an entire PDS -
//OVERFORM OUTPUT CLASS=D,PAGEDEF=A18C,FORMDEF=A18C,FORMS=0201,
// DEST=U14
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2010 1:37 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: QUIKCELL Doc
Can anyone tell me where I can find doc for the QUIKCELL mechanism?
It seems
W dniu 2010-04-14 20:26, McKown, John pisze:
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/04/14/1548238/Is-OS2-Coming-Back?art_pos=3art_pos=3
http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/news/article/0,289142,sid80_gci1508584,00.html
quote
A systems integrator close to the computing giant swears there's a
On 13 Apr 2010 15:36:51 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Walt Farrell
Sent: Tuesday, April 13, 2010 9:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Heads Up: APAR IO11698 - New SAF
W dniu 2010-04-14 21:01, Clark Morris pisze:
[...]
Can SYS1.LPALIB on volume 123456 have a different RACF profile than
SYS1.LPALIB on volume 987654? If not, this raises some interesting
questions.
Yes, it can. See discrete profiles. However I don't see any gotcha here.
In many cases updates
On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 16:01:52 -0300 Clark Morris cfmpub...@ns.sympatico.ca
wrote:
:Also given the problem found with SMP/E, I would hope that IBM and
:other vendors are checking to see if there are similar exposures in
:other utilities and services.
Only possible if IBM tells what the exposure
CA-Endevor is an APF-authorized product that can install and maintain
software.
Is that similar enough such that it needs to be examined? I have no idea.
However, if you don't know what the exposure is, it will be darn hard to
evaluate it.
Don Williams
-Original Message-
From: IBM
A little Google'ing turned up some surprising hits:
http://www.amazon.com/OS-2-Warp-4-0-CD-ROM/dp/B2S8D6
http://www.os2bbs.com/OS2News/
http://www.os2site.com/
By 'surprising' I mean seeing activity dates as little as two weeks ago.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
It is OS/390 1.3 and the OSA card has only one port OSA card that supports
Ethernet and Token Ring.
We have a 3745 we want to get rid of. It has a total of 6 printers and
terminals that are still SNA. We have DLSw router in front of the 3745. We
are trying to get rid of the 3745 and just
It's interesting that I can find the older manual for 3171, 3172 and 3175
(GA23-0060) but NOT the newer manual for 3174 (GA23-0061).
Nonetheless, I believe that information contained in the following manual may
be relevant to your purpose.
Yes, I'm aware of uncaptured time but since i just want to know
the most idle system, i think there is no problem in ignoring
uncaptured time (which seems to be a % of system utilization).
After correcting the formula, it shows results similar to %EAPPL
of RMF Monitor III.
Thanks for your time.
Wow.
IT SOX auditors are going to have a field day with this.
I can hardly wait to do my next SOX audit.
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Don Williams donb...@gmail.com wrote:
CA-Endevor is an APF-authorized product that can install and maintain
software. Is that similar enough such that it
try TERM=xterm
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 6:25 AM, Michael Knigge
michael.kni...@set-software.de wrote:
All,
could anyone tell me correct settings for a SSH connection to a z/OS Box? I
use PuTTY and encounter some funny things, for i. e. I can't enter the
number 2 Maybe just $TERM is wrong
Frank
If you do what you are supposed to do and use IBM's Search function, you
end up with one of those blood-pressure danger panels with the words Our
apologies
prominently but disingenuously displayed:
http://www.ibm.com/publications/servlet/pbi.wss?
CTY=USFNC=SRXPBL=GA23-0059-07
Since two
In keeping with the consolidated response (if I'm not losing too much context):
Mark,
Yes, I recall the striping issue you had. I think we can avoid that.
Yes, the
That's exactly the doc I was looking for. Thank you IMMENSELY :-) I was
searching under the wrong name.
Rick
-
McKown, John wrote:
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
[mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Rick
That would be it. It was originally called QuickCell in the first
release of MVS and consisted of the macros BLDCPOOL, GETCELL, FREECELL
and DELCPOOL and the underlying quickcell services. Somewhere along the
line, it wound up with a single macro interface, CPOOL. How much the
internals of the
I can't speak to your specific situation, but I have used ONLINE,UNCOND to
address boxed situations after the causing issue was resolved.
Regards,
Kevin
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Hale, Bob
Sent: Wednesday, April
To those using the archives searching for information on SYSTCPD
Also to Edward Jaffe, Charles Mills and Marty French if they happen to notice
this thread to which they contributed is still running
-
This thread started - and largely appeared to finish - in mid-December last
(2009). I thought
z/VM Evaluation Edition is available here:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/eval
If you have a System z10, you can stand up z/VM Evaluation Edition (under
its license terms) and Linux without even ringing IBM. This is z/VM 5.3, so
it's a little dated, but it'll give you a reasonable idea of the
What are the customer's plans to update from OS/390 V1R3? That information
could be quite helpful in advising on short-term connectivity with a
longer-term view. (Hopefully to avoid reworking the connectivity, in other
words.)
- - - - -
Timothy Sipples
Resident Architect (Based in Singapore)
STG
Hi Clark,
One way to give you volumes specific RACF protection!
Use an EXIT.
++SRC (ICHRCX01) DISTLIB(AOSBN).
**
*
ICHRCX01 TITLE 'ICHRCX01 - RACF - RACHECK PRE-PROCESSING EXIT'
88 matches
Mail list logo
