Re: APAR OA30338 for PDSE Users

2010-06-09 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
"Edward Jaffe" wrote in message news:<4c0def64.9020...@phoenixsoftware.com>... > I can't for the life of me explain why this is not HIPER, but if you use > PDSEs in your shop I highly recommend APAR OA30338. > > Without this fix, we had broken PDSEs that could not be read, accessed, > or even d

IEBGENER - 1 input to 2 output volumes. Why?

2010-06-09 Thread Saul Richman
We run z/TPF without peer-to-peer VTS so we use IEBGENER to automatically copy logical volumes from z/TPF System Capture across VTS machines "L" and "R" for security reasons. We find for certain z/TPF single volume input tapes, we get *2* output volumes As they say on English TV program Blue Pet

dsnbind

2010-06-09 Thread DATURLOT DE CHAVIGNY Marc
Hello I work on DB2V8 . What is the plan has dsnbind ? Thanks your answer. Cordialement Marco Daturlot de Chavigny Générali France Assurances. Immeuble Wilo - W03B2088M 11-17 avenue Francois Mitterrand 93200 Saint Denis Tel: 01 58 38 59 69 mda

dsnbind

2010-06-09 Thread DATURLOT DE CHAVIGNY Marc
Hello I work on DB2V8 ; what is the plan dsnbind ? Cordialement Marco Daturlot de Chavigny Générali France Assurances. Immeuble Wilo - W03B2088M 11-17 avenue Francois Mitterrand 93200 Saint Denis Tel: 01 58 38 59 69 mdaturlotdechavi...@generali.

Re: IEBGENER - 1 input to 2 output volumes. Why?

2010-06-09 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
"Saul Richman" wrote in message news:... > We run z/TPF without peer-to-peer VTS so we use IEBGENER to automatically > copy logical volumes from z/TPF System Capture across VTS machines "L" and > "R" for security reasons. > > We find for certain z/TPF single volume input tapes, we get *2* output

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Edwards
On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 03:11:20 -0400, Gerhard Postpischil wrote: >There's good news and bad news > >I've been trying to restore SEASIK since Friday, with no luck. > >1) There is a design error in DSSREST. When I added the RDW >code, I wrote the code so it only works when the block size is >equal t

Re: Personal use z/OS machines was Re: Multiprise 3k for personal Use?

2010-06-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 20:14:29 -0400 Pinnacle wrote: :>same thing. Authorized code can hack MVS, unauthorized code can't. The security exposures exist when the authorized code "trusts" an address passed by unauthorized code. Authorized code cannot trust anything provided by unauthorized code. Th

OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Wilson
Hi, One of our network guys has asked if an OSA(s) support network etherchannel/bonding/port-channel? Whereby the two OSA ports are presented to the network switch as one .. ie giving you double bandwidth .. Kind Regards, Mark -

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Riedel, Alexander
Hi Mark, What operating-system are you using ? With z/Linux and z/VM we have already tested it successfully. It is documented here: http://www.vm.ibm.com/virtualnetwork/linkag.html Kind Regards, Alexander -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.u

Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Manfred Lotz
Hi there, I was looking for a way to have some sort of version control in ISPF for members of PDS(E) datasets. Nothing fancy just for a single developper. I like to have some kind of open source thingy if possible. Didn't find anything on CBT tape though but perhaps my search wasn't smart enough.

z/OS & WAS Work in WashDC

2010-06-09 Thread Jim Marshall
In need of a z/OS Systems Programmer to work in downtown Washington DC. The work is as a contractor working in a US Government Agency in downtown near the Viet Nam Wall. The operation has 2 IBM 2096 computers running in a z/OS Parallel Sysplex; CICS, DB2, ADABAS, WAS, MQ, Enterprise Service Bus

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Binyamin Dissen
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:48:27 +0200 Manfred Lotz wrote: :>Hi there, :>I was looking for a way to have some sort of version control in ISPF :>for members of PDS(E) datasets. Nothing fancy just for a single :>developper. :>I like to have some kind of open source thingy if possible. Didn't :>find any

Re: IEBGENER - 1 input to 2 output volumes. Why?

2010-06-09 Thread Saul Richman
Hi Kees In reply: I don't know the ptp vts, we have a TS7700. Are the z/TPF and z/OS logical volumes the same size? Yes! They are interchangable. The z/TPF volume was written with COMP on, is the z/OS volume also COMPacted? As I know, Yes. We have z/TPF and z/OS here too (we are an airline).

Antwort: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Albert Klimek
Hi Manfred A low cost solution for z/OS is CVS for MVS (dccmn.com/cvsmvs). You can use it from USS-side via native CVS commands or via Batch-Job from TSO. Albert VERLAGSGRUPPE WELTBILD GMBH Sitz der Gesellschaft: Augsburg Handelsregister Augsburg HRB 6035 Ust-ID-Nr: DE 127501299 Geschäftsführ

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Wilson
Alexander, Thanks for the reply, we are zOS But will look at the facilities provided.. Mark On 09/06/2010 11:44, "Riedel, Alexander" wrote: > Hi Mark, > > What operating-system are you using ? > > With z/Linux and z/VM we have already tested it successfully. > It is documented here

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Petersen, Jim
It is not supported for z/OS but we make each OSA adapter a /30 network and then the switch guys do some magic so that they are load balanced from the switch side and we use Multipath PERConnection on the outbound z/OS side. ___ Jim Petersen MVS - Lead Sys

Re: JVMJ9VM015W

2010-06-09 Thread Chase, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin > > (Would this be better on MVS-OE? TSO-REXX? Other?) > > Attempting to invoke "jar" with Rexx "address SYSCALL spawn" > from ISPF Command Shell, I get: > > JVMJ9VM015W Initialization error for lib

Re: Personal use z/OS machines was Re: Multiprise 3k for personal Use?

2010-06-09 Thread Edward Jaffe
Pinnacle wrote: Tony, Thank you for at least posting two concrete examples of past holes. There was a recent article in zJournal about hacking z/OS, but it was disappointing, limited to what we've discussed here. The article quoted a number of noted gurus (some on this thread), and they all

Re: APAR OA30338 for PDSE Users

2010-06-09 Thread Edward Jaffe
Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote: You mentioned the EAV volume. Do you have indications that this is part of the problem, i.e. the problem only occurs on EAV volumes? No. EAV has nothing to do with it. The problem can occur on volumes of any size. -- Edward E Jaffe Phoenix Software Internationa

Re: JVMJ9VM015W

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:55:28 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: >On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:19:05 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >> >>See REXXSTOR on my web site or CBT file 434. URL below. >> >Interesting. Thanks. But isn't this Schr?dinger's cat? >I can call REXXSTOR before "jar", which tells me what I'm >u

PDSE(1)_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE (was Re: APAR OA30338 ...)

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 23:54:57 -0500, Barbara Nitz wrote: >You could try my 'Keep the PDSE open' program, a small thing that just does >an open on all of them and then goes to sleep forver. That keeps the >connection, and for the next 15 minutes or so, the opening by someone else is >actually fast.

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Staller, Allan
I cannot help, with this question but you will probably get a better answer on the TCP/IP list: Topic:IBM TCP/IP e.g. TCP/IP on S/390 Name:IBMTCP-L Type: LISTSERV Listserv:lists...@vm.marist.edu Subscribe to IBMTCP-L List:ibmtc...@vm.marist.edu Web

FTP RDW (was: SEASIK 1.0 released)

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 04:17:02 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: > >Don't look at me. IBM are the ones who created ftp >with the RDW option, and I'm not the only user of that. > >And the special utility is only required because IBM (again) >neglected to provide a facility to reverse that. They will >presumab

Re: Personal use z/OS machines was Re: Multiprise 3k for personal Use?

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:01:51 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: > >I wonder if anyone was able to exploit SMP/E to run arbitrary code in a >privileged state? > You're cruel. Integrity exposures, like pregnancy, are pretty much devoid of degree. If a program gets in KEY 0, it can modify system control bloc

CSFM122I

2010-06-09 Thread Michael Klaeschen
Hello, at startup of ICSF message CSFM122I informs that PKA services were not enabled. From my understanding PKA settings cannot be changed when no cryptographic coprocessor is available, e.g. when solely CPACF is active. So, the message is expected. However, I did not expect it to be highligh

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-09 Thread J R
> dinosaurs still use 3350s. And I'm no dinosaur, even if I > do still block at 6233 or less so that I can fit data onto > even a 2314 if necessary. I'm a dinosaur and I'm pretty sure I remember 7294 bytes fitting on a 2314. Where did 6233 come from? > Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 04:17:02

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-09 Thread J R
OK. I've had my coffee now and I understand the relevance of 6233! > Date: Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:47:10 -0400 > From: jayare...@hotmail.com > Subject: Re: SEASIK 1.0 released > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > > > dinosaurs still use 3350s. And I'm no dinosaur, even if I > > do still block at 6233 or

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Mason
Allan > I cannot help, with this question but you will probably get a better answer on the TCP/IP list: In general regarding questions involving IP platforms on z Series, you are correct. However, in this case, assuming that what is said in the only reference manual for OSA features - excludi

Re: IEBGENER - 1 input to 2 output volumes. Why?

2010-06-09 Thread Vernooij, CP - SPLXM
"Saul Richman" wrote in message news:... > Hi Kees > > In reply: > > I don't know the ptp vts, we have a TS7700. Are the z/TPF and z/OS > logical volumes the same size? > > Yes! They are interchangable. > > The z/TPF volume was written with COMP on, is the z/OS volume also > COMPacted? > > A

Re: JVMJ9VM015W

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 08:05:29 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 22:55:28 -0500, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > >>On Tue, 8 Jun 2010 21:19:05 -0500, Mark Zelden wrote: >>> >>>See REXXSTOR on my web site or CBT file 434. URL below. >>> >>Interesting. Thanks. But isn't this Schr?dinger's cat

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Wilson
Chris, Thanks for the reply, the issue I have is my lack of networking knowledge. I am just the zOS mansometimes :)... If I had to ask the network team some relevant questions what would they be? Mark On 09/06/2010 15:23, "Chris Mason" wrote: > Allan > >> I cannot help, with this ques

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Manfred Lotz
Hi Albert, Thanks for your reply. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:14 PM, Albert Klimek wrote: > Hi Manfred > A low cost solution for z/OS is CVS for MVS (dccmn.com/cvsmvs). > You can use it from USS-side via native CVS commands or via Batch-Job from > TSO. > Yep, CVS or even simpler RCS would be possi

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List > [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Manfred Lotz > Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 9:43 AM > To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu > Subject: Re: Version control for PDS(E) members > > Hi Albert, > > Thanks for your reply. > > On Wed

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-09 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 6/9/2010 5:17 AM, Paul Edwards wrote: Don't look at me. IBM are the ones who created ftp with the RDW option, and I'm not the only user of that. You missed one crucial step - you zip the AWS file, and then ftp that. No worry about record format or boundaries, and a "universal" unzip is ava

Re: SEASIK 1.0 released

2010-06-09 Thread Gerhard Postpischil
On 6/9/2010 9:47 AM, J R wrote: I'm a dinosaur and I'm pretty sure I remember 7294 bytes fitting on a 2314. Where did 6233 come from? It's (sub)optimal for every disk from 2314 to 3390/9345 on Also it's the (approximate) size IBM used for its own distributions, way back when. Gerhard Pos

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:43:12 +0200, Manfred Lotz wrote: > >Yep, CVS or even simpler RCS would be possible. However, then I would >have to copy PDS member to USS, actually in both directions, as both >CVS and RCS can only deal with USS files as far as I can see. > Why "both directions"? Once they're

Re: Setting up timezone in Unix on Mainframe

2010-06-09 Thread Dana Mitchell
Lizette, >From my notes when the daylight saving time changed in 2007, the places I had to update included: TCSH uses /etc/csh.login CRON uses /etc/init.options /etc/profile, /etc/init.options, and /etc/rc

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Manfred Lotz
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:46 PM, McKown, John wrote: > > A friend said that SCLM stinks, but it does support PDS(E) and change > control. And it is bundled with ISPF. > Hmm, I don't know SCLM but it seems to be a much bigger beast (in terms of complexity regarding customization and usage) than I

Re: IEBGENER - 1 input to 2 output volumes. Why?

2010-06-09 Thread Saul Richman
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:20:16 +0200, Vernooij, CP - SPLXM wrote: >"Saul Richman" wrote in message >news:... >> Hi Kees >> >> In reply: >> >> I don't know the ptp vts, we have a TS7700. Are the z/TPF and z/OS >> logical volumes the same size? >> >> Yes! They are interchangable. >> >> The z/TPF vol

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Manfred Lotz
On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:43:12 +0200, Manfred Lotz wrote: >> >>Yep, CVS or even simpler RCS would be possible. However, then I would >>have to copy PDS member to USS, actually in both directions, as both >>CVS and RCS can only deal with USS file

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:08:34 +0200, Manfred Lotz wrote: > >I have good old assembler coding which resides in PO datasets and >which I assemble via batch job. That's why I automatically thought the >source should stay there. > Of late, you can use Unix files/directories, allocated with batch JCL, as

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Mason
Mark Now that we know that your platform is z/OS rather than z/VM (typically with "guests" which could include z/OS), it is clear that, while the strict answer to your "network team" is "Yes, OSA-Express features *do* support "Link Aggregation".[1] However, as is clear from the reference I gave

IOCS dates?

2010-06-09 Thread Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.)
I've written a Wiki article on IOCS[1] and would appreciate any timeline information. In addition, I'd appreciate any non-IBM references to IOCS to establish its notability, and anything else that you believe might be helpful. The article is [[Input/Output Control System]]. [1] I've started others

Re: FTP RDW (was: SEASIK 1.0 released)

2010-06-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 04:17:02 -0500, Paul Edwards wrote: Don't look at me. IBM are the ones who created ftp with the RDW option, and I'm not the only user of that. And the special utility is only required because IBM (again) neglected to provide a facility to reverse that. T

IF/ELSE/ENDIF strange behavior

2010-06-09 Thread Monika Amiss
Hello group, I'm running following job with z/OS 1.10 /JES3). Program MAKEABND (STEP04) produces an S0C1-Abend, and STEP06 is executed, which I did not expect. If I put the ENDIF before STEP06, STEP06 is Flushed (like expected), //STEP01 EXEC PGM=IEFBR14

Re: IF/ELSE/ENDIF strange behavior

2010-06-09 Thread Starr, Alan
Monika, I found the following tidbit in the JCL reference: By default, job steps within the IF/THEN/ELSE/ENDIF statement construct do not execute when * An abend occurred, and * the IF/THEN/ELSE/ENDIF structure containing the job steps does not specify the ABEND, ABENDCC, or ¬ABEND keyword. I

Re: IF/ELSE/ENDIF strange behavior

2010-06-09 Thread Paul Gilmartin
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:07:40 +0200, Monika Amiss wrote: > > I'm running following job with z/OS 1.10 /JES3). Program MAKEABND > (STEP04) produces an S0C1-Abend, and STEP06 is executed, which I > did not expect. If I put the ENDIF before STEP06, STEP06 is Flushed > (like expected), > >//STEP01 EXEC

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Staller, Allan
Would a VIPA provide the functional equivalent of "link aggregation"? I am referring to the process of gaining greater aggregate thruput via the use of one or more physical interfaces, as opposed to a RFC like definition of "link aggregation". Something like the following (assuming the same VLAN

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Manfred Lotz wrote: On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 4:56 PM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:43:12 +0200, Manfred Lotz wrote: Yep, CVS or even simpler RCS would be possible. However, then I would have to copy PDS member to USS, actually in both directions, as both CVS and RCS can only deal

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Where can I find details on this "four levels of versioning"? -- Frank Swarbrick Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Development FirstBank Data Corporation - Lakewood, CO USA P: 303-235-1403 On 6/9/2010 at 5:19 AM, in message , Binyamin Dissen wrote: > On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 12:48:27

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread zMan
I believe he's referring to the "Group" level identifiers in ISPF option 2. But your question is still a good one: where is this described? I know about it because someone explained it to me. On Wed, Jun 9, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Frank Swarbrick < frank.swarbr...@efirstbank.com> wrote: > Where can I fi

Comic for us.

2010-06-09 Thread McKown, John
http://www.gocomics.com/freerange/2010/06/09/ John McKown Systems Engineer IV IT Administrative Services Group HealthMarkets(r) 9151 Boulevard 26 * N. Richland Hills * TX 76010 (817) 255-3225 phone * (817)-961-6183 cell john.mck...@healthmarkets.com * www.HealthMarkets.com Confidentiality Noti

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Steve Comstock
Frank Swarbrick wrote: Where can I find details on this "four levels of versioning"? I always start at: http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/bkserv/ Scroll down to "z/OS elements and features publications" * Book 1.11 | 1.10 | 1.9 | 1.8 | 1.7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.4 ... * PDF 1.11

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Steve Comstock
zMan wrote: I believe he's referring to the "Group" level identifiers in ISPF option 2. Not really. See my reply to Frank. But your question is still a good one: where is this described? I know about it because someone explained it to me. The place to look about the Group thingy is the ISP

Re: OSA

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Mason
Allan Thanks for covering one of the important points about arranging to be able to use multiple paths for the *inbound* traffic. The destination IP address used by the partner IP nodes, perhaps "clients" where Mark's z/OS system is the "server", is going to need *not* intimately to be associa

Question about IGGDASU3 - DASDM scratch exit

2010-06-09 Thread Daniel Allen
According to the documentation I see, module IGGDASU3 is loaded into E-LPA. I have looked at IGDSMSxx in z/OS Init. & Tuning Ref. There is no way to point to an exit. I know that the SETPROG command has an EXIT option. So, for the command: SETPROG EXIT,ADD,EXITNAME=xxx.IGGDASU3,MODNAME=IGGDASU

JinsightLive - Java profile for z/OS and Linux on z

2010-06-09 Thread McKown, John
http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/jinsightlive This tool helps Java(tm) developers on System z(r) to profile complex programs. Today's Java applications often use third-party libraries, open-source libraries, and application-specific code; and it is not uncommon to see traces with tens of mill

Re: Question about IGGDASU3 - DASDM scratch exit

2010-06-09 Thread Starr, Alan
Daniel, As far as I know the DADSM exits are not defined as dynamic exits. It is theoretically possible to do this. You would have to write an assembler program to define the exit (using the CSVDYNEX macro). Since you define the exit, you can call it whatever you want (e.g. MY.IGGDASU3). After

DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Ruegsegger, Jeff
We recently completed a DASD refresh and we opted to migrate off 3390-3's to 3390-9's and 3390-27's. As such we have had to change our daily and weekly volume backups from a physical to logical dump with the following additional sub- keywords of SHARE and WAIT(1,2). This however causes some dat

Re: JinsightLive - Java profile for z/OS and Linux on z

2010-06-09 Thread Kirk Wolf
John, JinsightLive is a good tool, but it should be understood that it is a profiler that is driven by tracing *every* method call in the JVM, an so its overhead limits its practical use. Another style profiler is a byte-code instrumentation profiler, like http://jiprof.sourceforge.net/, which is

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Starr, Alan
I may be misunderstanding the issue, but I believe that TOL(ENQF) would address enqueue conflicts for a logical dump (if we're talking about DFdss). -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ruegsegger, Jeff Sent: Wednesday, June 0

Re: Question about IGGDASU3 - DASDM scratch exit

2010-06-09 Thread Knutson, Sam
The technique Alan suggested is described at greater length here http://tinyurl.com/gg244405 http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/resources/servers_eserver_zseries_zos_racf _pdf_racf_v2r1_installation_implementation_gg244405.pdf Mike Onghena (IBM) was kind enough to point me to it for a similar desi

Cobol routine to convert TEXT to displayable HEX

2010-06-09 Thread Donald Johnson
Hi guys and gals! Does anyone have a routine (COBOL preferable) that converts a standard text field into its HEX values? For example, if I have a field 'BEFORE,' I want to be able to translate it to CCCDDC 256695 or to C2C5C6D6D9C5. My ultimate goal is the first choice (vertical format), but I

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Hal Merritt
I believe that would will address the conflicts. However, you now introduce some doubt as to the integrity of the backup. It follows that, if the dataset may or may not be really backed up, then what's the point? Some consider 'fuzzy' or 'dirty' copies to be acceptable. Some don't. To the OP:

Re: Cobol routine to convert TEXT to displayable HEX

2010-06-09 Thread Starr, Alan
Don, I found two examples for your enjoyment (o; http://searchdatacenter.techtarget.com/tip/0,289483,sid%2010_gci757615,00.html http://www.simotime.com/simhex01.htm Cheers, Alan -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Donald

TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Matthew Stitt
I've been given a task which sounds easy, but.. The IP addresses is being changed to a different network and I'm having trouble (as usual) getting the ROUTE statement(s) set up correctly. Here is the specific information I've been given so far: network = 10.10.230.0 gateway = 10.10.230.2 net

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Starr, Alan
Matthew, The information you provide is a bit thin. Would it be possible for you to provide the output from: NETSTAT GATE,DETAIL TRACERTE 10.10.230.2 TRACERTE 10.10.231.99 Thanks, Alan -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of

Re: Cobol routine to convert TEXT to displayable HEX

2010-06-09 Thread Hardee, Charles H
Hi Don, 01 WK-NDX PIC S9(04) COMP. 01 WK-ZONE PIC S9(04) COMP. 01 WK-DIGITPIC S9(04) COMP. 01 TEXT-LENGTH PIC S9(04) COMP. 01 TEXT-FIELD. 05 TEXT-CHAR PIC X(01)

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Hal Merritt
What is your old network? What is your old default route? What does your current route statement look like? -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Matthew Stitt Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 3:50 PM To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.e

good FORMDEF/PAGEDEF/font for PSF header page

2010-06-09 Thread Frank Swarbrick
What are good ones to use? We had the default (I think!), but it cuts off the right side of the information (was the header designed for landscape? because the formdef/pagedef is portrait). Thanks, Frank >>> The information contained in this electronic communication and any document attach

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 15:11:47 -0500, Ruegsegger, Jeff wrote: >We were forced into the logical dump mode as >the physical dumps were causing elongated RESERVE's (converted to global >ENQUEUES by CA-MIM) and would spend hours thrashing due to the synchronous >batch that runs. I've always used this

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Matthew Stitt
Ok, I'll answer Hal's first: ROUTE 10.20.8.0 255.255.248.0= CH41LNK1 MTU 1492 ROUTE DEFAULT 10.20.8.2 CH41LNK1 MTU 1492 To answer Alan's: MVS TCP/IP NETSTAT CS V1R11 TCPIP Name: TCPIP 21:28:45 Known gateways:

Re: Version control for PDS(E) members

2010-06-09 Thread Frank Swarbrick
Oh that! Hmm, that is pretty basic. On 6/9/2010 at 12:55 PM, in message , zMan wrote: > I believe he's referring to the "Group" level identifiers in ISPF option 2. > But your question is still a good one: where is this described? I know about > it because someone explained it to me. > > On Wed,

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Ruegsegger, Jeff
I may have found our problem. I had mistakenly assumed we were converting SYSZVVDS and SYSVTOC in MIMGR. As it turns out we were not (apparenlty something I had always thought should be done but never was :( ) I made the change dynamically in CA-MIM and ran physical dump via DSS and I see no

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Hal Merritt
Add a route statement: ROUTE 10.10.230.0 255.255.254.0= CH41LNK1 MTU 1492 Change your DEFAULT to: 10.10.230.2 Optional - delete the ROUTE 10.20.8.0 statement. You may need it until everything on 10.20.8 is changed. HTH and good luck. -Original Message- From: IBM Mainframe Di

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Richard Peurifoy
On 6/9/2010 3:51 PM, Matthew Stitt wrote: I've been given a task which sounds easy, but.. The IP addresses is being changed to a different network and I'm having trouble (as usual) getting the ROUTE statement(s) set up correctly. Here is the specific information I've been given so far: net

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Mark Zelden
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 16:47:50 -0500, Ruegsegger, Jeff wrote: >I may have found our problem. I had mistakenly assumed we were converting >SYSZVVDS and SYSVTOC in MIMGR. As it turns out we were not (apparenlty >something I had always thought should be done but never was :( ) >I made the change dyn

Moving a Dataset to a Non-SMS Volume

2010-06-09 Thread Kopischke, David G.
Greetings, I'm trying to move a bunch of datasets to a non-SMS managed volume via DSS. I found examples in the manuals, but it's not working: COPY DATASET( - INCLUDE(DataSet.Name)) - OUTDDNAM(TARGET) - ALLDATA(*) - BYPASSACS(*) -

Re: SCRT Copy List

2010-06-09 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Fri, 4 Jun 2010 10:36:35 -0400, Ken Porowski wrote: >Somewhere on the SCRT website they state that the email list cannot be >saved for future use. > >I just get the copy sent to me an forward it. > Instead of uploading the report using the website, E-Mail it to them. That way you can script

RACF Records from IRRDBU00

2010-06-09 Thread Rick Fochtman
I need to find a detailed set of descriptions of the records produced by the IRRDBU00 RACF utility. I'm working on report generator programs that will use IRRDBU00 output as input. Can anyone point me to DSECTS, MACROs or appropriate DOC? Thanks, all. Rick ---

Re: RACF Records from IRRDBU00

2010-06-09 Thread John McKown
On Wed, 2010-06-09 at 18:57 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote: > I need to find a detailed set of descriptions of the records produced by > the IRRDBU00 RACF utility. I'm working on report generator programs that > will use IRRDBU00 output as input. Can anyone point me to DSECTS, MACROs > or appropria

Re: TCPIP Routes

2010-06-09 Thread Chris Mason
Matthew This has become rather confused. You appear to have the simplest of IP route definition cases, in other words, a single interface attached to a LAN with a single address for an adjacent router - what your network folk call a "gateway" - which gives you access to the rest of the intrane

Re: Personal use z/OS machines was Re: Multiprise 3k for personal Use?

2010-06-09 Thread Clark Morris
On 9 Jun 2010 06:38:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote: >On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 06:01:51 -0700, Edward Jaffe wrote: >> >>I wonder if anyone was able to exploit SMP/E to run arbitrary code in a >>privileged state? >> >You're cruel. > >Integrity exposures, like pregnancy, are pretty much devoi

Re: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27

2010-06-09 Thread Pinnacle
- Original Message - From: "Ruegsegger, Jeff" Newsgroups: bit.listserv.ibm-main Sent: Wednesday, June 09, 2010 4:12 PM Subject: DFSMSdss Physical dumps of 3390 Mod 27 We recently completed a DASD refresh and we opted to migrate off 3390-3's to 3390-9's and 3390-27's. As such we have

Multiprise 3000 - fatal SE problems - help please!

2010-06-09 Thread Mike Ross
Apologies for the long post, but perhaps someone here will be willing to help because I am, as MVS would put it, 'boxed'! I have recently acquired a MP3000, thanks to Tony Harminc. It was known to have a total array failure on the emulated (i.e. OS/2) array; the SE would not boot. This was fixed,

Re: RACF Records from IRRDBU00

2010-06-09 Thread Scott Barry
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 18:57:53 -0500, Rick Fochtman wrote: >I need to find a detailed set of descriptions of the records produced by >the IRRDBU00 RACF utility. I'm working on report generator programs that >will use IRRDBU00 output as input. Can anyone point me to DSECTS, MACROs >or appropriate DOC

Re: Multiprise 3000 - fatal SE problems - help please!

2010-06-09 Thread zMan
I like "fatal SE problems" -- I remember when that would have meant something QUITE different... -- For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions, send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the message: GET IBM-MAIN

How to create a new system from a existing system

2010-06-09 Thread ibmnew
Dear all As we know,if we want to create a new system from a existing system,we usually clone the existing system. When we clone the existing system,we could use a new name convention for the new system.for example : a new syslex name,a new system,a new MCAT name. but it take few days to

Re: Moving a Dataset to a Non-SMS Volume

2010-06-09 Thread Dave Kopischke
On Wed, 9 Jun 2010 17:35:13 -0600, Kopischke, David G. wrote: >Greetings, > I'm trying to move a bunch of datasets to a non-SMS managed volume >via DSS. I >found examples in the manuals, but it's not working: > >COPY DATASET( - > INCLUDE(DataSet.Name)) - > OUTDDNAM(TARGET

Re: PDSE(1)_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE (was Re: APAR OA30338 ...)

2010-06-09 Thread Barbara Nitz
Mark, >Has IBM ever told you why PDSE(1)_BUFFER_BEYOND_CLOSE isn't working >for you in this case? Have they committed to have some relief for you in >a future release (FIN APAR)? > >If you can write a little code to (almost) solve the problem, why can't IBM do >something similar (but better / mo

AW: RACF Records from IRRDBU00

2010-06-09 Thread Keller Walter
It's documented in "z/OS V1R11 Security Server RACF Macros and Interfaces", Chapter 9. -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:ibm-m...@bama.ua.edu] Im Auftrag von Rick Fochtman Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Juni 2010 01:58 An: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu Betreff: RACF