>IEA911E PARTIAL DUMP ON SYS1.DUMP00.
Look up IEA911E. It lists numerous reasons why not all requested
storage had been dumped (See SDRSN=).
--
Peter Hunkeler
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
se
Most PS files can be allocated with partial release and space constraint
relief. I make that the default and provide classes to allow override
for the exceptions.
PDS are usually not good candidates for partial release.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:I
Hi.jason.,
For PS, files you can use Release paramater(RLSE) in the DCB list while
defining PS files
to release un utilized space from the files..
thanks
Gayaz khan.
2011/4/21 ibmnew
> Dear all
>
> The application programmers in our shop always allocate many big
> datesets(PS,PDS,VS
Dear all
The application programmers in our shop always allocate many big
datesets(PS,PDS,VSAM),but they only use <10% space oF the datasets.
I want to release the spaces that aren't used by SMS .
Could you tell me how to do it?
I wonder what situations we need to use Space Const
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:25:30 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>I guess that answers Paul's question. However, the application I'm
>referring to was c. 1978. I'm sure we have many more ways to skin cats
>these days except we are stuck with 255 steps and some number of DD
>statements too.
>
The TASKLI
I guess that answers Paul's question. However, the application I'm
referring to was c. 1978. I'm sure we have many more ways to skin cats
these days except we are stuck with 255 steps and some number of DD
statements too.
Of course in 1978 we all thought that JCL would disappear and all jobs
would
At 08:46 +0200 on 04/20/2011, Hunkeler Peter (KIUP 4) wrote about Re:
Submit a series of jobs in order after the previous has:
>If I were doing it, I would slip a special job between Jobs 2 and 3.
It would have a /*VS V ,Online statement (if the JES2 Parms for
the Job Class allows in stre
At 11:07 -0500 on 04/20/2011, Paul Gilmartin wrote about Re: Submit a
series of jobs in order after the previous has:
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:09:53 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
If I were doing it, I would slip a special job between Jobs 2 and 3.
It would have a /*VS V ,Online statemen
Dear all
The summary is very very clear. Thanks you all for your help!
I want to ask you other questions:
>> when considering DFSMS compression , one should take into account that
>>it comes with a CPU price tag, so I would not compress everything
>>indiscriminately (unless CPU is cheaper
>Government logic" and "military intelligence" used to be the
"prototypical" oxymorons. Nowadays, the "prototypical" oxymoron is
"common sense". :-|
Management direction?
project plans?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rick Fochtman
>
>
--
>
> >Now you're talking "government logic", of which we could stand
**FAR**
> >less. :-)
> >
> >
>
---
Hi,
We found the below error in our SR queue.
IEA911E PARTIAL DUMP ON SYS1.DUMP00.
I did a /D DUMP,TITLE
IEE853I 07.39.39 SYS1.DUMP TITLES 224
SYS1.DUMP DATA SETS AVAILABLE=000 AND FULL=003
CAPTURED DUMPS=, SPACE USED=M, SPACE FREE=0500M
SYS1.CTS2.DMP00017 TITLE=DSN1,ABND=0
On 4/20/2011 8:12 PM, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
How can a single step have more than one STEPLIB?
By function, if not by name. I have a test task, loaded from
STEPLIB. When a LOADLIB DD is present, it attaches the program
to be tested using LOADLIB as a TASKLIB, providing STEPLIB
functionality
How can a single step have more than one STEPLIB?
I also remember everywhere I looked in my time at IBM it said
"THINK"...I'm thinking about it and the answer is still not 42.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>
>
You are easily baffled.
Application programs choose their own DDNAMEs, so the choice of DDNAME
was a very early design decision for this crock to work.
Program 1 gets dd01-dd99
ergo program 2 doesn't use those
Getting warmer?
On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 8:42 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote:
> On Thu
I wrote a REXX program that built the JCL. It was only when I
submitted the 4,000 step backup job that I realised I had to embed a
job card every 255 steps and then the conundrum of how to prevent
multiple jobs from executing and where this whole started from jogged
my memory.
On Thu, Apr 21,
Patrick,
this discussion seems to have gotten off track a little ... allow me to tell
you,
how we, at a company I worked for in the late 1970s, ran our overnight batch
production (at a time where job scheduling systems had not been available to
us):
At the start of the batch cycle, all jobs wer
Ron,
We had the same DUO issue (we had an mp) . One of the sysprogs had to write a
program that cleared out DUO
Area in low memory(yech). Duo was one of the poorer written utilities (not a
good term) that didn't transfer well from Mvt to MVS.
Ed
---
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 05:54:11 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>Isn't there a 255 step limit? I regularly hit this problem with
>multi-step database backups/tape stacking type process.
>
I would expect your fingers would get tired before you could
ever punch so many cards. But perhaps you have the l
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 07:18:38 +1000, Wayne Bickerdike wrote:
>This is an old recurring problem. Ditto for DD statement restrictions.
>
>I recall early in my career with IBM we had a homegrown job scheduler
>which required that every DDNAME be unique because effectively it was
>a single step job tha
Thanks. I like this approach and will investigate it more.
Brad Wissink
Information Technology Services
Iowa State University
515-294-3088
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
McKown, John
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 4:09 P
This is an old recurring problem. Ditto for DD statement restrictions.
I recall early in my career with IBM we had a homegrown job scheduler
which required that every DDNAME be unique because effectively it was
a single step job that controlled all "pseudo" steps in the job.
A friend of a friend
Is your STC APF authorized? I would assume so. If it is, then you can have the
code check the life of job SSIB to see if it was started under JES2. If it was
started under JES2, then you simply use MGCRE to issue the correct operator
command:
START STC,SUB=MSTR
and then terminate normally.
re
Thing is, by repeating asking to delete the post, and then say why, made
me go to google, and reread the original IMS post. The bigger deal you
make out of this is going to make everyone much more curious.
I didn't see anything obnoxious or company secrets in the original
email. I guess I don't
We have a home grown started task that controls how we shutdown before an
IPL. If the STC is not started with ,SUB=MSTR then it shows up as a task
still under JES2 when we do the $P JES2. We are trying to automate the
whole process so not allowing the STC to run if the enq exist is not what we
wa
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of john gilmore
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 3:26 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Submit a series of jobs in order aft er the pre
> vious has completed
>
> Wayne Bike
Wayne Bikerdike is quite correct. In its discussion of the EXEC statement the
JCL manual says:
| A job can have a maximum of 255 job step. This includes the steps
in any procedures the
| EXEC statements call.
Moreover, since the count is held (as an unsigned binary integer) in a
On 20 April 2011 13:46, Bill Fairchild wrote:
> If you don't want anyone to see your post, then why are you sending a post?
> The way to do this in z/OS would be to allocate your output file to DD DUMMY.
> Then you could write all the output you want and no one would be able to see
> any of i
--
Now you're talking "government logic", of which we could stand **FAR**
less. :-)
"Government logic" is a contradiction in terms by itself. :-)
I just found DLIB DDDEFs in my MVST100 target zone in my z/OS 1.12 SMPEMVS CSI.
And some of those entries in the SYSLIB DDDEF as well.
Has something changed or is this now the new normal?
-
Interesting - especially the CSA bit: The very first problem I worked on
in IBM (and I don't think I was much use) :-) in late 1985 was Virtual
Storage (a DOS to MVS migration). I was hooked. If I hadn't've been I'd
not've ;lasted long in IBM and the world would've been a different place.
:-)
Isn't there a 255 step limit? I regularly hit this problem with
multi-step database backups/tape stacking type process.
2011/4/21 john gilmore :
> In reading the various posts in this thread it has occurred to me that the
> distinction between a job and a job step, always arbitrary, is particula
Gentlemen,
Please, re-read carefully, all of us are right here :-)
1. I was right saying that dss output cannot be ext-PS. This restriction
is removed in z/OS 1.12 - but still true in older versions of z/OS, not
to mention that at least one of them is still supported. So, the
restriction "is",
On 4/20/2011 12:32 PM, August Carideo wrote:
Yes that's what he meant, he wants to reply to the list but doesn't want
every one who googles anything close to what he posted have it pop up,
same happened to me from a CICS list post, all of a sudden I am being
emailed here from people who want to r
l...@garlic.com (Anne & Lynn Wheeler) writes:
> DYADIC was term introduced with 3081 ... where it wasn't possible to
> split the configuration and run as two separate independent processors
> (wanted to draw distinction between past 360/370 multiprocessor that
> could be split and run independently
Ah. Now that makes sense. I wish there were no publically available archive
too. I get emails from dippy software vendors who must be doing email scraping
from the DB2 list. We don't even run DB2. I wish they'd go away. But, instead,
I put up another autodelete rule.
> -Original Message
Yes that's what he meant, he wants to reply to the list but doesn't want
every one who googles anything close to what he posted have it pop up,
same happened to me from a CICS list post, all of a sudden I am being
emailed here from people who want to reconnect etc. ( to put it nicely )
In reading the various posts in this thread it has occurred to me that the
distinction between a job and a job step, always arbitrary, is particularly
infelicitous here.
Make each all of these jobs a step in a framing job; and JCL will then provide
1) unambigouus linear ordering of these step
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Paul Gilmartin
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:20 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: PGM=WAIT (was: Submit a series of jobs in order ... )
>
> On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:15:53 -05
Can't someone just use another email id and false name to remain anonymous?
I have seen some of these on the lists.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Mark Regan
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 2:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of McKown, John
> >
> > The only reliable way to do that is don't send it.
> >
> > -jc-
> > >
> > > Ok i can understand that. But is it possible to hide the
> > posts that i
> > send to
> > > this list? The thing is th
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 12:15:53 -0500, McKown, John wrote:
>
>No need for PGM=WAIT from from I can see:
>
>//WAIT EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARM='SH sleep 10s'
>
Yah, but PGM=WAIT probably executes faster.
-- gil
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
If you mean outside of the list itself, that is, not to a public newsgroup like
Newsgroups= bit.listserv.ibm-main
http://groups.google.com/group/bit.listserv.ibm-main/topics
which can be hosted on any number of servers, including Google. The IBM-MAIN
list owner (Darren) would probably need to
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Chase, John
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 1:01 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Deleting post
>
> The only reliable way to do that is don't send it.
>
> -jc-
>
> >
The only reliable way to do that is don't send it.
-jc-
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Ron Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:42 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Deleting post
>
> Ok i can und
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:42 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Deleting post
>
> Ok i can understand that. But is it possible to hide the
> posts that
>i can understand that. But is it possible to hide the posts that i send to
this list? The thing is that i don't want anyone to see the post i send.
Why send them if you don't want them read?
-
Ted MacNEIL
eamacn...@yahoo.ca
Twitter: @TedMacNEIL
--
If you don't want anyone to see your post, then why are you sending a post?
The way to do this in z/OS would be to allocate your output file to DD DUMMY.
Then you could write all the output you want and no one would be able to see
any of it. Including you. I don't know the equivalent techniq
Ok i can understand that. But is it possible to hide the posts that i send to
this list? The thing is that i don't want anyone to see the post i send.
Regards
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions
Looks like I was a little backward. It's the DUMP destination file, not source
file, that cannot be extended:
PAGE 0001 5695-DF175 DFSMSDSS V1R10.0 DATA SET SERVICES 2011.110 11:36
DUMP DATASET (INCLUDE (PROD.DEMAND.PSTMTDB.BKP)) -
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Ron Thomas
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:27 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Deleting post
>
> Darren,
> Can you please help me as how to delete the post from this f
Darren,
Can you please help me as how to delete the post from this forum?
Please send me the command i need to use here?
Regards
Ron
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama
> No need for PGM=WAIT from from I can see:
>
> //WAIT EXEC PGM=BPXBATCH,PARM='SH sleep 10s'
> //STDOUT DD SYSOUT=*
> //STDERR DD SYSOUT=*
> //SYSIN DD PATH='/dev/null',
> // PATHOPTS=(ORDONLY)
>
Well, I wrote mine before I could spell USS let alone BPXBATCH :)
And strangely, I can't find it. I
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
> [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 12:07 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: Submit a series of jobs in order after the
> previous has completed
>
> This has been
Thank a lot to all who have replied on this.
regards,
Sumit.
From: Sumit S Sharma
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Wed, April 20, 2011 2:07:26 AM
Subject: DB2 V9 Vs V10
Hello all,
Our shop is currently running DB2 V8 for zOS.We are planning for an
upgrade.How
This has been a long topic.
Aside from the problem that the sequence stops if any one job fails,
using the last step of a preceding job to submit the single next job
will accomplish this.
This does not scale to any kind of set-up except one job after another
A -> B -> C -> > >
I suppose you c
From: Sam Siegel
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tue, April 19, 2011 11:14:30 PM
Subject: Re: OT but an interesting read for MVS system Programmers
-SNIP---
I'm not fan of MS ... but just put yourself in a Windows Admin's shoes when
reading an a
Huh? We use DFDSS for volume backups. And __all__ of our VSAM KSDS files are
defined as EXT, along with a few PS files. I just tried one and got the message:
ADR903I (002)-PSEDM(01), DUMP OF EXTENDED SEQUENTIAL DATA SET
DRXPN.DRXPERT.A#COREQS.G1352V00 WAS SUCCESSFUL. SIZE OF DATA SET
I'm no expert, but we discovered when we used EXT that we could not use SMS DSS
(ADRDSSU) to backup the file, because apparently DSS uses EXCP I/O (or
something), and EXT does not support EXCP. Or something like that.
--
Frank Swarbrick
Applications Architect - Mainframe Applications Developme
I suspect that more than one solution will work, but only one will give you
the complete control of your need(not only to serialise job but also to
control them)
In the easiest way you need 2 programs (i.e. rexx): the first one that makes
a submit and sleeps and another one that will always(in each
On Wed, 20 Apr 2011 01:09:53 -0400, Robert A. Rosenberg wrote:
>
>If I were doing it, I would slip a special job between Jobs 2 and 3.
>It would have a /*VS V ,Online statement (if the JES2 Parms for
>the Job Class allows in stream command issuance) and an IEFBR14 Step.
>That step would allocat
Hi,
>> 1. SMS requirement. 2. Some "low-level" programs do not accept EXT-PS.
>> Example: DFSMSdss dump dataset cannot be EXT-PS.
With DFSMS 1.12 this restriction was removed; from the "DFSMSdss Storage
Administration":
"With the DUMP command, you can dump DASD data to a basic sequential data
s
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
> Martin Packer
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 3:14 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: [IBM-MAIN] Dyadic vs AP: Was "CPU utilization/forecasting"
>
> Ron, care to remind us of the
Martin,
Yeah, what he said :-)
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of
> Anne & Lynn Wheeler
> Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:05 AM
> To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
> Subject: Re: [IBM-MAIN] Dyadic vs AP: Was "CPU utilization
Skip,
Your advise worked. Thanks a lot.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Skip Robinson wrote:
> The most common case I've seen is where an ISPF log or list data set is
> cataloged but not on the volume indicated by the catalog. Do a 3.4 list of
> your own high level qualifier (generally your use
RS,
I don't know if it's worth discussion either, but I've worked at two shops in
Fort Worth Texas USA and both of them had a defined jobclass for IT staff to
serialize submitted jobs. So, there's two. Wah-hoo!
Production jobs are defined to the job scheduler in both shops were I've
worked
martin_pac...@uk.ibm.com (Martin Packer) writes:
> Ron, care to remind us of the modelling difference? It's been a while. :-)
360 & 370 dual-processors shared memory but each processors had its own
dedicated channels ... and the configuration could be split and run as
two separate processors.
370
The most common case I've seen is where an ISPF log or list data set is
cataloged but not on the volume indicated by the catalog. Do a 3.4 list of
your own high level qualifier (generally your userid) and look for any
data set containing *ISP* that is not where it's supposed to be. Uncatalog
an
Yeah, I just noticed my 1.10 system had it the same way. Shows how observant
I've been.
Thanks Kurt and Radoslaw.
Bob
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Kurt Quackenbush
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 8:37 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
I just found DLIB DDDEFs in my MVST100 target zone in my z/OS 1.12
SMPEMVS CSI...
Has something changed or is this now the new normal?
Its normal, although not new. RESTORE, and sometimes APPLY, have a need
to get at the distribution libraries, hence the DDDEF entries for those
libraries m
>
> While creating tables in our database many times we get an error as
resource not
> available. When we analyse the error then we find that the volume where
the
> tablespace resides has gone into offline. Any reason why it goes to
offline with no
> manual intervention made from storage administr
W dniu 2011-04-20 14:00, Richards, Robert B. pisze:
I just found DLIB DDDEFs in my MVST100 target zone in my z/OS 1.12 SMPEMVS CSI.
And some of those entries in the SYSLIB DDDEF as well.
Has something changed or is this now the new normal?
It is normal
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
I just found DLIB DDDEFs in my MVST100 target zone in my z/OS 1.12 SMPEMVS CSI.
And some of those entries in the SYSLIB DDDEF as well.
Has something changed or is this now the new normal?
Bob
-
Robert B. Richards(Bob)
US Office of Pers
W dniu 2011-04-20 12:43, ibmnew pisze:
Dear
DSNTYPE=LARGE: The data sets are large format sequential data sets
DSNTYPE=EXT:no track limitation
Q1:What's the differences between DSNTYPE=EXT and DSNTYPE=LARGE for large PS?
Different design at very low-level. For regular applications
Review your log file settings in TSO ISPF 0. If you save your
dataset, you will need to delete it or rename it before re-using that
same name.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 5:14 AM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While saving my pds datasets I get the below error often. Any idea to
> refrain this
Automation, batch job, console operators, TSO SDSF users. Search the
system log for the ucb.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 4:46 AM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> While creating tables in our database manytimes we get an error as resource
> not available. When we analyse the error then we find th
It's about dynamic allocation. DAIR return code 12 is explained in TSO/E
Programming Services:
An error occurred in dynamic allocation; the dynamic allocation error code
is stored in the DARC field of the DAIR parameter block.
DARC 970C indicates an SMS reason code (97xx) and is described in c
Dear
DSNTYPE=LARGE: The data sets are large format sequential data sets
DSNTYPE=EXT:no track limitation
Q1:What's the differences between DSNTYPE=EXT and DSNTYPE=LARGE for large PS?
Q2:Could DSNTYPE=EXT replace DSNTYPE=LARGE ?
Q3:Ours shop is z/OS 1.11, Every PS should now benef
One other suggestion would be to enter the command OWNER ** on the DA screen.
Both PREFIX and OWNER can be used to filter what you see on many SDSF screens.
It is unlikely your problem but can cause the same type of display issue.
Check with your SDSF administrator to get an answer to your
Hi Ravi,
I have checked out the TSO address space. I didnt find anything related to
this message.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Ravi Gaur wrote:
> It's being generated following either SPFLOG dataset...go over to your TSO
> Address space ..and see if there's any error...it can be following m
It's being generated following either SPFLOG dataset...go over to your TSO
Address space ..and see if there's any error...it can be following many
reason..common are wrong dataset characterstic,not catalog,doesn't exist
etc..however it will be possible to trace down following running bit of
tra
Hi,
While saving my pds datasets I get the below error often. Any idea to
refrain this message.
*"ISPF system data set allocation error - press enter to continue.
log file allocation error - ISPF will operate without a log data set.
DAIR RC = 12 dec , DARC = 970C hex."*
**
**
*Regards,*
*Jags*
-
Ron, care to remind us of the modelling difference? It's been a while. :-)
Ron Hawkins wrote:
> Would it have been more appropriate if I added that dyadic
> processors required revision of many of the methods that
> we applied to earlier models.
> Would you use a capacity planning methodology
Ted,
Yes. I did.
Would it have been more appropriate if I added that dyadic processors
required revision of many of the methods that we applied to earlier models.
Would you use a capacity planning methodology for a 3033 AP when you model a
3090-200?
Ron
> -Original Message-
> From: IB
What was the solution for below problem.
Regards
Saurabh
On 4/20/2011 2:05 PM, jagadishan perumal wrote:
Montero,
Its working now.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
Already it is in Owner=* and have checked but no luck as of now. The user
who is trying to search is
Hi,
While creating tables in our database manytimes we get an error as resource
not available. When we analyse the error then we find that the volume where
the tablespace resides has gone into offline. Any reason why it goes to
offline with no manual intervention made from storage administrators
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:44 AM, Andrew Armstrong
wrote:
>
> FWIW, in my infrequent looks at RMF reports, OSA utilizations never seem to
> go much higher that 5% but that could just be typical of the networks I've
> been involved with.
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
At 1700, our TSM on MVS drives our net
Montero,
Its working now.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:58 PM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
> Already it is in Owner=* and have checked but no luck as of now. The user
> who is trying to search is an application developer who wants to check the
> CICS log.
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:21 PM, MONTERO
Already it is in Owner=* and have checked but no luck as of now. The user
who is trying to search is an application developer who wants to check the
CICS log.
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 1:21 PM, MONTERO ROMERO, ENRIQUE ELOI <
enriqueeloi.mont...@servifactory.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Did you tried in SD
I haven't tracked the Russinovich blog since he was hired by Microsoft when
they bought sysinternals back in 2006.
Must be the cynic in me, but I have to question whether an employee can be as
forthcoming as an independent developer - no questioning his technical nous.
Lots of things can be quietly
Hi,
Did you tried in SDSF
OWNER=*
make a SET DISPLAY ON to check the filters settings.
Regards,
Enrique Montero
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@bama.ua.edu with the me
Jim,
I know I've banged on about this before, but I can't stress enough just how
useful taking a (SYSTCPDA) packet trace during your problem period (even for
just a minute or two), using IPCS to convert it to SNIFFER format,
downloading it to a PC and feeding it into Wireshark (www.wireshark.org)
On 20/04/2011 12:14 PM, Sam Siegel wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 8:37 PM, Ed Gould wrote:
http://www.networkworld.com/supp/2011//041811-windows-7-crashes.html
This article is a "How to" for taking dumps and other debugging activity on
a
windows machine.
I do not know if I want to laugh or cr
I tried but no luck( PRE CICS**/*PRE ** ) ..
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Quasar Chunawala <
quasar.chunawa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *Hello - *
>
> Can you try *PRE CICS** or just *PRE * *on the SDSF Screen.
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Quasar Chunawala
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:45 AM, jag
>Well, I'm not sure whether it is worth discussion (in other words:
>I don't want to put irrelevant stuff here), however Ed said "many".
>Obviously "many" has no strict definition, but surely it is more
>than 1.
That was me not Ed, and I also typed the word "probably" meaning to
say "I guess it
*Hello - *
Can you try *PRE CICS** or just *PRE * *on the SDSF Screen.
Thank you very much.
Quasar Chunawala
On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:45 AM, jagadishan perumal
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In one of our test lpar. I am not able to find the Job CICS1(Job
> responsible
> for cics region). I know this quest
>NOT GOOD ENOUGH. JES2 can assign its own priority to jobs so that
>they will not necessarily run the the submitted/JOB-NUMBER sequence.
True. Forgot about that possibility JES2 offers. We just never cared
to tell JES an estimated execution time, so all jobs got the same
initial priority assigne
97 matches
Mail list logo
