-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
But I do think that the important number is that of paid attendees.
For me this is the most important number. It is based on this that vendors
will continue to support Share as it should be supported. I work for a
vendor that had a booth at Share
Not quite right. There were 1,081 folks in Orlando at SHARE. See the wrap-up
article published on the SHARE web site for more details about the event:
http://www.share.org/Events/PastConferences/SHAREinOrlando/OrlandoWrapUpArticle/tabid/787/Default.aspx
Brian
From: Carl Swanson
Date: Sun,
: SHARE Attendance
Not quite right. There were 1,081 folks in Orlando at SHARE. See the
wrap-up article published on the SHARE web site for more details about the
event:
http://www.share.org/Events/PastConferences/SHAREinOrlando/OrlandoWrapUpArti
cle/tabid/787/Default.aspx
Brian
From: Carl
- Original Message -
From: Carl Swanson carl.swans...@verizon.net
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2011 1:25:47 PM
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
But I do think that the important number is that of paid attendees.
For me this is the most important number. It is based
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Linda Mooney
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:29 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
I was at SHARE in Anaheim (couldn't go to Orlando); skipped dinner to be sure
not to miss SCIDS . I
Edward Jaffe wrote:
On 8/15/2011 9:00 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really
poorly attended - that's something of a mystery to me.
I didn't go to that reception because there simply wasn't time to get to
dinner and back before it ended.
@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 12:55 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
On 15 Aug 2011 14:12:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 8/15
On 8/16/2011 5:03 AM, Schneck.Glenn wrote:
Not sure what happened. Kristin Harper and the zNextgen were involved
in the sing along but not sure what the deal was this time. From the
CICS Project I can say it was a lame 'Farewell SCIDS'.
Was there a sing-along in Anaheim?
--
Edward E Jaffe
I believe so, but it was small and did not go real late either.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 10:57 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
On 8/16/2011 5:03
@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011 8:10:24 AM
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
I believe so, but it was small and did not go real late either.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On
Behalf Of Edward Jaffe
Sent: Tuesday, August 16, 2011
SHARE attendance was higher than the last summer meeting (Boston) and a bit
smaller than this past spring (Anaheim).
Glenn
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Ed Gould
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 1:16 AM
To: IBM-MAIN
I wonder if what I observed at another (not SHARE) conference held at the
Dolphin a number of years ago held true. Morning sessions were generally well
attended, but afternoon sessions not so much as a lot of participants headed
for the parks.
@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
I like the UPC type square encoding my vcard information.
Or just an index number into a Share attendance database of vcard
information, available
to all Share members or only those attending (I don't care which, but it
must not go
outside of those
Ben E. Keith Company
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Chase, John
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 9:59 PM
If attendance at the various receptions is any indication, SHARE attendance
was definitely DOWN in Orlando. Crowds at the CICS sessions I attended
Glenn,
Agh that#39; s the problem that is not always the case. Even now it#39;s a
about 10 percent that it isn#39;t. Usually it#39;s the Important one that
isn#39;t.
Granted the situation better now but it#39;s still about 10 percent chance
that it#39;s not. I can#39;t give you specifics as
-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Monday, August 15, 2011 12:00 PM
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really poorly
attended - that's something of a mystery to me. But I enjoyed the
discussion I heard between two 20-something programmers about
Greg Shirey of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
wrote on 08/15/2011 11:00:20 AM:
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really
poorly attended - that's something of a mystery to me.
The absence of Chuck Forney and Robert Rannie probably has something to
On 8/15/2011 9:00 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really poorly
attended - that's something of a mystery to me.
I didn't go to that reception because there simply wasn't time to get to dinner
and back before it ended.
--
Edward E Jaffe
On 15 Aug 2011 14:12:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 8/15/2011 9:00 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really poorly
attended - that's something of a mystery to me.
I didn't go to that reception because there simply wasn't time to
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Clark Morris
On 15 Aug 2011 14:12:50 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main you wrote:
On 8/15/2011 9:00 AM, Greg Shirey wrote:
The farewell reception (aka SCIDS for the old timers) was really
poorly attended - that's
What if we had 'smart dots' on the SHARE badges? Oh well, just trying to
help meld the techies and management aspects. The old trick used to be a
business card for a copy of the session handouts or added to the 'mailing
list'. Think I've still got a business card folder with a few
Ed,
Are you suggesting that each badge holder have a spot reader or the spot
reader be stationed throughout SHARE? I would object to the later. Possible
alternative might be one of those square(ish) UPC type encoded with your name
and address for proceeding handouts?
Ed
I like the UPC type square encoding my vcard information.
Or just an index number into a Share attendance database of vcard information,
available
to all Share members or only those attending (I don't care which, but it must
not go
outside of those boundaries).
/Tom Kern
On 8/14/2011 14:59, Ed
There's probably an APP to do this, just requires a smart phone and an
insertable antennae for broader coverage.vbg.
In a message dated 8/14/2011 3:21:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
tlk_sysp...@yahoo.com writes:
Or just an index number into a Share attendance database of vcard
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Schramm
I really hope that your skepticism is unfounded and that SHARE
attendance is
up.
If attendance at the various receptions is any indication, SHARE
attendance was definitely DOWN in Orlando. Crowds
Of Chase, John
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 9:59 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob Schramm
I really hope that your skepticism is unfounded and that SHARE
attendance is
up.
If attendance
about getting to the
session early and a seat.
Ed
From: Chase, John jch...@ussco.com
To: IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
Sent: Sunday, August 14, 2011 9:58 PM
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Rob
On 8/12/2011 8:51 AM, Schneck.Glenn wrote:
Attendence was up from Boston and close to Anaheim. It seems up from past
years and the sessions were very good and well attended.
Attendance in the 11AM Monday MVS Core Technologies Project Opening was 16.5%
higher than in Anaheim. (We had 162 in
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the Swan
also sold out. Some people are staying at an off-site hotel.
So did it appear that attendance was up for this SHARE? Any real numbers? Or
was there just lack of hotels for other reasons.
Regards,
Mark
--
Mark
I really hope that your skepticism is unfounded and that SHARE attendance is
up.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the
Swan
also sold
I didn't read it as skepticism, more of curiosity. I, too, hope SHARE
attendance is up too, and am curious, as Mark is, to know what the numbers are.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu] On Behalf Of
Rob Schramm
Sent: Friday, August
that your skepticism is unfounded and that SHARE attendance is
up.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:07 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com wrote:
Wow! SHARE sold out its room allocation at the Dolphin. Overflow at the
Swan
also sold out. Some people
...@mzelden.com
Mark's MVS Utilities: http://www.mzelden.com/mvsutil.html
Systems Programming expert at http://expertanswercenter.techtarget.com/
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 11:10:05 -0400, Rob Schramm rob.schr...@gmail.com
wrote:
I really hope that your skepticism is unfounded and that SHARE attendance
is
up
The Angry Birds IPO is issued at $1.2B, who woulda thunk?
In a message dated 8/12/2011 10:37:54 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
rob.schr...@gmail.com writes:
political double-speak as of late
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe /
Subject: Re: SHARE Attendance
Sorry Mark.. maybe it is just me... I suppose I have fallen into a bit of
pit of skepticism listening to all the political double-speak as of late.
Rob Schramm
Senior Systems Consultant
Imperium Group
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 11:31 AM, Mark Zelden m...@mzelden.com
I was too busy snubbing Sam to get them all. Not really, I got the lowdown on
the peel-off labels. From what I saw, three of the Route 22 labels were taken.
I had to ask why 22, and learned the age. And the relevance of the elephant?
Twelve of those appeared to be taken.
So did the twelve to
In a message dated 8/18/2008 9:14:45 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
had to ask why 22, and learned the age. And the relevance of the elephant?
Twelve of those appeared to be taken.
So did the twelve to 15 of you who took labels ever find someone wearing one?
Just
.EDU Re: Share Attendance
08/18/2008 10:10
In a message dated 8/19/2008 12:20:27 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
if I met up with another Route 22...
The idea was from the 'information super highway'...
**It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel
deal here.
-snip
If so, and if someone will give me the missing date ranges, I'll look
around and try to find my archives which should be pretty complete. (I
just hope that I don't have to get them off of a 3480 cartridge, which I
basically can't
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 07/30/2008
at 11:44 AM, Leonard D Woren [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
If so, and if someone will give me the missing date ranges, I'll look
around and try to find my archives which should be pretty complete. (I
just hope that I don't have to get them off of a 3480
-snip
Well, it might be that it was cheaper than lugging and storing. All for
times gone by, buttoned down minds and pinheads drive me to distraction.
Lost funding for SHARE long time ago, haven't been back since early
nineties. Was
In a message dated 8/2/2008 10:10:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Sarcasm intended!!!
Yeah, the other heavy hitter is 'room service rates' for the chips at SCIDS.
Last time I saw numbers it was $16 a bowl(but that was 1991) other sources
say it's really high
Yes Ed, it is. So is saying 'put up open easels' without thinking through how
to
make that happen. (Patience - I'll get to what happens these days.) These
open easels need to come from somewhere. Since SHARE is a User Group, it
takes users with ideas to help move it along into an action. Just
In a message dated 8/1/2008 11:29:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm lucky to sit low on the org chart and not have to deal with how money
gets spent. But I can think, 'would you be happy if we raised registration
by a
buck per person so these easels can just be
There used to always be an IBM-MAIN table at SCIDS. I think it had
disappeared last time I was there.
...
I heard SHARE requested it be disbanded because only SHARE
projects or programs were allowed official tables. This may have
happened when SCIDS was replaced by Meet the Projects.
Rumors
In a message dated 7/31/2008 9:55:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
was sheparding banners for other projects and the MVS banner is
now handled in this fashion. We still have our own stand. IBM-MAIN is
sitting
in someone's house.
Seems silly to me. Put up open
Ed Finnell wrote on 7/29/2008 7:15 AM:
[snip]
Darren is the only owner it's ever had, IBM-Main celebrated it's
22nd birthday in June.
Rats... I didn't subscribe until July 1986. Unless it's already been
done somewhere, someday I'm going to dig up all of the list traffic and
produce a
Unless it's already been done somewhere, someday I'm going to dig up all of
the list traffic and
produce a graph of average posts/day by month.
My understanding is that some of the early years were lost from the archives.
And, quite frankly, I cannot even remember when I started my first
In a message dated 7/30/2008 1:24:19 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
be amusing would be tallies of subscribers by number of years
subscribed. Of course, with email addresses changing this would be a
quite difficult statistic to do accurately. (I'm on about my 6th
Ted MacNEIL wrote on 7/30/2008 11:36 AM:
My understanding is that some of the early years were lost from the archives.
If so, and if someone will give me the missing date ranges, I'll look
around and try to find my archives which should be pretty complete. (I
just hope that I don't have
In a message dated 7/30/2008 1:44:32 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
around and try to find my archives which should be pretty complete. (I
just hope that I don't have to get them off of a 3480 cartridge, which I
basically can't do.)
Darren will have to answer
Ed Finnell of the IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
wrote on 07/28/2008 03:24:02 PM:
In a message dated 7/28/2008 3:10:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This may have happened when SCIDS was replaced by Meet the Projects.
Fraid it's more subliminal
In a message dated 7/29/2008 7:29:16 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you for IBM-MAIN. I remember the days when there were hundreds of
SHARE Posts and many replies to the posts. At my last SHARE in Baltimore I
think there were just 2 SHARE Posts and no
snip--
Yes, IBM-MAIN no longer has an official table, but you can usually
spot IBM-Main members at either the MVS, JES2 or JES3 table. However, I
generally find that the easiest way to meet IBM-Main'ers at SCIDS to
stand around the
In a message dated 7/29/2008 1:09:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'd love to meet other members face-to-face, but the economics are
prohibitive in my case. Maybe when SHARE comes back to Chicago...
I'll make ibm-main Dots if anybody does that kind of stuff
Pat O'Keefe wrote:
I won't be there. Snub someone for me. :-)
..and John Chase wrote:
I'll be absent as well. Please snub Ed Jaffe, Chris Craddock, Bob
Yelavich, and whoever else comes to mind for me. :-)
Well, how thrillingd to see the birth of a Chorus of Snubs!
Not unknown in
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Graeme Gibson
Sent: Tuesday, July 29, 2008 4:46 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Share Attendance
Pat O'Keefe wrote:
I won't be there. Snub someone for me. :-)
..and John Chase wrote:
I'll be absent as well. Please snub Ed Jaffe, Chris Craddock, Bob
Graeme Gibson wrote:
So much time, so little to do! (WW)
And, though clever, your whimsical post demonstrates quite clearly that
some people have far, far too much of it! :-)
Sorry you won't be joining us...
--
Edward E Jaffe
Phoenix Software International, Inc
5200 W Century Blvd, Suite
Gang,
My boss approved me going to Share in San Jose next weekend. If you would like
to meet the face behind the emails, I will be wearing my Doctor Who Tee-shirt
at SCIDS. Just come up and say hi.
Would love to meet the faces behind the names.
Lizette
Not that I will be there, but I must ask... WHICH Doctor Who will it be?
On Mon Jul 28 12:19 , Lizette Koehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] sent:
Gang,
My boss approved me going to Share in San Jose next weekend. If you would
like to meet the face behind the emails, I will be wearing my Doctor Who
@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Share Attendance
Gang,
My boss approved me going to Share in San Jose next weekend. If you would
like to meet the face behind the emails, I will be wearing my Doctor Who
Tee-shirt at SCIDS. Just come up and say hi.
Would love to meet the faces behind the names.
Lizette
As others have indicated they are returning to SHARE after a long absence
I too will be returning to this SHARE after being away for over 5 years.
Y'all have been warned :-)
Lionel B. Dyck, Consultant/Specialist
Enterprise Platform Services, Mainframe Engineering
KP-IT Enterprise Engineering
In my humble opinion - David Tennet is the BEST. Used to think it was Tom
Baker, but I really like the way DT does it.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: Gary Green [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jul 28, 2008 1:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Share Attendance
Not that I
: Share Attendance
Gang,
My boss approved me going to Share in San Jose next weekend. If you would like
to meet the face behind the emails, I will be wearing my Doctor Who Tee-shirt
at SCIDS. Just come up and say hi.
Would love to meet the faces behind the names.
Lizette
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:22:50 -0500, Miller, Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There used to always be an IBM-MAIN table at SCIDS. I think it had
disappeared last time I was there.
...
I heard SHARE requested it be disbanded because only SHARE
projects or programs were allowed official tables.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List On Behalf Of Patrick O'Keefe
[ snip ]
I won't be there. Snub someone for me. :-)
I'll be absent as well. Please snub Ed Jaffe, Chris Craddock, Bob
Yelavich, and whoever else comes to mind for me. :-)
-jc-
Of Patrick O'Keefe
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2008 2:20 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Share Attendance
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 13:22:50 -0500, Miller, Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There used to always be an IBM-MAIN table at SCIDS. I think it had
disappeared last time I was there.
...
I heard SHARE
In a message dated 7/28/2008 3:10:53 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This may have
happened when SCIDS was replaced by Meet the Projects.
Fraid it's more subliminal than that. So you have a list that transmogrifies
most projects and has been in existence since
Patrick O'Keefe wrote:
Considering the decline in the number of mainframe shops, the decline in
SHARE attendance is understandable. And lamentable.
SHARE was formed at a time when intercommunication between installations
was limited and systems had many problems. For decades, SHARE
In
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
on 09/14/2006
at 06:43 AM, Denise P. Kalm [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Chair became accepted practice as a way of making the position sound
less sexist back when people cared.
Doesn't the parliamentary form The chair recognizes foo go back
much further than that?
--
that
was around 5000. I remember it being commented on at the General Session.
Considering the decline in the number of mainframe shops, the decline in
SHARE attendance is understandable. And lamentable.
i remember several shares being regularly on the order of 5000 and
comments about
in October
1968 and the second in Washington in 1998. The combined attendance
in 1968 was about 3500 and in 1998 about 2100. Peek SHARE attendance
was 5806 in Anaheim in 1990. The high attendance was the catalyst for
IBM to begin running its own conferences.
SHARE develops a budget
.
Considering the decline in the number of mainframe shops, the decline in
SHARE attendance is understandable. And lamentable.
Pat O'Keefe
This may be a issue of my grammar, or lack there of. I will try to
restate what I was told, just to clear it up a bit.
Of the Share's held during the late 90's
As SHARE attendance increased, the number of cities where it would fit
dwindled. I believe there was indeed a Task Force on Growth (TFOG) which
considered constraining attendance. Based on the attendance trend (from 6000
down to 1000 or so) since TFOG was chartered, this was clearly one
/2006 04:55 PM
Please respond to
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@bama.ua.edu
To
IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: SHARE attendance
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/13/2006
at 02:57 PM, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[2] Newspeak for chairman.
No; the use
I know some people who are essentially inanimate objects. Me, before I have
had my coffee, for instance.
Jon
snip
Chair became accepted practice as a way of making the position sound less
sexist back when people cared. Chairperson was awkward and this seemed to
work for some. It has
On 14 Sep 2006 06:44:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chair became accepted practice as a way of making the
position sound less sexist back when people cared.
My 1953 Webster's 2nd gives presiding officer as
one of the
Chairs, chairpersons, sponsors, speakers, and pundits aside, maybe it's
time for SHARE to virtualize.
A company could opt for a video conference into a specific session, or
sessions, and pay a usage fee.
Between travel costs and extra security measures, it is getting quite
costly, isn't it?
Arthur T wrote...
For instance, how does the attendance match up with
prior years, especially those years when dinosaurs ruled
the world?
Some of the old sysprogs around here say that 5,000+ was the norm for the
west coast meetings in the 1970-1980's. Then it tapered off to 2,000+
after that.
John,
Actually, as in almost all statistics, there are numbers and there are
numbers. The 1100 number represents the number of full week paid
attendance. I believe the total attendance, which counts partial week,
etc., was slightly over 2,000, which is what the other numbers you
mentioned
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 10:25:09 -0500, Tom Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
By the way, what exactly was the bad press Baltimore received on this
list? I thought SHARE was vibrant and full of excellent sessions.
Perhaps it had something to do with not being able to take toothpaste
in your carry-on
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:07:57 -0400, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Sep 2006 06:44:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chair became accepted practice as a way of making the
position sound less sexist back when people cared.
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:33:27 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think his draconian restriction has pushed the envelope of trying to
understand discourse.
Uncalled for!
His list serve: his rules.
You don't like it; unsubscribe.
...
Add to that, one person's draconian restriction
At 11:25 -0500 on 09/14/2006, Tom Marchant wrote about Re: SHARE attendance:
I took Tom's original comment about talking furniture to be an
attempt at humor.
And it was the funniest thing I'd seen in a while. It was a good thing
I didn't have a mouth full of coffee when I read it!
Tom
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Robert A. Rosenberg
Sent: Thursday, September 14, 2006 4:26 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@BAMA.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: SHARE attendance
snip
Tom might be a fan of Piers Anthony's Xanth Fantasy series where
Tom Marchant wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006 11:07:57 -0400, Arthur T. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 14 Sep 2006 06:44:00 -0700, in bit.listserv.ibm-main
(Message-ID:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Chair became accepted practice as a way of making the
position sound less sexist back
of mainframe shops, the decline in
SHARE attendance is understandable. And lamentable.
Pat O'Keefe
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the message: GET IBM-MAIN
John S. Giltner, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
Someone emailed me offline and said it was low. Can anyone confirm/
clarify the numbers?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
Budget was for 1100; paid
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
Do you hear furniture talking often, or was that the only time it has
happened to you?
--
Tom
In a message dated 9/13/2006 1:49:58 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
Do you hear furniture talking often, or was
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 14:10:41 -0500, Ed Gould wrote:
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:23 AM, Tom Schmidt wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 21:37:15 -0400, John S. Giltner, Jr. wrote:
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
There have been 1 or 2 comments that people thought the chairs
comment was mine. I think there was too much snippage to get by the
robo that I believe Darren has set up. I know I have been bounced
because of this restriction. I think that the restriction put up by
Darren is a little too
I think his draconian restriction has pushed the envelope of trying to
understand discourse.
Uncalled for!
His list serve: his rules.
You don't like it; unsubscribe.
BTW, I think those comments should be sent to him directly.
NOT griped about in public.
If I were in charge, I would drop you
In a message dated 9/13/2006 4:18:57 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
There have been 1 or 2 comments that people thought the chairs
comment was mine.
I did, and I regret not taking a few more seconds to review the previous
posts. The comment involving chairs
In [EMAIL PROTECTED], on 09/13/2006
at 02:57 PM, (IBM Mainframe Discussion List) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
said:
[2] Newspeak for chairman.
No; the use of chair to refer to the office is old. IANAP, but I
believe that there is a subtle difference between chair and
chairman, possibly that the former
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006 21:33:27 +, Ted MacNEIL [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think his draconian restriction has pushed the envelope of trying to
understand discourse.
Uncalled for!
His list serve: his rules.
I, for one, would not like to go back to the old days when hundreds of lines
were quoted
Ed Gould wrote:
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
Someone emailed me offline and said it was low. Can anyone confirm/
clarify the numbers?
Ed
One of the chairs said that it was less than 2,000.
Anyone have the number for attendance of SHARE in Baltimore?
Someone emailed me offline and said it was low. Can anyone confirm/
clarify the numbers?
Ed
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send
100 matches
Mail list logo
