Hi list,
I'm having a problem looking at LLCAWTIM for a ZIIP core.
Currently my test system have been up for 4.5 days, so:
Current_TOD - IPAILTOD = 0005C8961CAFC6C0
LCCAWTIM for CP0 = 00033B94B019440C, so this Cpu use = 44.1%
LCCAWTIM for CP1 = 0002F2138BA76822, so this Cpu use
In <510035e7.1060...@valley.net>, on 01/23/2013
at 02:11 PM, Gerhard Postpischil said:
>On 1/23/2013 3:11 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht wrote:
>> You're snooping in others drawers? Naughty boy! ;-D
>Sorry to dash your tittilation, but four of us shared a small room
>where everyone could see what ot
In <6799950691796565.wa.paulgboulderaim@listserv.ua.edu>, on
01/24/2013
at 07:59 AM, Paul Gilmartin said:
>Remember the Bad Old Days when the operator needed to submit a
>dummy job to make a device actually go offline?
A START command with an undefined proc name qualified as a dummy job,
In
<7970407624693074.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu>,
on 01/24/2013
at 08:41 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
said:
>Question: what was the PGM and parms used in that dummy job?
Irrelevant; the job didn't have to actually run. What I saw most often
was START X, where there was no pro
Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
>>Question: what was the PGM and parms used in that dummy job?
>Irrelevant; the job didn't have to actually run. What I saw most often was
>START X, where there was no proc named X and the start would fail.
Perhaps irrelevant and more irrelevant these days, but w
The reason why "S X" became so prevalent was because it is much faster to type
3 characters into the main console than the nine characters of "S DEALLOC".
Since the results were the same, i.e., the device ended up being offline, the
faster method was always used way back when.
Bill Fairchild
P
On Thu, January 24, 2013 19:39, willie bunter wrote:
> I tried the LISTCAT
> of the .DATA component and since there was no cluster the LISTCAT was
> unsuccessful. In this case, how would I be able to tell what type of VSAM
> dsn it is?
I think you can't really restore that VSAM data set unless yo
Willie, this might be a foolish way to find what I need, but I always search
our production JCL library before I do anything. All but a handful of our VSAM
datasets have allocation JCL in there somewhere. On the odd, one off clusters,
that takes more digging.
On Thu, 24 Jan 2013 09:25:07 -
Willie
You can look at cbttape.org
294, 511, 726, 738
Could help with analyzing VSAM as well as collecting the VSAM define
statements for you.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf
> Of willie bunter
> Sent: Thur
Steve,
That's the first place I looked. If any one have LISTCATS of the following
type of VSAM dsns I would greatly appreciate it:
ESDS, VRRDS & RRDS.
I looked at the LISTCAT of the ESDS however it doesn't indicate what type of
VSAM file it is in the ATTRIBUTES. Perhaps
___
Hello, I'm looking for ideas to add to what I've come up with so far
If you are an application and you were deciding what platform you should be
developed and run on, what are the KEY items (IE: selling points) associated
with the mainframe environment that would steer you to pick the mainf
All,
We run three z/OS 1.13 images in a "bronzeplex" configuration, but do not share
the spool; each image is a "single-member MAS".
We're also "having fun" with an ISV product on the "sandbox", that started out
as simply a S0C4 at shutdown time of the product's STC, but only "frequently".
At
On 1/25/2013 8:42 AM, Sumi, Joseph J. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hello, I'm looking for ideas to add to what I've come up with so far
If you are an application and you were deciding what platform you should be
developed and run on, what are the KEY items (IE: selling points) associated
with t
Willie,
Here are some very basic sample DEFINE statements. You can run them in
your environment and then look at the listcats. This may be more helpful
than listcats from other installations.
DEFINE CLUSTER(NAME(TEST.VSAM.KSDS)-
INDEXED -
KEYS(7 0) -
RECOR
Sounds like one (or more ) of the LPARs/tasks has a very low relative weight
and is not getting services.
This is similar in concept (although not structure) to the purpose of the ERV
value in IEAOPTxx.
i.e. "prefer" this work for a short period of time because it might be holding
resources nee
Mike,
Unfortunately the user deleted the dsn before the query was done. The backup
taken was a physical DFDSS volume dump and there is no way of knowing the
attributes of the dsns.
From: Mike Schwab
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2
I might hazard a guess that someone put in a requirement to IBM that they
distribute a "deallocate" proc. Why would someone do that? Perhaps there were
stringent requirements at their shop about starting procs that don't exist or
they got exhausted writing up internal incident reports to expla
Bill,
I tried your suggestion. And it did tell me the type of dsn it is - RRDS. Now
another puzzling thought comes up. When I recataloged the dsn as NONINDEXED,
how does the system know that the Organization is RRDS and not ESDS?
From: Bill Oczak
To:
Sri,
Thanks for the doc. According to the definition of ESDS, the dsn is
NONINDEXED. However, when I recataloged the CLUSTER using the NONINDEXED parm
the dsn organization is RRDS (I used FileAid as suggested) and not ESDS.
Can the RRDS be NONIDEXED and numbered as well
Thanks Boris, I will run them off.
From: Boris Lenz
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 10:55:52 AM
Subject: Re: DIFFERENTIATION OF VSAM DSNS
Willie,
Here are some very basic sample DEFINE statements. You can run them in
your environmen
In
<8464779473941406.wa.elardus.engelbrechtsita.co...@listserv.ua.edu>,
on 01/25/2013
at 07:07 AM, Elardus Engelbrecht
said:
>Perhaps irrelevant and more irrelevant these days, but why was IBM
>distributing the proc DEALLOC (renamed by some sites to X) in the
>first place?
The hope that nobod
z/OS Security: Statement of Integrity.
With the Common Criteria Evaluation Assurance Level 5 (EAL5) awarded by
International Standards Organization, System z has the highest security
rating or classification for any commercially available server.
http://www-03.ibm.com/systems/au/resources/systems
Great stuff. Thanks.
Rgrds, Joseph Sumi
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Rob Schramm
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 12:03 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: mainframe "selling" points
z/OS Security: State
The article below does not paint a good future for the mainframe...I hope
the analysts are wrong.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-19399368
==
IBM unveils faster, smaller mainframe
IBM has unveiled a mainframe computer it
On Tue, 22 Jan 2013 18:54:41 +, Lund James E wrote:
>I have been looking into the "LOAD from Removable Media or Server" option
>available for remotely using these utilities, but, for lack of documentation,
>I'm unable to get the environment setup properly. Has anyone had success using
>an F
Rob Schramm wrote:
z/OS Security: Statement of Integrity.
Sometimes we overfocus on "what's new" rather than fundamentals. The
best tire in the world doesn't help you corner better if it falls off
the car when kicked!
So, I'd add data integrity. In fact, I'd put it first. The HW guys
s
We have migrated our test LPAR SMF data to DASD-ONLY logstreams. This is
working as described however, I am attempting to force the logstreams to a
different storage group via the SMS parms in the logstream definition. I do
not see any of the ACS routine messages that are usually displayed whe
We run with CF structure support, but I can see lots of messages like
this:
IEF196I IGD101I SMS ALLOCATED TO DDNAME (SYS15575)
IEF196I DSN (TECH.IFASMF.DEFAULT.A0096130)
IEF196I STORCLAS (STANDARD) MGMTCLAS (NOACTION) DATACLAS
IEF196I (SMFLOG)
IEF196I V
On 1/24/2013 9:11 PM, Shmuel Metz (Seymour J.) wrote:
Sorry to dash your tittilation, but four of us shared a small room
where everyone could see what others were doing.
Orgy?
Not enough room
Gerhard Postpischil
Bradford, Vermont
Skip,
Are these messages are in the output from the batch job running the IXCMIAPU
utility? If so, I see none of these. I have MSGLEVEL=(1,1) on the job card
which should show all messages.
Thanks,
Garry
--
For IBM-MAIN sub
Maybe I misunderstood the original question. These messages appear in
syslog as SMF logger rolls the offload data sets forward.
.
.
JO.Skip Robinson
Southern California Edison Company
Electric Dragon Team Paddler
SHARE MVS Program Co-Manager
626-302-7535 Office
323-715-0595 Mobile
jo.skip.robin
Maybe this is due to being DASDONLY, but I receive the IXG283I message when the
DEFINE is executed and also when a new offload dataset is allocated. However,
I do not see the IEF196I messages with either event.
--
For IBM-MAIN
Does this concern you all, it does me
http://thehackernews.com/?m=1
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
--
For IBM-MAIN
Which item?
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Scott Ford
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:07 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: OT -- hackers
Does this concern you all, it does me
http://thehackernews
Show how the hackers got in ..the code unless i am misreading something
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:20 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
> Which item?
>
> Charles
>
> --
Maybe I just misread
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:31 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
> Show how the hackers got in ..the code unless i am misreading something
>
> Scott fo
Does anyone happen to know of a utility, TSO command, ISPF panel, or similar
function that is commonly available that issues STOW I? (STOW I deletes all
of the members of a PDS in one fell swoop. I hoped maybe ISPF 3.1 had a
"delete all" function but no such luck.)
I want to test a program that
If you haven't gotten a full briefing on Red October malware it's pretty
sobering.
_http://www.pcworld.com/article/2025328/red-october-malware-discovered-after
-years-of-stealing-data-in-the-wild.html_
(http://www.pcworld.com/article/2025328/red-october-malware-discovered-after-years-of-steali
Hi,
If your intention is to delete all members of a PDS then it is quite
simple is ISPF itself
1. Open the PDS in EDIT mode
2. Type the following at the command prompt
S * D
3. Set the delete confirmation off and press enter
4. All the members are deleted.
Sri Hari Kolusu
IBM Mainframe Disc
On 01/25/2013 04:32 PM, Charles Mills wrote:
Does anyone happen to know of a utility, TSO command, ISPF panel, or similar
function that is commonly available that issues STOW I? (STOW I deletes all
of the members of a PDS in one fell swoop. I hoped maybe ISPF 3.1 had a
"delete all" function but n
No, I don't care to actually delete any members. I want to issue a STOW I
macro so I can process the resulting SMF Type 42 record.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Sri h Kolusu
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:41
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 14:32:55 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>Does anyone happen to know of a utility, TSO command, ISPF panel, or similar
>function that is commonly available that issues STOW I? (STOW I deletes all
>of the members of a PDS in one fell swoop. I hoped maybe ISPF 3.1 had a
>"delete all"
3.1 does have a delete all members command. On the command line, enter
S * D
When it finishes, compress the dataset because the high water mark is not reset.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Charles Mills
> Sen
Idcams?
Del mydsn(*)
Lizette
,
-Original Message-
>From: Charles Mills
>Sent: Jan 25, 2013 3:32 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Utility issuing STOW Initialize?
>
>Does anyone happen to know of a utility, TSO command, ISPF panel, or similar
>function that is commonly available
Promising, if I don't find a lazier approach LOL
Thanks,
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Joel C. Ewing
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Utility issuing STOW Initia
Thanks.
I can confirm that 3.1 S * D does *not* do things the easy way. SMF reveals
that it does 'n' member deletes.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of EXT-Schwarz, Barry
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 2:43 PM
To:
Gary,
I think you should the messages Skip has seen in syslog when a new logger
dataset is created. However, some of the updates are not applied until the
logstream is closed and reopened. Excerpt from 'Setting Up a Sysplex' Chapter
9.7 Updating a log stream's attributes:
Pending updates w
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 15:00:46 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>
>I can confirm that 3.1 S * D does *not* do things the easy way. SMF reveals
>that it does 'n' member deletes.
>
From CBTTAPE FILE182(PDSHELP):
002337 5. The RESET of a PDSE directory is done with the STOW
002338 Init
Bingo! Thanks!
Took me about ten minutes to find the IDCAMS doc. Does anyone else besides me
find the DFSMS bookshelf about the hardest to find anything in? Who would guess
that to delete a member of a PDS you had to look in a manual called "AMS for
Catalogs"?
Then it took me about ten minutes
Indexed (KSDS), Non-indexed (ESDS), Numbered (RRDS), or Linear (DB2,
etc). No ands.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:33 AM, willie bunter wrote:
> Sri,
>
> Thanks for the doc. According to the definition of ESDS, the dsn is
> NONINDEXED. However, when I recataloged the CLUSTER using the NONINDEXED
Try tso help delete
Might be faster than a manual search
Lizette
-Original Message-g
>From: Charles Mills
>Sent: Jan 25, 2013 4:00 PM
>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
>Subject: Re: Utility issuing STOW Initialize?
>
>Thanks.
>
>I can confirm that 3.1 S * D does *not* do things the easy wa
Don
The 'analysts' are wrong!
This biased article appeared on the BBC who is not known for any
opinion/expertise about IBM mainframes - you will also note that no 'person' is
attributed to authoring this article. It also quotes Pund-IT who also seem to
know nothing about mainframes. Finally, w
Card reader / punch, lineprinter, reel tapes, unmounted 3330 disk pack.
Things have sure progressed since then.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Don Williams wrote:
> The article below does not paint a good future for the mainframe...I hope
> the analysts are wrong.
>
> http://www.bbc.co.uk/new
Run 300 zLinux servers per z196 zIFL.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:47 AM, Steve Comstock
wrote:
> On 1/25/2013 8:42 AM, Sumi, Joseph J. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
>>
>> Hello, I'm looking for ideas to add to what I've come up with so far
>>
--
Mike A Schwab, Springfield IL USA
Where do Forest Ran
I don't know why people do this or want to guess I was raised too
responsible.
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 5:34 PM, Ed Finnell wrote:
> If you haven't gotten a
Probably. You said IDCAMS and I thought of batch, which is how I did it.
Charles
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Friday, January 25, 2013 3:41 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Utility
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
> I don't know why people do this or want to guess I was raised too
> responsible.
Well, it's for the intellectual challenge, plus the thrill. But yeah, I
don't get it--it's like random vandalism. I can see (but would never
commit) vandalis
ZMan, you got it exactly ..
Scott ford
www.identityforge.com
Tell me and I'll forget; show me and I may remember; involve me and I'll
understand. - Chinese Proverb
On Jan 25, 2013, at 7:37 PM, zMan wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Scott Ford wrote:
>
>> I don't know why people do
I think the IGD101I are from WRITE statements in the SMS code. You may wish
to add some writes to SMS where the Logger is setup and just try a couple of
WRITE statements and see if that does the trick.
Lizette
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@L
Spurred on by my upcoming Share session I've spent some time writing about
"Technology Update Pricing for AWLC". It was announced last August but there
has been little discussion of the software pricing related to zEC12s on
IBM-MAIN. As we seem to discuss on IBM-MAIN with each pricing change I w
On Fri, 25 Jan 2013 19:37:03 -0500, zMan wrote:
>> I don't know why people do this or want to guess I was raised too
>> responsible.
>
>Well, it's for the intellectual challenge, plus the thrill.
...
>But messing with someone half a world
>away that you'll never meet just seems pointless.
At
61 matches
Mail list logo
