the bind information returned.
Here is the updated source:
**-**
** PROGRAM : PORTDSPI **
** AUTHOR : BRIAN CHAPMAN **
** WRITTEN
ONITR =
NO *
*IST171I ACTIVE SESSIONS = 00, SESSION REQUESTS =
00 *
*IST314I END
*
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Nov 10, 2022 at 7:34 AM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> Normal processing is for the user to enter a logon s
of code before the DROP
instruction. I could have used the VTAMREG equate in the MVCL section, but
I wanted to be sure that it utilized an even-odd pair. In this case it
would have, but I like the flexibility of changing my equate assignments if
necessary.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Nov 1
I should also add another comment.
I was hoping I could just leave the bind area empty and let the SLU (the
user's emulator is the SLU in this scenario, right?) populate the bind
image with whatever it sends.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 2:59 PM Brian Chapman
ain, any assistance would be greatly appreciated.
**-**
** PROGRAM : PORTDSPI **
** AUTHOR : BRIAN CHAPMAN **
** WRITTEN ON : 23 AUGUST 2017
ar instruction (MVCL for example), then updating the equate for
SESSREG is much easier than performing CHANGE ALL commands and
inadvertently changing a field name, literal, or some other string.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 7:28 PM Michael Stein wrote:
> > Any a
R,WAIT,HOLD flags
TPUT (1),(0),R Reset the Attention IDentifier
TPG QUERY,L'QUERY,NOEDIT,WAIT Issue Query
...
...
RESETAID DCX'27F5C3' Escape, Erase/Write, WCC for resetting AID and
MDTs
QUERYDC X'F3000501F
ith "Previously defined
symbol' when I re-use the GTTLIST label.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Nov 1, 2022 at 3:42 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> All I see is that your save area code is bad, but that shouldn't affect
> the returned values from GTTERM. What's in S
0002CBFE 000BFE **
Address Offset from _0002C000Origin STORAGE 0001
0002CC00 000C00 **
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
Carmen/ Shmuel,
Thank you. I will review these reference manuals.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Sep 29, 2022 at 9:19 AM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> that's a better reference - I have a PDF saved on my work PC somewhere,
> but this looks about the same
>
> Carmen
>
&g
how do you copy
directories/folders without outages? For directories/files that can easily
be built with jobs, do you re-run these jobs on each system, or copy these
elements?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / si
*
* END *
* INTERPRET "PARMS = PARMS||"OBJ.DRAW_ROW_NUM.DRAW_FLD_CNT||, *
*"'.'J'='''PARM_VAL''';'"
Cameron,
If you add the data areas to the PROCEDURE DIVISION USING statement, then
COBOL will set the linkage accordingly.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 9:13 AM Cameron Conacher wrote:
> Hello everyone,
> I have been busy playing with an old support pac from IB
ogram yet another separately compiled subroutine is always an option
> too. It just feels like overkill for a four-instruction subroutine (not
> counting CSECT, END, AMODE, and RMODE).
>
> Replacing "clever" with a "builtin function" like XLC has would be my
> pref
** ASMA224E No control section defined, external reference with GOFF option
ignored - ###0021
Does the error say 021 or 0022? If it's 0022 then it looks like
you're missing a CSECT.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 3:49 PM Dave Jones wrote:
> Hi
It would be nice if COBOL had constant constructs. Knowing my shop's COBOL
developers, I could easily see one of them placing a table above this,
programmatically ignoring the COBOL OCCURS statement, and overrunning the
table and into your VALUE statements.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
O
I may need wrong, but I seem to remember reading that the 12 bit lower
order value had some relation to the processor ID. This ensured the STCK
value would be unique across the sysplex.
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 1:55 PM Farley, Peter x23353 <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> B
Peter,
This is interesting, but how is this better than just link-editing the
assembler program into the COBOL program?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021 at 11:50 AM Farley, Peter x23353 <
031df298a9da-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> I discovered that one
ary aspect) like web or video game development with
stunning visuals. The majority of the development and interactions are
handled as backend transactions, but young kids are clambering to work on
it. It's all about culture and perspective.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021
M needs to change their perspective and culture to encourage
young individuals to the mainframe.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 12:55 PM Support, DUNNIT SYSTEMS LTD. <
supp...@dunnitsys.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I was approached by a university student
Jasi,
Do you run CICS? If so, have you explored CICS web support using URIMAP and
DOCTEMPLATE?
https://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SSGMCP_5.5.0/applications/designing/dfhp3_doc_template.html
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Wed, Mar 10, 2021 at 10:21 AM Jasi Grewal wrote:
> Hi, I
s an input parameter for ASID, but running this
service for every active ASID on the system (roughly 150 on our sandbox
system) every quarter second (our WLM interval) is not cheap.
Is there a better solution for collecting this data or am I missing
something
As a CICS SysProg, this makes me cringe. I would highly recommend rewriting
your program to conform to CICS standards, and use CICS to acquire the
storage for you. Take a look at the CICS prolog and epilog macros with the
DFHEISTG macro. These macros make this super simple and I would wager that
it
Sam,
Thanks. Like you, I had to bumble my way through learning SMP/e. I had a
few fellow sys progs to lean on, but most of my knowledge was self taught
with lots of trial and error. I will definitely give this a read.
Something that I have not seen documented is how to create my own SMP/e
install
*
* BOTTOM OF DATA
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 1:05 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 17:54:22 +, Seymour J Metz wrote:
>
> >S
Carmen,
There's definitely data on the DD, but for some reason I just can't see it
when on the same system. The data will be old (sometimes more than a day)
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 10:23 AM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 08:56:24 -0500,
I assume this has something to do with viewing the SDSF buffers and some
setting that is ignoring the most recent buffer. Any help would be greatly
appreciated.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / arc
Correction: you can chain through the resister save area and use the *caller's
entry point* (not CEECAA)to chain to the caller's PPA and retrieve the
program name.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 7:39 PM Brian Chapman wrote:
> If the called program is asse
If the called program is assembler and the caller is COBOL (linked with
LE), then you can chain through the resister save area and use the CEECAA
to chain to the caller's PPA and retrieve the program name. This method
really only works for called assembler programs; don't bother with COBOL.
The nu
Pierre,
I'd love to hear if you find a resolution. I have a process with similar
behavior and I receive the same message for each sub-task when it
terminates within the ESTAE.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 9:49 AM Charles Mills wrote:
> I have always seen that
We have a similar problem when applying a new version of CICS. We must have
the AGGRGROW option specified on the USS file system mount for the
directory.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 12:11 PM Carmen Vitullo wrote:
> another thing I'd do is allocate your SMPWORK
n the intended program.
Does LE have stricter requirements with CEESTART in C programs?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Oct 1, 2019 at 1:23 PM Don Poitras wrote:
> In article t1cmgbfaka497yhff...@mail.gmail.com> you wrote:
> > I created a trace facility to intercept external in
ogram because it will produce unpredictable behavior. Must I
write a C program?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message:
calling
the subroutine, replace the RETURN statement with EXIT(0).
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Mon, Sep 30, 2019 at 9:38 AM Bill Giannelli
wrote:
> I am still learning Rexx. Can someone give a simple example of 1) calling
> a routine and returning. 2) branching to a routine without ret
have update access to system datasets. It
will definitely have read access to system datasets (although it may be
limited to CICS specific HLQs).
I would only allow the region to submit jobs under a different user.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 1:59 PM Seymour J Metz
Other than changing (or kicking) the hardware, what can be done on-site
that can't be done off-site? Most sysprog responsibilities are software.
On Thu, Aug 22, 2019, 1:08 PM Chuck Kreiter
wrote:
> Do you have to also go into the office for "off-hours" support? During an
> outage, I would expec
it is disingenuous and
unrealistic to say that a mainframe is antiquated or obsolete because of
these issues. These are just security 101 topics that are valid for every
platform.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 12:26 AM Timothy Sipples wrote:
> Let's quote the author dire
art. I think I
am only 1 of a handful of assembler programmers at my shop with hundreds of
mainframe programmers! I think you both answered my question. Thanks!
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 11:39 AM Steve Smith wrote:
> Write good code and forget about instruction timi
Mike,
I believe the difference is related to the fact that branch instructions
require a base register and jump does not.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:40 AM Mike Shaw wrote:
> On 8/12/2019 9:33 PM, Christopher Y. Blaicher wrote:
> > ..>
> > JUM
Thanks Giliad. This is what I was searching for. I understand that the
timings in this document are very old and probably wildly inaccurate for
today's Z systems, but would it be on a relative scale? Would a LR be twice
the speed of a L?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at
is actively
cached at execution of a certain instruction? What would cause the hardware
to move my literal pool out of cache?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:17 AM Charles Mills wrote:
> I second everything Chris Blaicher says. You just cannot say how long
Hi everyone,
I did some searching, but I didn't find anything that really discussed this
on the topic that I'm interested. Is there anything published that compares
the cycle times of the most used instructions?
For example; moving an address between areas of storage. I would assume
that executin
Peter,
Are you referring to eMemo by Techserv (was Nexus)?
On Fri, Jul 5, 2019, 12:00 PM Peter wrote:
> Hi
>
> Cross posted
>
> Does anyone uses this product to send email ?
>
> I am just looking for manual.
>
> Peter
>
> --
>
DCBD *
** *
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 2:15 PM scott Ford wrote:
> All:
>
> I have a QSAM question. If I have a Cobol program writing to a QSAM file
> and it runs out of space on the fil
allowed on our production systems.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 10:34 AM Charles Mills wrote:
> > How does z/OS handle a situation where two COBOL programs that are
> compiled
> > at different ARCH levels and part of the same LE enclave? Since the
> vendor
#x27;m not
sure what ARCH level the vendor compiles their COBOL code (if they have
any).
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Mon, May 6, 2019 at 9:01 AM John Abell <
john.ab...@intnlsoftwareproducts.com> wrote:
> Your should have something similar to the following in the COBOL listing
> whe
on to IBM would be in order.
>
> Thanks..
>
> Paul Feller
> AGT Mainframe Technical Support
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Brian Chapman
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2019 2:58 PM
>
take advantage of the new facility. Is the vendor correct?
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
*Doesn't CICS turn off authorization before executing transactions? *
I believe that is true. I believe it disables authorization before the PLT
(first opportunity for user code).
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 12:18 PM Seymour J Metz wrote:
> AFAIK, no IBM code
data without any validation, but this same exposure is present in space
switching PC routines hosted by an authorized address space.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 10:45 AM Binyamin Dissen
wrote:
> Two separate things:
>
> 1. Prepare user supplied authorized ser
zed code is COBOL. Before this
program is invoked, it initializes LE and replaces the default CEEZLOD and
CEEZDEL with my own version that loads from the tasklib.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / sign
CPU-Time field. Like Carmen noted, when I
add the GCP-Time, zIIP-Time, zAAP-Time, and zICP-Time it does not calculate
out to be the same as the CPU-Time or ECPU-Time amount.
Thank you,
Brian Chapman
On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 9:21 AM Peter Relson wrote:
> If the comment is correct that the S
, and zIIP-time match (as close as humanly possible
to switch 3270 emulators and press enter). I was under the assumption that
ECPU also included time spent on zIIPs, but that must not be true. Is zIIP
time included in CPU and ECPU? I'm thinking it is not.
Thank you,
Bri
I found this to be the most irritating aspect of working with 64 bit areas.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019, 5:23 PM Charles Mills I have an application that uses IARV64 REQUEST=GETCOMMON,COND=YES. I have
> tested with an unreasonable request size and gotten a return with a reason
> code as expected.
>
> I
1. Are you checking the COMM ECB after every wait? Even after a subtask
post the main task's ECB or any other ECB in your list? I've had problems
with subtasks posting the main task and not checking the COMM ECB after
servicing the subtask request and missing console commands.
2. Double check whic
Thanks Don.
I didn't realize that the listserv even existed. I thought the Google newsgroup
was the primary forum.
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with th
56 matches
Mail list logo
