OK, my tale of ancient electricity. Early '80s, NCR minicomputer (size of a
large refrigerator) installed 3 feet in front of main breaker box to computer
room. NCR was on site doing maintenance work inside the computer so skins were
off when the electricians decided they needed to do some
Actually I think you meant 30051, not 30015. I seem to remember somewhere in
the past, that IBM recommended the 30051 rather than the 32760 because the
DS boxes carved out the physical storage in multiples of 1113 cylinders,
which is an old mod1 size. Whether or not that still holds true,
Another thought on disk, whatever happened to MFNETDISK from Shai Hess? Don't
know if it would work in this environment or not.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mike Schwab
Sent: Monday, November 09, 2015 5:13 AM
Hi Gil,
I don't have time to play with it right now, but short answer to your question
is "yes". I got this from the help screen within ISRDDN. Unfortunately it
doesn't give syntax on how to actually use the parms.
Commands for viewing ENQs and ENQ contention:
She hasn't been in charge at HP for 10 years. I rather doubt she had anything
to do with this.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Monday, September 21, 2015 5:44 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Devious! I'll have to put that in my bag of tricks. :-) That could have
easily worked with any auditors I've encountered in the past, but Sharon's
auditors apparently know z/OS.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Charles,
Many years ago I sat in a vendor presentation peddling a particular application
geared for the healthcare industry. They were competing for business against a
different application whose software happened to run on MVS (yes, back in those
days). The vendor kept going on and on about
Scott,
I know nothing about how to package items for SMP/E, but there is a book in the
SMP/E bookshelf called "Standard Packaging Rules for z/OS-Based Products" that
looks like it might give you what you need to know. 1.13 number is
SC23-3695-10.
HTH
Rex
-Original Message-
From:
This is just a SWAG, but can you do mget *.BIN * (REPLACE?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bill Ashton
Sent: Wednesday, August 05, 2015 8:45 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Problem with FTP into a PDS
This
DEL (*) gives invalid dataset name
However:
DEL /(*) gives me an empty PDS and IDC0553I ALL MEMBERS IN DATA SET
RRP4912.TEMP.JCL DELETED
In addition, it works on an empty PDS to free space (as I expected it to).
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
OK, poor choice of words, it doesn't free the space, it compresses it.
Either way, I didn't know IDCAMS had been enhanced like this, so Thanks Steve!
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, July 21, 2015 1:31 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Deleting data sets in use
On 2015-07-21, at 11:08, Walt Farrell wrote:
On Tue, 21 Jul 2015
Jan,
I took the comic as just the opposite. The learning curve for VI is very high
right from the beginning, in that you have to learn a lot about vi before you
can do anything with it.
I know the first time (several times???) I was exposed to vi by thoughts were
along the lines of what
John,
Can you find something called LAUNCH.PDF? That looks to me to be the menu to
make sense out of the nice manual names. I just found some documentation for
AutoOperator 6.2 and 6.3 from back around the 2002-2003 timeframe.
Might be time to do some cleanup around here.
Rex
Engelbrecht
Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 8:18 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: BMC AutoOPERATOR questions.
Pommier, Rex wrote:
Can you find something called LAUNCH.PDF? That looks to me to be the menu
to make sense out of the nice manual names.
Indeed. Or 'Launch.html' which I
Hi All,
Is there any way to configure all or a portion of a TS7740 to not write cache
data to back-end tapes?
Here's the situation I am facing. I have a TS7720 without any tape drives.
Our DR facility has only a TS7740. We are preparing for a test and we don't
want to have to provide
Lizette,
You are absolutely correct.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Lizette Koehler
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 7:53 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Mysterious U4088-63 from RPTSTG(ON)
SDSF I
What machine are you planning on plugging this 3x74 into? IIRC, the 3274s were
strictly bus and tag, and there were some 3174s that were ESCON-capable. I
have no experience with the 9074 machines, but IBM doesn't support ESCON on
anything more current than the z196/z114, do they? So you're
Sorry, make that 2074, not 9074 - getting my numbers messed up
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on 3270
Probably the last time they sold one. :-)
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Charles Mills
Sent: Friday, May 22, 2015 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Question on 3270 Devices
revision date
Try renaming the non-SMS one to something outside your mask and trying it
again. If it works, you have your answer and your SMS datasets altered. Then
just rename the non-SMS one back.
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Willie, do you have your syntax backwards? You are looking to backup older
datasets, right? The way I read the syntax (and I could very well be wrong
here) is you're saying by
BY(CREDT,GE,(*,-3)))
Is if the create date is greater or equal to 3 days ago select it. If you want
datasets that
Shane,
Re: BTDTGTS, is that been there, don’t that, got (the) t-shirt or is it
been there, got that, got the scars?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 7:01 PM
To:
Hi Elardus,
Easter Egging in the more general sense is trying to fix something by randomly
replacing elements when you don't have any idea what to fix and hoping you get
the right thing. Based on the custom in various parts of the world of hunting
for Easter Eggs.
Also known as shotgun
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Phil Smith III
Sent: Friday, April 17, 2015 11:23 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: RACF POSIT follies
Pommier, Rex wrote, on IBM-MAIN, in response to What is 'Easter Egging'?:
Easter Egging in the more general sense is trying
I know the comment about the start button was supposed to be funny, but isn't
that a picture of the front of the machine accompanying the article? And isn't
the power switch pretty much in the center of the machine?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
-
Pommier, Rex
I know the comment about the start button was supposed to be funny, but isn't
that a picture of the front of the machine accompanying the article? And isn't
the power switch pretty much in the center of the machine?
Rex
-Original Message-
Tom Marchant
On Thu, 2 Apr
...and cleaning people. Bumping switches with mop handles etc.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jerry Whitteridge
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2015 10:52 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Forbes: Nice
That line coupled with We'll be adding value to the consumer when they give up
their information
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Shane Ginnane
Sent: Sunday, March 22, 2015 5:47 AM
To:
Karl,
This is probably a dumb question/observation, but in step CRE#A1D the SYSUT1 DD
has DSORG=PO on it. Is this correct? Granted it is a dummy dataset, but what
happens when you try to use *GENER to copy a PDS into a PDS member? I tested
it on 1.13 and it works the same either way, but I
John,
Does IEBCOPYO exist on z/OS 2.1? On my 1.13 system, IEBCOPY is not APF
authorized, but I have what appears to be an identical module, IEBCOPYO that is
authorized.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John
10:46 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: APF-authorized calling non-authorized
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote:
John,
Does IEBCOPYO exist on z/OS 2.1? On my 1.13 system, IEBCOPY is not APF
authorized, but I have what appears
and the
IEBDSCPY alias now applies to the standard non-APF-authorized form of
IEBCOPY.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:39 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote:
John,
Does IEBCOPYO exist on z/OS 2.1? On my 1.13 system, IEBCOPY is not APF
authorized, but I have what appears to be an identical
Tuco,
I just tried to ftp to ftp.emea.ibm.com both from within a browser and straight
from a command prompt, and got domain name does not exist.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Bonno, Tuco
Sent: Friday, March
I don't know if I would infer that JES2 resyncs to the top of the hour. I
would infer that JES2 simply restarted its 3600 second timer at the point of
time the time changed. I would guess that if, for example, at 5:35 PM you
changed the time to 5:36 PM, your hourly automatic command would
Ron,
Your site has replaced IEBGENER with the sort product (I'm guessing in your
case Syncsort). Can you get to the real IEBGENER?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Ron Thomas
Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 1:53
Dave,
Ask away. :-) There are plenty of DFSORT Q/A going on in this list - and at
least one very knowledgeable IBM'er from the sort team frequents the list and
answers questions. There used to be a couple of them, but Frank retired.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Gil,
In the scenario you mention below, there would be 3 different DLIB zones, so
the PROD DLIB wouldn't be at a higher level than the PROD TARGET zone. If it
were me I wouldn't bother with having 3 DLIB zones, I would have a single DLIB
and not do any ACCEPTs until after the maintenance was
else). But always ADRDSSU backup your SMP/E environment
beforehand. CP
Pommier, Rex wrote:
Gil,
In the scenario you mention below, there would be 3 different DLIB zones, so
the PROD DLIB wouldn't be at a higher level than the PROD TARGET zone. If it
were me I wouldn't bother with having 3
What happens if you replace RECATALOG(x) with CATALOG? Do the datasets
end up in the proper catalog? CATALOG uses the standard catalog search order
for cataloging the datasets.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
I just downloaded the book and glanced through a bit of it. Does anybody else
who looked at it find an incomplete index on pages 10 and 11, right after the
intro, and before chapter 1?
Just wondering if it is a glitch in my download (I tried it twice) or if it is
an error in the book.
John,
Thank you, sir, for this book. I hope you understand I wasn't nitpicking when
I asked about the fragmentary index. I was more looking to see if the download
had somehow messed it up.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
Hello all,
I'm back to working on implementing tape encryption on my 3584 library. Is
anybody running ISKLM for Windows to serve up keys for a 3584 platform? We're
looking at using z/OS for one of the key servers and Windows for the other one
due to DR considerations. Can I run the Windows
Presuming your workstation is a Windows machine, from what I have found on
their documentation, doing a rename on an mget is not supported. I think that
with Windows, you're stuck downloading the PDS without the extension then
renaming the files to add the .TXT afterwards.
As John M pointed
Can you just download them without the extension, then from a command prompt,
just do a rename * *.txt?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of J O Skip Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, January 28, 2015 12:54 PM
To:
Hi all,
I have a couple questions about tape reclamation and statistics. We have a
3494 tape library that is currently exclusively being used as physical
(stacked) tapes for a 3494-B20 VTS. We're in the process of migrating off this
hardware so we have no new allocations going to the B20 and
Elardus,
The link worked just fine for me. Check to see if your browser dropped extra
junk in the URL.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Elardus Engelbrecht
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2015 8:02 AM
To:
Dave and Charles,
I would guess that SYS1.PROCLIB is in your MSTJCL00 member under the IEFPDSI DD
card concatenation. I just did a bit of high level testing, as I have a
PROCLIB that is in my JES2 concatenation, but not in the IEFPDSI concatenation.
I placed a simple job in this PROCLIB and
Or possibly when the precursor to the binder was developed that long ago,
whoever wrote this section figured with a 44 character DSN being the longest
available, they padded it with 20 bytes to make sure it was plenty long. Then
when Unix-style path names came along later, whoever added the
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 5:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption
Russ,
Thanks for confirming how I thought it was supposed to work. I am missing
something else, then because when
Hervey,
I did this at a previous site but it was a very small system. My entire ML2
environment fit quite nicely on 10 mod54 volumes with room to spare. I also
had the luxury of being able to perform a complete full volume backup of my
entire DASD subsystem (including the ML2 volumes) every
PRIMARY ENCRYPTION KEY MANAGER WAS SUCCESSFULLY CONNECTED
IOS631I SECONDARY ENCRYPTION KEY MANAGER WAS SUCCESSFULLY CONNECTED
Ken
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
wrote:
Dave,
I found a couple issues with my library manager. Fist issue (minor) was
that I
AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption
SECONDARY HOSTNAME=NONE
I would think this has to be filled in to proceed.
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:07 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com wrote:
Hi Ken,
Thanks for that verification - about the key management
Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 6:12 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: TS3584 and TS1120 encryption
Russ,
Thanks for confirming how I thought it was supposed to work. I am missing
, Poland
W dniu 2014-11-13 o 17:39, Pommier, Rex pisze:
Hi Dave,
Actually I have the older EKM running, configured to use certs located within
the RACF DB. I was told the library manager was already ready to do
encryption but I'll check that out.
Rex
-Original Message
for.
Have you updated SYS1.PARMLIB(IECIOS00) to define your key managers?
Ken Smith
State of Maryland
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 11:39 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
wrote:
Hi Dave,
Actually I have the older EKM running, configured to use certs located
within the RACF DB. I was told
Hi list,
We have an existing 3584 tape library with encryption-capable TS1120 tape
drives installed in it. We haven't used encryption up to this point, but are
trying to get encryption started. We don't want to encrypt everything going to
the TS1120s, but want to, for example, encrypt our
Russ,
Thanks for confirming how I thought it was supposed to work. I am missing
something else, then because when I run a very simple job to attempt to encrypt
a tape, I get a JCL error as follows:
16.57.46 JOB03624 IRR010I USERID RRP4912 IS ASSIGNED TO THIS JOB.
16.57.47
Hi all,
We have a 3494 tape library with 3590 drives in it that is back-ending a
3494-B20 virtual tape library. We have about 17 TB of data sitting on physical
3590 tapes in the 3494 as stacked logical volumes from the B20. Does anybody
know of any way of getting a list of the logical tapes
Of Thomas Conley
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 9:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3494 tape library and B20 VTS question
On 10/30/2014 10:31 AM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Hi all,
We have a 3494 tape library with 3590 drives in it that is back-ending a
3494-B20 virtual tape library. We
be different.
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 9:30 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
wrote:
Hi all,
We have a 3494 tape library with 3590 drives in it that is back-ending a
3494-B20 virtual tape library. We have about 17 TB of data sitting on
physical 3590 tapes in the 3494 as stacked logical
Unfortunately this document...
IBM TotalStorage Virtual Tape Server
3494 Bulk Volume Information Retrieval Function User's Guide
(WP100430)
Appears to have vanished. The replacement doc, for the TS770 series is there,
but the older doc is gone.
snipped stuff
The BVIR function must be
Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 10:44 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3494 tape library and B20 VTS question
Tom,
How would CA1 even know about the back-end tapes? AFAIK, all it knows about
are the virtual tapes
library and B20 VTS question
On 10/30/2014 12:44 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Tom,
How would CA1 even know about the back-end tapes? AFAIK, all it knows about
are the virtual tapes in the B20, although I will admit I don't know much
about CA1.
Thanks,
Rex
Rex,
CA-1 tracks the stacked volumes
Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John McKown
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2014 12:16 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: 3494 tape library and B20 VTS question
On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 11:49 AM, Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
wrote:
Hi John
Hi Don,
The concern is that the 3590 tape drives are soon to be end of life, January
31, 2015 to be exact. IBM's externally available documentation says the 3590
H1x drives will be supported until October 2015, but our CE's manager told us
that is incorrect, and All the 3590s fall off
Well, I'm in Peter's corner on this one. Is it an irritant to see contact the
sysprog in an error manual? Yes, it can be, but maybe my developers are
weird, but some of them actually look at the books before coming running to me.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe
Hi all,
I found a thread from 2012 discussing BLSR and whether or not it supports
dynamic changes via the SETSSI command. That thread indicated that BLSR had
been updated to support SETSSI, and that upon a SETSSI ACT, the subsystem would
be added and activated. That part appears to work, but
Willie,
Just gleaning from the various replies on the list (without actually doing any
research of my own), the answer is it depends - are you looking at a single
volume VSAM dataset? If so, I believe the 65536 track (about 4369 cylinders)
is the max - nothing to do with the fact that it is
If you want the UID in the ps -ef command, try this instead:
ps -e -ouid -opid,ppid,pcpu=C -ostime,tty=TTY -oatime,args=CMD
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Hansen, Dave L - Eagan, MN
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2014
Rapids, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: old EKM software question
Hi
, MI 49546 MD RSCB2H
p 616.653.8429
f 616.653.2717
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2014 5:35 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: old EKM software question
Hi,
Is anybody
John,
You say the first vol of the multi-vol DSN is on SYS306, yet your INPUT1 is
pointing to SYS301.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Dawes
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2014 12:17 PM
To:
Hi,
Is anybody using the old encryption key manager for tape encryption? I'm
working on setting it up using RACF as my key store. The documentation that
comes with it says specifically that the userid that the EKM runs under does
not need to be UID=0. However, when I try to start the EKM
Jake,
You mentioned that SDSNLINK is in a USERCAT. Do you have VOLUME(xx)
defined in PROGxx for your SDSNLINK or are you relying on the catalog to find
it? It is documented (at least at z/OS 1.13) that it must either be cataloged
in the master catalog or have a VOLUME parameter to be
In an attempt to not hijack the thread I'm changing the subject line. Do you
have some significant differences in your compile or link parms between COBOL 4
and COBOL 5? What would be accounting for the rather significant load module
size growth between 4 and 5?
Rex
-Original
Radoslaw,
About whether your microwave is safe or not. Is it connected to the internet?
If so, it may be safe but other devices may not be because of it. Does it have
enough compute power and memory for somebody to remotely inject code into it?
Could this code then be used to send bogus
What is giving you the indication that they're ALIASes? Can you show a
snapshot of your ISRDDN screen? When I browse the SYSPROC concatenation in
ISRDDN I get the list of members along with which library they're in. I see
the BLS* members and ISRDDN indicates they're in library 8 which on my
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 8:43 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
On 2014-09-30, at 07:03, Pommier, Rex wrote:
What I did
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 14:03:27 +, Pommier, Rex wrote
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 9:24 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
Menu RefList RefMode Utilities Workstation Help
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tom Marchant
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:48 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: ISRDDN SHOWS MEMBER ALIAS
On Tue, 30 Sep 2014 13:03:45 +, Pommier, Rex wrote
Isn't the C library and compiler shipped and installed with all serverpacs? It
just isn't activated until you do so in IFAPRDxx?
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Mainframe Mainframe
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2014
HCLB201 appears to be C/370 version 2.2 from 1999. Is there a specific reason
you're installing what appears to be a very old C? If you need this old
version of C for some reason, you may need to build a completely separate SMP/E
environment to install it. I think your problem may be that
The dataset called GDG in your DCB also needs to exist and be cataloged
somewhere on your new z/OS 2.1 system. In your DCB=(GDG,LRECL=...), the GDG
is called a model DCB and it is another dataset name that needs to exit and be
found in the normal catalog search.
Rex
-Original
I've been watching this exchange from a distance. Are we now confusing 2
issues here? We have the original problem of CEEPLPKA and the secondary one of
his running apply jobs bypassing holderrors without knowing what he was
bypassing.
The OP has gotten an apply check to run with RC=0
system matches Anthony's
2.1 system. Is the fact that the OP's system appears to be different in
SCEELKED another problem?
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2014 11:51 AM
To: IBM
.ibm.com/systems/z/os/zos/tools/java/services/j6servsum31.html
--
Donald J.
dona...@4email.net
On Tue, Aug 26, 2014, at 12:05 PM, Pommier, Rex wrote:
Hi,
I have a question on java versioning and maintenance levels on z/OS. I have
2 different copies of Java 1.6.0 and am trying to decipher
Ron,
One of your explanation paragraphs caught my attention so I'm asking out of
curiosity, for my own benefit.
your paragraph
What I find important is there is no data transformation or recall latency:
it is all transparent to the application. You have to read 12 months of
General Ledger
Hi,
I have a question on java versioning and maintenance levels on z/OS. I have 2
different copies of Java 1.6.0 and am trying to decipher which is the more
current. I've been under the assumption that the SRmFPn gave the maintenance
level, and that the higher the numbers, the more current
Ron Thomas wrote:
The Program is running in production, when we browse the loadlib it is
showing ABEND U4093-92 . We are now planning to make the changes and move to
production, was wondering why this is showing like this ?
When we browse the loadlib... Are you getting an ISPF abend?
Hi list,
I've been meandering through the archives and saw several threads regarding
documentation changes that IBM has been implementing, with knowledge centers et
al. So my question is a rather basic one. We just upgraded to 1.13 a couple
months ago. Do the documentation DVDs no longer
-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:25 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
Hi list,
I've been meandering through the archives and saw several threads
/
Kolusu
IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU wrote on
08/19/2014 08:24:52 AM:
From: Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/19/2014 08:25 AM
Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN
/2014 11:24:52 AM:
From: Pommier, Rex rpomm...@sfgmembers.com
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Date: 08/19/2014 11:25 AM
Subject: revisiting the documentation dilemma
Sent by: IBM Mainframe Discussion List IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Hi list,
I've been meandering through the archives and saw
it to download all
of
the IBM Manuals I want. I think I downloaded 678 PDFs from IBM in about 10
mins maybe 20 mins.
Lizette
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-
m...@listserv.ua.edu]
On Behalf Of Pommier, Rex
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2014 8:25
Willie,
While I can't comment on what you need to do to actually fix the problem, I can
comment on your confusion about the SDSP. The description in the storage mgmt
manual (I have a slightly older revision of the book) for message 909 (you
documented 908) says:
MSG 909 ERROR OPENING
Try running the extract again, using TECH.SCRT.PART2 as your input and see what
dates you get. I think it MIGHT be giving you the beginning and ending dates
of the data it found in the input report.
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 8:40 AM, John Gilmore jwgli...@gmail.com wrote:
snipped
it is lucid enough, but to read it easily you will need to be
comfortable with and tolerant of current computer-science jargon.
(The acronym MASPEGH ought, for example, to have been strangled at or,
better,
Agreed, it is a rather strange acronym. Maybe somebody in ACM likes the
Muppets (MASPEGHI sounds suspiciously like Miss Piggy). smile
Rex
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of John Gilmore
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2014
801 - 900 of 1057 matches
Mail list logo
