Hi,
I am looking for a CH3s QH50, P/N 63F3825 for a 9221 ES/9000.
Regards,
Kevin
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff / archive access instructions,
send email to lists...@listserv.ua.edu with the message: INFO IBM-MAIN
EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
>
> Dave,
>
> There must be a reason why are you using the hipersocket IP address and
> not just the default TCPIP stack IP address and perhaps this is where your
> problem lies. Could this just be a simple TCPIP routing i
completely upon your
network design and where packets might route during interface outages.
Regards,
Alan.
-Original Message-
From: Gibney, Dave [mailto:gib...@wsu.edu]
Sent: 01 November 2017 10:51 pm
Subject: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
I think I've done an equivalent set o
, Dave
Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 4:45 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
All ove the internal Hipersocket inside the CEC network.
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On
e: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
>
> Is the new IP path traversing any Firewalls???
>
> If so, Port 175 will need to be opened between the end points!
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSE
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
Using EJES,
LINES -- DELENN Line Status
---
Row 1 of
Cmd Device Status Node Work-Selection Line-Limit Page-Limit JobName
frame Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Gibney, Dave
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 1:38 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
>
> Us
TCP
> -Original Message-
> From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Cieri, Anthony
> Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2017 1:15 PM
> To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> Subject: Re: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to
17 3:51 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Moving from NJE over ESCON CTC to IP
I think I've done an equivalent set of JESPARMS, but I get this
$HASP568 NODE=AISDEVL - AUTOMATIC CONNECT (SOCKET=AISDEVL)
IAZ0543I NETSRV4 TCP/IP connection with IP Addr: 192.168
I think I've done an equivalent set of JESPARMS, but I get this
$HASP568 NODE=AISDEVL - AUTOMATIC CONNECT (SOCKET=AISDEVL)
IAZ0543I NETSRV4 TCP/IP connection with IP Addr: 192.168.1.3
Port: 175 Initiated
IAZ0543I NETSRV4 TCP/IP connection with IP Addr: 192.168.1.3
Po
Doubtful regarding your high availability question. True, you are no longer
bound to an ESCON pair of type CTC/CNC. FICON has superior features, but if I
understand your configuration correctly, I am not sure how much you are gaining
as your CTCs still appear to be just two channels.
Are you
Dear
We have a processor for SDM system. There are two base sysplexes in this box.
There are two FICON channels defined for CTC in each sysplex.
Before migrating CTC from ESCON to FICON,each sysplex used two ESCON. one ESCON
was defined as SENDER,the other one was defined as receiver.
In
Point to point or switched? Are ESCON and FICON available on the system or is
this preparation for a new system?
Not sure what you mean about changing parameters. I/O configuration or
PARMLIB, VTAMLST, etc.?
Would make sure you fully understand how your CTCs are being used then plan the
Easy to do, however, there is maint required for z/OS 1.11(?) up to 1.13(?) to
support FICON CTC. Check the PSP buckets.
To migrate(after cabling):
Stop one set of pathin/pathout (ESCON). Start the corresponding set of
pathin/pathout (FICON).
Repeat for the second set of escon/ficon pairings
Hi all
We are migrating CTC ESCON channels to CTC FICON channels.
We want to use HCD Option 2.10 to build I/O configurations ,then we
change some parameters to migrate CTC from ESCON to FICON.
Could you share your any experience to do it ?
Thanks a lot!
Best Regards,
Jason Cai
On 04/04/14 14:43, Benjamin Huntsman wrote:
Apologies for the odd question, but anyone know where I could land a 9033 Model
4 ESCON director, plus console, and hopefully manuals and the console software?
Thanks in advance!
-Ben
I get a monthly email from this company. I don't know if
Apologies for the odd question, but anyone know where I could land a 9033 Model
4 ESCON director, plus console, and hopefully manuals and the console software?
Thanks in advance!
-Ben
--
For IBM-MAIN subscribe / signoff
: Jose Munoz
Sent: Friday, March 7, 2014 2:05 AM
To: IBM Mainframe Discussion List
Hi,
I have a CISCO SNA ESCON channel routers on a z890 and I'm migrating to zBC12
(no ESCON) channels and I don't want to keep those CISCO routers. The SNA
traffic on those routers are LU0
W dniu 2014-03-07 11:59, Jose Munoz pisze:
Radoslaw,
To implement your suggested solution OSE, do I need to change something in the
host definitions? What kind of CISCO router/switches can I use?
It depends. Tell us about your configuration, because "SNA" could mean
different things. For examp
Hi all,
I need services with fees to migrate CISCO ESCON SNA to TCP/IP? Who is
interested to offer this service, please contact me offline.
Regards
Jose Munoz
Senior zEnterprise Architect
E: jmunoz6...@gmail.com
> On Mar 7, 2014, at 1:42 PM, Mike Wawiorko wrote:
>
> If the end devic
; W dniu 2014-03-07 08:05, Jose Munoz pisze:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have a CISCO SNA ESCON channel routers on a z890 and I'm migrating to
>> zBC12 (no ESCON) channels and I don't want to keep those CISCO routers. The
>> SNA traffic on those routers are LU0/1/2/3 an
o:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Jose Munoz
Sent: 07 March 2014 07:06
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: SNA CISCO ESCON router Chanel attach replacement
Hi,
I have a CISCO SNA ESCON channel routers on a z890 and I'm migrating to zBC12
(no ESCON) channels and I don't want
W dniu 2014-03-07 08:05, Jose Munoz pisze:
Hi,
I have a CISCO SNA ESCON channel routers on a z890 and I'm migrating to zBC12
(no ESCON) channels and I don't want to keep those CISCO routers. The SNA
traffic on those routers are LU0/1/2/3 and APPC LU6.2.
Which alternative solutions
Hi,
I have a CISCO SNA ESCON channel routers on a z890 and I'm migrating to zBC12
(no ESCON) channels and I don't want to keep those CISCO routers. The SNA
traffic on those routers are LU0/1/2/3 and APPC LU6.2.
Which alternative solutions we have on FICON and/or OSA.
Regards
August,
I haven't worked with PRIZM boxes, but we did have OPTICA ESCON converters at
one time, I assume they work similarly. I'm curious how you are hanging
multiple 3174's off the same chpid. Is there a director in the setup
somewhere? As far as I remember ESCON 3174&
W dniu 2014-02-27 19:35, August Carideo/RYE/US pisze:
I am in the process of setting up the ICC / OSC now, and I bet w/ all involved
here you would not get it done in half a day,
Well, I know datacenters where I would wait more than 1 day for userid
and password (of course after relevant folks
g multiple ? and on what op sys ?
We have VM, VSE, and Z/os LPARS
W dniu 2014-02-27 17:56, August Carideo/RYE/US pisze:
> Please skip all the comments about still using 3174's we are well aware,
> The question is, is anyone using Optica Prizm FICON to ESCON converters that
> have
>
W dniu 2014-02-27 17:56, August Carideo/RYE/US pisze:
Please skip all the comments about still using 3174's we are well aware,
The question is, is anyone using Optica Prizm FICON to ESCON converters that
have
3174's hooked to them ?
Yes. (Not me actually).
Wild guess: did you change
Please skip all the comments about still using 3174's we are well aware,
The question is, is anyone using Optica Prizm FICON to ESCON converters that
have
3174's hooked to them ?
We are having issues since cutting over from our z/196 that was using ESCON
point to point,
To our Z/1
Hello
I just know one supplier (http://www.opticatech.com/products/prizm/) has
these converters available. IBM converters are Optica.
Any other?
--
Carlos Bodra
IBM Certified Specialist System z
Sao Paulo - Brazil
--
F
ow is it looks like? I mean how many ports are available on FICON and
> ESCON side, etc.
>
> --
> Radoslaw Skorupka
> Lodz, Poland
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
> przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytk
Q1. Anybody knows a price of the converter?
Q2. How is it looks like? I mean how many ports are available on FICON
and ESCON side, etc.
--
Radoslaw Skorupka
Lodz, Poland
--
Treść tej wiadomości może zawierać informacje prawnie chronione Banku
przeznaczone wyłącznie do użytku służbowego
DNS squatting and recycling
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 20:10:19 -0400, Tony Harminc wrote:
>
>SSA was an industry standard for a few milliseconds in 1997. It's
>sad/amusing to scan the Wayback Machine for the quondam SSA Industry
>Association site www.ssaia.org . From 1997 to early 1998, it's there,
>alo
t...@harminc.net (Tony Harminc) writes:
> One would think that Fortune 500 companies would protect their old
> sites, but no one seems to have noticed or cared about this one.
re:
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012k.html#68 ESCON
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/2012k.html#69 ESCON
how 'b
On 13 August 2012 09:31, Anne & Lynn Wheeler wrote:
> In that time-frame, IBM had developed its own serial-copper for disk
> operation (internal name harrier out of hursley) and announced as
> 9333. It ran 80mbits/sec ... full-duplex (aka concurrent 80mbit/sec in
> both direction) using "packetiz
r.skoru...@bremultibank.com.pl (R.S.) writes:
> So, 12 years old FICON is simply obsolete and we should expect
> something new? And don't tell me about FICON enhancements, ESCON was
> enhanced as well!
> So? Shall we expect wi-fi based channels?
FICON is features on top of F
W dniu 2012-08-13 14:49, Timothy Sipples pisze:
[...]
Perhaps contrary to our perceptions, ESCON did not enjoy I/O superiority
for very long. Less than 8 years later IBM introduced FICON with its
System/390 Generation 5 models announced on May 7, 1998. But every machine
up to and including the
Here's the link to Optica's FICON to ESCON solution:
http://www.opticatech.com/products/prizm/
The general advice is to shift as much as you can to either FICON or
network connectivity, then supplement that strategy as/if needed with
Optica's Prizm. (Optica also supports chaini
thanks for your reply I was aware of all of solutions suggested, and this
is why I cross posted to Z/os (typical responses from larger shops ), Z/vm
and Z/vse
which we happen to run all on the same box, the smaller shops which IBM
doesn't seen to care about all still needed ESCON, and al
chrisma...@belgacom.net (Chris Mason) writes:
> In fact, for a reason having everything to do with "marketing" and
> nothing whatsoever technical, VTAM does *not* implement LEN protocols
> over the "type 2.1 CTC", only APPN protocols.
aka ... at the time APPN was to be announced ... the communicat
e also
"cross-domain". If you want to know more, just examine all available operands
of the VTAM CDRSC (cross-domain resource) statement.[1]
So, assuming my interpretation is correct, ESCON can be used in order to
implement the "type 5 CTC" but FICON cannot.
I checked
VTAM CDRSC (cross-domain resource) statement.[1]
So, assuming my interpretation is correct, ESCON can be used in order to
implement the "type 5 CTC" but FICON cannot.
I checked that FICON can be used to implement the "type 2.1 CTC" - let's
acknowledge the artificial rest
W dniu 2012-08-10 19:46, August Carideo pisze:
> IBM is not going to support ESCON on its newest box, only FICON
> I find this ludicrous, and just was wondering how many on the list would
> still
> require ESCON like we do for older devices we still use like 3174's, 3490E
> (
We are more likely to eliminate the z than upgrade it. But, we do use some
ESCON. We use them for: CTC; to implement VTAM cross domain and XCF
communications for *basic* sysplex; 3490 external tape drive, for external use
(very rare); Visara/local 3270 controller for z/OS consoles.
--
John
IBM is not going to support ESCON on its newest box, only FICON
I find this ludicrous, and just was wondering how many on the list would
still
require ESCON like we do for older devices we still use like 3174's, 3490E
( for recall ), 3590's and XCF ,
I know we can convert the 3174
45 matches
Mail list logo
