I have copied the source code for Jol up to the www.Oscar-Jol.com
website. IBM examined and approved the code many years ago.
Jol effectively replaces the JCL interpretor and quite a lot of the
initiator when using Dynamic Allocation instead of JCL. It is part
compiler with PL/I style syntax,
I was thinking about my last post
First off let me say a little bit about background
I have had some experience with vendors but it’s very light
Doing this type of programming was my passions unfortunately for me I got into
it after 2000 when IT destabilized
I am fortunate to have a landed a mo
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 04:25:18 +, Chris Hoelscher wrote:
>
>In Java you have other issues, every programming lanuaages has pluses and
>minuses..
>
>Indeed they do - without them, adding and subtracting would become quite
>difficult
>
What about COBOL ADD ... GIVING ...
... and LISP?
Or
In Java you have other issues, every programming languages has pluses and
minuses..
Indeed they do - without them, adding and subtracting would become quite
difficult
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which
it is addressed
and may contain CONFIDEN
profitable
> to offer certification courses in Windows.
> > :>
> > :>Peter
> > :>
> > :>-----Original Message-
> > :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU]
> On Behalf Of Steve Smith
> > :>Sent: Monday, N
; :>
> :>Peter
> :>
> :>-Original Message-----
> :>From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
> Behalf Of Steve Smith
> :>Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:33 PM
> :>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
> :>Subject: Re: Why ar
List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Seymour J Metz
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2018 5:04 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not available?
[was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
While I
onday, November 12, 2018 5:11 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@listserv.ua.edu
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not available?
[was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
And that was my whole point -- Where are the examples for programmers to see
how to do i
While I really wish IBM really would have some better examples than what is in
SAMPLIB and SHASSRCE, you really can learn most of what you will need from
manuals and the rest of it is (unfortunately for me) trial and error. When you
are developing Systems programming code, if you son'e have an
ion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tony Thigpen
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 8:28 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not available?
[was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
Speaking as a
Speaking as a vendor.
There are several interfaces that I had to invest a *lot* of time to get
working right. And using those interfaces is what makes my products
efficient and market worthy.
If I were to publish some of my interface code, some new guy would have
75% of a product that can co
LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not
available? [was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access
spaces]
Then the not-yet-available examples ought to include all the error recovery
infrastructure needed to assure the least system impact possible.
.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 5:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not
available? [was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access
spaces]
There are a large number of parts to make sur
sion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 5:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not
available? [was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access
spaces]
There are a
Just my $.02...
Back when I was learning to program I was told the best way to learn to
program well was to read well-written code.
Lou
--
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity
- Unknown
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 4:21 PM Paul Gilmartin <
000433f07816-dmarc-requ...@listse
lf
Of Binyamin Dissen
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 5:54 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not available?
[was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
There are a large number of parts to make sure that things a
st [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On
Behalf Of Steve Smith
:>Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:33 PM
:>To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
:>Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not
available? [was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
:>
:>
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 22:11:15 +, Farley, Peter x23353 wrote:
>
>Of course, all that isaancient history now. No university or education center
>offers anything like that anymore. Much more profitable to offer
>certification courses in Windows.
>
Marist? But still, a limited choice.
-- gil
13:30 +, Farley, Peter X23353
> (peter.far...@broadridge.com) wrote about "Why are sophisticated
> system-level coding examples not available? [was: RE: Recommended
> method for accessing secondary access spaces]" (in
> ):
>
> > Not jumping on Ed Jaffe or Peter Rels
I was in several of the OCO sessions at SHARE. They were heated but in summary
there were two major points. Intellectual property(the clones were trying to
reverse engineer MVS), change control-Hursley was saying the large majority of
their problems were coming from modified IBM code. Our post S
amentals.
sas
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 1:56 PM David W Noon <
013a910fd252-dmarc-requ...@listserv.ua.edu> wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:13:30 +, Farley, Peter X23353
> (peter.far...@broadridge.com) wrote about "Why are sophisticated
> system-level coding examples
houldn't be trying to use these techniques.
Peter
-Original Message-
From: IBM Mainframe Discussion List [mailto:IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU] On Behalf
Of Paul Gilmartin
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2018 3:19 PM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Re: Why are sophisticated system-level
On 11/12/2018 10:56 AM, David W Noon wrote:
I think most of the low-level techniques were derived from code seen on
the IBM-supplied microfiche (remember that?) that arrived with MVS
installation media. It would benefit the mainframe industry if
microfiche (or a more modern medium) were reinstat
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 10:52:02 -0800, Charles Mills wrote:
>+1
>I would say that sometimes right after a feature comes out there is a
>presentation at SHARE, e.g., "How to use the new PC-ss facility." That is not
>optimal if your first need to use PC-ss comes five or ten years after it first
>is
On Mon, 12 Nov 2018 18:13:30 +, Farley, Peter X23353
(peter.far...@broadridge.com) wrote about "Why are sophisticated
system-level coding examples not available? [was: RE: Recommended method
for accessing secondary access spaces]" (in
):
> Not jumping on Ed Jaffe or Peter Relson
November 12, 2018 10:14 AM
To: IBM-MAIN@LISTSERV.UA.EDU
Subject: Why are sophisticated system-level coding examples not available?
[was: RE: Recommended method for accessing secondary access spaces]
Not jumping on Ed Jaffe or Peter Relson or any of the other thoughtful and
helpful responders in t
Not jumping on Ed Jaffe or Peter Relson or any of the other thoughtful and
helpful responders in this email chain, but it still rankles me that there are
no good examples anywhere (not at IBM and not at CBT) for programmers to review
that show exactly how to set up and use "SRB to the other addr
27 matches
Mail list logo
