You will indeed a second subnet for this guest lan. And, unless you use
ProxyArp, event the CTC to your router TCPIP woild be a -small- subnet on
its own.
If you have only one TPF guest in this VM, it would indeed be easier to have
a second CTC: one couple of CTC devices to TCP/IP VM, another
Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote (in part) :-
One exception: the CP FOR command. If you want to issue a CP command as
though you were another virtual machine sync, CP FOR will do it for you.
I.e. it can replace CP SEND CP.
The CP FOR command is great and is certainly has some
Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com wrote:-
You could use Rexx's IUCV support.
Advantage (one reason why I started using it instead of SMSG/MSG): it
can transfer large amounts of data.
It is not too complicated.
You can also use the CMS Multitasking queues. Brian Wade's web page has
Thanks Kris.
I can't be sure that the other side can support ProxyApp. Is it possible to
use the existing CTC pair or do I need a second in either case?
i
-- Original Message --
Received:
From: Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Virtual QDIO
I'd say you'd need a second pair. Maybe Alan will contradict me: TCP/IP in
VM might be able to forward the ProxyArp from TPF over its own -probably
ProxyArped- CTC to the outside world.
2008/12/12 Ian S. Worthington ianworthing...@usa.net
Thanks Kris.
I can't be sure that the other side can
Yup, that's what I am using.
Regards,
Mike
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: December 11, 2008 5:33 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: TRANS13 , IND$FILE and CA-TPX
On Thursday, 12/11/2008
I should have added that this is how it works in z/VM 5.2.0 and newer
releases. z/VM 5.1.0 and older still use the old FRMTE based locking
scheme, and there's no host logical / host real differentiation, so there
's
only one check, FRMCPLOK.
- Bill Holder, z/VM Development, IBM
On Fri, 12 Dec
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 09:04 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
D4B3290
Yup, that's what I am using.
That's the best logmode there is. But it assumes that the VTAM app
(CA-TPX) is actually going to obey it. I don't think you're going to
resolve this until the question
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 1:56 PM, Ian S. Worthington
ianworthing...@usa.net wrote:
Thanks Kris.
I can't be sure that the other side can support ProxyApp. Is it possible to
use the existing CTC pair or do I need a second in either case?
Proxyarp is what the router stack does. When someone ask
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 10:13 EST, Horlick, Michael
michael.horl...@cgi.com wrote:
Actually , it has nothing to do with TPX.
For one virtual terminal (4D0) I changed the Logappl to VM:
Try D4A3290 (it is an SNA logmode, D4B is non-SNA).
It still doesn't work for the client. I am thinking
thanks - I'll let you know when I get this cookin'
David
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Bill Holder
Sent: Fri 12/12/2008 9:39 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] query of CP locked guest pages
I should have added that this is
I am writing an exec that reads a file pulls certain lines out and write
this data to an output file. Simple.
I am trying to use the CHARIN() and CHAROUT and I am failing miserably.
Right now I queue the commands:
parse arg where
On Fri, 12 Dec 2008 12:28:22 -0600 Wilson, Roger said:
I am writing an exec that reads a file pulls certain lines out and write
this data to an output file. Simple.
snip...
Roger,
Take advantage of PIPE command to do all the work for you. Something
like this should get you started:
'pipe
D4A3290, no go, gives me:
13:54:44 VTAM: IST663I BIND FAIL REQUEST RECEIVED, SENSE=0821
13:54:44 VTAM: IST664I REAL OLU=SYSCOR.TC4D0REAL
DLU=SYSCOR.VMD
13:54:44 VTAM: IST889I SID = CC4F9B4CA20797EF
13:54:44 VTAM: IST890I AUTOLOGON SESSION SETUP FAILED
13:54:44
Try 'pipe stem mondata. | find CICS | specs 1-16 1 | SUMUSE LOG A'
Peter (Listening to a very fine recording of Messiah)
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Wilson, Roger
Sent: December 12, 2008 14:22
To:
Chip Davis wrote:
I suspect most folks are unaware of this issue. It really should be
added to
the listserver netiquette guide along with trim your quotes, avoid
long
siglines, and never annoy Chuckie (I'm sure that one's in there; if
not it
should be added too. :-)
DO NOT HIJACK A THREAD
I want to put rundate as a line, the value of Interval log a as the
next line then the values from 'PIPE VMC ' where ' USER | all /CICS/ !
/DOSVSE/ ! /COMP/' into one file, how would I do that?
This is what I have:
rundate = date(weekday)
say rundate
How about this:
rundate = date(weekday)
say rundate
parse arg where
if where = '' then where = 'PERFSVM '
'PIPE (endchar $) VMC '
Hello Everyone,
All PTFs that pertain to enablement of the z/VM 540 SSL server are now
available and can be ordered. The complete list is available at this URL
:
http://www.vm.ibm.com/related/tcpip/tcsslsvc.html
Regards, Mark Cibula (z/VM TCP/IP Support)
Grab the INTERVAL in one segment of the pipe and whatever doesn't match g
o
to a second segment to grab the machine names.
(not tested so there may be some typos)
rundate = date(weekday)
say rundate
Et voila (I define the ?-char as end character, then one can code a
multistream pipe:
parse arg where
if where = '' then where = 'PERFSVM '
'PIPE (end ?) VMC ' where ' USER ',
'|O: Fanout', /* Make a second copy of the data */
'| Locate /Interval/' ,
'| specs 35-65 1',
Mark, does that mean the SPE 2 tape is available, or just these individual
PTFs?
On 12/12/08 4:46 PM, Mark Cibula cibul...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Hello Everyone,
All PTFs that pertain to enablement of the z/VM 540 SSL server are now
available and can be ordered. The complete list is available
David,
I just checked on IBMLink and the APAR VM64471 (for z/VM 5.4.0) is still in
certification. It looks like Mark's info is only for the SSL server.
Too bad!!!
HITACHI
DATA SYSTEMS
Raymond E. Noal
Senior Technical Engineer
Office: (408) 970 - 7978
-Original Message-
From: The
Hi
My spool is getting a little to big and I want to clean it up. What is
the easiest way to accomplish this? Is there a command to clear files
from the spool?.
Asked as a 'new-be' but getting there!!
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS z/VM
Hi, Terry.
Take a look at the SFPUGER utility; it should do exactly what you want. It's documented in
Chapter 3 of the CMS Commands and Utilities book.
You can either run SFPURGER manually whenever you think the spool area needs to be
cleaned, or you can set it up to run at set times (once
From a CLASS D userid (not usually a good thing for MAINT, but you can
from MAINT usually enter: SET PRIV MAINT +D, and then when done CP STE
PRIV MAINT -D), enter:
PIPE CP Q RDR ALL ISO | ALLSPOOL FILES A
PIPE CP Q PRT ALL ISO | ALLSPOOL FILES A
PIPE CP Q PUN ALL ISO | ALLSPOOL FILES A
Also watch out for console spool files for servers that never shutdown.
For example:
q prt all
EREP 0012 T CON 0235 001 NONE OPEN- 001F
THDBUSCH 0010 Z CON 00325277 001 NONE OPEN- 0009
THDBUSCH has 325K console lines. As that is an open spool file, it can't be
purged.
I have a situation where I need to extract a single record from each of
several files based on the first word of the record. A construct like
this
Pipe ... | getfiles | pick w1 == /value/ | ...
Does the job. However I know there is no more than one matching record,
there may be none,
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 12:32 AM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
Is there any prettier or better way of doing it? Perhaps some way to avoid
the Rexx filter?
I don't see an option without the callpipe. But if you don't want a
separate REXX stage there, you can generate the pipeline...
You can avoid the rexx stage by using SPECS to construct your callpipe,
feeding the resulting record to pipcmd:
PIPE
.
. no getfiles
.
|Spec /Callpipe / n w1.3 nw /||pick w1 ==,'value',||take 1||*:/ n,
|Pipcmd,
...
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:14 AM, Mike Harding mike.b.hard...@kp.org wrote:
You can avoid the rexx stage by using SPECS to construct your callpipe,
feeding the resulting record to pipcmd:
Correct! *pipcmd* Somehow I was thinking pipcmd but type runpipe.
:-( its bed time
Hello Mike,
Please go back to your original failing setup, but see if there is
setting within the emulator to control the packet size of the transfer.
Adjust the packet to 576 (allowed by all TCP/Ip systems).
Let me know what happens
Ed Martin
Aultman Health Foundation
330-588-4723
ext 40441
On Friday, 12/12/2008 at 08:37 EST, Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
wrote:
I'd say you'd need a second pair. Maybe Alan will contradict me: TCP/IP
in VM
might be able to forward the ProxyArp from TPF over its own -probably
ProxyArped- CTC to the outside world.
When ProxyARP is
33 matches
Mail list logo