Why not always imbed the MOUNT in a PIPE? I've got lots of code like this
'PIPE COMMAND CMDCALL someSFScmd',
'|VAR EMSG |DROP', /* take emsg/remove header */
'|...analyze the response
if rc<>0 then do
inform enduser 'Command xyz failed:' emsg
.
The CMDCALL is ty
Hello Friends,
I bekome just up to now mails from
IBMVM and IBMTCP-L
because of a change in our mailing system I have to
unsubscribe these two letters.
I hope You can help me with my problem, otherwise I beg You for
an address or You can reroute my mail to this address.
Thanks a lot.
Regard
You may leave the list at any time by sending a "SIGNOFF VMESA-L" command
to lists...@listserv.uark.edu.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Matthias Erlacher
Sent: Tue 3/31/2009 6:20 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Unsubscribe
Hello Frien
We have z/os running on an lpar and z/vm running on an IFL. I just used z/os
as my ftp server to install second level.
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of O'Brien, Dennis L
Sent: Mon 3/30/2009 7:51 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: VM 5.4
Too bad.
Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885
'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any attachments are for the sole
use of the intended recipient(s) and may
Apologies. My previous email/post was not an intended reply to this
thread.
Steve Mitchell
Sr Systems Software Specialist
Blue Cross Blue Shield of Kansas
(785) 291-8885
'There are no degrees of Honesty-you're either Honest or you're not!
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This email message and any att
Or do what I do: I install in a second level guest, but I follow the 1st
level DDR instructions.
Brian Nielsen
On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:51:33 -0700, O'Brien, Dennis L
wrote:
>Steve,
>You can do a first-level install if you're willing to shut your VM
>system down, or you have an extra LPAR to r
I attempted to apply 901 service before 901 RSU which of course resulted in a
failure. I want to start over with the 901 RSU, but there is a RESTART RECORD
preventing me from starting over. Can I just delete that record or is there
some other clean up I must do first? Thanks in advance.
S
On: Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 12:20:14PM +0200,Matthias Erlacher Wrote:
} Hello Friends,
}
} I bekome just up to now mails from
}
} IBMVM and IBMTCP-L
}
} because of a change in our mailing system I have to
}
} unsubscribe these two letters.
Matthias, you don't want to unsubscribe. You want to ch
Usually the parts in a single Diag x250 request are reordered and kept in
as few channel programs as possible. However, if alias devices are
attached to the system, these channel programs will be issued to the first
available base or alias device (for minidisk I/O).
Steve Wilkins
z/VM I/O Strat
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 5:18 PM, Steve Wilkins wrote:
> Usually the parts in a single Diag x250 request are reordered and kept in as
> few channel programs as possible. However, if alias devices are attached to
> the system, these channel programs will be issued to the first available
> base or a
I have installed VM 5.4 and I am performing the migrate option. I am receiving
the message below and I really don't have a clue as to what to do with it. The
manual is vague about it. Can someone point me in the right direction?
CK:VMFMGR2308I Part CHKIPADR SAMPEXEC which was customized by being
Kris,
I did say, "... or is it necessary to use a PIPE..." I have that type of
code in several places, too. Presumably, the incidence of errors will be
very low, and they are the only reason for imbedding the command in a
PIPE; a return code of 0 is a success. The overhead of using a Pipe so
that
On Tuesday, 03/31/2009 at 01:41 EDT, "MacIntyre, Cory"
wrote:
> I have installed VM 5.4 and I am performing the migrate option. I am
receiving
> the message below and I really don't have a clue as to what to do with
it. The
> manual is vague about it. Can someone point me in the right directi
Thanks, now that makes a heck of a lot more sense.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:03 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Install vm 5.4
On Tuesday, 03/31/2009 at 01:
I have forwarded the message documentation concern to the proper person in
z/VM Information Development. However, as Alan mentioned, opening a PMR or
submitting a reader's comment will drive the message home (no pun
intended!).
Michael J. Forte
z/OS Storage ID and POK Softcopy Support
Software
I'll do the PMR after I finish this install just in case I run into other
confusing junk.
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Michael Forte
Sent: Tuesday, March 31, 2009 1:16 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject:
Sounds good. Good luck!!
Michael J. Forte
z/OS Storage ID and POK Softcopy Support
Software Engineer, System z Information Solutions 58HA
IBM Poughkeepsie, New York
mjfo...@us.ibm.com
Office: 845-435-9062, T/L: 295-9062
Fax: 845-432-9405
Building 052-1, B09
2455 South Road, Poughkeepsie, NY 1260
Hi Everyone,
First, let me preface the question by saying I'm mostly a z/OS weenie.
Last time I installed VM it came on 2400' reels. Our campus Department of
Fine Arts got a grant for a Z10 EC and Red Hat. (an interesting story for
later). Their support folks are more into Dell than anythin
Bruce,
Never having to install z/VM from the DVD I can't really comment on what is and
what is not considered supported devices for the installation process. You may
want to verify the FCP and/or FBASCSI device types are supported devices by the
installation process. EDEVICES are constructs ava
GUILDFTPD is a free Windows FTP server...
Ward, Mike S wrote:
It’s not free, you just get a 30 day trial.
*From:* The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
*On Behalf Of *Huegel, Thomas
*Sent:* Monday, March 30, 2009 3:18 PM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re:
I plan to install z/VM5.4. We has 3390 model 3; mod 9 and mod 27. And we
use Z10.
My question is which one is better for VM CP module and paging space?
VM5.4 CP palnning and Administration said "3390 model 9 is not recommended
for CP system areas and does not support track"---on "Allocating Dasd
The DS6000 is supported for a z/VM install to SCSI. Here are some
comments / questions from one of our install folks.
"What level of VM he is trying to install? Is it first level or second
level? The first thing that pops into my head is that if he (Bruce) is
trying to install on SCSI devices
If you have to pick a model - I would go with the 3390-3.. best for paging,
etc.
My current customer is using mod9's with PAV -- no issues, although I think
their paging performance would be better with mod3's for paging volumes.
3390-27 I would reserve for guests (such as Linux) which can use t
Hi Steve,
You're right, z/VM is 540 level. the DVD shipped in December. The Z10 and
DS6000 are totally new from the factory, no other disk or hardware either.
Actually my Boss has been struggling with the IODF since late December and I
just got to touch the box myself for the first time las
On Tuesday, 03/31/2009 at 11:27 EDT, "Heckler, Bruce"
wrote:
> Apparently when you define a string in IODF it builds a string as type
FCP.
> Then it builds another string type FBASCSI which has the LUN, ..., and
> references back to the same offset FCP address. The burning question is
when
In any case, so not only paging: the model you'd use depends on the IO
rate. If you need lots of space with low IO rates: bigger models don't
penalize you. PAV will lower the observed IO rate.
CP's paging routines don't exploit PAV. So, if you'd have lots of stuff
slowly paged out and in, a mo
27 matches
Mail list logo
