Found this little link in my weekly announcement summary :
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10576_5350_121006_email_DYN_1IN/fremt106679968
Basically, it's z/VM 6.1.. Don't know if anyone had said anything about
it previously..
Anyway.. the most striking feature I see in this literature is
Alan,
That was my mistake, I had brought up an old 2.3 system to pull
information from and inadvertently used it's TCP/IP stack (that wasn't
up). (I'm on z/VM 5.4.)
Okay, I've changed NSINTERADDR to point to our internal DNS (actually
DC's).
; NSINTERADDR 127.0.0.1
NSINTERADDR 10.1.2.50
On Tuesday, 07/07/2009 at 08:54 EDT, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek...@ailife.com wrote:
Okay, I've changed NSINTERADDR to point to our internal DNS (actually
DC's).
; NSINTERADDR 127.0.0.1
NSINTERADDR 10.1.2.50
NSINTERADDR 10.1.2.4
I still can't get it to resolve host names. The ping,
Also, Did you catch this part of the announcement
IBM Europe, Middle East, and Africa Marketing Announcement ZA09-0015
So sorry everyone else, we have to wait this time around, no 6.1 for us yet :)
William 'Doug' Carroll
Mainframe Systems Eng Sr I
Global Technology Infrastructure
ECS Core
Ivan Warren wrote:
Found this little link in my weekly announcement summary :
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10576_5350_121006_email_DYN_1IN/fremt106679968
Basically, it's z/VM 6.1.. Don't know if anyone had said anything
about it previously..
Anyway.. the most striking feature I see
On Tuesday, 07/07/2009 at 02:25 EDT, Ivan Warren i...@vmfacility.fr
wrote:
Found this little link in my weekly announcement summary :
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10576_5350_121006_email_DYN_1IN/fremt106679968
Basically, it's z/VM 6.1.. Don't know if anyone had said anything about
Those are Statements of Direction, not in 6.1.
But good stuff!!! Hurry up and bring on 6.2! (if that is what they are in!).
Marcy
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you
are not the addressee or authorized to receive this for the addressee, you must
not
:
:
DMSZETRR: Number of Question RRs: 1
DMSZETRR: Question 1:
DMSZETRR: IBM.COM
DMSZETRR: Type (0X001C) T_ Class (0X0001) C_IN
DMSZETRR:
I hope that Linux is the first, not the only, guest O/S that can be supported
by Guest Relocation.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
* *z/VM Live Guest Relocation*
IBM intends to further strengthen single system image support by
providing live guest relocation. This is planned
Now it's looking like it's a routing/firewall problem. I can resolve
and ping the intranet.
Thanks for your help!
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
Systems Programmer MCP, MCP+I, MCSE RHCE
American Income Life Insurance Co. Phone: (254)761-6649
1200 Wooded Acres Dr.
I interpret the following to say that V6.1 will only run on a z10.
Correct/Incorrect?
This release implements a new Architecture Level Set (ALS) available
only on the IBM System z10 Enterprise Class server and System z10
Business Class server and future generations of System z(r) servers.
It was probably going to be OFFICIALLY announced at SHARE in August ?
Now you have gone and spoiled the surprise !
Bill Munson
Sr. z/VM Systems Programmer
Brown Brothers Harriman CO.
525 Washington Blvd.
Jersey City, NJ 07310
201-418-7588
President MVMUA
http://www2.marist.edu/~mvmua/
Correct.
Hodge, Robert L wrote:
I interpret the following to say that V6.1 will only run on a z10.
Correct/Incorrect?
This release implements a new Architecture Level Set (ALS) available
only on the IBM System z10 Enterprise Class server and System z10
Business Class server and future
See Alan's response.
True. We wanted to exploit instructions that are available only on the
z10.
On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 10:38 AM, Hodge, Robert L robert.l.ho...@lmco.comwrote:
I interpret the following to say that V6.1 will only run on a z10.
Correct/Incorrect?
This release implements a
Is this GDPS/VM???
Alan Altmark wrote:
On Tuesday, 07/07/2009 at 02:25 EDT, Ivan Warren i...@vmfacility.fr
wrote:
Found this little link in my weekly announcement summary :
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10576_5350_121006_email_DYN_1IN/fremt106679968
Russel,
Have you been successful with the install over an OSA defined on a layer
2 network?
We are running z/VM 5.4 with the latest PTF’s and SUSE 10 SP2 trying to
perform the install using the IBM scripts.
It is failing every time during the re-boot phase of the install.
If you are asking
I get the US IBM Announcements and this was in it today.
http://www.ibm.com/vrm/newsletter_10577_5037_121009_email_DYN_1IN/gvuhb33457147
Jim
William D Carroll wrote:
Also, Did you catch this part of the announcement=0D=0AIBM Europe, Middle=
East, and Africa Marketing Announcement
Nope, but you can buy that today if you really wanted to.
It's called GDPS/PPRC Multiplatform Resiliency for System z (Cross Platform
Disaster Recovery)
http://ew.share.org/client_files/callpapers/attach/SHARE_in_Orlando/S5247NL094447.pdf
(GDPS/VM would be a much easier to understand/remember
On Tuesday, 07/07/2009 at 12:27 EDT, Mr. Woofer mrwoo...@swbell.net
wrote:
Is this GDPS/VM???
Not really, no. GDPS is a collection of Services offerings that create an
automated recovery HA/DR environment for System z (site failover, I/O
failover, ...) with special focus on z/OS. GDPS
Or later .. is it time for z11 yet??
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rich Smrcina
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 10:32 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 - IBM Preview Letter..
Correct.
Hodge, Robert L
It is a sad day for the VM community. One of our Knights, Rick Bourgeois, has
passed away. Rick supplied niche products, VPARS and VTAPE, that enabled the
large scale development and testing of applications for the TPF environment.
His creations were absolutely essential to that environment.
z11? And you call yourself a __SYSPROG__!!?
Wouldn't the next model be a zA? ;-)
Oh, that's right... there are probably rooms full of IBM marketeers who
don't speak geek yet pick the next model names. Nevermind.
For that matter, z/VM Version 6.1? What happened to Version 6.0? Doesn't
Well we have been trying to set this up under z/VM 5.4 with suse10 sp 2
on a layer 2 switch with no luck. So I guess we should hold off until
6.1 is available :-)
Anyone having any luck with the ability to move Linux guests from one
z/VM to another while retaining it's IP and MAC address?
We
On 7/7/2009 at 3:31 PM, russell.gendr...@custserv.com wrote:
Well we have been trying to set this up under z/VM 5.4 with suse10 sp 2
on a layer 2 switch with no luck. So I guess we should hold off until
6.1 is available :-)
I doubt this has anything to do with the version of z/VM you're
Sounds like a re-birth of VM/CMS Unlimited's Single System Image product from
VM/SP 5 and HPO 5 days. I am guessing that Romney W. may have something to do
with this :)
Mike
Brocade Communications
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu]
Wouldn't it be zB ? :)
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Mike Walter
Sent: Tuesday, July 07, 2009 2:36 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 - IBM Preview Letter..
z11? And you call yourself a
Already have, just hoping someone may have this working; or are we
trying to do something that really has not been done or proven in a
production business environment.
I will say I believe the issue is more then likely with the linux guest
install script or something related to the install of the
In the days of O/S 360, the even numbered releases were the bad ones. Was it
perhaps because of the team alignments? We went from O/S MFT R15 to R17 and
then to R21 and had very little trouble with any of them. On the other hand,
the people I knew who installed R16 and R20 had all sorts of
Mike,
zA would come after z9, not z10.
Dennis
A good plan, violently executed now, is better than a perfect plan next
week.. -- General George S. Patton
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
On Tuesday, 07/07/2009 at 03:33 EDT, russell.gendr...@custserv.com wrote:
Well we have been trying to set this up under z/VM 5.4 with suse10 sp 2
on a layer 2 switch with no luck. So I guess we should hold off until
6.1 is available :-)
Anyone having any luck with the ability to move Linux
Richard Schuh wrote:
It is a sad day for the VM community. One of our Knights, Rick Bourgeois, has
passed away. Rick supplied niche products, VPARS and VTAPE, that enabled the
large scale development and testing of applications for the TPF environment.
His creations were absolutely essential to
On 7/7/2009 at 4:12 PM, russell.gendr...@custserv.com wrote:
Already have, just hoping someone may have this working; or are we
trying to do something that really has not been done or proven in a
production business environment.
I've done it a number of times on my z/VM guest, and never saw
My condolences to his family and friends..
Schuh, Richard wrote:
It is a sad day for the VM community. One of our Knights, Rick
Bourgeois, has passed away. Rick supplied niche products, VPARS and
VTAPE, that enabled the large scale development and testing of
applications for the TPF
Hi Mike,
No luck yet. We are watching the install run now and we can see the MAC
address that was assigned along with it's IP address when we display the
vswitch with details. We changed the porttype from trunk to access and
defined the NIC. We should find out shortly if the install is
Dennis,
You win the kewpie doll! I was wondering how long it would be before a
REAL SYSPROG would notice that.
Of course... I planted it that way to see who was paying attention. That's
my story and I'm sticking to it! ;-) blush
After a z10, it would always be a z11 if IBM suddenly
Mike Walter wrote:
After a z10, it would always be a z11 if IBM suddenly switched over to
binary, right? Then a z100, etc...
Let's try to make sense of the marketroids branding system..
1st, let's look at the facts : In chronological order, and excluding the
'BC' class systems (z800,
After a z10, it would always be a z11 if IBM suddenly switched over to
binary, right? Then a z100, etc...
Well, actually, assuming any reasonably rational base, 11 would always follow
10. The question gets interesting when you reach n symbols in a single position
(assuming zero as minimum).
I will be out of the office starting 07/07/2009 and will not return until
07/11/2009.
I will respond to your message when I return.
38 matches
Mail list logo
