Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Adam Thornton > Sent: 29 July 2009 02:26 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9 > > On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:32 PM, John McKown wrote: > > > On Tue, 28

Re: IBM DS6800 caching

2009-07-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 7:52 PM, Tom Duerbusch wrote: > Can cache be turned off for a volume on the DS6800? > > I don't think so.  But I would like to confirm that. I believe it's up to the device to decide what to do with the cache bits in the channel program. Since it emulates "real disks" usin

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Nick Laflamme
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:03 PM, Graeme Moss wrote: The company I work for is very tight with money (eg they don't pay me what I would like to receive) and the section I work for (Software Factory) only gets hand-me-down mainframes. I can see the situation arising where our clients who are on a

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
>I really looking for the manual to setup linux system on two z/VM. >Could you give me the detail manual ? z/VM CP Planning and Administration     Dennis O'Brien "That's one sma

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jul 28, 2009, at 6:32 PM, John McKown wrote: On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Adam Thornton wrote: On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Edward M Martin wrote: I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version) under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any sense of hu

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread Yoon-suk Cho
On Sat, Jul 25, 2009 at 7:30 AM, O'Brien, Dennis L wrote: > Sunny, > > If you really have two guests up at the same time, using the same DASD, I > can’t believe that one or both of them haven’t crashed. > > > > We have the same guests defined on two z/VM systems.  We use the XLINK > feature of CSE

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread David Boyes
On 7/27/09 1:03 PM, "sunny...@wcb.ab.ca" wrote: > What will happen if one zlinux running on 2 z/VM? > There is a IP conflict and dasd R/W conflict. > So it is the same as running two linux server sharing the same IP and the same > disks? Exactly. > And z/VM has done nothing with

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Les Geer (607-429-3580)
>> We are licensed to run z/VM 5.x on our z9. I do not believe there is a >> restriction that it must be the host system in a lpar thus running lpar >> -> vm -> linux -> hercules -> vm is quite legal. I am trying to asertain >> should I bother going to our procurment people to ask them to talk to I

Re: IBM DS6800 caching

2009-07-28 Thread Edward M Martin
Hello Tom, Never tried, but I do not think you can. I have not found the command or any reference how to adjust the cache. Ed Martin Aultman Health Foundation 330-363-5050 ext 35050 -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Tom

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread John McKown
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Adam Thornton wrote: > On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Edward M Martin wrote: > > > > > I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version) > > under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any > > sense of humor. > > Perfectly fine to run it und

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread John McKown
On Tue, 28 Jul 2009, Edward M Martin wrote: > Hello Everyone, > > I would suggest to you all, IBM LAWYERS are now watch everyone > involved with this Hercules conversation. > > I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version) > under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 7/28/2009 at 6:03 PM, Graeme Moss wrote: > We are licensed to run z/VM 5.x on our z9. I do not believe there is a > restriction that it must be the host system in a lpar thus running lpar -> > vm -> linux -> hercules -> vm is quite legal. I am trying to asertain should > I bother going

Re: Where is z/VM CSE

2009-07-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
Sunny, CSE itself is not a product. It’s part of z/VM. Chapter 10 of CP Planning and Administration describes the requirements and capabilities of CSE. RSCS is required if you’re using DirMaint to maintain a single source directory for the cluster, and you don’t enable cross-system SPOOL. P

Where is z/VM CSE

2009-07-28 Thread sunny . hu
I did reseach. But can't figure out where we can get it. q product on z/Vm. I only see 5VMRSC30 disable. Does CSE have to be purchused ? Thanks! Sunny Hu This message is intended only for the addressee. It may contain privileged or confidential information. Any unauthorized disclosure

Re: SHOW

2009-07-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
Somebody else asked about SHOW and I wanted to make sure I pointed him to the right place. Regards, Richard Schuh > -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of P S > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 3:23 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSE

Re: SFS - Moving File Pool Minidisks to Different Physical Devices

2009-07-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
You can create a storage group 3, move your filespaces to it with FILESERV MOVEUSER, then disable storage group 2 with FILEPOOL DISABLE GROUP 2 EXCLUSIVE DETACH. You can then replace the old storage group 2 minidisks with 1-cylinder minidisks. This isn't completely transparent, because FILESERV i

Re: SHOW

2009-07-28 Thread P S
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:39 AM, Schuh, Richard wrote: > Is the version of SHOW on Fran Hensler's Packages page the current version > or is there a more recent one? That's it. Are you just checking, or do you need something?

Re: SFS - Moving File Pool Minidisks to Different Physical Devices

2009-07-28 Thread Tom Duerbusch
I thought SFS used standard CMS mindisks with a single mode 6 file on them. If so, just create a new minidisk that has at least the same amount of 4k blocks and copy the CMS file to the new minidisk. Then swap the directory entries. Note that this is a physical copy and can't be used for expan

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Dave Wade
> -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On > Behalf Of Rob van der Heij > Sent: 28 July 2009 22:26 > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9 > > On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Mark Post wrote: > On 7

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Graeme Moss
We are licensed to run z/VM 5.x on our z9. I do not believe there is a restriction that it must be the host system in a lpar thus running lpar -> vm -> linux -> hercules -> vm is quite legal. I am trying to asertain should I bother going to our procurment people to ask them to talk to IBM about

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I don't think IBM would see you a new license for z/VM 6.1 on a z9, but if you have an existing z/VM version 5 license with Subscription and Support, you're entitled to version upgrades at no extra charge. Read the fine print in your license agreement. You shouldn't expect support for z/VM 6.1

Re: SFS - Moving File Pool Minidisks to Different Physical Devices

2009-07-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
You would undoubtedly need to regenerate the file pool to change disk types instead of simply formatting the disks. Regards, Richard Schuh From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Sterling James Sent: Tuesday, July 2

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Dave Jones
But I think that's the real problem here, you can not license z/VM 6.1 on a z9 processor, so in effect you would be running unlicensed software (z/VM 6.1) on an unsupported system (z9->Linux->Hercules->z/VM 6.1). And, as Rob has pointed out, performance would in all likelihood be perfectly hor

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Adam Thornton
On Jul 28, 2009, at 4:25 PM, Edward M Martin wrote: I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version) under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any sense of humor. Perfectly fine to run it under Hercules on the processor z/VM is licensed to. Adam

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Edward M Martin
Hello Everyone, I would suggest to you all, IBM LAWYERS are now watch everyone involved with this Hercules conversation. I can say that, 1) it is illegal to run z/VM (pick a version) under Hercules, 2) they do not like it, and 3) they do not have any sense of humor. Hone

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:11 PM, Mark Post wrote: On 7/28/2009 at  5:03 PM, Graeme Moss wrote: > -snip- >> Questions >> 1/ Do you think z/VM 6.1 could be installed under Hercules under Linux on a >> z9 ? > > Most likely it would work. Re-reading the original question, it appears that OP is

SFS - Moving File Pool Minidisks to Different Physical Devices

2009-07-28 Thread Sterling James
Hello, After reading the manual, it looks as if you want to change the storage group 2 + minidisk to different physical devices or (FBA to ECKD), The process is back it up, yank out the old, replace with the new, format it, and then restore. I did not see a less of a slash-and-bum method like a

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread McKown, John
> -Original Message- > From: The IBM z/VM Operating System > [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Graeme Moss > Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 4:04 PM > To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU > Subject: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9 > > The company I work for is very tight with money (eg they

Re: z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Mark Post
>>> On 7/28/2009 at 5:03 PM, Graeme Moss wrote: -snip- > Questions > 1/ Do you think z/VM 6.1 could be installed under Hercules under Linux on a > z9 ? Most likely it would work. > 2/ Do you think IBM would allow it since it is not production? Absolutely not. If someone from IBM finds out,

z/VM 6.1 and Hercules on Z9

2009-07-28 Thread Graeme Moss
The company I work for is very tight with money (eg they don't pay me what I would like to receive) and the section I work for (Software Factory) only gets hand-me-down mainframes. I can see the situation arising where our clients who are on a z10 will want z/VM 6.1 but the Software Factory only

Re: VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM

2009-07-28 Thread Mike Walter
While z/OS is a licensed product (and probably so is OS/390 and MVS/ESA), check the following page for possible legal alternatives: http://www.ibiblio.org/jmaynard/ I'm not an attorney (especially not an IBM attorney), and thus cannot offer legal advice - so note the use of the word "possible".

Re: VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM

2009-07-28 Thread Alan Altmark
On Tuesday, 07/28/2009 at 02:59 EDT, Sergio Lima wrote: > All that We tried to run ZOS17 under Z/VM, was unsucessfuly. > How We said, this is a lab environment for us, that run under Hercules > emulator, and of course, We don't have much support. It's more complicated than that, Sergio. Two p

SHOW

2009-07-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
Is the version of SHOW on Fran Hensler's Packages page the current version or is there a more recent one? Regards, Richard Schuh

Re: VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM

2009-07-28 Thread Mike Walter
Sergio, Telling us that you run this lab environment under Hercules provides significant new information, information that might have been helpful to know (or perhaps not) right from the first request for help. Still, anything you can contribute as general knowledge should always be appreciat

Message DTCSTM025I

2009-07-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
We have been getting the messages 17:16:49 DTCSTM025I Telnet server: Conn 100: SendOutData (StMaster) calls StKillConn in otherwise clause. 17:16:49 DTCSTM028I Cannot send data 17:16:49 DTCSTM126I Telnet server: Conn 100: StKillConn- TcpClose failed: No such connection They appear to be assoc

z Training: IBM System z Expo - Oct. 5-9, 2009 - Orlando

2009-07-28 Thread Pamela Christina enjoying summer in Endicott
Cross-posted to IBM-MAIN, IBMVM, and Linux390 for those who are interested in technical training for System z, z/OS, z/VM, z/VSE, and Linux on System z. The next IBM conference for System z, IBM System z Expo, is open for enrollment and in case you didn't see an e-mail about it, there is an early

Re: VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM

2009-07-28 Thread Sergio Lima
Hello Mr. Mike, All that We tried to run ZOS17 under Z/VM, was unsucessfuly. How We said, this is a lab environment for us, that run under Hercules emulator, and of course, We don't have much support. How, with the ZOS19 version, the system is up normally for us is enough. But, We will continue

Re: VTAM Abend 0C4 under Z/VM

2009-07-28 Thread Sergio Lima
Hello Mr. Mike, All that We tried to run ZOS17 under Z/VM, was unsucessfuly. How We said, this is a lab environment for us, that run under Hercules emulator, and of course, We don't have much support. How, with the ZOS19 version, the system is up normally for us is enough. But, We will con

IBM DS6800 caching

2009-07-28 Thread Tom Duerbusch
Can cache be turned off for a volume on the DS6800? I don't think so. But I would like to confirm that. Tom Duerbusch THD Consulting

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread sunny . hu
Thanks, Robert! I do love to see the code. And I try to understand what is going on between z/VM and linux. Any books? RPN01 Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System 07/28/2009 06:32 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: Is it ba

SFS Command To Query CONTROL Disk Usage

2009-07-28 Thread Michael Coffin
Hi Folks, Does anyone know of an SFS command to query the actual utilization of the CONTROL disk so we can plan to increase the size of it if necessary? QUERY FILEPOOL CATALOG and MINIDISK sure don't show utilization (just TOTAL allocated 512 blocks, not in use/free or the like). -Mike

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread Thomas Kern
I have not yet implemented CSE to protect our linuxes from being started on two different LPARs. I would be interested in getting a copy of your Janus code. Thanks for your assistance. /Tom Kern RPN01 wrote: > The best solution for your problem is to couple the two systems with > CSE, so that th

Re: Is it bad to make one zlinux running on 2 z/vm?

2009-07-28 Thread RPN01
The best solution for your problem is to couple the two systems with CSE, so that they¹ll know what the other is doing. Before we implemented CSE, we created a service we called Janus, which we ran in the profile of each Linux server during the CMS startup. The purpose was to look up which system