Re: RSU installation

2010-01-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com wrote: Carlos,  how can I ftp both files to z/vm 4.4 and define lrecl 1024 and recfm f, since if I do not specify nothing during ftp they are ftped to A mdisk as V and 8192. I do a: ftp bin ... ftp quote site fix 1024

Gavin Appleton is out of the office.

2010-01-28 Thread Gavin Appleton
I will be out of the office starting 28/01/2010 and will not return until 05/02/2010. I will respond to your message when I return.

Re: mdcache

2010-01-28 Thread Phil Tully
suggesting a performance monitor is appropriate, but more appropriate is pointing to the commands or screens of such that should be used in that monitor to determine what was wrong. Also, this is ALMOST a full-pack mdisk, it starts at cyl 1-end,not cyl 0 BTW: I am attempting to do this with

Re: mdcache

2010-01-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Phil Tully tull...@optonline.net wrote: suggesting a performance monitor is appropriate, but more appropriate is pointing to the commands or screens of such that should be used in that monitor to determine what was wrong. My apologies. I was actually holding

Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-28 Thread Graves Nora E
Do you run a User Locking monitor? If so, you can view the report at any time from the Control Center Monitor List function. That will show you the number of User and System blocks allocated and used. I do not see any references to this condition either. Nora Graves nora.e.gra...@irs.gov

Re: mdcache

2010-01-28 Thread PHILIP TULLY
Rob, Sorry if my answer was to strong, ( I answered before my first cup of coffee, which is dangerous territory for me) Phil On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 7:42 AM, Rob van der Heij wrote: On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 1:27 PM, Phil Tully tull...@optonline.net wrote: suggesting a performance monitor is

XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Michael MacIsaac
Hi, I was asked for help with a Linux install problem and it seems that the Linux parameter file, stored in a CMS file, had been folded to upper case. Getting the parameter file with the correct case will probably fix the problem. The default setting seems to be CASE UPPER for most file

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Mark Pace
I don't believe I edit anything without my own Profile Xedit so I know exactly what the settings are. Well except for when I create my Profile Xedit the first time on any VM. On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.comwrote: Hi, I was asked for help with a Linux

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.comwrote: Hi, I was asked for help with a Linux install problem and it seems that the Linux parameter file, stored in a CMS file, had been folded to upper case. Getting the parameter file with the correct case will probably

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Munson
Mike, I have been creating my own XEDIT on any CMS userid I use, for so long, that is almost the first thing I do when I encounter a new System It is annoying when you go to a NEW place and it is not set up properly good luck munson 201-418-7588 Michael MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:08 AM, Bill Munson william.mun...@bbh.comwrote: Mike, I have been creating my own XEDIT on any CMS userid I use, for so long, that is almost the first thing I do when I encounter a new System It is annoying when you go to a NEW place and it is not set up properly

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Michael Donovan
Mike, The XEDIT default settings are described in Appendix A of the z/VM: XEDIT Commands and Macros Reference. The case settings are determined by the filetype of the file. If the filetype is not one in the recognized list, then the case defaults to upper. Thanks! Mike

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Munson
and I agree with just one addition SET PF12 RETRIEVE munson P S zosw...@gmail.com Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 01/28/2010 10:11 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: XEDIT

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Scott Rohling
I think you're thinking of the PROFILE EXEC .. ? Scott On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Bill Munson william.mun...@bbh.com wrote: and I agree with just one addition SET PF12 RETRIEVE munson

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Peter . Webb
We have both a system Profile Xedit and user ones. Both set different defaults for different file types. The original came from IBM on a release of VM in the 80's, and I created my version in 1989. Now I tend to favour LEXX. Peter -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Munson
it can be in both which I do - just to be sure Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 01/28/2010 10:22 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: XEDIT

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Munson
and yes sometimes I wear a belt and suspenders ;-) Bill Munson william.mun...@bbh.com Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU 01/28/2010 10:33 AM Please respond to The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: XEDIT

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 4:07 PM, P S zosw...@gmail.com wrote: It defaults per filetype based on the tables in DMSXTF, which haven't been updated in a coon's age, maybe two coons. Defaulting to CASE MIXED has always seemed to make sense to me, especially if the tables in DMSXTF still applied

Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-28 Thread Bill Pettit
Unfortunately no monitor. Not since CA pulled the rug out from under the DBMonitor product Sterling had. Thank you Nora. Bill -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Graves Nora E Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 6:46 AM To:

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
That is the purpose of the PROFILE XEDIT; to customize it to your own preferences. My best is likely to not be your best. Changing the system wide default of something that has been around for 1 or 2 coon's ages would have the potential for causing many people/programs anguish. It is, in my

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread James A. Bohnsack
It's probably worse than that. If I remember correctly, to enter a lower case character on an 026 or 029 keypunch, you had to multipunch the column in the card. Backward compatibility is important. Jim From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Mike Walter
Excellent response, Richard! Changing ancient defaults is not backward compatible, and risks breaking untold old (and perhaps poorly written) XEDIT macros. Our Y-disk contains the following PROFILE XEDIT Y2, that performs some (what I call) bare-minimum defaults so that all users get the

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Michael MacIsaac
since it is documented to act that way I couldn't find that. Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread C. Lawrence Perkins
You can test the FILETYPE ( or FILENAME or FILEMODE ) within PROFILE XEDI T and set your CASE to whatever you want based on what the variable extract s for you. Sample: /*PROFILE changed to REXX */ trace off 'extract /FT/' if ftype.1 = 'EXEC' |, ftype.1 = 'REXX' |, ftype.1

Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-28 Thread Graves Nora E
Do you have Control Center? It's an IBM Licensed Program Product. If so, select Option M from the main menu. Add a Monitor, and select User Locking. This does have the side effect of displaying messages any time locks are encountered, so check out the appropriate notify parameters. We

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@hewitt.comwrote: Excellent response, Richard! Changing ancient defaults is not backward compatible, and risks breaking untold old (and perhaps poorly written) XEDIT macros. This is of course correct. The best solution is a time

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
That is not far enough back, it has to go back at least to 1972 :-) Regards, Richard Schuh From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of P S Sent: Thursday, January 28, 2010 10:44 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject:

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote: That is not far enough back, it has to go back at least to 1972 :-) Not for XEDIT?! But when I finish it, it will go back earlier, to fix: - ASCII vs. EBCDIC - null-terminated strings - case sensitivity in *IX All three

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Schuh, Richard
The company where I was for Y2K ignored our advice and pleas to do something about it, pleas starting in the 1980s and continuing until they looked into it in 3Q 1997. Their conclusive action was to outsource the entire IT function. Where's the fun in that? Regards, Richard Schuh

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 12:31 PM, Mike Walter mike.wal...@hewitt.comwrote: Excellent response, Richard! Changing ancient defaults is not backward compatible, and risks breaking untold old (and perhaps poorly written) XEDIT macros. This is of course correct. The best solution is a time

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote: The company where I was for Y2K ignored our advice and pleas to do something about it, pleas starting in the 1980s and continuing until they looked into it in 3Q 1997. Their conclusive action was to outsource the entire

3584 support in vm tape manager software

2010-01-28 Thread Barbara Andrews
Is anyone out there using an IBM 3584 Tape library with either of the following products? - CA's VM:Tape - IBM Tape Manager for z/VM I do not see support of the 3584 explicitly stated in either product's documentation. I see 3494's and 3495's mentioned, but not 3584.

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 6:41 PM, C. Lawrence Perkins vmwiz...@ix.netcom.com wrote: You can test the FILETYPE ( or FILENAME or FILEMODE ) within PROFILE XEDIT and set your CASE to whatever you want based on what the variable extracts for you.  Sample: If you do UPDATE in XEDIT, you may want to

Different PROFILE TCPIP for DR

2010-01-28 Thread O'Brien, Dennis L
I'm setting up a DR process for a new system. I need to use a different PROFILE TCPIP when the system is up in the DR site. I know that the easy and wrong way is to update TCPIP's PROFILE EXEC to copy the correct PROFILE TCPIP to the A-disk. I'm trying to do it the right way, by using a

Re: Different PROFILE TCPIP for DR

2010-01-28 Thread Fran Hensler
See the PROD-DR files on http://zvm.sru.edu/~download What I do is ask the operator at IPL time whether we are running on PROD or DR. Depending on the response various service machines choose the correct PROFILEs/EXECs on VM and also on VSE. /Fran Hensler at Slippery Rock University of

Re: Different PROFILE TCPIP for DR

2010-01-28 Thread Marcy Cortes
We're now in a 3 site situation and one of those does not change nodes. We had been 2 and used different files since we changed the node name. The new 3rd site does not change. The multiple file solution was problematic because folks often forget to make their changes to all the different

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Les Koehler
Using WORDPOS() would be a *lot* more efficient and easier to type! Les C. Lawrence Perkins wrote: You can test the FILETYPE ( or FILENAME or FILEMODE ) within PROFILE XEDI T and set your CASE to whatever you want based on what the variable extract s for you. Sample: /*PROFILE

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread P S
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Les Koehler vmr...@tampabay.rr.comwrote: Using WORDPOS() would be a *lot* more efficient and easier to type! And so the wars resume...

Re: VM DB2 7.3 question

2010-01-28 Thread Roland P. Chung
Hi Bill, This means the agent wants to read a directory block from disk, but there are no available directory buffers, so the agent waits for another agent to free up a buffer.  When a buffer is freed, this agent will be un-waited so it can try to get the buffer again.   This indicates an

Re: XEDIT SET CASE default setting - is it the best?

2010-01-28 Thread Chip Davis
Perhaps. But this thread evolved into a best practices discussion. That is a wide gamut which conceivably extends down to Rexx coding suggestions. For example, my PROFILE XEDIT checked the first line of the file and if it found a lower-case character, it 'SET CASE MIXED RESPECT', otherwise it