George,
Check also your HCD definitions into zOS.
The same ancient habit keeps all terminals as 3278-2, that doesn't reply
correctly to queryable logmodes.
The better choice is to define as 3270-X.
Have a Happy New Year.
__
Clovis
From:
Alan
We have some services which should be up during normal working hours
only, i.e. not on weekends and not on public holidays either.
Could be done by WAKEUP, but ...
How to code movable feasts like Easter Monday and others depending on
the first full moon in spring?
I know the formula is complex,
Here are dates that could be put into a table.
The following are dates of Easter from 1980 to 2024:
1980 April 6 1995 April 162010 April 4
1981 April 191996 April 7 2011 April 24
1982 April 111997 March 302012 April 8
1983 April 3
So just change the / to % and you have a Rexx program :-)
Les
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
Here are dates that could be put into a table.
The following are dates of Easter from 1980 to 2024:
1980 April 6 1995 April 162010 April 4
1981 April 19 1996 April 72011
So it would appear. At least it works for me.
I didn't know about the % (w/o quotes).
I learned something today.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Les Koehler
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 11:01 AM
To:
Per the IBM documentation, the z/196 requires z/VSE 4.1 or above, z/VM 5.4 or
above and Suse 10 or above.
Of course, as those products are the only supported products available.
So, did the z/196 break older operating systems? I don't care that the older
ones can't use newer facilities.
Tom wrote:
Per the IBM documentation, the z/196 requires z/VSE 4.1 or above, z/VM
5.4 or above and Suse 10 or above.
Of course, as those products are the only supported products available.
What about Red Hat?
Is that also supported for z/196, or is it only Suse?
Tom Duerbusch
I don't have Red Hat, but the documentation says RHEL 5 or better.
Tom Duerbusch
THD Consulting
George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com 12/29/2010 10:17 AM
Tom wrote:
Per the IBM documentation, the z/196 requires z/VSE 4.1 or above, z/VM
5.4 or above and Suse 10 or above.
Of course,
And there is // to get the remainder of a division.
2010/12/29 Gentry, Stephen stephen.gen...@lafayettelife.com
So it would appear. At least it works for me.
I didn't know about the % (w/o quotes).
I learned something today.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
If you are coming from an MP/3000 are you considering a z10-BC? If you are,
you should still be able to get a z10-BC box from IBM. At this time there is
not a BC version of the z196. We are getting a z10-BC to replace a z9-BC.
Paul Feller
AIT Mainframe Technical Support
-Original
Hi... I fondly remember TOOLSRUN from my IBM days... We're looking
for a similar function - a tools repository mirrored between many VMs,
some distant. But we aren't licensed for RSCS, and that cost becomes
prohibitive for this customer...
So short of writing our FTP based tool, does
We share an SFS across the various systems using ISLINK and IPGATE for the more
distant ones. Works great as long as the host system with the SFS is up and
running.
Bob Bates
robert.ba...@wellsfargo.com
This message may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are
not the
NFS? If you truly want a local copy, just in case - run a local 'sync'
from the NFS disk. Maybe even use a Linux guest and 'rsync' rather than
coding compare logic?
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:01 AM, Lee Stewart
lstewart.dsgr...@attglobal.net wrote:
Hi... I fondly remember
Works fine.
See one REXX version:
/**/
trace r
arg year .
c = year % 100
n = year - 19 * ( year % 19 )
k = ( c - 17 ) % 25
i = c - c % 4 - ( c - k ) % 3 + 19 * n + 15
i = i - 30 * ( i % 30 )
i = i - ( i % 28 ) * ( 1 - ( i % 28 ) * ( 29 % ( i + 1 ) ) ,
* ( ( 21 - n ) % 11 ) )
j =
Brain hiccup -- skip the Linux guest idea unless you have something that
writes CMS files from Linux...
Scott Rohling
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 10:11 AM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.comwrote:
NFS? If you truly want a local copy, just in case - run a local 'sync'
from the NFS disk.
Maybe VM/NFS exporting SFS directories?
__
Clovis
From:
Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.com
To:
IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
Date:
29/12/2010 15:12
Subject:
Re: Toolsrun function without RSCS
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System
Lee,
Fire up your UFTD servers, then use SENDFILE fn ft fm TO
targe...@targetsys.mydomain.com (UFTSYNC NETDATA to move the files around
just like you would with RSCS.
Best regards,
Mark Wheeler
UnitedHealth Group
--
Excellence. Always. If Not Excellence, What? If Not Excellence Now,
Faced with similar circumstances, I used the UFT support in the free RSCS
and the UFTD server that comes with TCPIP. Then it was a simple exercise
to note and propagate changes.
--
Mike Harding
z/VM System Support
mhard...@us.ibm.com
mike.b.hard...@kp.org
mikehard...@mindless.com
(925) 926-3179
On Wed, 29 Dec 2010 01:40:01 -0500 Alan Altmark said:
On Tuesday, 12/28/2010 at 04:08 EST, George Henke/NYLIC
george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote:
Our Supersession boys swear it is not Superseesion.
Could it be the Coupling Facility Service Machine doing it?
George, the Coupling Facility is not
All,
Is there a way to set the date and time stamp on a file?
Thank you...
...Dave
DMSPLU
-- R;
Rick Troth
Velocity Software
http://www.velocitysoftware.com/
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 16:25, Tracy, David david.tr...@nielsen.com wrote:
All,
Is there a way to set the date and time stamp on a file?
Thank you...
...Dave
I don't know where I got it (it's date stamp is about 4 years ago) but
here is my TOUCH EXEC.
address command
parse upper arg fn ft fm StampIt
if StampIt = '' then do
We have two service machines, I will call them A and B for this discussion.
These machines share a 191 disk. When A is xautologged, it initializes itself
and then xautologs B. I logged both machines off and added two new ACCESS
commands to the PROFILE EXEC. I then logged A on and checked its
You have to reaccess RO disks to see changes. Doesn't sound like you
did.
Scott Rohling
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 29, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
We have two service machines, I will call them A and B for this
discussion. These machines share a 191 disk. When
Along with the rest, on the IBM VM Download page (
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/ ):
SETDATE EXEC
FIXDATE EXEC
http://www.vm.ibm.com/download/packages/
Mike Walter
Aon Corporation
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Tracy, David david.tr...@nielsen.com
Ignore last post.. Maybe mdc off?
Sent from my iPhone
On Dec 29, 2010, at 1:42 PM, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com wrote:
We have two service machines, I will call them A and B for this
discussion. These machines share a 191 disk. When A is xautologged,
it initializes itself and then
Your machines don't share it in MW mode? If yes, anything is possible
They are on the same z/VM system? If not, the MDC cache on the system that
didn't update the disk can be backlevel.
2010/12/29 Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
We have two service machines, I will call them A and B for
LOGOFF/LOGON certainly does that.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Wednesday, December 29, 2010 2:07 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Configuration
As stated, one has it R/W the other R/O. Someone has to log on to the machine
that has it R/W to update it, there is nothing in the machine, itself, that
writes anything. I am aware of MDC, and it is not in play, here. Both are on
the same VM system. The update was done while both were logged
The fact that you had to logon to B, and detach/relink the disk tells me
that either (1) B never really logged off, or more likely (2) B wasn't
linking the disk you thought it was, but when you did it manually you got
the disk you thought it should have (the one A updated).
--
Mike Harding
z/VM
On: Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:11:58PM -0800,Schuh, Richard Wrote:
} We have two service machines, I will call them A and B for this discussion.
These machines share a 191 disk. When A is xautologged, it initializes itself
and then xautologs B. I logged both machines off and added two new ACCESS
Thanks for the several ideas! I'm sure we can get one of them to do
just what we need...
Lee
On 12/29/2010 10:29 AM, Mark Wheeler wrote:
Lee,
Fire up your UFTD servers, then use SENDFILE fn ft fm TO
targe...@targetsys.mydomain.com (UFTSYNC NETDATA to move the files
around just like you
Mike,
1.
If it had not been fully logged off, then the XAUTOLOG commands probably would
have failed, would they not? It was logged off many times, both were logged off
many times.When A was logged off, it would XAUTOLOG B, otherwise I would do the
honors. Q USER B, preceded by Q USER A when
No. A's directory entry for the disk is an MDISK statement the has a mode of
MR. Q LINKS 191 from B showed only 2 links, those from A and B.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Rich
We share an SFS across the various systems using ISLINK and IPGATE for
the more distant ones. Works great as long as the host system with the
SFS is up and running.
That's a good option. We have a TOOLS: filepool that we distribute via SFS to
our VM systems that contains the basic goodies we
35 matches
Mail list logo
