Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

Try summing Vitural and Total CPU in milliseconds and convert once for the CPUADDR/INTERVAL break (vs summing USER CPUVIRT and CPUTOTAL). On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:50 PM, Barton Robinson bar...@vm1.velocity-software.com wrote: how you do the arithmetic relates to the problem you are trying to

Re: Defining FCP devices to z/VM

As you can see, I did not get your screen shots :( Would you mind sending them to me direct (maybe as an attachment) to anne.d.crabt...@wv.govmailto:anne.d.crabt...@wv.gov In the meantime, here's what I have for OS config (new VM one): Å¢¢¢ Change Operating System Configuration

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:31 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote: ...And so the important factor is no what % of phyiscal CP (PCP) bu what % of logical CPU is being realized in each LPAR, Guest Machine Some percent of an interval is going to be used by PR/SM for

Re: Xedit question

I perfer Column Locate (CL) then Column Insert (CI) finishing with a REPEAT * (or as many lines as need modifing). -Original Message- From: "Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)" Sent: Feb 21, 2011 2:16 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Xedit question

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

When i do the analysis for 100% capture ratio, i add the physical overhead, the logical overhead and the z/vm captured time. that works. so vm must be lpar aware... Gregg wrote: On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 7:31 PM, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com

Writing a Systems Programmer Resume

I would like to invite anyone attending next week's SHARE conference in Anaheim to come to my session on How to Write a Resume for a Mainframe Systems Programmer (session 8903). It is the third time I have given th is presentation at SHARE and it contains a lot of useful information and samples

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

I agree; I just don't think it (lCP % of pCP) can be determined in ACCOUNT. 3 lCPs with a weight(CEC full load)/cap of 2.66 pCPs will have the potential for 2.66 CPU seconds/second or 159.6 CPU seconds in a one minute interval minus logical overhead... Though if Capped, it'll get 3 to 5 more %

Z/vm 5.4 on z890 and migrated to z10 problem

We moved our z/VM 5.4 system from a z890 to a z10. Everything on the z890 was running well. The Multiple SSL Server Support was working too. Once we moved to the z10 by doing a cable swap, the Multiple Server Support for our SSL connections failed to operate. The SSL worker machines were getting

Re: VM Total time in $ACCOUNT files

This VM system runs in BC mode not PR/SM. You should trust the floating point arithmetic in SAS Derek Ackerman Enterprise Capacity Planning Performance Management Infocrossing Inc (206) 432-9737 || C: (206) 225-3585 || derek.acker...@infocrossing.com  Please consider the environment before

Re: Z/vm 5.4 on z890 and migrated to z10 problem

On Tuesday, 02/22/2011 at 12:56 EST, Hughes, Jim jim.hug...@doit.nh.gov wrote: We moved our z/VM 5.4 system from a z890 to a z10. Everything on the z890 was running well. The Multiple SSL Server Support was working too. Once we moved to the z10 by doing a cable swap, the Multiple Server

Re: z196 lb4ul

tyvm, Paul and Marcy: Paul's approach is to first come up with the new changes to a new SYS2817 CONFIG using FN= to IPL and leaving the old SYSTEM CONFIG unchanged and intact as a fallback. What is the thought of making the change to SYSTEM CONFIG after renaming the it to something else as a

Re: 2nd level z/VM 5.4 installation

I have copied all of the dvd files to a subdirectory on the the FTP serve r as recommended in From an FTP Server Directory (p 98 of the Guide for Automated Installation and Service). So can anyone clarify the -D parameter of the FTPGET command? pipe (stagesep !) ftpget -h xxx.xx.x.xx -u

Re: z196 lb4ul

I did it my way to avoid any issue with an unplanned IPL of the lpars. We have two lpars on the new z196 box. One of the lpars is our tech support lpar which could get IPLed during the week. I didn’t want an issue with trying to IPL either of the lpars before the actual cutover to the new

Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

I have to change some DEV ATTACHes in our TCPIP PROFILE Exec in preparation for new OSA ADDRs in our IODF for our new z/196. What is the best way to implement this? I suppose I can logon to TCPIP AC ( noprof and create a backup copy of the PROFILE EXEC and then change the original DEV ADDRs.

Re: Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

ATTACHES can be done in file yournode DTCPARMS or SYSTEM DTCPAMRS on TCPMAINT 198. *They shall never modify a PROFILE EXEC on TCPIP 191, it's IBM property;-)* And, for dynamic changes there is the CP ATTACH command and an OBEYFILE command. 2011/2/22 George Henke/NYLIC

Re: Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

On Tuesday, 02/22/2011 at 04:59 EST, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote: I have to change some DEV ATTACHes in our TCPIP PROFILE Exec in preparation for new OSA ADDRs in our IODF for our new z/196. What is the best way to implement this? I suppose I can logon to

Re: 2nd level z/VM 5.4 installation

It looks like there must be a stage separator before -d - even though you aren't showing one. Or maybe it's not being typed as one long command? In any case - PIPE thinks that -d is the start of a stage and there is no -d pipe stage. Make sure you are entering the entire command on the command

Re: 2nd level z/VM 5.4 installation

one thought - does the password (-p) end with ! by any chance? Scott Rohling On Tue, Feb 22, 2011 at 3:23 PM, Scott Rohling scott.rohl...@gmail.comwrote: It looks like there must be a stage separator before -d - even though you aren't showing one. Or maybe it's not being typed as one long

Re: 2nd level z/VM 5.4 installation

On Tuesday, 02/22/2011 at 04:48 EST, Sherry Everhart severh...@maccnet.com wrote: pipe (stagesep !) ftpget -h xxx.xx.x.xx -u -p xxx -d /upload/cpdvd -v BEF -DVDEOF -f CKD222* !UNPACK! ECKDREST How do I tell VM to go to that directory ftpdir? I keep getting the error:

Re: Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

tyvm, Alan and Kris, once again for saving my neck. DEV 9000, 9001, 9002 are changing to 9400, 9401, 9402 Here is what I have now: TCPIP: PROFILE EXEC 'Access 198 D' 'Access 591 E' 'Access 592 F' ATT 9000 TCPIP 9000 ATT 9001 TCPIP 9001 ATT 9002 TCPIP 9002 ATT 9100 TCPIP 9100 ATT 9101

Re: z196 lb4ul

George, that's probably how I would do it in order to avoid changing the IPL procedures that ops has documented. Marcy. Sent from my BlackBerry. From: George Henke/NYLIC [mailto:george_he...@newyorklife.com] Sent: Tuesday, February 22, 2011 03:15 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU

Re: Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

On Tuesday, 02/22/2011 at 06:00 EST, George Henke/NYLIC george_he...@newyorklife.com wrote: DEV 9000, 9001, 9002 are changing to 9400, 9401, 9402 Here is what I have now: TCPIP: PROFILE EXEC 'Access 198 D' 'Access 591 E' 'Access 592 F' ATT 9000 TCPIP 9000 ATT

Re: Changing TCPIP PROFILE EXEC

You probably have those :owner. tags in there for the console log. Do yourself a favor and just put a TCPRUNXT EXEC on TCPMAINT 198 that defines a common owner. Then you can remove those extra entries. Here is an example: /* TCPIP Startup Exit TCPRUNXT EXEC */