On 02/25/2011 10:35 AM, Sherry Everhart wrote:
#CP Q V DASD
DASD 0190 3390 520RES R/O107 CYL ON DASD 0F00 SUBCHANNEL = 0008
DASD 0191 3390 EM0F05 R/W 10 CYL ON DASD 0F05 SUBCHANNEL =
DASD 0192 3390 EM0F05 R/O 50 CYL ON DASD 0F05 SUBCHANNEL = 000B
DASD 019D 3390
did I miss something?
vary on chpid ??
and maybe the CU as well?
Kim Goldenberg
?
The appropriate debug version of libwxgtk; at least that's where it is
in Ubuntu.
Kim Goldenberg
On 01/20/2010 01:09 PM, Philip Tully wrote:
What would cause the output of a Q VSWITCH DETAIL not have the IP address
filled in for an active linux guest?
Details below:
The following are the displays of 2 active linux guests, from the Q VSWITCH
DETAIL command, as you can see the first
On 01/20/2010 01:48 PM, Philip Tully wrote:
I concur they are layer 2, but both are layer 2 so it is a question of
consistency.
Why would one show up and not the other.
Phil
Are they both up and running with TCP/IP connected to the vswitch?
Kim
Schuh, Richard wrote:
Is it just us or are others having trouble getting to Barton's site?
Regards,
Richard Schuh
Not just you; I'm having trouble with that site and linuxvm.org that
shares the same system.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ
applied 0902 yesterday, and had the following warning and RC(4)
VMFBDC2250W The following OSA objects have been built on BUILD0 100
(K) and should be copied to your workstation:
VMFBDC2250W IOAJAVA BIN
This is probably your warning as well.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - Office
Heckler, Bruce wrote:
Hi Dave,
Let me preface I’m just a part time VM’er. I just got on this
listserve a few weeks ago, so I didn’t see any of the previous. I
spend most of my time with z/OS TCP/IP, but the two stacks are pretty
close.
- Last time I looked, x3270 is a TN3270 client, not
David Boyes wrote:
On 2/3/09 10:55 AM, Wakser, David david.wak...@infocrossing.com wrote:
Why would you even, for a second, doubt your sanity?
Vendor is trying to invoke “not tested configuration” clauses and
doing other assorted whining to avoid providing a fix. I want to get a
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
I'm seeing something very strange when I ipl a 2nd level VM system. I
first noticed it on z/VM 5.4, but this a.m. saw that z/VM 5.3 works the
same way. The Guide for Automated Installation and Service, which I was
following closely since I was installing from a DVD by way
Duane Weaver wrote:
I am setting up a guest VM system that will be using VSWITCH. Does
this require the first level host VM system to be running a vswitch?
No
Kim
Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) wrote:
Hi
I am on a z/VM 5.3 system with no printing capabilities at this time. I
want to try to get a copy of the USER DIRECTORY my z/OS LPARA so that I
can print it, or is there a better way to print the DIRECTORY?
Do you have TCP/IP up? If so,
Mary Zervos wrote:
Hello all,
Our first install of Redhat on our z/VM 5.3 system. We are having
trouble using Xwindows from a UBUNTU system into the
Redhat install shell for a GUI interface install window. We can Xwindow
from our UBUNTU system to other systems, just the z/VM5.3
side of it
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
I received electronic service for z/VM 5.3, RSU 7304. I am not clear on
Did you mean 5304?
interpreting the installation instructions. I received 4 files:
S7858796.SHIPDOC
S7858796.SHIPRSU1
S7858796.SHIPRSU2
S7858796.SHIPRSU3
I got mine through SRD and they came as
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
I got mine thru ShopZ and I remembered having to decide if I wanted to
download them thru a browser or ftp. I chose browser and those 4
separate files are what were downloaded. Yes, I guess I meant RSU 5304.
I just tried it again. Starting with the z/VM Electronically
Jim Bohnsack wrote:
It's working!! No help from the documentation. The only thing you said,
Kim, that isn't necessary or wanted for an RSU is to do the SERVICE ALL
SHIPDOCS. One of the many pieces of documentation says that you don't
do that for an RSU, only for a COR. It went completely
Stricklin, Raymond J wrote:
Folks --
Is RSU 5304 orderable on shopzseries yet?
http://www.vm.ibm.com/service/rsu/stk530.html shows 5304RSU current as
of May 20, but when I log in to ShopzSeries, the 5303 stacked RSU from
December 12 is the most recent of the orderable options.
Am I missing
Alan Altmark wrote:
Pop quiz:
For those of you who have multiple boxes (CECs) sharing devices, do you
assign the same device number in the IOCDS to the device for each CEC?
Example: Given a shared 3390 volume, if it is known as device number 800
on CEC A, do you assign it device number 800
the X11 and Athena widgit development packages,
installed clean and works great (on x64 processor even!).
Kim
--
Kim Goldenberg
Systems Programmer I
State of NJ - OIT
609-777-3722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Jacobs wrote:
Did you perform a XHOST FP REHASH command after you installed the fonts?
That command is xset and it should be lower case: xset fp rehash
Kim
--
Kim Goldenberg
Systems Programmer I
State of NJ - OIT
609-777-3722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
free to append or to send to me offline.
What happened to Alan Altmark's z/VM security talk that was to be
rescheduled?
Kim
--
Kim Goldenberg
Systems Programmer I
State of NJ - OIT
609-777-3722
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Shields Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802
814-863-4739
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To make an apple pie from scratch, you must first invent the universe.
Carl Sagan
I currently have a test HATS system up and running on a single engine
SLES9x image with ~2G of memory, and it's running fine.
Kim
--
Kim
it?
If you don't want to do the tape thing, you could always just do your
changes. Then, if necessary, just regenerate them with the instructions
in the Service Guide, since you indicated originally that this was an
initial system with no tailoring.
Kim
--
Kim Goldenberg
Systems Programmer I
State
://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprecation
for a further discussion.
Kim Goldenberg
Systems Programmer I
State of NJ - OIT
is the maintenance disk for the 190, and is
what put2prod uses to update the 190.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - OIT
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
609-777-3722
Comstoack
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) who teaches assembler among other classes. I
understand he comes to you, so that might be a possibility in your scheme.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - OIT
if it's the latter, I'd better not tell my test 5.2
system, it can't run on my 4.4 production system on our z9. grin
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - OIT
Shimon Lebowitz wrote:
On 28 Aug 2006 at 8:08, Schuh, Richard wrote:
Before XEDIT, ISPF looked really good. Then there are those (are you
reading this, Mike?) who will tell you that Edgar was the best.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
And after XEDIT, ISPF looks really really bad. (Spoken
Brian Nielsen wrote:
I doubt DIRMAINT or VMSECURE will let you do this, but if you do the
directory by hand it works fine.
I've found with VM:Secure that I can just put a comment line before the
MDISK statement(s) to document their use as necessary.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - OIT
Associates
The opinions expressed herein are mine alone, not my employer's.
Thanks, but we are (unfortunately) running with ACF2, instead of rules
and for those few things I need to comment, I can remember to change the
entry for the new comment. All other information, I'm keeping in a wiki.
Kim
the I/O
than have it sitting around.
Kim Goldenberg
State of NJ - OIT
31 matches
Mail list logo
