We have a customer that wants to install Linux in an LPAR by itself. Their
system is a separate CEC without a VM license. It seems I should be able to
install Linux under VM onto dedicated volumes and using real OSA addresses, and
then IPL via the HMC for the assigned LPAR. If that's true then
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 2:49 PM, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov wrote:
We have a customer that wants to install Linux in an LPAR by itself. Their
system is a separate CEC without a VM license. It seems I should be able to
install Linux under VM onto dedicated volumes and using real OSA
On Tuesday, 07/06/2010 at 08:50 EDT, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov
wrote:
We have a customer that wants to install Linux in an LPAR by itself.
Their
system is a separate CEC without a VM license. It seems I should be able
to
install Linux under VM onto dedicated volumes and using real OSA
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Indeed you can, but as Rob says, all other LPARs must be protected from
the volume. The preferred way is to alter the I/O configuration to allow
access to those volumes only from the the Linux LPAR and the VM LPAR.
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 10:33 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Define FULL PACK MDISK or DEDICATE z/Linux DASD
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Alan Altmark
alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Indeed you can
On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Mrohs, Ray ray.mr...@usdoj.gov wrote:
Very good. I'll pass these caveats along to the z/OS group. What are the
consequences of keeping the Linux volumes online to z/OS, for example on a
system that runs FDR disk level backups?
This risk is that that Linux
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov wrote:
Anyway, during our z/Linux guest build process, which we are doing at a very
fast pace, we end up initializing the z/Linux DASD under z/VM. Now, when we
execute the z/Linux Kick Start that
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Rob van der Heij
Sent: Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:55 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Define FULL PACK MDISK or DEDICATE z/Linux DASD
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 1:53 AM, Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR)
terry.mar
On Wednesday, 06/30/2010 at 10:07 EDT, Hans Rempel
h...@hmrconsultants.com wrote:
Terry. Full volume minidisk do give you the MDC option even when it is a
full
volume minidisk. Dedicate does not. I personally like to define my
mini-disk
with offset 1 cyl so CP owns and controls cyl 0 where
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com wrote:
Protecting the system itself from guests with fp minis or dedicated
2. Use DEVNO minidisks or dedicated volumes
I would not look forward to D/R where have to change all DEVNO
statements and get it right...
On Thursday, 07/01/2010 at 03:20 EDT, Rob van der Heij rvdh...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 5:48 PM, Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
wrote:
Protecting the system itself from guests with fp minis or dedicated
2. Use DEVNO minidisks or dedicated volumes
I would not look
Hi
I am sure this has come up before but I could not find it in the
archives (getting oldJ).
Anyway, during our z/Linux guest build process, which we are doing at a
very fast pace, we end up initializing the z/Linux DASD under z/VM. Now,
when we execute the z/Linux Kick Start that
MDISK or DEDICATE z/Linux DASD
Hi
I am sure this has come up before but I could not find it in the archives
(getting oldJ).
Anyway, during our z/Linux guest build process, which we are doing at a very
fast pace, we end up initializing the z/Linux DASD under z/VM. Now, when we
execute
13 matches
Mail list logo
