We have two production VM systems,
plus a few others - small DR system,
2nd level test system, 1st level LPAR
test system.
I always build *one*, and then copy the
required parts to other systems. For those
things that need to be generated differently,
I have local PPF overrides/CNTL files
That's a good question. Was wondering what all of you with 5
systems
do about that. Right now we maintain them individually (it wasn't
that
long ago that we had 1 system). Now I'm hearing rumblings about maybe
adding 2-4 more systems for capacity/availability reasons... If we go
from 6
That's good news. Perhaps it is time to re-examine our staunch opposition
to PUT2PROD.
Another problem with PUT2PROD that comes to mind is that we don't want to
install VM on every system, we want to install it once (actually twice
because of VPARS and VTAPE) and then copy it to all the
Alan wrote: We have 5 primary VM systems and 11 (?) VM guests. Does
anyone install VM separately on each of multiple systems? Does even IBM?
That's a good question. Was wondering what all of you with 5 systems
do about that. Right now we maintain them individually (it wasn't that
long ago
On Wednesday, 06/07/2006 at 11:07 EST, Alan Ackerman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's good news. Perhaps it is time to re-examine our staunch
opposition
to PUT2PROD.
Another problem with PUT2PROD that comes to mind is that we don't want
to
install VM on every system, we want to install it
I like to know what happens to my systems. So I even never tried
PUT2PROD.
And just like Brian, I swap MAINT's minidisk addresses 190/193/19E with
490/493/49E. I wish DIRMAINT provided a SWAPMDSK command to swap mdisk
addresses, now I need
DIRM OFFLINE
DIRM FOR MAINT CHV 190 TO
Little routine to rebuild CMS? Without automation what about the tried
and true: (ok it's a procedure not a routine)
from MAINT:
VMFSETUP ZVM CMS (for those too lazy to access the right disk directly...)
SAMPNSS CMS
IPL 190 CLEAR PARM SAVESYS CMS
!!
David
I reckon I should just code up my own
Quoting David Kreuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Little routine to rebuild CMS? Without automation what about the tried
and true: (ok it's a procedure not a routine)
from MAINT:
VMFSETUP ZVM CMS (for those too lazy to access the right disk directly...)
SAMPNSS CMS
IPL 190 CLEAR PARM SAVESYS CMS
Well, I'm another OT who doesn't use PUT2PROD. First, I see no reason to
take on the unneccessary risks associated with PUT2PROD.
Second, I like my modified version of the traditional IBM service process
even better than the documented traditional IBM service process. Let's
take, for
Add me to the list of sysprogs who has always installed by hand or at
least by homegrown EXECs. Sorry Chuckie. Too many battle scars in the past.
On Friday, 06/02/2006 at 11:47 AST, George Haddad [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Add me to the list of sysprogs who has always installed by hand or at
least by homegrown EXECs. Sorry Chuckie. Too many battle scars in the
past.
Well, just to show we don't hold a grudge, other people (not you, George,
On Fri, 2 Jun 2006 14:02:19 -0500, Leland Lucius [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Quoting Alan Altmark [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[But it changed only because someone called and complained.]
59825,379,000 ... so there, get to work. :-)
When attempting to rebuild CMS using PUT2PROD SAVECMS, I sporadically
receive HCPSEC068E and I can't figure out why. In case it matters, I'm n
ot
doing this from MAINT. I've setup another user with (what I think to be)
appropriate privileges. Any ideas?
Thanks,
Leland
Here's the console
System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Leland Lucius
Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2006 13:48
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: [IBMVM] HCPSEC068E when doing PUT2PROD SAVECMS
When attempting to rebuild CMS using PUT2PROD SAVECMS, I sporadically
receive HCPSEC068E and I can't figure out why
IBM states that you must run PUT2PROD from MAINT.
David
Leland Lucius wrote:
When attempting to rebuild CMS using PUT2PROD SAVECMS, I sporadically
receive HCPSEC068E and I can't figure out why. In case it matters, I'm n
ot
doing this from MAINT. I've setup another user with (what I think to
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 15:51:14 -0500, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I bet you can't get SECUSER. Does your console statement in BLDCMS need
to be changed:
CONSOLE 009 3215 T MAINT
The weird part is that it always succeeds when I run the EXEC connected.
It's when the guest is
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:52:27 -0400, David Kreuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
resources.com wrote:
IBM states that you must run PUT2PROD from MAINT.
But, it'd be a horribly dull world if we always did what IBM told us to d
o
or not to do. :-) Heck, I never listened to my parents either, why shou
ld
I
PUT2PROD is, gulp, I'm told by the powers that be (Chuckie included) is
the way of the future. Follow the instructions. I know, it's hard.
David
Leland Lucius wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:52:27 -0400, David Kreuter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
resources.com wrote:
IBM states that you must run
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] HCPSEC068E when doing PUT2PROD SAVECMS
PUT2PROD is, gulp, I'm told by the powers that be (Chuckie included) is
the way of the future. Follow the instructions. I know, it's hard.
David
Leland Lucius wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 16:52:27 -0400, David Kreuter [EMAIL
On Thursday, 06/01/2006 at 04:21 EST, Marcy Cortes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just be careful out there. PUT2PROD on TCPIP will force your TCPIP
service machine (and later versions find it even if his name is not
TCPIP :( _ ).
We continue to refine PUT2PROD to avoid doing Really Annoying
20 matches
Mail list logo
