I just made a test with a secondlevel z/VM system (it has 600-605, SYSG and
SYSC as consoles in SYSTEM CONFIG)
- #CP TERM CONMODE 3270#IPL LOADPARM CONS0009
- I DIAL to the secondlevel as 601, and logon to MAINT there
- on the firstlevel system, I issue #CP DEF 9 1F
- in the secondlevel's
Kris, I wasn't disputing the current state of affairs, but was expressing
my opinion on how it *should* work.
Regards,
Alan Altmark
IBM Lab Services
-
Sent from my BlackBerry Handheld.
Have you submitted requirements? :-)
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System
[mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2011 3:25 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
On Wednesday, 06/22/2011 at 11:41 EDT, Schuh, Richard rsc...@visa.com
wrote:
Have you submitted requirements? :-)
Why, no. I just figured I'd post here like everyone else and hope for a
miracle. :-) [Certain People in the Lab will be disappointed to the know
that I will be back in the
Frank M. Ramaekers writes:
But I'm still confused. Back at home I have to 2nd level VMs named
VMTEST and VMNEW. They IPL CMS and run an PROFILE EXEC. Both are
exactly the same:
[...]
CP IPL 06F8 CLEAR LOADPARM 0009
[...]
Yet, they IPL differently (VMNEW is 6.1 and VMTEST is
I'm thinking, 'AUTO_IPL parameter on FEATURES statement missing in SYSTEM
CONFIG on the 6.1 system'
IIRC, the system does not ship with AUTO_IPL enabled - you have to make that
change yourself.
Example (fragment) from a SYSTEM CONFIG near me ...
z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Malcolm Beattie
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 2:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
Frank M. Ramaekers writes:
But I'm still confused. Back at home I have to 2nd level VMs named
VMTEST
Hi,
This thread has brought up a question in my mind (maybe it's a dumb one,
but I'll ask it anyway :))
Assumptions:
1) This is the default value for Operator_Consoles in the SYSTEM CONFIG
file (and probably most shops do not delete or change the last two
entries):
Operator_Consoles
On a 2nd level z/VM, these consoles don't exist -- so a wait 1010 is very
possible... on a 1st level system, I agree with you - we'd have to hear
more to figure it out, I think.
I'm actually not seeing why console definitions are explaining why one of
the Frank's guests IPL without a prompt,
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Scott Rohling
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 8:10 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
On a 2nd level z/VM, these consoles don't exist -- so a wait 1010 is
very possible... on a 1st level system, I agree with you - we'd have
to hear more to figure
Oh, it just cannot be responded to normally when ‘HCPSED6013A A CP read is
pending’ is displayed. Instead all responses must be prefixed with “#CP
VINPUT VMSG ‘.
** **
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr.
** **
** **
--
*
*
Ok - that explains the
Date:
21/06/2011 09:58
Subject:
Re: Problems at DR test
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@listserv.uark.edu
Hi,
This thread has brought up a question in my mind (maybe it's a dumb one,
but I'll ask it anyway :))
Assumptions:
1) This is the default value for Operator_Consoles
1) This is the default value for Operator_Consoles in the SYSTEM CONFIG file
(and probably most shops do not delete or change the last two entries):
Operator_Consoles 0020 0021 0022 0023 0E20 0E21 1020 ,
System_3270 System_Console
As I understand it, the Operating System
my 2 cents: because most 009 consoles are defined as 3215 on z/VM guests.
(as for the ones that are listed.. ummm.. darts? :-)
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote:
1) This is the default value for Operator_Consoles in the SYSTEM
Well, as has been mentioned ages ago here: when you IPL with an override for
CONS, the list of consoles in SYSTEM CONFIG is replaced by the overide. So,
if after an IPL with override VM is restarted (with SHUTDOWN REIPL or after
an abend), and at that time that console isn't theren, you get wait
On 6/21/2011 9:18 AM, Scott Rohling wrote:
my 2 cents: because most 009 consoles are defined as 3215 on z/VM
guests. (as for the ones that are listed.. ummm.. darts? :-)
Scott Rohling
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 8:09 AM, David Boyes dbo...@sinenomine.net
mailto:dbo...@sinenomine.net wrote:
On 6/21/2011 9:18 AM, Scott Rohling wrote:
my 2 cents: because most 009 consoles are defined as 3215 on z/VM
guests.
(as for the ones that are listed.. ummm.. darts? :-)
There's no reason why CP could not issue TERM CONMODE 3270, as Linux does
when instructed to use a 3270 console. Even
There's no reason why CP could not issue TERM CONMODE 3270, as Linux
does
when instructed to use a 3270 console. Even CMS issues TERM CONMODE
3215
when it IPLs.
I mean, really, mom... all the cool OSes do itwhine
8-)
-- db
PS- it's been one of those days. Laugh it up.
Is SYSC the unique restriction?
Another legacy of the last millennium?
__
Clovis
From:
Alan Altmark alan_altm...@us.ibm.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
21/06/2011 15:14
Subject:
Re: Problems at DR test
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating System
On Tuesday, 06/21/2011 at 02:40 EDT, gclo...@br.ibm.com wrote:
Is SYSC the unique restriction?
Another legacy of the last millennium?
Restriction against what? It is the one unifying console interface. It
works for all the OSes. If you know how to use it for one OS, you know
how to use
I'm attempting to bring up our VM system under 2nd level at the DR site.
The problem that I'm running into is:
08:58:10 HCPZCO6718I Using parm disk 1 on volume 610RES (device 06F8)
08:58:10 HCPZCO6718I Parm disk resides on cylinders 39 through 158.
08:58:10 Start ((Warm|Force|COLD|CLEAN)
You z/VM system didn't find a 3270 console, so it is using the System
console As you run second level, you an respond to VM questions using
#CP VINPUT VMSG
To make it easier:
before you IPL, issue
CP Q V CONS
note the address, often 009
CP TERM CONMODE 3270
CP IPL
If you're not getting the prompt - you likely have Auto_IPL Warm or Auto_IPL
Force configured in your SYSTEM CONFIG... I use Auto_IPL FORCE on my test
systems so that they come up without the need for operator response.
Scott Rohling
On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Frank M. Ramaekers
framaek
Ideas?
Do a TERM CONMODE 3270 before the IPL.
Mike MacIsaac mike...@us.ibm.com (845) 433-7061
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
You z/VM system didn't find a 3270 console, so it is using the System
console As you run second level, you an respond to VM questions using
#CP VINPUT VMSG
To make it easier:
before you IPL, issue
CP Q V CONS
note the address, often
Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
I'm getting 'HCPCLT1013E An invalid operand was supplied for LOADPARM -
CONS-0001.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr
-646-452-3359
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Frank M. Ramaekers
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:41 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
I'm getting 'HCPCLT1013E An invalid operand was supplied for LOADPARM -
CONS
, so
you don't have to remember to change it.
-MC
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU] On
Behalf Of Michael Coffin
Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:48 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
I think it's just LOADPARM ccuu, so if your consoles
DIRECT, looks like physical to second
level VM. Including console.
Best regards,
__
Clovis
From:
Kris Buelens kris.buel...@gmail.com
To:
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Date:
20/06/2011 10:13
Subject:
Re: Problems at DR test
Sent by:
The IBM z/VM Operating
20, 2011 9:48 AM
*To:* IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
*Subject:* Re: Problems at DR test
** **
I think it’s just LOADPARM ccuu, so if your consoles is at virtual address
0001:
** **
CP IPL LOADPARM 0001
** **
Of course, you can avoid this all together by making your
, 2011 8:12 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Problems at DR test
You z/VM system didn't find a 3270 console, so it is using the System
console As you run second level, you an respond to VM questions using
#CP VINPUT VMSG
To make it easier:
before you IPL, issue
CP Q V CONS
CA Technologies is preparing to start a beta test period involving almost
all of our VM products. We have new features coming soon that we hope you
will find useful at your sites. If you are a current customer for a CA VM
product who is interested in working with us, and would like to get
System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Sergio Lima
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Test Return Code using FTP under VM/CMS
Hi List,
We made a EXEC here, that do a automation.
This exec work with WAKEUP RDR, then Receive files, and next do
On Wednesday, 06/16/2010 at 01:34 EDT, Sergio Lima
sergiovm...@hotmail.com wrote:
If the FTP don't run well, We need get the Return Code, but when FTP
fails the
Return Code also was 0
Use the EXIT option on the FTP command. Any time there is an error, the
FTP command will immediately end
...@hotmail.com
Sent by: The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
06/16/2010 12:34 PM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Test Return Code using FTP under VM/CMS
Hi List,
We made a EXEC here, that do
[mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On Behalf
Of Sergio Lima
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2010 12:34 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Test Return Code using FTP under VM/CMS
Hi List,
We made a EXEC here, that do a automation.
This exec work with WAKEUP RDR, then Receive files, and next do a FTP
Gary
Gary L. Shiminsky
I'm going to move you baby!
Captain, USS Titanic
Legend of the USS Titanic - Jamie Brockett
Systems Communications Sciences, Inc
At TSG, DoIT Services Data Center
State of New Hampshire
(603) 271-1509
Hello!
Please ignore this message. It is being used to confirm that the list server
can see my messages, and the manager can complain if he so wishes.
--
Gregg C Levine hansolofal...@worldnet.att.net
The Force will be with you always. Obi-Wan Kenobi
What I need is a test that what is entered only contains the digits
0123456789.
Anybody have a nice quick way to test for a valid whole number between 1
and 9? Testing for values 1 and 9 are immaterial to this
question and are already tested.
I thought DATATYPE(number,W) would do
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Test for Valid Whole Number
What I need is a test that what is entered only contains the
digits 0123456789.
Anybody have a nice quick way to test for a valid whole
number between 1 and 9? Testing for values 1 and
9 are immaterial to this question
Perfect! Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Schuh, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:40 AM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Test for Valid Whole Number
Try
if verify(number, '0123456789') = 0
respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Test for Valid Whole Number
What I need is a test that what is entered only contains the digits
0123456789.
Anybody have a nice quick way to test for a valid whole number between 1
Hi
I am testing my connection to this list serve could I get ONE
acknowledgement of the receipt of this email.
Thank You,
Terry Martin
Lockheed Martin - Information Technology
z/OS z/VM Systems - Performance and Tuning
Cell - 443 632-4191
Work - 410 786-0386
I saw it.
Kent Taylor
- Original Message -
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 8:59 PM
Subject: Test
Hi
I am testing my connection to this list serve could I get ONE
acknowledgement
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:ib...@listserv.uark.edu] On
Behalf Of Kent E. Taylor
Sent: Sunday, February 15, 2009 9:04 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: Test
I saw it.
Kent Taylor
- Original Message -
From: Martin, Terry R. (CMS/CTR) (CTR) terry.mar...@cms.hhs.gov
To: IBMVM
Actually this is one of a suite of non-comprehensive benchmark programs I
ran back in the day to compare various instructions. It was useful to
compare pcm's against blue boxes.
I posted the assembler source because I was hoping someone would welcome
the opportunity to demonstrate their
Thanks to John Franciscovich for the link. I've IPL'd ZCMS and everythin
g
I have runs perfectly, however I don't have anything THAT big.
I do have a nice simple benchmark program somebody gave me back in the 80
's
(?). I hope it pastes in correctly here.
TITLE ' BENCHMARK VARIOUS
On Thursday, 08/28/2008 at 04:14 EDT, Bob Heerdink
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to John Franciscovich for the link. I've IPL'd ZCMS and
everything
I have runs perfectly, however I don't have anything THAT big.
I do have a nice simple benchmark program somebody gave me back in the
80's
Bob - it takes real courage to put an assembler program out to the list!
David
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System on behalf of Bob Heerdink
Sent: Thu 8/28/2008 4:13 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: Re: [IBMVM] What is z/CMS - have ZCMS, need test program
Mike,
Maybe everyone is silent for the retirement of Will Roden today.
IBM is losing a good man, Party on Will !
Bill Munson
IT Specialist
VM System Programmer
Office of Information Technology
State of New Jersey
(609) 984-4065
President MVMUA
http://www.marist.edu/~mvmua
Mike Walter
08:04 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Test to see if listserve is working for IBMVM list
Mike,
Maybe everyone is silent for the retirement of Will Roden today.
IBM is losing a good man, Party
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
05/31/2007 08:04 AM
Please respond to
The IBM z/VM Operating System IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
To
IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
cc
Subject
Re: Test to see if listserve is working for IBMVM list
Mike,
Maybe everyone is silent for the retirement of Will Roden today.
IBM is losing
Test message to see if IBMVM listserve is working.
In my best B-movie voice, usually said in a wooded or jungle area: It's
quiet out there... too quiet.
Maybe everyone's spirit is broken after Alan Ackerman's (somewhat
warranted) dis of CMS as a development platform on the Memorial Day
(interesting timing) holiday.
:-(
Mike Walter
Hewitt
Test Only
__
Fale com seus amigos de graça com o novo Yahoo! Messenger
http://br.messenger.yahoo.com/
did we fix our dns? can i send to the listserv now?
If you can't measure it, I'm Just NOT interested!(tm)
//
Barton Robinson - CBW Internet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Velocity Software, IncMailing Address:
196-D Castro Street
Yep.
Regards,
Richard Schuh
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 2:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: test
did we fix our dns? can i send to the listserv now
Looks like you did.
-Original Message-
From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Barton Robinson
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 4:20 PM
To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU
Subject: test
did we fix our dns? can i send to the listserv now?
If you can't
58 matches
Mail list logo
