Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-17 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/14/2007 at 01:27 EST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 40x90 is not even an option offered by my emulator. What one do you use and what other exotic sizes does it support? IBM PCOMM, of course! :-) I get any size I want by editing the .ws file and manually filling in

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-17 Thread Alan Altmark
On Saturday, 12/15/2007 at 10:25 EST, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you know anyone in VM development? Yes, though they won't admit it. I have been ready for years to stop reformatting data to accomodate 80 columns. Back when we used Real 3270s, that was an issue. No longer.

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-17 Thread Mike Walter
To IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU cc Subject Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST On Friday, 12/14/2007 at 01:27 EST, Schuh, Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 40x90 is not even an option offered by my emulator. What one do you use and what other exotic sizes does it support? IBM PCOMM, of course! :-) I get any size I

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-16 Thread Phil Smith III
Imler, Steven J [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, re scaling large numbers to 45K etc.: This is exactly the philosophy that CA's V/Seg-Plus uses to display user/system spool file lists ... Just as an example where some users may be able to see this in action! To be fair (since I wrote that code), I

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-15 Thread Imler, Steven J
-Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Alan Altmark Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 01:18 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST On my z/VM 5.3 system I have 9 characters. But this issue with large

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Phil Smith III
Jim Bohnsack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I could retire if a had a dollar, or certainly a euro, for every time I heard the religious argument you have the full power of XEDIT. I still have managed to keep a copy of the full strength FULIST and there are very few times when I use filelist vs

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread RPN01
Given the amount of time that filelist has been available, wouldn't it be more prudent to be requesting the features you feel are lacking in filelist, rather than trying to keep an old sagging horse alive? Obviously, flist is still maintained, since it was changed in the current release. But it

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Rob van der Heij
On Dec 14, 2007 1:28 PM, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And bemoaning, daily, the lack of similar functionality in Those Other Operating Systems (no, Windows Explorer is NOT equivalent!)... Oh dear... Just when I was going to offer a massive improvement for FLIST It removes the

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Colleen Brown
There are many appends about FLIST so I apologize if this has been suggested before. You can use the USE option of FLIST. This may give you the function you want. It is explained in the HELP file and in the CMS Commands and Utilities book. The book also shows an example of an FLISTS exec to

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Nielsen
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 09:45:51 -0500, Colleen Brown [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are many appends about FLIST so I apologize if this has been suggested before. You can use the USE option of FLIST. This may give you the function you want. It is explained in the HELP file and in the CMS

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Rich Greenberg
On: Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 09:08:11AM -0600,Brian Nielsen Wrote: } As has been mentioned here before, KEDIT KEX are a wonderful versions of } XEDIT REXX. What may not have been mentioned is that it also is an I will second Brian's admiration of Kedit. For those who have Kedit and are not

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Brian Nielsen
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 07:28:21 -0500, Phil Smith III [EMAIL PROTECTED] software.com wrote: And bemoaning, daily, the lack of similar functionality in Those Other Operating Systems (no, Windows Explorer is NOT equivalent!)... soapbox As has been mentioned here before, KEDIT KEX are a wonderful

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
Even better, make the random change with each use. Regards, Richard Schuh -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij Sent: Friday, December 14, 2007 6:37 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Adam Thornton
On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: I have been ready for years to stop reformatting data to accomodate 80 columns. Back when we used Real 3270s, that was an issue. No longer. It is time to take a bold step forward into the 1990s. That's enough outta you, heretic. 80

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread David Boyes
I have been ready for years to stop reformatting data to accomodate 80 columns. Back when we used Real 3270s, that was an issue. No longer. It is time to take a bold step forward into the 1990s. He's a witch! Burn him! (in best Monty Python style...) -- db

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Peter . Webb
The USE and MENU options don't get around the problem of the tiny input area. -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Colleen Brown Sent: December 14, 2007 09:46 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Alan Altmark
On Friday, 12/14/2007 at 12:40 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The USE and MENU options don?t get around the problem of the tiny input area. On my z/VM 5.3 system I have 9 characters. But this issue with large disks threatens to get out of hand. Apparently the word isn't getting around that

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
:18 AM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST On Friday, 12/14/2007 at 12:40 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The USE and MENU options don?t get around the problem of the tiny input area. On my z/VM 5.3 system I have 9 characters. But this issue with large disks threatens to get

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-14 Thread Schuh, Richard
@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST On Dec 14, 2007, at 12:18 PM, Alan Altmark wrote: I have been ready for years to stop reformatting data to accomodate 80 columns. Back when we used Real 3270s, that was an issue. No longer. It is time to take a bold step forward into the 1990s. That's

z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Peter . Webb
We have recently moved to z/VM 5.3 from z/VM 3.1. We are getting lots of complaints about the FLIST command. The command entry area has changed from 20 bytes down to 7 bytes. Yes, I know about PF11, but you used to be able to enter quite a few commands within the 20 bytes. Does anybody know if/how

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Peter, It's been going down steadily. On VM/ESA 2.4 it was 2 bytes. We skipped ahead to z/VM 4.4 and it went down to 16 bytes. I complained (ETR) and was told I could try the old VM/ESA FLIST module. It worked, but the users were okay with 16 characters. Now we are z/VM 5.2 and it is down to 9

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Er, that was supposed to be 22 bytes not '2'. (who is this guys editor??) On 12/13/07, Ron Schmiedge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter, It's been going down steadily. On VM/ESA 2.4 it was 2 bytes. We skipped ahead to z/VM 4.4 and it went down to 16 bytes. I complained (ETR) and was told I could

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Peter . Webb
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Er, that was supposed to be 22 bytes not '2'. (who is this guys editor??) On 12/13/07, Ron Schmiedge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Peter, It's been going down steadily. On VM/ESA 2.4 it was 2 bytes. We skipped ahead to z/VM 4.4 and it went down to 16 bytes. I complained

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Feller, Paul
PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 3:09 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST It wouldn't be so bad if IBM was using the space for something useful, but it just seems to be empty 'wasted space'. Peter -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Peter . Webb
, 2007 16:36 To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Didn't know there was something other than FILELIST. Started looking at FLIST. Would the PF11 key help? It looks like the PF11 key increases the input area to end of line. Paul The information transmitted is intended

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Rick Bourgeois
That's very interesting, I've never used FLIST I've always used FILEL so I never saw the change. Rick Bourgeois Virtual Software Systems, Inc. 7715 Browns Bridge Rd Gainesville, GA  30506 [EMAIL PROTECTED] 770-781-3200

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread George Haddad
Once upon a time, there was FLIST, but no FILELIST. Some of us old-schoolers still prefer it. Rick Bourgeois wrote: That's very interesting, I've never used FLIST I've always used FILEL so I never saw the change. Rick Bourgeois Virtual Software Systems, Inc. 7715 Browns Bridge Rd

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Feller, Paul
, December 13, 2007 3:40 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Yes, I know about PF11, but there are a lot of 'little' commands that you can enter in the 20 bytes. It's just a little bit of productivity lost for no gain. Peter -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Huegel, Thomas
Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST I also agree with you that there looks to be a lot of empty space on the screen. Moving a few fields to the right would increase the input area. Paul -Original Message- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Kris Buelens
- From: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 3:40 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Yes, I know about PF11, but there are a lot of 'little' commands that you can enter in the 20

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Nope, never :-) What I like about FLIST is I can easily set up the PF keys the way I want (see FLIST $PROFILE). We have used this to give users customized things they can do. Including removing the ability to edit the files (ever have a user edit a listing to change the numbers on a report,

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Schuh, Richard
Schmiedge Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 2:19 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Nope, never :-) What I like about FLIST is I can easily set up the PF keys the way I want (see FLIST $PROFILE). We have used this to give users customized things they can do. Including

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Dave Lewis
My favorite FLIST function is entering a bunch of commands and then hitting PF3 to exit FLIST and have the commands run.

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Brian Nielsen
Create the 2 files shown below, then use FL instead of FILEIST. Feel fre e to change the names to suit your taste. FL EXEC --- /* */ arg data push 'set pf2 before macro execute cursor exec b' 'FILELIST' data B EXEC --- /* */ arg data 'browse' data Brian Nielsen

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Brian Nielsen
Or just use this as your FILELIST profile: /* */ 'MACRO PROFFLST' 'set pf2 before macro execute cursor BROWSE' (The below was QAD and didn't need the B EXEC.) Brian Nielsen On Thu, 13 Dec 2007 16:37:29 -0600, Brian Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Create the 2 files shown below, then use

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Cool! Thanks Brian. I guess I would still need to pull PROFFLST SXEDIT apart and figure out how to change the description (still says REFRESH)... 'execute cursor browse' works too without a B exec. I use the synonym command to make BROWSE shorter when I have to type... On 12/13/07, Brian Nielsen

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Doug Breneman
You can use the following macro to set PF10 to BROWSE and even display it at the bottom of the screen. I used PF10 just because it was available. This macro is based on the example shown in the appendix of the CMS Command and Utilities Reference. /* MYFLIST XEDIT -- My FILELIST profile to add

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Ron Schmiedge
Thanks Doug. Must be Christmas! I don't want to sound ungrateful, but am I wrong in still thinking that entering this line in FLIST $PROFILE: *PFKEYS 10 BRW BROWSE the file on cursor line and then updating the last line to include '10 BRW' is a little simpler and easier? Ron On 12/13/07,

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Doug Breneman
Hi Ron, You are correct; it is easy to update FLIST $PROFILE for a PF key. Someone on the list indicated that it would be useful if he could get a PF key for BROWSE in FILELIST. I appended to show how this could be done. I am not trying to convert anyone from FLIST to FILELIST. Both can get

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Jim Bohnsack
: The IBM z/VM Operating System [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2007 3:40 PM To: IBMVM@LISTSERV.UARK.EDU Subject: Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST Yes, I know about PF11, but there are a lot of 'little' commands that you can enter in the 20 bytes. It's just

Re: z/VM 5.3 FLIST

2007-12-13 Thread Alan Altmark
On Thursday, 12/13/2007 at 05:55 EST, Doug Breneman/Endicott/[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can use the following macro to set PF10 to BROWSE and even display it at the bottom of the screen. If I may, here's mine: /* Get the displayed PF key settings */ 'EXTRACT /RESERVED' pfrow1_idx =