Have you tried HTML5 YouTube?
Yes, from info given here. Two results:
1) It's better. But it's a better sequence of still pictures. :(
2) You only get HTML5 *IF* the video doesn't have an ad on it and there
are only a small number of those.
So, effectively, it's not better enough to make it
Have you tried HTML5 YouTube? Apparently it works well even on the faster G4s.
www.YouTube.com/html5
-Elliott
On Oct 27, 2010, at 8:52 PM, Malcolm O'Brien wrote:
> Not the thing to watch Flash video on though. :P I just don't go to YouTube
> with that machine.
--
You received this mess
you have a 17" iMac G4 800? THose are nice machines
Yup, I love mine! Not the thing to watch Flash video on though. :P I
just don't go to YouTube with that machine. Instead, I use my PC
desktop, PC notebook or iPod Touch.
When my 80GB drive was getting full, I replaced it with a 500GB that I
On 2010/10/27 19:53, Mystic Prowler so eloquently wrote:
I can overclock my 1.25Ghz iMac G4 to 1.67Ghz, but I need a giant fan
(or 2) on the logic board, and i will need to take out the HDD and CD
drive.
How would you overclock it? Looking at Daystar's pages for their EOL'd
1.92 GHz upgrade I
When I ran my iMac G5 ran at the "automatic" option, it felt like I was
running a crawling 1.5Ghz G4. Now that I turned on the "Best" option, I
don't care if it makes too much noise, as long as it isn't too loud, and to
make sure it doesn't overheat. I don't want that capacitor problem with my
Rev
At 4:46 PM -0600 10/27/2010, Tina K. wrote:
the one thing about the upcoming release that I am curious about is
will Apple finally commit to 64 bit through and through, or is this
going to be another of several incremental steps toward 64 bit that
began with 10.4 Tiger?
IF Apple goes with a p
Yay, I remembered to start a new thread for once!
On 2010/10/27 17:02, Mystic Prowler so eloquently wrote in another thread:
Especially my iMac G5. I turned the energy saver option to "Best" for
performance, and this machine roars louder than my G4 machines combined.
That is my biggest be
I am okay with PowerPC macs for now... mostly because leo is still
supported. They are fast, don't get me wrong. Especially my iMac G5. I
turned the energy saver option to "Best" for performance, and this machine
roars louder than my G4 machines combined. I do need a new MBA, though. A
good 15" Pow
Being a PPC user, 10.7 Lion has no bearing on my computing experience.
At least not until I can afford an Intel Mac, which is years away.
But the one thing about the upcoming release that I am curious about is
will Apple finally commit to 64 bit through and through, or is this
going to be anot
Malcom 'o Brian, you have a 17" iMac G4 800? THose are nice machines you
know, I have 2. One is a 17" 1.25Ghz that WAS a 1Ghz but had it's logic
board replaced because of an unknown reason. My second iMac G4 is identical
to yours except it is a 15" screen, and it's internal IDE Bus failed. It is
ru
trying not to repeat the switch from OS 9 to OS X
But see, that switch was mostly painless for users. This reaps them
mucho good will from many people (such as me). In fact, there were 3
enormous changes over the years:
1. 68xxx to PowerPC
2. OS to OS
3. PowerPC to Intel
ALL of these were a
well it was news to me..
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Mystic Prowler wrote:
> I have a direct link to the site that Apple has it's Mac OS X lion page.
> This OS is coming out in Summer 2011.
>
> www.apple.com/macosx/lion
>
> --
> You received this message because you are a member of the iMac
Well, it will probably leave out in the cold some early Intel Macs,
Please tell us more before we go out and buy one of them.
--
Malcolm
800MHz 17" flat panel iMac running Leopard (1GB RAM, 500GB HD)
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those usi
cool I am getting an 867Mhz 15" Powerbook G4 next week... =)
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/li
On Oct 27, 2010, at 12:24 PM, Mystic Prowler wrote:
> My bad, on track, not tack.
Hmm, at first I thought it was a NEW theological argument: "How many Apples can
balance on the head of a tack?" 8-P
--
Bruce Johnson
"Wherever you go, there you are" B. Banzai, PhD
--
You received this messag
My bad, on track, not tack.
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/imac/list.shtml and our netiquette
guide is at http://www.lowendmac.com/lists/netiquette.shtml
To post to t
Apples are the best computers I have and will ever use. I have no need for
anything else. As long as Apple stays on tack, i'm happy.
--
You received this message because you are a member of the iMac Group, a group
for those using Apple iMacs and eMacs.
The list FAQ is at http://lowendmac.com/ima
On Oct 26, 2010, at 10:21 PM, Dave wrote:
> Gosh, folks, is this what they mean by the Apple tax?
No, the 'Apple Tax' is a sarcastic term used by Windows trolls to complain that
Macs cost more than Dells, even though comparably equipped Dells usually cost
just as much. (or morecost out wha
18 matches
Mail list logo
