It's probably worth mentioning, to be fair to Reindl, that he can no longer
respond publically to this list..
Thanks,
Kiall
Sent from my phone.
On Apr 7, 2012 8:07 p.m., "Maciek Sokolewicz"
wrote:
> On 07-04-2012 03:10, John Crenshaw wrote:
>
> Seriously, if you're so angry that you can't even
On 07-04-2012 03:10, John Crenshaw wrote:
Seriously, if you're so angry that you can't even type straight you should take
a break before responding. Any argument delivered like this won't be well
received anyway. Take a break, find your place of zen, respond when you can be
civil.
Do you ha
Sébatien Durand wrote:
But I was not completely aware of the level of change/break my suggestion
will cause.
I'm grateful the work you do. It was just a usability/cosmetic remark of a
daily PHP user. I can live with it.
You have to bear in mind that many of us have many years of code base inve
-Original Message-
From: Reindl Harald [mailto:h.rei...@thelounge.net]
> Am 07.04.2012 01:30, schrieb Chris Stockton:
> > Hello,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> Am 06.04.2012 23:54, schrieb Tom Boutell:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:39 P
Am 07.04.2012 01:30, schrieb Chris Stockton:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>>
>> Am 06.04.2012 23:54, schrieb Tom Boutell:
>>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald
>>> wrote:
>>
>> the "who" in such cases are ALL developers out there damned
>> c
Hello,
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 06.04.2012 23:54, schrieb Tom Boutell:
>> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> the "who" in such cases are ALL developers out there damned
> can i send you the invoice for my time if your ideas
> would be re
> yes, i am not able to stop calling people to lazy writing whitespaces in front morons
The constant personal attacks are a violation of the mailing list rules. Nobody
likes getting this in their inbox. Please let's keep this civil.
John Crenshaw
Priacta, Inc.
--
PHP Internals - PHP Runtime D
Am 06.04.2012 23:54, schrieb Tom Boutell:
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>> what do you expect by propose work for many people
> Oh I'm sorry, do we need to start every feature suggestion with a
> description of exactly who will do the work?
the "who" in such cases are
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 5:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> what do you expect by propose work for many people
Oh I'm sorry, do we need to start every feature suggestion with a
description of exactly who will do the work?
> is it so hard to write
It is so embarrassing. Every time I type it a Ruby
Tom Boutell wrote:
Knock it off with the ad-hominem attacks please.
You are entitled to your views, but I suspect that this would be a nail far too
far. I for one would be only too happy to cut loose and keep a REAL copy of PHP
running as all this ballast is simply destroying what used to be
Am 06.04.2012 23:30, schrieb Tom Boutell:
> Knock it off with the ad-hominem attacks please.
what do you expect by propose work for many people
> It's not "change for the sake of change" to propose that PHP move on from
> needing (and breaking mysteriously in weird
> subtle ways if it's miss
I should have said "breaking mysteriously in weird subtle ways if
there are blank lines before wrote:
> Knock it off with the ad-hominem attacks please. It's not "change for
> the sake of change" to propose that PHP move on from needing the stop of every class file (and breaking mysteriously in w
Knock it off with the ad-hominem attacks please. It's not "change for
the sake of change" to propose that PHP move on from needing wrote:
> what exactly is your problem?
> having solution searching problem?
>
> what are people like you try to achieve?
> what would make you happy in breaking BC?
>
what exactly is your problem?
having solution searching problem?
what are people like you try to achieve?
what would make you happy in breaking BC?
what would you make happy generate lot of work for others?
what would be better for anybody?
change for the sake of the change is blindly stupid
Am
To tell the truth I'd be more excited by a proposal to kill wrote:
> I have to agree with that. Also: does PHP need to be a templating
> language anymore, given excellent templating language implementations
> in PHP, like Twig?
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, John Crenshaw
> wrote:
>>> -
I have to agree with that. Also: does PHP need to be a templating
language anymore, given excellent templating language implementations
in PHP, like Twig?
On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 3:05 PM, John Crenshaw wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Sébatien Durand [mailto:sun...@live.com]
>> Sent:
> -Original Message-
> From: Sébatien Durand [mailto:sun...@live.com]
> Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 10:55 PM
> To: internals@lists.php.net
> Subject: [PHP-DEV] PHP as a template language
>
> IMHO, PHP is a great template language. This is what makes it so simple and
> powerful, compare
Am 06.04.2012 04:55, schrieb Sébatien Durand:
> IMHO, PHP is a great template language. This is what makes it so simple
> and powerful, compared to other web languages.
>
> So far, we have "
> A suggestion : deprecate these old tags and replace them with a more
> elegant and a shorter impleme
On Apr 5, 2012, at 8:22 PM, Rasmus Lerdorf wrote:
> On 04/05/2012 07:55 PM, Sébatien Durand wrote:
>> IMHO, PHP is a great template language. This is what makes it so simple
>> and powerful, compared to other web languages.
>>
>> So far, we have ">
>> A suggestion : deprecate these old tags an
On 04/05/2012 07:55 PM, Sébatien Durand wrote:
> IMHO, PHP is a great template language. This is what makes it so simple
> and powerful, compared to other web languages.
>
> So far, we have "
> A suggestion : deprecate these old tags and replace them with a more
> elegant and a shorter implemen
20 matches
Mail list logo
