> Long Title: "Stateless Automatic IPv6 Address Configuration (SLAAC) with
> Stable and Semantically Opaque Interface Identifiers"
>
> Short Title: "SLAAC with Stable and Opaque IIDs"
>
> I propose to use the word "opaque" here because the pseudo-random number
> generator is an implementation de
w that
the two are closely related, but different, to highlight what has
changed.
Adding "stable" does the job.
Tom Petch
>Brian
>
> >
> > -Dave
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: ipv6-boun...@ietf.org [mailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org
On 08/12/2013 09:11 PM, james woodyatt wrote:
>> Given the above options I'd stick with the current title. Besides,
>> the community has become used to refer to this method as
>> "stable-privacy-addresses".. so changing the title at this point
>> would, IMHO, only contribute to confusion.
>
> Coun
On Aug 9, 2013, at 14:59 , Fernando Gont wrote:
> The arguemtn, as far as I can tell, is that the current title might be
> confusing (mostly because of the confusion there is with different
> terminology on the subject).
Oh yay! Something I'm good at!
> Given the above options I'd stick with
> -Original Message-
> From: Bob Hinden [mailto:bob.hin...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, August 12, 2013 12:59 PM
> To: Mark ZZZ Smith
> Cc: Bob Hinden; Ole Troan; Brian Carpenter; IPv6 IPv6 List; Dave Thaler
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses: Docume
Hi, Bob,
On 08/12/2013 04:59 PM, Bob Hinden wrote:
>
> Pseudo-Random Per-Subnet Interface Identifiers
>
> They are pseudo-random and intended to be used on a single subnet.
>
> Personally, I would prefer something like these titles because
> "privacy" is once of several characteristics and the
Mark,
> Why does this method have to be limited to SLAAC, or rather, wouldn't
> describing it as SLAAC related imply that this or a similar technique can't
> be used with DHCPv6 or any other address configuration methods?
>
> While DHCPv6 assigned addresses are naturally per-subnet, I'd think t
Hi,
- Original Message -
> From: Ole Troan
> To: Brian E Carpenter
> Cc: Fernando Gont ; "6...@ietf.org" <6...@ietf.org>;
> Dave Thaler
> Sent: Monday, 12 August 2013 6:59 PM
> Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses: Document titl
On 08/12/2013 07:31 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>> One thing is some node using an address to communicate with you.
>> Another thing is that other node being able to learn other
>> information by means of such address.
>>
>> -- e.g, since the IID changes from one network to another, you
>> cannot track t
Fernando,
I will observe that Alissa's term "random per-network" isn't in any of the
possibilities
below and the reasons given wouldn't apply if that term were used.
Perhaps that
could be used in a title?
>>>
>>> Nah. Too complex for a title, and "random" is a bad word
Hi, Ole,
On 08/12/2013 05:59 AM, Ole Troan wrote:
>>>
>>> I will observe that Alissa's term "random per-network" isn't in any of the
>>> possibilities
>>> below and the reasons given wouldn't apply if that term were used. Perhaps
>>> that
>>> could be used in a title?
>>
>> Nah. Too complex for
>>
>> I will observe that Alissa's term "random per-network" isn't in any of the
>> possibilities
>> below and the reasons given wouldn't apply if that term were used. Perhaps
>> that
>> could be used in a title?
>
> Nah. Too complex for a title, and "random" is a bad word - you should always
un...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>> Fernando Gont
>> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 2:59 PM
>> To: 6...@ietf.org
>> Subject: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses: Document title
>>
>> Folks,
>>
>> I has been suggested to me that we might want to change the
ailto:ipv6-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> Fernando Gont
> Sent: Friday, August 9, 2013 2:59 PM
> To: 6...@ietf.org
> Subject: draft-ietf-6man-stable-privacy-addresses: Document title
>
> Folks,
>
> I has been suggested to me that we might want to change the title of this
&
Folks,
I has been suggested to me that we might want to change the title of
this document, and the chairs have suggested that I comment on this one
on-list.
The arguemtn, as far as I can tell, is that the current title might be
confusing (mostly because of the confusion there is with different
te
15 matches
Mail list logo
