Hello list,
Is it possible to select non-readonly textboxes with JQuery? I've
tried the following queries, non of which worked:
$(input:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
$(input:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'false'])
$(input:[EMAIL PROTECTED]'true'])
However it was possible to select readonly textboxes with the
Try this
$(input:text).not([EMAIL PROTECTED]);
-GTG
On 8/17/07, Mohsen Saboorian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello list,
Is it possible to select non-readonly textboxes with JQuery? I've
tried the following queries, non of which worked:
$(input:[EMAIL PROTECTED])
$(input:[EMAIL
Folks,
This is originall a question to Erik Beeson (so I hope he is lurking
around) from a previous thread on Creating DOM Elements on the fly ,
but I chose to post it as new topic since it lead to and also touches
on some fews issues regarding the theory of jQuery.
First, Erik provided a neat
Thanks for the sample plugin code Sean,
This looks like a really neat plugin, I'll have to take care of the
indentation though. Can get very messy at 3 levels if not written
well.
Anurag
On Aug 17, 4:19 pm, duma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anurag,
I've written a Dom element-creating plugin for
I'm always for separating thing. Maybe, this would be nice:
Function my_f(arg1,arg2,arg3)
{
//code
}
$(...).click().f_call(my_f,{arg1: arg1,arg2: arg2,arg3: arg3});
or similar.
Maybe, plug in mechanism can be extended to do this stuff.
John, for us who prefer
$(...).bind(click,f(){});
On Aug 17, 5:43 pm, westamastaflash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I wrote a periodic execution function for jQuery, similar to the
PeriodicExecuter function of prototype. I'd like some feedback as to
it's usefulness (or non-usefullness). This is my first plugin, so any
suggestions as to what
My Bad, your inline comments did imply to return false to stop the
callback, other TRUE to continue.
But how to you pass the options, specifically, changing the
frequency?
Thanks
On Aug 18, 5:45 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 17, 5:43 pm, westamastaflash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure westamastaflash will reply to ur query, but in the meantime, since
i am still awake (3 PM here), i thought i will do a good deed before i goto
bed.
try $.periodic(callback, {frequency: 5});
You were using quotes for the options object. That was probably the cause of
the problem
And
On 17/08/07, Rob Desbois [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone know offhand how much overhead using .add() instead of the comma
incurs?
Is it just the additional function call?
--rob
It is likely to be an additional function call or two, so the
difference is negligible. If you have the
Hi Andy
I really wish but I am not JQuery Ninja, yet.
; )
Mario
2007/8/17, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Yeah...would be nice if someone took something like that and converted it
to a plugin. Mario? YOu up for it?
:)
--
*From:*
On Aug 18, 5:59 am, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am sure westamastaflash will reply to ur query, but in the meantime, since
i am still awake (3 PM here), i thought i will do a good deed before i goto
bed.
try $.periodic(callback, {frequency: 5});
You were using quotes for
I fiqured this out:
$('input type=checkbox id=cb/')
.appendTo('#myFormId', 10)
.click(function() {
// do something
});
The .appendTo overload (Erik's plugin) which is designed to clone the
html does not return an array, hence chaining the .click
IMO this should be prominently on the Jq site. This article explains the
jQ way so well, it's invaluable.
~ ~ Dave
Priest, James (NIH/NIEHS) [C] wrote:
I didn't write this but saw it on Reddit while browsing at lunch:
http://simonwillison.net/2007/Aug/15/jquery/
Jim
Sorry about not replying sooner, I was offline after I posted last
night.
Pops:
About passing parameters:
I tried to follow the example in the jQuery docs of using
jQuery.extend to handle optional parameters to functions - I think
it's like using named notation for parameters in PL/SQL - i.e.
Thats really surprising, the same code doesn't work for me but works for you.
No I dont have IE in quirks mode. Does that make a difference?. Do you know
any other way to make this work.
Thanks.
Olaf wrote:
Potluri schrieb:
Can you please help me out in how to make it work in IE. It
thanks !
On Aug 17, 6:45 pm, Justin Sepulveda [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What you're looking for sounds a lot like tab functionality. I think
you could pull it off using Klaus's tab plugin.
http://www.stilbuero.de/2007/05/14/tabs-plugin-more-flexibility/
On Aug 17, 1:21 pm, [EMAIL
Thanks a lot Ganesh,
It works for me. I've beenworking a lot on this.
Regards,
Vijay Potluri
Ganeshji Marwaha wrote:
try something like this...
$(#some_table_name).click(function() {
$(#rs_loading).show(function() {
someFuncTORefine();
$(#rs_loading).hide();
});
IE has problems with selectors on dynamic elements (elements created
in script), but can handle classes just fine, so if you can change
your code to hunt classes instead, that should work.
...or use Geneshjii's advice and see if you can't speed that up
instead.
Having class=srRow on every tr
I've just added an example of how to stop an animation to the jQuery
documention's Effect page.
No longer will people have to scour jQuery source code to find the
answer :P
On Aug 18, 12:03 am, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey Christian,
This is either a huge co-incidence or we
WOW!
Thanx! You actually got me hooked up bigtime - the visual JQuery is very
helpful BUT..
I still have major problems on click/drag/drop Layers - it's as if the
z-index returns to default... There are strange things happening there. Go
here:
I finally figured out what was wrong with my attempt to get
stopPropation to work so I could simulate focus on any div, not just
an input element. This is the link to the demo and below is how it
works (the foucs and unfocus part).
Interface Elments is very cool but I think its overkill. Its not that
easy to use.
jCarouselLite seems just the oppostie, too simple and not enough
features.
What you want to do doesnt need a plugin, its really easy in jQuery
using show and hide or animate.
I do which there was a carousel that
Cool, That seems to look like an extension of my jkwick source. Was jkwick
the starting point? :-)
Anyways, i guess u r facing the same problem as i am at this point.
Initially i had it similar to yours, but the problem is the individual items
bump left and right especially when we are hovering
Anyone know there is such as plugin, e.g.
div id=image1
img src='...
desc...
/div
div id=image2
img src='...
desc...
/div
div id=image3
img src='...
desc...
/div
...
the effect is the DIVs keep rolling (over and over) from a limited
area
(which only show at most 2 items at the same time)
i guess u r looking for jCarouselLite -
http://gmarwaha.com/jquery/jcarousellite/
-GTG
On 8/18/07, howa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone know there is such as plugin, e.g.
div id=image1
img src='...
desc...
/div
div id=image2
img src='...
desc...
/div
div id=image3
img src='...
With the paging feature you will need more then one line of code.
Cycle has exactly what you want. Its called the Pager. I am going to
use that myself, its so simple.
http://www.malsup.com/jquery/cycle/int2.html
Mitch
IMO, part of good software craftmanship and being productive is being
able to recognized code in brain speed. One might called say the art
of jQuery Theory dissemination of information applies here.
I agree! Also, something yet unaddressed in this thread is callbacks.
I really enjoy the
Thanks!!
Yes, indentation helps make this readable ;-)
AnuragMishra wrote:
Thanks for the sample plugin code Sean,
This looks like a really neat plugin, I'll have to take care of the
indentation though. Can get very messy at 3 levels if not written
well.
Anurag
--
View this
$(object).css(opacity, 0.7).fadeIn(400);
Ha! That did the trick. Thanks.
Aaron
@Aaron:
Does this accomplish your original goal, fading TO 70%, in all
browsers? The code reads to me that it will fade from 70% to 100%. I
have had so much trouble with the fadeTo working crossbrowser.
Right on browthanks for your review, I love the word excellent.
There is not much better, except maybe awesome.
As far as being way to the right, I was trying to be clever and make
the window float in the middle of the page by putting everything
inside a table.
That was before I really
Quick question to attempt to avoid reinventing the wheel.
Is anyone aware of a Javascript library (JQuery or otherwise) which
will find URLs in a chunk of text and either turn them into links, or
make it easy for me to do so myself? (Something like Perl's URI::Find
module, or the urlizer
+1
One thing about jQuery, atleast for me so far, it has brought back
similar APL like mental translations requirements. In APL, essentially
a math language of scalar, vectors and matrixes, forces or promotes
you to envision all the data in your mind, thinking and soping out all
your
Hey guys,
So I've been lobbying for syntax along the following lines:
$(...).attr(foo, {{width() 40 ? 'bar' : 'baz'}})
or
$(...).attr(target, {{rel}})
which would basically expand to:
$(...).attr(foo, function() {
return this.width() 40 ? bar : baz;
});
and
$(...).attr(target, function() {
No need to start a new thread, if your questions are about the same
page/topic.
The animated slide effect works for me in Firefox 2.0.0.6 (latest
stable ver), as well as Opera 9.02.
It looks like the stay-on-top will work, but you have conflicting
bindings, and I think we need to add a zIndex
Ohhh, I see, the slideDown effect doesn't work after scrolling...
I think the position property may somehow get reset during the
animations? Unfortunately we're now getting in over my head as the
animation code is quite complex. I'd love to know the reason, any
insight from jQuery fx code
Thanks a lot it works for me. I realized that IE is not recognizing child
selectors.
Cybolic wrote:
IE has problems with selectors on dynamic elements (elements created
in script), but can handle classes just fine, so if you can change
your code to hunt classes instead, that should
Hi,
I'm using this method to store id's of checked checkboxes in array object
like
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]'checkbox']:checked).each(
function()
{
arrayName.push(this.id);
}
);
it works but above way takes .656 secs for storing in array object with 50
checkboxes. Is there a 1 line way to store
Omg,is this in the jquery-core?! O_o
If it is then I won't need to use interface iutil and ifx anymore, yay!
On 8/17/07, Cybolic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can start and stop an animation like so:
// start
$('#animationElement').animate({width: 50}, slow);
// stop
stop() is going to be in jQuery 1.2, and I believe it is already in trunk.
-- Yehuda
On 8/18/07, Joan Piedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Omg,is this in the jquery-core?! O_o
If it is then I won't need to use interface iutil and ifx anymore, yay!
On 8/17/07, Cybolic [EMAIL
I dare say someone can offer a better solution for your first request:
To know whether all checkboxes are checked. I'd probably try !$
(#id1,#id2,#id3).is(:not(:checked)) which returns true if all are
unchecked (Note the ! at the beginning).
Your second request is easy: To know whether at least
Potluri wrote:
Hi,
I'm using this method to store id's of checked checkboxes in array object
like
$([EMAIL PROTECTED]'checkbox']:checked).each(
function()
{
arrayName.push(this.id);
}
);
it works but above way takes .656 secs for storing in array object with 50
checkboxes. Is there a 1 line
I don't know about finishing in 0.0 secs but there is an attrs()
method in the moreSelectors plugin that returns an array of attribute
values from all matched elements.
Eg: $(input:checkbox:checked).attrs(id) will return an array
[id1,id2,id3 etc]
It can also accept a second parameter if you
$.fn.all = function(selector) {
return foo.filter(:checked).length == foo.length;
});
Kudos to John for that one ;)
-- Yehuda
On 8/18/07, Joan Piedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$('a.toggleCheckbox').click(function(){
$(':checkbox').each(function(){
if(this.checked) {
yehuda, i dont see it in the trunk... am i missing something...
-GTG
On 8/18/07, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
stop() is going to be in jQuery 1.2, and I believe it is already in trunk.
-- Yehuda
On 8/18/07, Joan Piedra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Omg,is this in the jquery-core?!
Ganeshji,
Maybe it's on plan to make it happen for 1.2, but It isn't in trunk just
yet.
Hope to see your plugin soon.
On 8/18/07, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yehuda, i dont see it in the trunk... am i missing something...
-GTG
On 8/18/07, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Untested, but should work.
$.ajax({
type: POST,
url: /data/tags,
data: format=xhtml,
success: function(data){
$('#tags').html(data);
}
});
On 8/18/07, angelogladding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I attempt to load into a ul (#tags) jQuery seems to be sending a
`POST`
I dunno, but using no jQuery at all, your alpha filter doesn't appear
to be set up properly:
http://dev.jquery.com/~john/ticket/fadeTo/
--John
On 8/17/07, Aaron Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an element with this style associated with it:
filter:alpha(opacity=0);
On 8/18/07, Mitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am pretty sure I can get the outdiv to float in the center of the page,
I just
have to remember how to do it.
I believe this is what you're looking for:
body {
position: relative;
margin-left: auto;
margin-right: auto;
width:
On Aug 19, 12:10 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The default is GET, however, if you pass the 2nd parameter as URL data
and not a function, then jQuery assumes a POST is desired. Studying
this seems odd. I can take a swag at the reasons:
- As a poor's man security consideration
Looks like a lot of what I've done was done before with jQuery Timers
- so take a look at that as well.
On Aug 18, 9:40 am, westamastaflash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry about not replying sooner, I was offline after I posted last
night.
Pops:
About passing parameters:
I tried to follow
On Aug 18, 9:43 pm, Mitch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact this demo has a little bit of every thing in it.
That's what impressed me. It really is a full-fledged app (or appears
to be - i couldn't figure out how to get it to do anything, so i
assume it's a prototype or mock-up). You did a hell
On Aug 18, 9:50 pm, Rod Begbie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quick question to attempt to avoid reinventing the wheel.
Is anyone aware of a Javascript library (JQuery or otherwise) which
will find URLs in a chunk of text and either turn them into links, or
make it easy for me to do so myself?
It's actually not my group, I'm just a participant, but I'll forward that
information on.however, I can't see them changing the name from AIR
since they've been using it for 10 years already.
On 8/17/07, Andy Matthews [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You should consider a new acronym for your
The default is GET, however, if you pass the 2nd parameter as URL data
and not a function, then jQuery assumes a POST is desired. Studying
this seems odd. I can take a swag at the reasons:
- As a poor's man security consideration against ajax
injections. and
- If you are sending JSON
In the docs for .load, it has:
params (Object): (optional) A set of key/value pairs that will be sent
as data to the server.
That is not what I am seeing, the following
$('#containerId').load(url,k1=v1k2=v2);
The jQuery.js code at lin 1671:
params = jQuery.param( params );
On Aug 19, 12:31 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the docs for .load, it has:
params (Object): (optional) A set of key/value pairs that will be sent
as data to the server.
That is not what I am seeing, the following
$('#containerId').load(url,k1=v1k2=v2);
Hi, Pops!
That should
On Aug 19, 12:39 am, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(...).load('url', {k1='v1', k2:'v2'});
s/k1=/k1:/, of course.
On Aug 18, 6:15 pm, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One of the negative side-effects is, however, that POST is not
configured consistently across servers. For example, i had the example
same problem as the OP... i was trying to load() an HTML file and it
worked on my local system.
Yes, a POST will be performed instead. I updated the docs to represent this:
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax#load.28_url.2C_params.2C_callback_.29
--John
On 8/18/07, angelogladding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
When I attempt to load into a ul (#tags) jQuery seems to be sending a `POST`
request.
Ok, there is no way i can oppose that. You are an authority in what u r
talking about and i comletely agree with u. I also understand exactly what u
mean when u say that...
That said, the interesting part is, in the case of my lavalamp plugin
http://www.gmarwaha.com/jquery/lavalamp/test/test.html
On Aug 18, 7:01 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, a POST will be performed instead. I updated the docs to represent
this:http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax#load.28_url.2C_params.2C_callback_.29
John, I'm sure you read my recent new post regarding the DOC nit.
You need to add, correct
Stephan,
You're pulling my leg?
Firebug shows this when I enter the following in the console:
console.log($.param({k1='v1', k2='v2'}));
0=%7B1=k2=13=%3D4='5=v6=17='8=%2C9=%2010=k11=212=
%3D13='14=v15=216='17=%7D
This is called in
params = jQuery.param(params)
in the .load method to
Right, that's because you're not supposed to pass in a string, you
pass in an options block. If you pass in a string it splits the string
up by character, which is not what you want.
--John
On 8/18/07, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 18, 7:01 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 19, 12:55 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was you sending?
i wasn't sending anything - i just wanted to load the contents of an
HTML snippet file (not a complete/well-formed HTML document) into a
DIV.
We write our own web server and as such we conform to HTTP RFC
standards, and
You don't put the object in as a string - you put it in as an object:
console.log($.param({k1:'v1', k2:'v2'}));
which outputs:
k1=v1k2=v2
--John
On 8/18/07, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan,
You're pulling my leg?
Firebug shows this when I enter the following in the console:
On Aug 19, 1:16 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan,
You're pulling my leg?
Not as far as i know, but...
Firebug shows this when I enter the following in the console:
console.log($.param({k1='v1', k2='v2'}));
0=%7B1=k2=13=%3D4='5=v6=17='8=%2C9=%2010=k11=212=
On Aug 19, 1:21 am, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um... err... ??? i may be wrong on what the param object should be,
but my understanding is that it's an Object/map of key/val pairs.
Maybe someone out there can correct or confirm that?
From the example on the docs page:
Hi guys,
I have just committed a new plugin to the trunk. It's a simple templater
that allows you to create templates that get populated via JSON objects.
Some examples:
var tmp = $.makeTemplate(My name is {{foo}} and your name is {{bar}});
tmp({foo: Yehuda, bar: jQuery}) #= My name is Yehuda
On Aug 18, 4:28 pm, Potluri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is there a way to check like $(#id1,#id2,#id3).attr(checked); should
return true if all of them is checked.
I believe another possible idiom would be:
fResult = #('[EMAIL PROTECTED]@[EMAIL PROTECTED]:checked').length == 3;
and also is
Sweet, i needed something like this about a week ago, ended up writing my
own :-/
Cool anyways! nice job!
On 8/18/07, Yehuda Katz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys,
I have just committed a new plugin to the trunk. It's a simple templater
that allows you to create templates that get
On Aug 18, 7:17 pm, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, that's because you're not supposed to pass in a string, you
pass in an options block. If you pass in a string it splits the string
up by character, which is not what you want.
Ok. I just tried it.
console.log($.param({k1:'v1',
On Aug 18, 7:19 pm, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 19, 12:55 am, Pops [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What was you sending?
i wasn't sending anything -
h, ok, but that should keep with GET if you are not passing
parameters.? No?
Apache can be configured to allow/disallow POST
On Aug 18, 7:28 pm, Stephan Beal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://docs.jquery.com/Ajax#load.28_url.2C_params.2C_callback_.29
..
In that usage, the params object is indeed an object/map.
The problem with that example is that it uses an HTML file as the
target, whereas (as mentioned in my
I have a question:
scrollable html table are now vertical(scrollbar);
Can be horizontal (scrollbar)?
Ladies and Gentleman,
A few hundred bytes were added to the jqModal plugin to aid those
struggling with z-Index container stacking issues. Namely; there's now
a shortcut** to overcome the overlay covers everything, including the
dialog! issues. Other improvements include a fault-tolerant focus
Hi all,
I'm looking to allow a user to upload mutliple files or even better, an
entire directory worth of files. Adding a progress bar for the batch or
single file upload would be ideal.
What's my best bet for doing this?
Thanks.
- sf
Hi folks
This is the basic loadContent function
function loadContent() {
$(#myContent).load(mypage.php);
}
This works fine if I'm in the root of my website:
domain.com/page.php
however I have several rewritten urls (mod rewrite) on the site with
paths such as:
domain.com/folder1/page.php
I just wanted to comment on something that seemed really out of place,
though the openness of the community has already been addressed.
People who are unwilling to become comfortable with the language
they're working in (e.g., by using its available features, such as
anonymous functions)
I'm trying to use the hoverIntent plugin with jQuery, but I don't
fully understand how it works and was hoping someone could help me out
with a few issues I'm having.
The page I'm working on is at http://schollsferryauto.com , the two
buttons in the upper right corner of the page which are Hours
Hi all,
I'm looking for an elegant and visual appealing file upload plugin. I
don't need any stunning effects, just something appealing to the eye,
and can allow a user to upload an image or directory on their local
system.
Can anyone recommend such a utility with jquery?
Thank you all!
- sf
Ladies and Gentleman,
A few hundred bytes were added to the jqModal plugin to aid those
struggling with z-Index container stacking issues. Namely; there's now
a shortcut** to overcome the overlay covers everything, including the
dialog! issues. Other improvements include a fault-tolerant focus
I have two small questions, if anybody can help:
1. This was recently published concerning .NET:
if you have an element that has runat=server attribute you cannot
call it directly as #loginForm because asp.net rewrites the id to
something different just doa view source on your aspx page and
Hey everyone,
I have successfully integrated jquery(AJAX) into an mmorpg website, i
am facing one problem that i cannot understand.
Whenever in chat/message boards, i use a filter file to create image
smilies, and filter words. Now when i dont include this file,
everything works ok, but
Pretty cool Yehuda, I'll have to give it a shot so I can give ya some
feedback.
~Sean
Hey all, I'm trying to blur (remove focus from) a link.
Non-working code:
$('#tags_clear').blur();
Working code:
document.getElementById('tags_clear').blur();
Is there something glaringly obvious I'm missing here?
Thanks,
Angelo
--
Angelo Gladding
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://angelogladding.com
Nope, that should work - do you have a page with this code on it?
--John
On 8/18/07, Angelo Gladding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey all, I'm trying to blur (remove focus from) a link.
Non-working code:
$('#tags_clear').blur();
Working code:
document.getElementById('tags_clear').blur();
I believe this is fixed in SVN (Revision 2529).
While you are waiting for 1.1.4, you can do it this way:
$('#tags_clear')[0].blur();
--
Brandon Aaron
On 8/18/07, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nope, that should work - do you have a page with this code on it?
--John
On 8/18/07,
Thanks Brandon that fixed it for the temporary. I had a feeling it was
something like that from the docs.
On 8/18/07, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I believe this is fixed in SVN (Revision 2529).
While you are waiting for 1.1.4, you can do it this way:
$('#tags_clear')[0].blur();
$(this).hide().parent().prepend(img class='ajax-loader' src='ajax-
loader.gif' height='14px' style='padding-left:7px;' alt='loading...'/
);
This, obviously, is in the head tag. However, when I run it through
the validator, it is returning an error:
document type does not allow element img here
The easiest way around the asp.net control id rewriting is something
like this:
var $myControl=$(#%=MyControl.ClientID%);
When that page is generated, the server will substitute in the real ID
of the control it has generated.
On Aug 18, 3:29 pm, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
Code should read:
$(this).hide().parent().prepend(img class='ajax-loader' src='ajax-
loader.gif' height='14px' style='padding-left:7px;' alt='loading...'/
);
John, i now completely get what u mean... This is actually not stopping
animation ;-).
:-( we will wait for jquery 1.2 in the meantime... Thanks for letting us
know.
-GTG
On 8/18/07, Ganeshji Marwaha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, there is no way i can oppose that. You are an authority in what
try this...
http://www.oscaralexander.com/tutorials/how-to-make-sexy-buttons-with-css.html
On Aug 17, 5:20 pm, Tobias Parent [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, all -
I'm trying to create an UNOBTRUSIVE JAVASCRIPT routine to replace links
in a navigation menu with button graphics. All good, so
93 matches
Mail list logo
