On Fri, 20 Jul 2001, Andrew Hoying wrote:
Hello,
While going though the busybox options, I saw that you could turn on Minix
version 2 file system support. I checked and Oxygen currently is using
version one, and I'd guess the other distributions are as well. Is there any
advantages to
On Wed, 18 Jul 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
Please take a look at the new proposed format for our DocManager documents.
I don't want to start modifying the rest of our FAQs until I get some
feedback on this format. Thanks.
Why does the DocManager...
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Hilton Travis wrote:
Are those the 8 floppy disks?
I think the 8 floppy disks never held more than 250KB at most, anyway.
Now where are these floppys with 800M free? And is that 800MB or 800Mb?
On 13 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey, I bought a disk notcher so I could double side my 5-1/4 floppy
disks. I saved SO much money. ROFL
I saved more than you... I used an exacto knife I already had lying
around. I thought the 3.5 floppy format was a conspiracy by the disk
Anyone have any thoughts on http://www.netlinos.org?
It seems ... thin. Build a website and they will come. Full-page ad in
LJ, but the online press release is dated 6/12/2001, so it is kind of
behind the curve. I could see it becoming a useful site, if it can get
rid of its strong Cyclades
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
I've also downloaded the CD's, but it seems that something is wrong
with
CD1...
It should boot, but I get nothing.
Hmm...I just tried booting mine and I get a lilo prompt...
I have a 1.2 and 2.0(2disks), and the former will boot
On Tue, 26 Jun 2001, Greg Morgan wrote:
[...]
I just came across some Redhat documentation. It's Appendix A in the
Red Hat Linux 7.1: The Official Red Hat Linux Reference Guide.
There's a reference for almost everything. It starts here:
On Thu, 21 Jun 2001, Luis.F.Correia wrote:
One extra thought!
MD5 checksums ARE OK!!!
Bye!
p.s. Charles, if you managed to boot it, can you privately send me the boot
floppy?
-Original Message-
From: Luis.F.Correia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, June 21,
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Scott C. Best, 2001-06-13 23:25 -0700
Heyaz. So, I went to the LEAF site today trying to
imagine myself as a new LRP user who's going there for the
first time.
And it strikes me...where's the distro? IMO, frontcenter
links to both
On Thu, 14 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
[...]
What most people want - a blackbox that you plug in and turn on and
forget - it just isn't going to happen:
1. Too many variables: do you want a VPN? Shell access? Proxy?
DMZ? Web Cache? Web server? SNMP? Web statistics? Name
On Tue, 12 Jun 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Ray Olszewski wrote:
We need to be careful here. Silence does not equal assent, and many of the
important participants in LEAF have been most notable for their silence on
this thread.
I'd like to speak up myself. I would also like to echo
On Sun, 3 Jun 2001, KP [iso-8859-1] Kirchdörfer wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. Juni 2001 23:09 schrieb Charles Steinkuehler:
- Use the ramlog package instead of the log package...this puts the logs on
a seperate ramdisk, avoiding the full ramdisk issues, which are the most
likely thing to kill
On Tue, 22 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
George Metz wrote:
That's a lot of wordplay in there. I think that Oxygen/2 should actually
be Oxygen System/2, but that's just me. =)
I thought /2 was copyrighted by IBM :-(
I personally like Oxygen: Ozone Edition for the next release.
On Tue, 8 May 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
I've managed to get the lrp/ directory and Makefile near completion.
It relies on some shell scripts contained in the same directory. My
goal is (after compiling source):
I have visions of a cloud saying *and a miracle occurs* and then we
proceed
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-05-03 13:22 -0500
It might be a good idea to gather together on a weekend sometime. We
could call it a Silicon Valley LEAF Developers Group (SVLDG) meeting.
We need a place that is accessible by public transportation to
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Ewald Wasscher wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
What I had in mind was to do the same thing, but with patched sources
- and thus then create a package at the same time.
I would like to keep the lrp-specific things as seperate as possible
from the original
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Ray added/updated the ping FAQs in DocManager sec07. Please review them if
you have time.
https://sourceforge.net/docman/?group_id=13751
I seem to recall something like:
Ping type 4: Ping returns immediately with Destination (host|net) is
unreachable.
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-20 18:03 -0700
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
This still doesn't explain why Debian is
trying to do the following for their boot floppies.
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot-0102/msg00435.html
~ Build in
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, George Metz wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Jack Coates, 2001-04-21 16:08 -0700
I just hunted through my module archives and I've never built it as a
module...
I also did a google search, but the only ones I turned up in reasonable
timeframe
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, George Metz wrote:
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
Not a bad idea; however, there are a few things that come to mind:
* How do you create a VFAT diskette under Windows? Some may laugh; I
for one am not sure how
Beats me. I think it's a simple
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
David Douthitt, 2001-04-20 16:25 -0500
I like the long name idea, using VFAT. The only thing is, VFAT adds
FAT to the kernel (pun intended :-) Just how big is this thing?
Would someone explain to me why we shouldn't use cramfs? I believe it works
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-20 16:30 -0700
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
David Douthitt, 2001-04-20 16:25 -0500
I like the long name idea, using VFAT. The only thing is, VFAT adds
FAT to the kernel (pun intended :-) Just how big is
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-20 17:26 -0700
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
I thought this might be a good way to write protect hard drives
and flash disks.
Perhaps... or it may actually be _too_ restrictive, since you simply
don't have
On Fri, 20 Apr 2001, Eric Wolzak wrote:
Hello all Unix guru's
I got myself a problem
I need for a weblet a function that first check if teststring is already
inserted in a file, if not it will be inserted. This to prevent that
reloading will cause repeated insertions.
due to
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-10 21:28 -0700
Having the mime-type in place, apparently Netscape now recognizes that an
lrp file is binary even without specifying the type in the URL.
Jeff,
That's what I got too. I added the following helper application
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Ray Olszewski, 2001-04-10 20:57 -0700
sigh This really should be a FAQ answer.
Netscape exhibits this problem because Netscape is polite and follows the
html standards. So if a Web server says a file is text, trusting old
Netscape believes it and
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-04-10 16:26 -0700
On Tue, 10 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
I'm working on the second part of this FAQ. Netscape has similar
problems with ftp downloads. I was unable to get the ;i switch to work
on .lrp files in our
On Mon, 9 Apr 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
[...]
What do you all think about NOT getting package names from the name of
the package file?
For example:
foo.lrp
...could have its real name being...
fooBecomesALongNameBeforeYouKnowItanditsUNSTOPPABLE
:-) Seriously though, then
On Fri, 6 Apr 2001, David Douthitt wrote:
I'm surprised no one is understanding this complaint; I think I
understand it perfectly. It has occurred to me also.
Some good points are made below, but the temporary copy still seems
unnecessary.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001,
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, Scott C. Best wrote:
Actually I like .lrp as well, though my complaint
with it is different. I find it difficult to extract files
from a .lrp without potentially overwriting important system
binaries on the development box.
I don't grok this. I have never had
On Thu, 5 Apr 2001, S.C.Best wrote:
Jeff:
Sorry you don't agree.
Well, I am too. I feel like one of us is operating under some
misconceptions about how lrpkg or tar works. By continuing this thread, I
hope to grok your concern, or perhaps you will find your concerns were not
On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Matthew Schalit wrote:
George Metz wrote:
(Lets face it gang, ain't no UNIX browser out there
that matches up to IE5, no matter how much I want Mozilla to succeed)
IE5 is p@@p.
Hmm. A few too many proprietary features, but remarkably stable for me.
I
On Sat, 24 Mar 2001, Jack Coates wrote:
Just thinking here, generally a bad idea... I've been reading the
Postfix list lately, on which Linux is dissed for a couple of reasons:
a) asynchronous flushing in ext2fs causes lost mail
This is a good reason to diss, and I've been avoiding
On Thu, 22 Mar 2001, Steven Peck wrote:
I think the new image should remain hard to spell. :)
Kilamanjaro?
Kilimanjaro was the predecessor to Materhorn.
Maybe change the series name completly
Sea - because install is such a breeze
Plastic - because it can recycle old hardware
Aluminum
On Wed, 21 Mar 2001, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
"Plagiarize... don't let it evade your eyes..." :)
Is this a slight misquote of Tom Lehrer's "Lobachevsky" (Don't let other's
work evade your eyes...), or some other reference?
My old boss, R.G. Spears, used this phrase. I don't know where
On Mon, 19 Mar 2001, Paul Batozech wrote:
Steven Peck wrote:
[...]
Worse than slaughtering HTML, different. With HTML you say BOLD or ITALICS
or CENTER, etc. With Docbook you don't. You say emphasiswords/emphasis
and the DTD when fed through Openjade with determine HOW the emphasis
36 matches
Mail list logo
