Everyone,
Our binary packages directory[1] in cvs is now exporting daily to our
shell space on SF. I haven't completed population of glibc-2.0[2] or
nolibc yet. Also, I haven't worked out how I want to auto index our
package repository. Anyway, you can now link to any of our current
packages from:
Hi Mike,
Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
Our binary packages directory[1] in cvs is now exporting daily to our
shell space on SF. I haven't completed population of glibc-2.0[2] or
nolibc yet. Also, I haven't worked out how I want to auto index our
package repository. Anyway, you can now link to any
On Mon, 2004-02-02 at 12:33, Martin Hejl wrote:
Nice work - that should make the links for pointing people to the right
package a lot shorter (and hopefully solve the problems with slow CVS
servers).
Martin,
Thanks. :-)
Our project is a small percentage of the overall load placed on the SF
Hi Mike,
Nice work - that should make the links for pointing people to the right
package a lot shorter (and hopefully solve the problems with slow CVS
servers).
Our project is a small percentage of the overall load placed on the SF
cvs pserver.
lol - I know. I didn't mean solve the problem for
Everyone,
Our repository wasn't synced properly when SF did their server update
today. I've opened a SR to correct the problem. I'll let everyone know
when our repository is fixed.
[ 882587 ] CVS sync issue
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=882587group_id=1atid=21
Site
Everyone,
Here is the latest information on our SF CVS repository.
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1
( 2004-01-22 16:57:31 - Project CVS Service ) The SourceForge.net
team is working to resolve outstanding problems from the hardware
cutover of the
Everyone,
I started maintenance on our SF.net project trackers. You may see
significant email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a result.
New policies:
All trackers will initiate in our Support Request tracker. Triage
will be performed on them, and they will be placed in the proper
trackers.
, November 28, 2003 9:23 PM
To: leaf-devel
Subject: [leaf-devel] Site update 2003-11-28
Everyone,
I started maintenance on our SF.net project trackers. You may
see significant email from [EMAIL PROTECTED] as a result.
New policies:
All trackers will initiate in our Support Request
On Fri, 2003-11-28 at 19:37, Sean wrote:
Mike,
Would this maintenance result in really old support requests being
mailed out again? Like 707274 and 668889? I got 2 Emails today about
these support requests.
Sean,
Yes. Unfortunately, the SF.net tracker emails all registered users
Everyone,
SF has disabled ViewCVS and pserver repository access temporarily. Plan
accordingly.
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1
(2003-01-14 14:04:19 - Project CVS Services) As of 2003-01-14,
pserver-based CVS repository access and ViewCVS (web-based)
Everyone,
It looks like I'm going to be eliminated from both of my fantasy
football league playoffs.
Therefore, I plan on updating our LEAF site to phpWebSite 0.8.3 cvs by
the end of Dec. The new 0.9x phpWS tree now requires php 4.2.2 to run.
We need to wait for the SF staff to update php before
Mike Noyes wrote:
Charles,
Would you please tarball your mirror of lrp.c0wz.com, and ftp it
with the following name to upload.sourceforge.net directory
incoming. Please send me a message off-list after you upload the
tarball. Thanks.
site_tarball-lrp_c0wz_com.tar.gz
Everyone,
There is a problem with commit messages. Please use -m instead of vi to
until the problem is fixed. Thanks.
[ alexandria-Support Requests-638471 ] CVS stale lock removal: leaf
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=21aid=638471group_id=1
The SourceForge.net team is
Everyone,
The SF mailing list archives are off-line while they migrate to db2.
Please use the archives at mail-archive.com until the SF archives
return. Thanks.
https://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=2352group_id=1
(2002-08-14 12:42:17 - Mailing List Services) The
The SF mailing list archives are off-line while they migrate to db2.
Please use the archives at mail-archive.com until the SF archives
return. Thanks.
Heh...maybe soon searching the SF list archive will actually work?!?
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
On Fri, 2002-08-16 at 10:23, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
The SF mailing list archives are off-line while they migrate to db2.
Please use the archives at mail-archive.com until the SF archives
return. Thanks.
Heh...maybe soon searching the SF list archive will actually work?!?
Charles,
Everyone,
I just made some major changes to our cvs repository. We are now using
an access control list script (ACLS) for write access to
directories/files in our repository. Project admins have global write
access to our repository. Individual developers have write access to
their directory in
Everyone,
I released all of the Dachstein contributed images in our files area
today. Let me know if I missed any. Thanks.
File List
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/
http://leaf-project.org/
Everyone,
Personal note: I'm now a member of the SF sitedocs project. I also, got
my name in lights here:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=6047group_id=1
Packages Tree Status:
I committed through m to our new packages repository. 450+ files
processed and ~400 to go. I hope to
Subject: [Leaf-devel] Site update (2002-04-25)
Everyone,
I'm not progressing as fast as I thought I would with our bin/packages
tree in cvs. I'm only on h. :-(
Have we decided where (noglibc, glibc-any, etc.) we would like to place
our packages that don't require libc.so.6?
PhpWebSite 0.8.2
Everyone,
I'm not progressing as fast as I thought I would with our bin/packages
tree in cvs. I'm only on h. :-(
Have we decided where (noglibc, glibc-any, etc.) we would like to place
our packages that don't require libc.so.6?
PhpWebSite 0.8.2 was released recently. After I complete the
Everyone,
I updated our phpWebSite Releases / Branches page. I used the
descriptions from FAQ docid 1400. If you find inaccurate information
please update docid 1400 in CVS. I'll try to keep docid 1400 and our
Releases / Branches page in sync. Thanks.
Releases / Branches
Everyone,
I just updated our phpWebSite Support page, with the new How do I request
help? FAQ. I'll try to keep this page and docid 1891 in sync. I thank
everyone who made this possible.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=11page_id=4
I also created a new Testimonials page.
Everyone,
I updated the Change Log on my page. If you missed anything, you can find
it here:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/mod.php?mod=userpagemenu=1400page_id=20
I added WRP content to our site. see announcement on our home page.
To-do:
Release Oxygen 1.9 (Development) in our files area.
Eveyone,
I released the following files in our files area today.
Bering_beta-4_img_bering-1680.bin
Bering_beta-4_img_bering-1680.exe
Bering_beta-4_kernel_2.4.17.tar.gz
Oxygen_1.8_img_oxygen-1.8.1.bin
Oxygen_1.8_img_oxygen-1.8.2.bin
PacketFilter_1.72_img_bootdisk.bin
Hey,
I just cleaned out my directory, saving 8M. Everything I do is now
primarily on my site, secondarily in CVS.
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002, Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
I had hoped for some additional time, before we needed to address this
issue, but the situation has changed. We are once again
Everyone,
I had hoped for some additional time, before we needed to address this
issue, but the situation has changed. We are once again over our quota on
the shell server (ref. forward from Jacob Moorman at the bottom of this
message). I'm proposing the following changes to our Individual
Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome.
snip
I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been a
while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage quota
checks, we noticed that leaf is once again using a fairly large chunk
of disk for disc
At 2002-02-27 11:04 -0600, Charles Steinkuehler wrote:
Suggestions and comments on the proposed change are welcome.
snip
I hope all has been going well for your projects lately -- has been
a while since we've talked. As part of our periodic disk usage
quota checks, we noticed that leaf
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
Also, note files that are 10MB should not reside on the shell
server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving
their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP. Thanks.
At 2002-02-27 20:22 +0100, KP Kirchdörfer wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 27. Februar 2002 17:39 schrieb Mike Noyes:
Also, note files that are 10MB should not reside on the shell
server. I would greatly appreciate it if everyone started moving
their files into their personal tree in cvs ASAP. Thanks.
Everyone,
I created phpWS admin/author accounts for all of our developers. Send me
email off list for login instructions. Note: our phpWebSite doesn't share
authentication with SourceForge.
I backed up our MySQL database, and performed the following modifications.
mysql ALTER TABLE developer
At 2002-01-19 15:11 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2002 13:45, Matt Schalit wrote:
Option 3:
Create a page in our phpWebSite for this purpose. Example:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000page_id=4
Now that I like. I was hoping for something really
On Sunday 20 January 2002 10:41, Mike Noyes wrote:
Matt Lynn,
Take a look at the link above now, and let me know if this is what
you had in mind.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000page_id=4
Looks great to me, ty!
--
~Lynn Avants
aka Guitarlynn
guitarlynn at
Mike Noyes wrote:
At 2002-01-19 15:11 -0600, guitarlynn wrote:
On Saturday 19 January 2002 13:45, Matt Schalit wrote:
Option 3:
Create a page in our phpWebSite for this purpose. Example:
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=1000page_id=4
Now that I like. I was
At 2002-01-20 12:10 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
When you say you disabled user logins, do you mean that you
took the Login via SSL link off the home page? Just wondering
becuase I was hunting around for that a bit myself.
Matt,
This seems to be a common misunderstanding. Our phpWebSite and
Mike Noyes wrote:
At 2002-01-18 02:18 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
I realized that what I really need from you, in addition
to all the excellent work that you've done maintaining the
SF site, is to keep some sort of really simple web based
log of these informational emails.
It'd be so
Mike Noyes wrote:
Everyone,
I updated our files section. I think I released all of the appropriate
files. If I missed any, please let me know.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751
Everyone, should have a personal tree in cvs now. see
At 2002-01-18 02:18 -0800, Matt Schalit wrote:
I realized that what I really need from you, in addition
to all the excellent work that you've done maintaining the
SF site, is to keep some sort of really simple web based
log of these informational emails.
It'd be so awesome to be able to scroll
Everyone,
I updated our files section. I think I released all of the appropriate
files. If I missed any, please let me know.
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=13751
Everyone, should have a personal tree in cvs now. see
Everyone,
I just created a new tracker for SourceForge site problems in 2002, and
closed the one for 2001.
https://sourceforge.net/pm/task.php?func=detailtaskproject_task_id=45594gr
oup_id=13751group_project_id=5257
SourceForge Site Problems (2002)
This is the place to note problems we are
Everyone,
Eric and I successfully updated our web site to phpWebSite 0.7.9 yesterday.
We are experiencing a problem with the new php session code. I opened the
following support request with the phpWS team. This problem only seems to
affect admin/author sessions. I'll update everyone when I
Mike,
It looks good. We might want to update
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=1407group_id=13751
It looks like I'll be getting my modem back this weekend so I'll finally be able to
get back online from home and do some work. From work, there are limitations to th
sites
[EMAIL PROTECTED], 2001-07-13 09:09 -0700
Mike,
It looks good.
Steven,
Thanks. I'm adding the new header and footer information to our Why does
the DocManager... FAQ. I want everyone to take a look at what's required
to use the new format, before I change anymore FAQs. I'm concerned that
On Fri, 13 July 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Great. Did Morgan Reed get in touch with you about your wireless setup?
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
Yes he did, unfortunatly I accidently nuked his response (stupid webmail -delays so
you end up clicking on the
Mike Noyes wrote:
A couple of intersecting projects were brought to my attention on irc.
* udeb and udpkg - http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/udpkg/
Busybox has a dpkg application, and a new version of the busybox dpkg
app is about to be checked into CVS which is more powerful
David Douthitt, 2001-07-12 12:37 -0400
Mike Noyes wrote:
A couple of intersecting projects were brought to my attention on irc.
* udeb and udpkg - http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/tools/udpkg/
Busybox has a dpkg application, and a new version of the busybox dpkg
app is about to be
Everyone,
I just finished updating our web site Guides, HOWTOs, and Man Pages pages.
Any feedback is appreciated. Also, please look at the new Download page,
and my update of the Packages page. Thanks.
I took a look at your site updates earlier but forgot to reply. Once again,
it looks like
Mike Noyes wrote:
Busybox has a dpkg application, and a new version of the busybox dpkg
app is about to be checked into CVS which is more powerful than its
predecessor.
Does the udpkg+udeb combination provide us with a possible package format?
I don't know. The busybox unrpm (or is it
David Douthitt, 2001-07-12 13:59 -0400
Mike Noyes wrote:
Busybox has a dpkg application, and a new version of the busybox dpkg
app is about to be checked into CVS which is more powerful than its
predecessor.
Does the udpkg+udeb combination provide us with a possible package format?
I
David Douthitt, 2001-07-12 13:59 -0400
Mike Noyes wrote:
Busybox has a dpkg application, and a new version of the busybox dpkg
app is about to be checked into CVS which is more powerful than its
predecessor.
Does the udpkg+udeb combination provide us with a possible package
format?
I
Everyone,
Good news. The SourceForge staff has fixed the Apache .htaccess DefaultType
override problem. All undefined file types should now download as binary.
An explanation of the fix is below.
Comment By: Uriah Welcome (precision)
Date: 2001-07-10 16:21
Message:
Logged In: YES
user_id=3
Everyone,
I created a new Download page for our web site, and updated the Packages
page. Please take a look at them, and let me know what you think.
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=15page_id=21
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/content.php?menu=12page_id=14
Note: The packages page
Everyone,
I was just given an update on the Apache binary download problem we're
having. It is an Apache bug that's causing our problem. A site wide upgrade
of Apache is in the testing phase. When the upgrade is put in place it
should fix our download problems. I'll keep everyone updated on
Everyone,
I just posted two new articles on our web site. They are for new releases
of lrpStat and Shorewall.
--
Mike Noyes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
___
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Mike,
I just posted two new articles on our web site. They are for new releases
of lrpStat and Shorewall.
wow, you're quick... I'd say everybody (however remotely - like me, I don't
consider myself really contributing to LEAF) involved in the LEAF project
owes you a lot for the great effort
Steven Peck wrote:
I have an icon or two I will send you after I get done moving. Does anyone
beside Rick hang out in the IRC channel. I hit it periodically, but it is
always dead quiet.
You won't find me there. I don't usually even load an IRC client when
I load an OS; I'd rather use
Steven Peck, 2001-06-20 08:55 -0700
I have an icon or two I will send you after I get done moving.
Steven,
Great. I look forward to viewing them. :)
Does anyone beside Rick hang out in the IRC channel. I hit it
periodically, but it is always dead quiet.
I don't know. I noticed this article on
On Wed, 20 June 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Steven Peck, 2001-06-20 08:55 -0700
Does anyone beside Rick hang out in the IRC channel. I hit it
periodically, but it is always dead quiet.
I don't know. I noticed this article on Debian Planet about
OpenProjects.net, so I thought I'd ask if
Last but not least, our phpWS has received 64732 visitors since
2001-03-19.
What sort of a statistic is this? Is this unique IP's, individual webhits,
or something in-between?
Charles Steinkuehler
http://lrp.steinkuehler.net
http://c0wz.steinkuehler.net (lrp.c0wz.com mirror)
Charles Steinkuehler, 2001-06-10 13:18 -0500
Last but not least, our phpWS has received 64732 visitors since
2001-03-19.
What sort of a statistic is this? Is this unique IP's, individual
webhits, or something in-between?
Charles,
I just performed a little test. I went to the admin Client
Everyone,
Here is some interesting information. Let me know if you think I should
stop posting stats from our site.
Site Stats:
We received 29691 visitors since March 19, 2001 (from phpWS stats)
Top Referrers since April ? (from phpWS stats)
http://lrp.c0wz.com/ 398
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 07:48 -0700
I'm making a few minor changes suggested by Jeff to docid 1891 Appendix C.
In addition I'm going to use tidy to convert it to xhtml. If this works
well I'll convert the rest of the documents.
I just completed this. Please review the document. Thanks.
Current
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 07:48 -0700
I'm making a few minor changes suggested by Jeff to docid 1891 Appendix C.
In addition I'm going to use tidy to convert it to xhtml. If this works
well I'll convert the rest of the documents.
I just completed this.
George Metz wrote:
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Mike Noyes wrote:
On another note, we broke into the top 100 projects on SourceForge
yesterday. :-)
DateRank Percent of total
2001-04-15 273 87.0722 2104
2001-04-16 413 84.1843 2605
2001-04-17 393 85.567
David Douthitt, 2001-04-19 13:21 -0500
It wouldn't have to do with the new ISO image would it?
I tried to find out more, but the stats are almost a week old and show
almost consistently zero downloads. What gives?
David,
The download stats are broken. It's a known problem, and the SF staff
to stay home this weekend and actually
finish up some stuff. Like formatting my how to and posting it to leaf.!
yah
Steven Peck
-Original Message-
From: Mike Noyes
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 4/19/2001 10:25 AM
Subject: Re: [Leaf-devel] Site Update
Mike Noyes, 2001-04-19 07:48 -0700
Steven Peck, 2001-04-19 13:35 -0700
I like the format. The print option is just to cool as well.
Steven,
I added the print option to all of our documents after Larry Platzek told
me there was a problem. The format of that FAQ was produced by linxdoc. I'm
only going to change the underlying
Everyone,
I just finished updating everyone's developer permissions to work with the new SF
Tracker. Right now David and Charles are by default assigned Oxygen and EigerStein
support requests. I don't think David and Charles should have to respond to requests
unless we're unable to resolve the
x-flowedEveryone,
Mailing Lists
I think our lists are working again. Unfortunately, I have no idea when
message submitted to the lists during the outage will be posted. I don't
think any messages will be lost, but if they are please post them again.
Thanks.
SourceForge Site Status
The SF
x-flowedEveryone,
I backed up the DocManager yesterday. I tried to add the shell script to my
crontab file but couldn't. David created some new documents on Jan 26.
Why does my program produce a Segmentation Fault?
Does LEAF support PCMCIA?
Where is the ae editor? (Oxygen)
How do I back up
71 matches
Mail list logo
