On Sun, 2011-06-19 at 12:48 +0200, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> The FRS is the File Release System of SF; the place where you can download
> the
> images.
Everyone,
Release Files for Download (FRS)
http://sourceforge.net/apps/trac/sourceforge/wiki/Release%20files%20for%20download
The FRS supports s
19.06.2011 20:10, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> on 19.06.2011 18:56, Andrew wrote:
>> 19.06.2011 19:29, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> ...
>
some later, now I haven't enough time (it may require 1-2
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 18:29:26 schrieb Erich Titl:
> on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
> > 19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
> >> Hi Andrew
> >>
> >> on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
> >>> 19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
> >> ...
>
> ...
>
> > Removing staging/i486-pc-li
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 18:56, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 19:29, Erich Titl пишет:
>> on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
>>> 19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
Hi Andrew
...
>>> some later, now I haven't enough time (it may require 1-2 weeks).
>> Maybe there is place for discussion in
19.06.2011 19:29, Erich Titl пишет:
> on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
>> 19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> Hi Andrew
>>>
>>> on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
>>> ...
> ...
>
>> Removing staging/i486-pc-linux-uclibc (and possible i486-* in
>> stagi
on 19.06.2011 17:31, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
>>> 19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
>> ...
...
>>
> Removing staging/i486-pc-linux-uclibc (and possible i486-* in
> staging/bin) doesn't help for you?
Maybe it would
19.06.2011 17:20, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
>> 19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
> ...
>> I usually running rebuild from scratch (it takes some hours) with manual
>> removing of staging, source and so on.
>> Try to remove staging/i486-pc-linux-uclibc dir
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 16:01, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
...
>>
> I usually running rebuild from scratch (it takes some hours) with manual
> removing of staging, source and so on.
> Try to remove staging/i486-pc-linux-uclibc dir, and rebuild buildenv if
> you want to re
19.06.2011 16:48, Erich Titl пишет:
>
> I am sure this reasoning is correct.
> Just make extra sure the actual mess is not repeated.
>
>HOSTCC scripts/basic/fixdep
> /data2/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/src/leaf/buildtool/staging/lib/gcc/i486-pc-linux-uclibc/4.4.5/../../../../i486-pc-linux-uclibc/b
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 15:07, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 14:51, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Andrew;
>>
>>
...
>> As Erich I'd like to have something that stays for more than a few days.
>>
>> kp
> I just removed ine unneeded directory level in path, If we will move
> binary packages out of the cur
19.06.2011 14:51, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Andrew;
>
> Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 13:16:35 schrieb Andrew:
>> 19.06.2011 13:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Hi Erich;
>>>
>>> Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
Hi KP
on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>
Hi Folks
just an update to where I am
I have to rebuild everything from scratch, a task taking the better of
24 hours. Also I possibly lost or have to retinker some of my
modifications of the last few weeks. This is not what I call productive
work.
Please reconsider such moves in the future. It
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 13:25:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> on 19.06.2011 12:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Hi Erich;
>
>
>
> > I agree, in theory it does look bad. But then, what are you're real
> > problems having binaries in git?
>
> This is _inside_ the git tree
>
>
Andrew;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 13:16:35 schrieb Andrew:
> 19.06.2011 13:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Hi Erich;
> >
> > Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >> Hi KP
> >>
> >> on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> >>> Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb
Hi KP
on 19.06.2011 12:48, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Hi Erich;
>
>
> I agree, in theory it does look bad. But then, what are you're real problems
> having binaries in git?
This is _inside_ the git tree
/home/mega/leaf/bering-uclibc/devel/src/leaf/bering-uclibc4/buildtool/package
and thu
19.06.2011 13:48, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Hi Erich;
>
> Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
>> Hi KP
>>
>> on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
>>> Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
>>> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe ther
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:43:16 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi Andrew
>
> on 19.06.2011 12:28, Andrew wrote:
> > 19.06.2011 13:00, Erich Titl пишет:
> >> Hi Andrew
> >>
> >> on 18.06.2011 22:56, Andrew wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least
Hi Erich;
Am Sonntag, 19. Juni 2011, 12:09:36 schrieb Erich Titl:
> Hi KP
>
> on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> > Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
> > P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
> > useful places for them (file
Hi Andrew
on 19.06.2011 12:28, Andrew wrote:
> 19.06.2011 13:00, Erich Titl пишет:
>> Hi Andrew
>>
>> on 18.06.2011 22:56, Andrew wrote:
>> ...
>>
IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the main
tree, they are a nuisance there, even though it may brake the curren
19.06.2011 13:00, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Andrew
>
> on 18.06.2011 22:56, Andrew wrote:
> ...
>
>>> IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the main
>>> tree, they are a nuisance there, even though it may brake the current
>>> release process.
>>>
>>> OK GIT gurus, what do I
Hi KP
on 18.06.2011 23:50, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote:
> Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
> useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for
> source distribution/versioning
Hi Andrew
on 18.06.2011 22:56, Andrew wrote:
...
>> IMHO we should leave compiled packages out git, at least out of the main
>> tree, they are a nuisance there, even though it may brake the current
>> release process.
>>
>> OK GIT gurus, what do I have to do to get back in sync? And please don't
Am Samstag, 18. Juni 2011, 22:51:41 schrieb Erich Titl:
> >>> P.S. Should we store compiled packages into git? Maybe there are more
> >>> useful places for them (file archive/FTP/etc)? Git is more oriented for
> >>> source distribution/versioning...
>
> IMHO we should leave compiled packages out g
18.06.2011 23:51, Erich Titl пишет:
> Hi Folks
>
> on 16.06.2011 21:41, Andrew wrote:
>> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can
Hi Folks
on 16.06.2011 21:41, Andrew wrote:
> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
>>> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>>
>>
Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches that
makes it seamless
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:32:55 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:29:34 schrieb Andrew:
> > 16.06.2011 23:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
> > >> 16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > >>> Am Donnerstag, 1
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:29:34 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 23:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdo
16.06.2011 23:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
>> 16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:25:13 schrieb KP Kirchdoerfer:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
> > 16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
> > >> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > >>> Am Donnerstag, 1
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 22:13:33 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdo
16.06.2011 22:52, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
>> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine a
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 21:41:45 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> >>> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches
> >>> that makes it s
16.06.2011 22:25, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
>> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
>>
>
>>> Anway, if you think it's necessary to refine and can provide patches that
>>> makes it seamless, I for shure won't oppose :)
>>>
>>> kp
>> git mv sh
On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 21:47 +0300, Andrew wrote:
> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > hello gents;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for
Am Donnerstag, 16. Juni 2011, 20:47:41 schrieb Andrew:
> 16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> > hello gents;
> >
> > Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
> >> 14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modu
16.06.2011 21:07, KP Kirchdoerfer пишет:
> hello gents;
>
> Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
>> 14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0: one
>>> request on leaf-user for asix.ko and I also got a di
hello gents;
Am Dienstag, 14. Juni 2011, 22:40:55 schrieb Andrew:
> 14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0: one
> > request on leaf-user for asix.ko and I also got a direct request for
> > r8168.ko the other day. I
14.06.2011 22:31, davidMbrooke пишет:
> Hi,
>
> We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0: one
> request on leaf-user for asix.ko and I also got a direct request for
> r8168.ko the other day. IMHO it would be good to make those available
> via version 4.0.1 and maybe later
Hi,
We are getting a few requests for additional kernel modules for 4.0: one
request on leaf-user for asix.ko and I also got a direct request for
r8168.ko the other day. IMHO it would be good to make those available
via version 4.0.1 and maybe later a 4.0.2 etc.
We also have a large number of fai
39 matches
Mail list logo
