On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, S Mohan wrote:
> My experience says not true. There are kernel differences which do lead to
> segmentation faults.
In the majority of cases, segfaults arise from mismatch between library
requirements. In particular, Oxygen packages are liable to depend on
glibc2.1 or glibc2.
I am using Bering for my firewall. I am currently testing it in this
configuration...
I have a firewall (192.168.0.1)that connects a private network and a dmz
to the internet. I run NAT and use the 192.168 range of IP's.
I am testing the Bering firewall/router with an IP of 192.168.0.250 in
the
I have created a GRE tunnel between a Bering firewall and a firewall I
have running on a Suse system running iptables.
It runs fine when I first start it. I will come back to it later though
and the tunnel will not work until I ssh into the Suse system and ping
the other end of the tunnel. Then
My experience says not true. There are kernel differences which do lead to
segmentation faults. I think Mike has been cataloguing and maintaining the
list. To be safe, I always take modules and lrps from jnilo's area which I
know have been tested on bering.
Can there be a compatibility or tested
On 27 Aug 2002 at 20:56, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Mike Holdaway wrote:
>
> > On 27 Aug 2002 at 18:11, Jeff Newmiller wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Mike Holdaway wrote:
> > >
> > > > For Bering I cannot see (easily) how to get an IPX interface up and
> > > > running
Karl Gaissmaier wrote the following at 22:31 27.08.2002:
>Hi Matthew,
>
>
>Maybe in your config, where your LEAF Box is the firewall
>to the outside world. But imagine n x LEAF Boxes for a
>University Class B network protecting some departments
>more or less. The LEAF box is fetching some configs
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Joey Officer wrote:
> I read the links below, and found a little information. One thing of
> importance that I read was the authentication. Part of the documentation
> says that it is not required, however judging by the error I receive, it
> seems that authentication is re
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, guitarlynn wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 August 2002 17:30, Joey Officer wrote:
> > I found ppp.lrp on the Dachstein CD (forgot to look earlier) and I'm
> > getting an error that says :
>
> ppp.lrp is the client package, not the server. You'll need pppd.lrp
> instead and probably n
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, Mike Holdaway wrote:
> For Bering I cannot see (easily) how to get an IPX interface up and
> running from boot. In my case I'd like to limit it to ETH0, so the only
> wireless IPX is via PPTPD and not ETH1 (Wavelan). Also, how to get
> (if needed), some IPX_CONFIGURE state
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002, S Mohan wrote:
> Lynn/Mike and list members:
> I got one too here in India. Cost me $40 eq. Qty, duties and demand
> being the culprits. I looked at the board. It has a r8 on the top which
> is for WP. The manufacturer has not given a jumper though. Looks like we
> have to ri
Lynn/Mike and list members:
I got one too here in India. Cost me $40 eq. Qty, duties and demand
being the culprits. I looked at the board. It has a r8 on the top which
is for WP. The manufacturer has not given a jumper though. Looks like we
have to rig up a jumper. It also says we can write and se
I read the links below, and found a little information. One thing of
importance that I read was the authentication. Part of the documentation
says that it is not required, however judging by the error I receive, it
seems that authentication is required... please review :
--snip
# pppd -detach c
As of yesterday, I finally upgraded my old hacked Eiger Wavelan
router to Bering plus its pcmcia and pptpd (to make it a little more
secure than it was...?) I may eventually get to IPSEC but my test
wireless workstation is only Win95.
I also needed IPX support. My old hacked IPXD and IPXUTILS
> at any rate, I grabbed the ppp.o from the same CD and I get this
>
> # insmod ppp
> insmod: /lib/modules/2.2.19-3-LEAF: No such file or directory
> Using /lib/modules/ppp.o
> insmod: unresolved symbol slhc_init
> insmod: unresolved symbol slhc_free
> insmod: unresolved symbol slhc_uncompress
> i
I did not see a PPPd.lrp file. However there is an pppd function within the
ppp.lrp file. I don't know if this makes a difference...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of guitarlynn
Sent: Tuesday, August 2
I found it.. I'm not thinking very well this afternoon... I checked the
dependencies and found the problem.. will continue to work and see where it
leads me...
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of guitarlyn
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 17:30, Joey Officer wrote:
> I found ppp.lrp on the Dachstein CD (forgot to look earlier) and I'm
> getting an error that says :
ppp.lrp is the client package, not the server. You'll need pppd.lrp
instead and probably need to load the ppp modules for the support
to work
I found ppp.lrp on the Dachstein CD (forgot to look earlier) and I'm getting
an error that says :
firewall: -root-
# pppd
ioctl(TIOCSETD(PPP)): Invalid argument(22)
pppd: This system lacks kernel support for PPP. This could be because
the PPP kernel module could not be loaded, or because PPP was
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 16:48, Joey Officer wrote:
> I did not find any links on Charles' website that mentions the
> scripting you did. Furthermore, I did not find any reference to PPPd
> on charles' website either
PacketFilter does this as a fringe benefit, you may possibly be able
to use th
I did not find any links on Charles' website that mentions the scripting you
did. Furthermore, I did not find any reference to PPPd on charles' website
either
Joey Officer
Martin Apparatus, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan French [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 2
hi,
Does anyone know of a good tool that will work with Bearing
to monitor network traffic on an IP or subnet bases?
Thanks,
j.
--
..
. Jason C. Leach
..
Current PGP/GPG Key ID: 43AD2024
---
This sf.net email is
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Karl Gaissmaier wrote:
> Hi Matthew,
>
> Matthew Schalit schrieb:
> >
> >The only downside I've found to booting using remote packages
> > for the LEAF box is that my LEAF box is my router and tinydns
> > nameserver. So when it's still trying to boot, the internal
> >
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002 12:46:59 +0200 Karl Gaissmaier wrote:
> Hi Bering developers && users,
>
> has someone already thought about to broaden the PKGPATH concept?
>
> It would be very helpful to have a bering CD/FD and download
> some additional packages via tftp|http|scp|...
IIRC, David Douthi
Thanks for the info guys, I read a little bit of the HOW-TO from one of the
other posts I received, and I will be playing with that tonight.
Charles, I don't know if you remember but you helped me awhile back get the
serial console working, and I have felt silly ever since for never verifying
tha
Hi Matthew,
Matthew Schalit schrieb:
>
>The only downside I've found to booting using remote packages
> for the LEAF box is that my LEAF box is my router and tinydns
> nameserver. So when it's still trying to boot, the internal
> network can't resolve itself and whatnot. When that happens,
> It has been done before. If it helps, I wrote a ppp server howto
awhile
> ago for actual dialups - I think it is on Charles' site. You will not
> need all the password setup instructions, obviously. Basically you'll
> use PPP over the null modem cable to connect the two machines. For
the
> D
>
> I have an old laptop that is running Linux that I'd rather not invest in a
> pc-nic for it, but I do have a null modem serial cable to connect to the LRP
> box. Is there a way to get an IP over the serial line. Similar to using a
> modem I would think? Or is this something that has not be
Will Bering be able to work with any .lrp file, or only .lrp files made
for Bering? Is there a definitive place to find packages? I've looked
around sourceforge and monkeynoodle, but I've never seen an answer to
these two questions
-Mark Ivey-
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 08:02, guitarlynn wrote:
>
> > Now when connection my firewall from any host on the internet
SOMETIMES
> > it puts me through to my webserver and everything seems fine. But
99% of
> > the time, it seems like the router doesnt work at all (ie doesnt
> > forward and/or doesnt respond).
> > Mostly it works a while after boo
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Anders Akesson wrote:
> I have serious problems with my firewall/router running Bering rc3.
> I run the 2 interface configuration masqing my internal network on one
> nic to an internet connection on the other nic. Everything seems fine
> from the routers point of view, and e
Hello Andrew, list
> On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Meng, Andrew wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I want to administrator LEAF box using telnet, I have done:
> >
> > 1 In inetd.conf, uncomment in.telnetd.
> > 2 In securetty, add ttyp0 and ttyp1
> >
> > But it still does not work(refused connection...), can
The only downside I've found to booting using remote packages
for the LEAF box is that my LEAF box is my router and tinydns
nameserver. So when it's still trying to boot, the internal
network can't resolve itself and whatnot. When that happens,
the remote computer that would be serving up th
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Meng, Andrew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to administrator LEAF box using telnet, I have done:
>
> 1 In inetd.conf, uncomment in.telnetd.
> 2 In securetty, add ttyp0 and ttyp1
>
> But it still does not work(refused connection...), can anyone shed any light
> on this?
As oth
> One thing the currently concerns me with this process (the way I see
it
> anyways), is that you will either have to scrap the current scripts
(or
> modify them), like the network config script, or write a routine to
parse
> the configuration information and then write it back to file without
> b
hi andrew,
you already have in.telnetd _and_ tcpd in /usr/sbin ?? telnet is not
included in standard bering rc3.
greetz
stefan
> I want to administrator LEAF box using telnet, I have done:
>
> 1 In inetd.conf, uncomment in.telnetd.
> 2 In securetty, add ttyp0 and ttyp1
>
> But it still does not
I only want to telnet to my LEAF box. Do you know anything I need to do
other than those two?
Thanks!
-Original Message-
From: stefan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 11:09 AM
To: Meng, Andrew; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] telnet to LEAF bering box.
Maybe shorewall firewall blocking telnet port.
Try fix it.
roberto
On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 10:59:47AM -0400, Meng, Andrew wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to administrator LEAF box using telnet, I have done:
>
> 1 In inetd.conf, uncomment in.telnetd.
> 2 In securetty, add ttyp0 and ttyp1
>
> B
Hello all,
I am in the process of making a 4 month move, that involves staying with my
sister-in-law. As such, I had to pack my Dachstein firewall, and I am now
using a Linksys router/Wireless AP. What I have always envisioned as a Web
Admin tool, would be something of the nature that they use
I guess that the in.telnetd binary is not provided in the distro.
Normally no one would just do telnet to the firewall.
They normally use ssh or connect through a serial port.
My 0.02 EUR...
-Original Message-
From: Meng, Andrew [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 200
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 09:44, Todd MacDougall wrote:
> Yeah, I'm looking at using Trinux. Comes with a lot of admin
> packages and hopefully won't be much of a headache to setup.
>
> > George Luft wrote:
> >
> > No, none. iptraf comes with trinux. Is that the small distro that
> > you plan t
Hello,
I want to administrator LEAF box using telnet, I have done:
1 In inetd.conf, uncomment in.telnetd.
2 In securetty, add ttyp0 and ttyp1
But it still does not work(refused connection...), can anyone shed any light
on this?
Thanks!
Andrew
*
I have serious problems with my firewall/router running Bering rc3.
I run the 2 interface configuration masqing my internal network on one
nic to an internet connection on the other nic. Everything seems fine
from the routers point of view, and everything seems to work from the
internal network. (
Yeah, I'm looking at using Trinux. Comes with a lot of admin packages
and hopefully won't be much of a headache to setup.
> George Luft wrote:
>
> No, none. iptraf comes with trinux. Is that the small distro that
> you plan to use? Don't know about ipmeter.
>
> > -Original Message---
On Tue, 2002-08-27 at 03:28, Brad Fritz wrote:
>
> On 26 Aug 2002 22:32:04 MST Jack Coates wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:16, Mark Ivey wrote:
> > > What is the best way to monitor bandwidth usage with Bering? Ideally, I
> > > would like to run something like MRTG on the Bering box itsel
No, none. iptraf comes with trinux. Is that the small distro that you plan
to use? Don't know about ipmeter.
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd MacDougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 10:24 AM
> To: George Luft
> Cc: Brad Fritz; Mark Ivey; [EMAIL PROTECTE
George,
any experience with any of the other monitoring apps, such as iptraf or
ipmeter?
Todd
George Luft wrote:
>
> IPAUDIT is a great tool--especially for finding those bandwidth hogs. But I
> would run it on a separate box.
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Todd MacDougall [mai
On Tuesday 27 August 2002 05:46, Karl Gaissmaier wrote:
> Hi Bering developers && users,
>
> has someone already thought about to broaden the PKGPATH concept?
>
> It would be very helpful to have a bering CD/FD and download
> some additional packages via tftp|http|scp|...
Oxygen and OpenBrick (Be
IPAUDIT is a great tool--especially for finding those bandwidth hogs. But I
would run it on a separate box.
> -Original Message-
> From: Todd MacDougall [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 9:25 AM
> To: Brad Fritz
> Cc: Mark Ivey; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re:
Mark,
I too have been looking at bandwidth monitoring with Bering. I have
used MRTG in the past and it gives nice graphical output of usage but it
isn't really sufficient for any useful accounting purposes. For
example, if you're simply trying to find out who is hogging all the
bandwidth on any
Hi Bering developers && users,
has someone already thought about to broaden the PKGPATH concept?
It would be very helpful to have a bering CD/FD and download
some additional packages via tftp|http|scp|...
Most useful, the backup (partial backup) should use this
feature too, to save your changes
On 26 Aug 2002 22:32:04 MST Jack Coates wrote:
> On Mon, 2002-08-26 at 22:16, Mark Ivey wrote:
> > What is the best way to monitor bandwidth usage with Bering? Ideally, I
> > would like to run something like MRTG on the Bering box itself with graphs
> > drawn in the weblet, but I realize MRTG r
Hi Brock,
I still don't understand your setup. I don't exclude possibility
that there can be a problem with the bridging itself, as the code
for parproute is quite new. If you can send that Visio diagram to
me... :-)
Regarding DHCP across the bridge - it will not work. DHCP is
Layer 2 protocol,
Have you checked WHY are your log files getting so large?
You may have a problem there...
-Original Message-
From: Godfried Duodu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, August 27, 2002 12:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Berin
53 matches
Mail list logo
