On Wed, 29 Jan 2003 14:56:01 -0800 Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote
>
>
> --On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 PM +0100 Erich Titl
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > AFAIK LiveUpdate is initiated from the station that requests it, so
> > normally you don't need to set up anything
On Tue, 28 Jan 2003 20:16:13 -0800
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Message: 3
> From: Peter Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:35:03
> -0800 Subject: [leaf-user] distribution for flash + 2.4.20 + iptables
> (no shorewall)
>
> Hi gang
Andrew,
Could you outline the steps you took to get this to work.
thanks
Paonia
> I have a Dachstien CD box running Satellite from iHug here in Australia. I
> simply downloaded the drivers from the ISPs web site for the Kernel version
> and installed them. The system has been up for over a mon
--On Thursday, January 30, 2003 9:52 AM +0800 David Pitts
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
1. Which version of uDHCP is compatible with Bering? I would like
to eventually make SSH fit on my floppy so I would like to use uDHCP.
Don't know.
2. Is there anything about the Bering/Shorewall three i
Sorry for the lack of Subject Line in first e-mail
Now supports AOL, MSN, Internet Explorer, Netscape, Opera, WMConnect,
CompuServe, Juno, NetZero and Yahoo SBC! BONUS: Blocks Windows
Messenger and GAIN pop-ups!
This is what I use and it was WELL worth the money
http://www.panicware.com/produ
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 08:30 pm, you wrote:
> Thanks Lynn. I'm not at my computer right now so I will have to get
> back to you with this. Regarding uDHCP, you have two packages available
> at your site, one for Dachstein and another for the rest. Should I be
> using the Dachstein package,
Thanks Lynn. I'm not at my computer right now so I will have to get
back to you with this. Regarding uDHCP, you have two packages available
at your site, one for Dachstein and another for the rest. Should I be
using the Dachstein package, given that Bering evolved from Dachstein,
or the other on
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 07:52 pm, you wrote:
> First, thanks for your generous support with this 'stuff'.
Your welcome. ;-)
> 1.Which version of uDHCP is compatible with Bering? I would like
> to eventually make SSH fit on my floppy so I would like to use uDHCP.
All of them that I kno
First, thanks for your generous support with this 'stuff'.
I am attempting to setup a Bering/Shorewall firewall with a DMZ (just
because I want to!). And I am making (slow) progress. I have just run
into a couple of issues that I could do with some advice on. I haven't
included logs etc because
Chris -- Your routing table is sufficiently a mess that your problems are
probably a by-product of that.
You have both interfaces (eth0 and eth1) on the same /24 network
(192.168.1.0/24):
ip addr show
[...]
7: eth0: mtu 1500 qdisc pfifo_fast qlen 100
link/ether 00:90:47:01:98:80 brd ff:ff
I've searched the archives, but the only thing that looked helpful to me
was the following:
"Dachstein and its predecessors block private ips by default. In Dachstein
you can just comment out the line that denies these It is in
/etc/ipfilter.conf - under stopmartians procedure # RFC 1918/1627/1
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 05:14 pm, you wrote:
> I read somewhere that Shorewall was not capable of being removed from
> Bering. Unfortunately I couldn't locate this post in a quick few minutes.
> I checked the Bering documentation and didn't find a reference, therefore
> I'm pretty sure this
Hi Peter,
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 3:14 PM -0800 Peter Mueller
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I read somewhere that Shorewall was not capable of being removed from
Bering. Unfortunately I couldn't locate this post in a quick few minutes.
I checked the Bering documentation and didn't find a
As Erich says, the workstation initiates the update, not the server. The
usual loc->net ACCEPT policy therefore allows the connection.
-Tom
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 5:08 PM -0600 "Henning, Brian"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
why isn't that stopped by the firewall?
-Original Message-
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 05:08 pm, you wrote:
> why isn't that stopped by the firewall?
Because your LAN machine(s) initate the connection.
--
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Firewall Project developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
---
This SF.N
Hi Tom & list,
> If you understand enough to create your own secure firewall
> using iptables,
> then I'm amazed that you feel the need to post on a mailing
> list to learn
> how to omit one small package (Shorewall) from a simple
> floppy-based Linux
> distribution (Bering). Nevertheless, I
why isn't that stopped by the firewall?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Eastep [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 4:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Symantec
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 PM +0100 Erich Titl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
--On Wednesday, January 29, 2003 11:40 PM +0100 Erich Titl
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
AFAIK LiveUpdate is initiated from the station that requests it, so
normally you don't need to set up anything as this is related traffic.
Correct -- I have LiveUpdate running here on two systems without a
Homer
Homer Parker wrote the following at 18:04 29.01.2003:
What would be the best way to handle Symantec's LiveUpdate through a
Bering 1.0 firewall? Tom says using domain names is not a goot thing, and
I understand the reasoning behind that. liveupdate.symantecliveupdate.com
resolves to
FYI
Forwarded Message
Date: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 6:28 AM -0800
From: Tom Eastep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Shorewall Announcements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Shorewall Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: shorewall on gibraltar (fwd)
Forwarded Message ---
Hello All,
Short Version:
Can someone make a Distributed.net module for Dachstein?
Long Version:
A long time ago, I submitted the below to the LRP list. Which was basically a request
for a distributed.net module to add into LRP. I eventually managed to cobble together
something that worked.
Support Requests item #675725, was opened at 2003-01-27 22:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=675725&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
>Status: Closed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
Assigned to: KP Kirchdörfer (
Support Requests item #675725, was opened at 2003-01-27 16:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=675725&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
Assigned to: KP Kirchdörfer (kap
When you referenced the ISP I do recall that when I obtain my IP from Time
Warner / Road Runner that it is coming from the RFC1918 space.
I apologize for my idiocity. The other reply from fname lname (funny?)
mentions this as well coming from Time Warner, although I have never called.
It makes si
Support Requests item #675725, was opened at 2003-01-27 15:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=675725&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
Assigned to: KP Kirchdörfer (kap
>At 09:51 AM 1/29/03 -0600, Joey Officer wrote:
>>I'm not sure if that topic is adequate, but here goes.
>>Jan 29 11:23:47 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
>>10.51.192.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=350 S=0x00 I=25217 F=0x T=255 (#8)
>>
>>I know the 10.x.x.x is for private use,
On Wed, 29 Jan 2003, Todd Pearsall wrote:
> Thanks for the help Chris, but I really wanted Bering/Shorewall as the
> router/firewall for the flexibility for DMZ configurations, dynamic DNS
> updates, etc.
>
> Steps to the final solution for the archives:
> - The Cayman 3320H cannot be put in brid
What would be the best way to handle Symantec's LiveUpdate through a
Bering 1.0 firewall? Tom says using domain names is not a goot thing, and
I understand the reasoning behind that. liveupdate.symantecliveupdate.com
resolves to several IPs on akamai.net, so putting in IPs will be a
constan
Support Requests item #675725, was opened at 2003-01-27 22:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=213751&aid=675725&group_id=13751
Category: packages
Group: None
Status: Open
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Dushok (bdushok)
>Assigned to: KP Kirchdörfer (ka
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 10:45 am, Todd Pearsall wrote:
> Is /tmp for backing up packages?
Yes it is.
--
~Lynn Avants
Linux Embedded Appliance Firewall developer
http://leaf.sourceforge.net
---
This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
SourceFo
Joey,
My two cents worth: log files are good, the more the better, it just a
matter of how to manage them. I have my firewall (and HP Unix box, 2 Red
Hat servers and even a couple NT) doing a remote syslog to an internal
RedHat box, then logcheck runs every 15 minutes. Logcheck for anything out
On Wednesday 29 January 2003 09:51 am, Joey Officer wrote:
> Is
> there a way to trace what appear to be spoofed IP addresses.
They're not spoofed addresses just trash from your ISP or a misconfigured
router/firewall, M$ boxes spew traffic broadcasts out all interfaces.
> Jan 29 11:23:47 f
I know I've done it on previous LEAF distros so I'm not sure it was
moved or if I'm losing my mind.
My routers have 32MB to 48MB so I wanted to bump up / and /var/log a
little. Is /tmp for backing up packages? I've never noticed it being
used.
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available
At 09:51 29/01/03 -0600, Joey Officer wrote:
Jan 29 11:23:47 firewall kernel: Packet log: input DENY eth0 PROTO=17
10.51.192.1:67 255.255.255.255:68 L=350 S=0x00 I=25217 F=0x T=255 (#8)
What you have there is just "static" from your ISP, that you can safely put
in silent deny.
Your ISP's
At 09:51 AM 1/29/03 -0600, Joey Officer wrote:
I'm not sure if that topic is adequate, but here goes.
I'm sick of my logs filling up with various IPs all trying to hit various
ports. I know I can put the silent deny up and it won't fill up the log any
more, but is there a more defensive approach
I'm not sure if that topic is adequate, but here goes.
I'm sick of my logs filling up with various IPs all trying to hit various
ports. I know I can put the silent deny up and it won't fill up the log any
more, but is there a more defensive approach that can be taken? Is there a
way to trace wha
Thanks for the help Chris, but I really wanted Bering/Shorewall as the
router/firewall for the flexibility for DMZ configurations, dynamic DNS
updates, etc.
Steps to the final solution for the archives:
- The Cayman 3320H cannot be put in bridge mode if it uses PPPoA. With
the early firmware it w
Hi all,
I'm have problems in a Hyperlinktech, 1W bidirecional amplifier, I'm having
Noise level too high, and I'd like, how can I do to decrease a few in a
receive gain.
Thank's for all!
+++
Gilberto de Freitas Mendes
Técnico em comunicação
Wireless Mananger
DNA
Since Sympatico High Speed is not dial-up based, the dial-up script
probably doesn't apply.
===
Work: http://www.olgclotteries.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
888-345-7568 ext. 2205
Personal: http://www.mullan.ca
[EMAIL PROTEC
No. A phone number was not necessary. Even though I've been using
Dachstein (then Bering) for 2-3 years now, I still don't get so deep into
the networking/linux thing to know and/or describe things perfectly. With
that in mind..
I believe that I left DNS server up to DHCP Client to figure
Andrew GRAY wrote:
> I have a Dachstien CD box running Satellite from iHug here in Australia.
Is that a PCI card that interfaces to the satellite dish? Yes
What make and model?sm200d
What type of cable runs from the dish to the PCI card? coa
Hi Tony,
No the satellite is not 2 way, we have to dial up to establish the link. There is no
noticeable lag normally and the connection, for the most part, is quite fast. We do
have
some problems with the satellite path on occasions but I believe they are mostly
caused by
the ISP and weathe
Peter
At 18:35 28.01.2003 -0800, you wrote:
Hi gang,
What would be the best distribution to use on a flash + 2.4.x system? I
like Bering, but I am going to be setting up linux routers with BGP so I
don't want to experiment with learning shorewall on these systems. Space is
not an issue as I ha
43 matches
Mail list logo
