I am trying to upgrade my current firewall which is using LEAF Bering uClibc
3.x something. I'm taking things cautiously because I had read information
about changes with the 4.x version, especially around Shorewall, so I wanted to
take things slowly and not put myself into huge hole of
everything
properly. Hopefully, there was something I missed (which happens a lot).
However, if there are any further suggestions I'm open to them.
On Apr 11, 2012, at 10:31 AM, Victor McAllister wrote:
On 4/11/2012 7:32 AM, Brad Klinghagen wrote:
I am trying to upgrade my current firewall which
Okay, I just tried another attempt. I kept the Geode based initrd.lrp, but
removed the part of the APPEND line indicating the serial port, REMOVED the
configdb.lrp file, and then added the libata.dma=3 into the APPEND statement.
It boots up. Thanks again.
Now that it is booting, can I just
that LEAF does
load and work nicely, version 3.0.1.
-Original Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 4:25 PM
To: Brad Klinghagen
Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RealTek RTL8100 NIC Driver
Brad
Brad Klinghagen
to starting
shorewall as well as after starting shorewall.
_
From: Brad Klinghagen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 1:14 AM
To: 'leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net'
Subject: RE: [leaf-user] RealTek RTL8100 NIC Driver
Well I tried once again to get my new system working
Message-
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2008 2:25 AM
To: Brad Klinghagen
Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] RealTek RTL8100 NIC Driver
Brad
Brad Klinghagen wrote:
I think I may have found how to make it work. I tried a couple
I'm configuring a new firewall appliance (an Acrosser AR-M9952 network
appliance/embedded PC), and it uses the RealTek RTL8100 BL NIC driver. To
try and determine what NIC driver to use, I consulted their website which
indicated that for all the various OSes, the driver for rtl8100 xL and
rtl8139
,
~
Brad Klinghagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erich Titl
Sent: Wednesday, March 14, 2007 1:12 PM
Cc: leaf-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] WRAP EOL
These are valid points, and would be considered within the design of an
upgrade tool.
But a better scenario would be that the package developer/designer would
consider upgrades. The big issue being add/change/deleted variables, and/or
new or deleted features. If the package developer considered
I have wondered if there was any better method for upgrading from a previous
version of Bering uClibc, and I assumed that what Charles said below was the
best possible solution. However, when I have upgraded, I have found that it is
better to just to a fresh new install, then cut and paste the
I noticed when I started using Bering uClibc 2.2.2 there was a new menu
choice under System (Main menu choice 2), which was something to the
effect of global system settings, or global system variables (for
experts only).
Within the file, it provided a couple examples of the variables that
could
, 2004-06-30 at 01:16, Brad Klinghagen wrote:
I just wanted to check to make sure I'm looking at the Shorewall logs
correctly. Below, I've pasted a small sample of what I'm seeing in my
log file. The particular IP address that begins with 66 is the source
and 10.1.1.65 is the destination
, and I've assumed that's random
traffic. When I had Verizon, I noticed they had Netbios packets going
everywhere, which I blocked out, assuming again that that was just
wasteful, useless traffic.
Thanks for the asssistance and feedback.
bpk
On Wed, 2004-06-30 at 06:33, Tom Eastep wrote:
Brad
07:32:18
eth0 eth1 66.232.154.8 10.1.1.65TCP802039
Thank you for your assistance,
Brad Klinghagen
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat Briefings Training.
Attend Black Hat Briefings Training, Las Vegas July 24-29
fi
#
# clean up
rm $prefix*
#
# written by
# vette66 (chuck)
# http://www.vette66.com
- Original Message -
From: Erich Titl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Brad Klinghagen [EMAIL PROTECTED]; LEAF User
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, May 23, 2004 6:03 AM
Subject: Re: [leaf-user] Simple IP
I am encountering errors when I am attempting to back up packages after
making configuration changes. I am currently using LEAF 2.0.1. The
packages that are being loaded, in order, are:
root,config,etc,local,modules,hdsupp,libm,mawk,tc,daemontl,iptables,
Currently I have an ISP that provides an IP address via DHCP, and the
address occasionally changes. What I want to do is to retrieve the IP
address of the Internet side interface (eth0) of my firewall without
manual intervention, and stuff that value into a variable. I need the
value for
17 matches
Mail list logo
